Pages:
Author

Topic: This is the thread where you discuss free market, americans and libertarianism - page 2. (Read 33901 times)

member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
For the third time:
Markets existed in Ireland when it had no state, and in Iceland, when it had free-market law.  So your premise that "some non-voluntary monopoly (e.g.: a government) might be necessary in order to create suitable conditions for markets." has already been dis-proven by history.

And then they invented alcohol. Wink
Don't their tribal mini-kingdoms count as governments? Seems like you're arguing semantics.
Voluntary, non-contiguous tribal mini-kingdoms. ie, not a non-voluntary monopoly.  Kiss
Gee, what a strange society it must have been... So many people 'volunteered' to be peasants, and hardly anyone 'volunteered' to be king.... Too much inbreeding?

Once again, you imply that AnCap = theft and/or lawlessness.  There is no doubt that you are being disingenuous.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
If bitcoins volatility is the result of a free market give me a banking cartel and ill give you my coins.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
E.g.: Chimneys. They're everywhere. All over the world.
Do all those private enterprises try to calculate the 'costs' of lung cancer rates in their workplace and community from all the toxic materials that get spewed into the air? No. Instead, some Capitalists complain that their taxes are too high, and that they feel oppressed by brutal legislation that forces them to install costly particulate filters that reduce their profit margins. Even though I've never been to China, I heard that their air quality can be quite bad in some places. Maybe their government doesn't care if some of their citizens get slowly poisoned. But what about all the Capitalist companies actually responsible? They don't care either. We were promised that "private security" would fix this sort of thing!

Thank you for bringing up China's air pollution, because that is a perfect example of government doing the opposite of what you hoped.
If we were living in an AnCap world, and a factory nearby was polluting your air, you'd be pretty pissed, right? You might even go out and ask them to stop, if they ignored you, go and protest them, and if they continued to ignore you, maybe even turn to sabotage and violence. I mean, they are killing you with cancer causing chemicals! More-so, they are doing it to everyone in the area, so it wouldn't be just you doing this, it'd be a whole mob. So either they will be taken out, or else they would have to hire their own private security, which would make business much more expensive for them. And the more they pollute and piss people of, the more security they will need, meaning $$$ out of their own pockets.
But we are living with a government that has laws and regulations. Sadly, this company that's polluting your air is not breaking laws, and is complying with regulations, likely because they bought a politician, and wrote the regulations themselves. And if you go and protest them or try to fight them with sabotage our violence, they will be defended by government police. Police which, by the way, you paid for with your taxes. So, they write the laws, and get you to pay for that law enforcement yourself. Sweet deal for them, but sucks for you.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
For the third time:
Markets existed in Ireland when it had no state, and in Iceland, when it had free-market law.  So your premise that "some non-voluntary monopoly (e.g.: a government) might be necessary in order to create suitable conditions for markets." has already been dis-proven by history.

And then they invented alcohol. Wink
Don't their tribal mini-kingdoms count as governments? Seems like you're arguing semantics.
Voluntary, non-contiguous tribal mini-kingdoms. ie, not a non-voluntary monopoly.  Kiss
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
Profit is an accounting delusion.
Cheesy Oookaaay...
Glad you agree.
I don't. I use the same tone with the man on the bus who tells me how microchips in my blender are controlling my brain through subliminal messages on my microwave. However, you're not here to try to eat my face, so I feel comfortable laughing, first ( Cheesy ).

Markets still require foundations on which they can be built.
So they do. We've established communication is one, and that a State is not needed for communication. What other foundations are required for Markets, and how do they require a State?
You didn't provide any argument to dispute my point.
You must have missed it. I'll repeat it:
And you haven't even begun discussing how An-Cap could provide a superior framework for markets.
No, I haven't. We're still letting you make your case.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Profit is an accounting delusion.
Cheesy Oookaaay...
Glad you agree.

For the record, I followed it up with a lengthy explanation and additional observations:
Quote
some non-voluntary monopoly (e.g.: a government) might be necessary in order to create suitable conditions for markets
BECAUSE...
In order for people to trade, first they need to be able to communicate with each other.
In order to be able to communicate, they need to learn to communicate.
Somebody needs to supply those skills. For example, parents teach their children basic skills.
However, is that a market? No, it is not. Call it evolutionary programming or whatever -- it's NOT A MARKET.
Even if you claim that markets only require 'supply' and 'demand', and participants, those participants still need to be able to follow the established rules. What rules, you ask? Whatever rules are created as a result of the participants communicating with each other prior to the market being able to function.
OK, so, because parents need to teach their children how to communicate in order for those children - once grown - to establish a market, therefore we need a monopoly government. Suuuuure....

