Topic: They will find someone to blame for their mistakes - page 4. (Read 1911 times)

I agree with what you say that gambling does not choose anyone, whether it is sports or elections; as long as they make money, they will do it, and gamblers will do that. Even basketball, sports running, wrestling, and others are used for betting by other gamblers.

It seems that the topic of betting is really broad; as long as you can bet, whatever it is, gamblers will definitely make money from this type of gambling.

Exactly, you said - our relationship with the casino can be characterized in many cases as "the jungle", or, for example, as the "Wild West" in America in the 19th century. Almost always, when playing in a casino, the player does not leave such a latent feeling that after some time you will definitely encounter some difficulty in the game, first of all, of course, when withdrawing money to your wallet, especially if you won some significant amount. This feeling usually spoils all those pleasant moods from gambling. Sometimes, when the hassle with withdrawing money after a joyful win begins, the mood goes into minus, becomes irritation and resentment

Sportbet does not care about whoever is gambling in their site, what they are after is their profit and that is why you will see that if a casino is not making profit, they will come up with bonuses and free spin to entice gamblers in using their site to gamble. Same with the bookmakers, who are after profits and that is why you see them increasing and reducing the odds when a match has started. Whatever features by he casino put in there is for their own favor and not in favor of the gamblers.

Of course and I think if we use our rational mindset in terms of responding and dealing with what we are facing then I think we will easily realize that the purpose of the casino is not to give away money for free to gamblers but to profit from gamblers who lose.
Losing is a natural outcome in gambling, everyone must lose and this is the reason why it is always advisable to set limits, not to not experience any losses at all but to minimize the amount of our losses so that they are not too significant.
Regarding blaming others for losing I think that should not happen, because we should realize from the start that losing is a natural part of gambling regardless of whether you gamble in your own way or follow the method suggested by others.

I do agree on what you have said that if someone is really that on a tough situation or condition then they would really be having those kind of blaming on the time that they would really be on the losing condition on which its really that laughable on which it is really that considered out to be that the ones whose mistake is to be themselves on why they are experiencing out such bad condition. Pointing out fingers isnt really just that limited on gambling scene or condition but also in other real life situations as well on which people do really love on point out their fingers just to have that kind of defensive mechanisms on which it isnt really just that right on having that kind of approach. You would really be making to look someone to be bad,whereas the only one should really be blame nothing but you.

If you dont like to mess up yourself with gambling then you should be held responsible on the actions that you are taking rather than on having that a fan of pointing out fingers on someone who arent that connected
into the decisions that you had made out. The ones who would really be blame is really that yourself just like on what you have said above. It would really be that impossible that you cant be able to
assess out whether the actions you are doing is already that wrong or bad.

Running up a business such as casinos or into those betting platforms or whatever that correlates into this one then it would really be that understandable that they would really be having that advantage or
simply they are really that indeed on the winning side speaking about long term. This is why as a gambler then you should really know on what you are dealing with and act accordingly into it.
You cant really just that make yourself be able to avoid loses thats why moderation would be the key. As for blaming then it would really be just that understandable that there would really be those
people who would really be loving on pointing out their fingers into someone just because they cant really be able to accept their condition and this what makes things hard
and make you that impulsive on what you are really that possibly be betting even more.

don't take me wrong here
they even NEED some success stories to use it as example and to give people hope, so MAYBE there's a small chance you aren't banned
but truth is most people will lose money and the casino owners are the only ones who are guaranteed to win longterm
sad that this happens over the expense of so many people
I'd say it's a negative sum game
pure jungle out there

In my opinion, such control should naturally be included in the documents regulating the activities of the regulator authorized to control gambling in the country.  So, identifying such cases is generally the job of the regulatory body and praising it simply for the performance of its official duties does not make much sense.  This should simply be done constantly and on a regular basis.  It seems that there is nothing to praise the regulator for.  But then the reaction of law enforcement agencies is important, and more specifically, a high-quality investigation, transfer of the case to court with weight and evidence, and appropriate punishment for both the defendants in this case and the officials of the casino itself. 
In my opinion, this is precisely the critical point in this whole story.

Every country has gambling laws, and if its provisions allow for gambling on election dates, the regulatory body is not guilty of any crime. If you assume that such an aspect of gambling shouldn't be legal, your option should be to lobby the lawmakers to make laws that will make gambling on political events illegal. For me, the regulatory body deserves to be praised because they did their job perfectly. Their job was to identify gamblers or gambling service providers who break the law and report them to relevant authorities. They did the right thing to arrest and report this suspect to the law enforcement agents.

But, let's hope that such bets in the future will still be identified by law enforcement agencies of the country where this happened as a crime.  This particular crime is fraud for the purpose of illegal enrichment.  On the other hand, this entire combination can be called the use of insider information.  This is also an offense.  As for the regulatory authorities, it is obvious that a casino that allows such bets should be punished, but only if it can be proven that the bet was made by a person who owns critical information or by another person affiliated with the source of information. 
But in the second case, if the scammers are well prepared, then it is quite problematic to prove. 
But in any case, such an incident requires a special investigation.

