Now that's libel [...]
Yeah but [...]
I didn't think it would be so easy to get you to admin that.
out of all the reputable dice owners you promoted them and recommended,
I participated in their forum signature campaign. As did many other people. Just-Dice was down and lots of people were looking for a dice site to invest in. At the time, dicebitco.in looked to me like they were the best available. There weren't many other options. PRC was having all kinds of problems at the time. I don't want to get into all that again, but I wouldn't have felt good about recommending them to anyone. As it turns out I was wrong, and dicebitco.in turned out to be a scam, and PRC is still going for now.
them if this was a judge you could have been a suspect in this crime and im sure you would have been tried in court.
Are you saying "if there was a judge you're sure there would have been a trial"? That's usually how it works. I don't think anyone was ever convicted of having the wrong ad in their forum signature. That's my only "crime" here. Note also that I only ran the ad in my signature for 1 month. After that (and before they were caught cheating) I removed it because I no longer felt OK advertising them. Many other people kept the site's ad in their signature even after the site was caught cheating.
Probably also pay damages if they did a big investigation and found that, they probably gave you money to do this and you wont at least admit that.
It's hard to follow your meaning, but there's nothing for me to admit. They gave me money for 1 month of signature advertising, and no other money. It seems like you're clutching at straws here because I pointed out your attempt to sell a broken betting system.
From what I saw, I made a judgement your a scammer that took advantage of the people, cause people wont think you do something bad, this was a crime, if you think about you can get away with it. Im sure if there was an FBI investigation you would be shitting your pants.
You're free to do that. You're wrong (again), but that's OK. Why don't you make a trust feedback for me showing your evidence. If you really have anything then maybe others will believe you. I would suggest having a literate adult read it over first so others can follow your meaning. And maybe leave out the bits about soiled underwear. Nobody wants that image.
The only thing you've convinced me of is that Dooglus is unfit to join a clairvoyant association.
I knew you were going to say that.
The evidence was when he recommended them so many times and brought them lots of traffic, way more then PRC had. Why didn't he do the same for PRC?
The reasons are well documented on these very forums. I don't want to bring up that old war again. Basically I didn't like or trust PRC for many reasons.
show me reason how he was not connected?
You're asking for proof of a negative. How do you imagine it's possible to prove that anyone wasn't connected? Can you prove that you didn't receive money from them? And I was connected, in that I joined their forum signature ad campaign for 1 month. I also made sure to regularly point out that I didn't know who ran the site and didn't have any idea how trustworthy they were.