Certainly communication is required, but not a State. For instance, take two traders who do not share a language. They can (and have in the past) create a shared language, in order to facilitate trade. No State (or even parents) required.
Authority is scalable. Markets still require foundations on which they can be built. You didn't provide any argument to dispute my point. And you haven't even begun discussing how An-Cap could provide a superior framework for markets.

For the third time:
Markets existed in Ireland when it had no state, and in Iceland, when it had free-market law.  So your premise that "some non-voluntary monopoly (e.g.: a government) might be necessary in order to create suitable conditions for markets." has already been dis-proven by history.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
It's unfounded because it exists without someone owning it, it can be utilized without someone owning it, and a capitalist owning it always results in waste.
The irony that you're posting this on a smartphone is not lost on me.

First:
Yes, it exists without something owning it. Thus "unowned property." Not a good justification for calling property unfounded.
While something can be utilized without someone owning it, that likewise a poor justification for calling property unfounded, because it cannot be utilized by two people at the same time.
And finally, Capitalism does not "always result in waste." Waste is loss. Capitalists don't like loss. They like profit. Capitalists avoid waste like the plague.

Profit is an accounting delusion.

In accounting terms 'profit' most likely should be counted as extra costs: it gets tacked onto the reward system (bonus, extra holiday etc.), or added to the safety buffer (to cover seasonal variation etc.), used for company growth, etc.
 
People like profit because of the quick reward. However, profit really means the budgeting was wrong. Somewhere along the line, the costs and gains were miscalculated. Proponents of Capitalism try to entice people by claiming that it's more efficient and profitable compared to other systems, but they always gloss over the social costs -- even total denial of "tragedy of the commons" effects that often enable 'profit' in the first place!

E.g.: Chimneys. They're everywhere. All over the world.
Do all those private enterprises try to calculate the 'costs' of lung cancer rates in their workplace and community from all the toxic materials that get spewed into the air? No. Instead, some Capitalists complain that their taxes are too high, and that they feel oppressed by brutal legislation that forces them to install costly particulate filters that reduce their profit margins. Even though I've never been to China, I heard that their air quality can be quite bad in some places. Maybe their government doesn't care if some of their citizens get slowly poisoned. But what about all the Capitalist companies actually responsible? They don't care either. We were promised that "private security" would fix this sort of thing!

WOW!
There was more lung disease before chimneys were invented.  There were more respiratory illnesses before the auto took over from the horse.  You are deluded.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
Profit is an accounting delusion.
Cheesy Oookaaay...

But anyway, you're not off the hook on this yet:

Quote
some non-voluntary monopoly (e.g.: a government) might be necessary in order to create suitable conditions for markets
BECAUSE...
In order for people to trade, first they need to be able to communicate with each other.
In order to be able to communicate, they need to learn to communicate.
Somebody needs to supply those skills. For example, parents teach their children basic skills.
However, is that a market? No, it is not. Call it evolutionary programming or whatever -- it's NOT A MARKET.
Even if you claim that markets only require 'supply' and 'demand', and participants, those participants still need to be able to follow the established rules. What rules, you ask? Whatever rules are created as a result of the participants communicating with each other prior to the market being able to function.
OK, so, because parents need to teach their children how to communicate in order for those children - once grown - to establish a market, therefore we need a monopoly government. Suuuuure....

Certainly communication is required, but not a State. For instance, take two traders who do not share a language. They can (and have in the past) create a shared language, in order to facilitate trade. No State (or even parents) required.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
I am beginning to think AnCap may have long-term eugenic effects, as those who cannot adhere to NAP are slowly weeded out of the gene pool via self-defense.  As to whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, well, don't ask me, I'm just a clever talking monkey.
A descendant of a long line of increasingly clever talking monkeys (well, you wanna get all technical about it, apes), in fact. It's telling that so many critics of AnCap say that it would be Darwinism as though that were a bad thing.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
It seems to me that most who worry about "perverted human nature" are themselves pretty messed up.  I am beginning to think AnCap may have long-term eugenic effects, as those who cannot adhere to NAP are slowly weeded out of the gene pool via self-defense.  As to whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, well, don't ask me, I'm just a clever talking monkey.