The regulatory body of casinos in the country it's too be held responsible for not doing their job properly, thereby slowing the bet to be insurance in the bookies, grabbing is an opportunistic activity, whereby everyone sizes any available opportunity to maximize his profits, so blaming the guard for the mistakes of the casino bodies isn't viewed by me as justice.

The head of casino regulatory body should be the one arrested for enabling such bet exist under his watch, his incompetence led to taking advantage of such rare opportunity by the guard who's a real gambler

Since a country's secrets are best kept secret, allowing such bets could be devalued. But I can't blame typical gamblers for that especially for election. Because they cannot know that secret. The best solution is if it is turned off. Although some will place bets based on guesswork in this type of betting, gamblers will accept it regardless of whether they win or lose. But there are different areas of betting so it is better to avoid these bets. But people have a different attitude towards this type of betting where people get a lot of pleasure. Because this matter is the talk of the town before the results.

The game went in the favour of the politicians staff and he shouldn't be deny his prize at all since he or the boss are not the elections body that conduct the election, or the voters who decides who candidate to vote for or not, so for goodness sake how then is he disqualified, unless if the rule for the bet is that politicians staffs are prohibited from taking part in the bet, but if there is no such arrangements to exclude some bettors then it means that he should be considered and given his winnings.
Insider information have alot to do with bets that are predetermined such as questions and answers bets, but in a situation that is volitile and unpredictable like an election, excluding individual that have political affiliation with candidates should be sidelined out of the bet.

Away from such persons having information about such in a way that it will be their advantage, it may also create a bridge for the security structure and apparatus of such an individual thereby increasing their vulnerability. Such person are very vital and key in the life of their employers and shouldn't be putting them at risk because they want to win a bet and that can also be an act of bringing internals to he public and compromising such an individual, it will be best such games are never seen on any casino, if possible rhw regulatory bodies should set a law in that regards it will help a long way.

Naturally, if you start winning too much, then this definitely raises questions on the part of the casino and betting sites are certainly not interested in losing money instead of earning it.  Therefore, all sorts of difficulties and obstacles from the casino in the event of a series of winnings are almost guaranteed to take place.  And you need to be prepared for this.  Then, for example, you don’t have to be indignant that you are forced to undergo KYC, which for some reason does not suit the casino.  And it is simply impossible to pass it, for example, because of the country where you registered your citizenship.  Or vice versa because of the country where you live.  I think there are many such ways of not paying lucky winning clients from the casino side. 
And most of the methods are also well justified from a legal point of view.

it is rare to see a betting site that will care for users well-being
unfortunately they won't care so much as long as you are spending
and some say that even the sports betting books will end up banning you if you start winning too much

it's a jungle out there

You are right, betting sites will not care and they will only focus on looking for profit opportunities from this type of betting. However, the presidential election will not be able to be predicted accurately, even if you analyze that the majority supports a certain candidate but it is not guaranteed that the candidate will win the final poll, they do not represent all the people of the country and we can say they represent some of the supporters who vote for a particular candidate.

I have predicted the presidential election based on the analysis of supporters but the fact is that they have everything to recruit participants with money and those in power can have the opportunity to manipulate votes to win certain pairs of candidates.

Undoubtedly you are absolutely correct to the best of my knowledge betting sites shouldn't be allowed to include such bet, it is apparently cheating and corruptible act such that it can not easily be overcome by those that are close to such resourceful information hence betting sites shouldn't include such bet, it is not worth enough to include such circumstances that humans can have the final say such as settling of date in terms of gambling since it can be easily manipulated by the person or sets of people. If they can't keep such secret to themselves there is no point blaming anyone for such and as well called it a mistake.

I don't see this your way, it's not today that gambling platforms are offering betting on events, time, outcomes etc, so this is not different. All they do at that time is to open a betting offer on the possibility of it, they may not know what the outcome would be but base it on rumours and other factors. I see nothing wrong about this as it is harmless and has no implication on national security.

But for a security man to have leaked such a date that he was privy to know due to the position he occupied is not pardonable. It is better such a leak is not traced to him than to be traced to him. Any official knowledge you have as a security officer should stay buried with you, not even the family and friends should know, that is one of what I believe they would have thought and warned them about. What he did is a misuse of his position and nothing will change. No casino will now take a fall for his fault and betting will continue to take place in different ways, including this.

Betting sites are just about making profit, so if adding this option benefits them they definitely will,..But I think there are some presidential elections that has a clear and predictable outcome especially when the citizens of that country are desperately looking for a change and hope on one of the candidates for what they need..An example of what I'm saying is the presidential campaign going on the united states', The US is in a chaotic state at the moment and 70 to 80 percent of the citizens are hoping on Donald trump to fix it because he's the only that has the capability to do that right now, in this case wouldn't it be easy to predict??