It's a good thing.  It makes the sociopaths among us extremely obvious.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Human nature was perverted by the state enforcing remote property claims. Mutual Aid is human nature.
And by this logic, after nearly a century of Communist rule, Russians should all have been "fixed," and mutual aid have been the rule, right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Bloc_economies#Black_markets
Quote
Black markets were created that were often supplied by goods stolen from the public sector. A saying in Czechoslovakia was "if you do not steal from the state, you are robbing your own family." This second "parallel economy" flourished throughout the Bloc because of rising unmet state consumer needs. Black and gray markets for foodstuffs, goods, and cash arose. Goods included household goods, medical supplies, clothes, furniture, cosmetics, and toiletries in chronically short supply through official outlets.
Oh, maybe not.

So, what "perverted human nature" there? The state enforcing common property?

It seems to me that most who worry about "perverted human nature" are themselves pretty messed up.  I am beginning to think AnCap may have long-term eugenic effects, as those who cannot adhere to NAP are slowly weeded out of the gene pool via self-defense.  As to whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, well, don't ask me, I'm just a clever talking monkey.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
Human nature was perverted by the state enforcing remote property claims. Mutual Aid is human nature.
And by this logic, after nearly a century of Communist rule, Russians should all have been "fixed," and mutual aid have been the rule, right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Bloc_economies#Black_markets
Quote
Black markets were created that were often supplied by goods stolen from the public sector. A saying in Czechoslovakia was "if you do not steal from the state, you are robbing your own family." This second "parallel economy" flourished throughout the Bloc because of rising unmet state consumer needs. Black and gray markets for foodstuffs, goods, and cash arose. Goods included household goods, medical supplies, clothes, furniture, cosmetics, and toiletries in chronically short supply through official outlets.
Oh, maybe not.

So, what "perverted human nature" there? The state enforcing common property?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
So the pilgrimz werent eeevil imperialist proto capitalists?!?!?!?!?
Nope, they intentionally set up a communist society. Which promptly started to starve to death. Until:
I bet you have a bank account, or pay taxes. Way to pay troll tolls.
You know what they say about assuming....
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Capitalism is the crisis.
Google "commons" and tell me if you see land or not.
Funny... this came up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
Self interest over total gain- precisely my criticism of the trappings of what amounts to a purely capitalist impulse.
So, you want to change human nature, then? Then you're doomed to fail.
We figured that out as early as Plymouth Colony:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard130.html
I'm still waiting for my troll toll tip. You had fun, admit it. Pay me!
I don't pay trolls to keep trolling me.


From the top and for the win, to close out today's troll market, the troll index hit a new high with trolls reqursting payment from trolls trollng trolls about trolling in a troll thread.
So the pilgrimz werent eeevil imperialist proto capitalists?!?!?!?!?
Human nature was perverted by the state enforcing remote property claims.Mutual Aid is human nature.
I bet you have a bank account, or pay taxes. Way to pay troll tolls.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Capitalism is the crisis.
Google "commons" and tell me if you see land or not.
Funny... this came up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
Self interest over total gain- precisely my criticism of the trappings of what amounts to a purely capitalist impulse.
I'm still waiting for my troll toll tip. You had fun, admit it. Pay me!

Actually, you owe me.
Should we be using ripple for this?
Lawl.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
Google "commons" and tell me if you see land or not.
Funny... this came up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
Self interest over total gain- precisely my criticism of the trappings of what amounts to a purely capitalist impulse.
So, you want to change human nature, then? Then you're doomed to fail.
We figured that out as early as Plymouth Colony:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard130.html
I'm still waiting for my troll toll tip. You had fun, admit it. Pay me!
I don't pay trolls to keep trolling me.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Google "commons" and tell me if you see land or not.
Funny... this came up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
Self interest over total gain- precisely my criticism of the trappings of what amounts to a purely capitalist impulse.
I'm still waiting for my troll toll tip. You had fun, admit it. Pay me!

Actually, you owe me.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Capitalism is the crisis.
Google "commons" and tell me if you see land or not.
Funny... this came up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
Self interest over total gain- precisely my criticism of the trappings of what amounts to a purely capitalist impulse.
I'm still waiting for my troll toll tip. You had fun, admit it. Pay me!
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Google "commons" and tell me if you see land or not.
Funny... this came up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons

Yep.  Land owned by all is owned by none. 
There is either freedom, and free markets, or there are storm-troopers, and mass murder.
It's down to us and them, again.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
Pages:
Jump to: