I already loving tokpie and it seems 2.0 would make things even better.
My worry was that we are in a seller's market. And how the system can look good for buyers. Collateral seems to fix the problem. If the seller doesn't pay or he doesn't really have that stakes, that would bring 15x for a buyer. I would buy with these conditions. Also 10x for enterprise members are a nice idea too. They already have 50k tokens on stake.
Still, some area seems grey.
What will happen to 15x collateral if the seller doesn't deliver tokens? Will it giving to the buyer as compensation?
If a bounty got fail, it says seller won't get the money of sold stake but it seems buyer doesn't get a refund so will tokpie take the amount?
1. If a bounty got to fail.Consequences:
For Stakes BuyersStakes buyer doesn't get a refund. This is the same scheme as it works now: if all hunters get nothing from failed project then stakes buyer get nothing too.
The logic: when you buy smth you must check what you are buying. Otherwise stakes buyers will not be motivated to make wise decisions regarding listed stakes.
For Hunters Users who made initial stakes deposits will get back their TKP in collateral LESS TKP received from selling related stakes (before bounty got to fail).
For example, 1500 TKP used for collateral, hunter deposits and sells stakes for 100 TKP. Then e.g. in two-month bounty got to fail and hunter receive back 1500-100 = 1400 TKP. The result he gets back full collateral 100+1400 = 1500 TKP.
The logic: imagine that hunter did not use 'bounty stakes trading' and worked in an old way, then he got nothing for the bounty work made. So hunter shall not suffer any additional loss from engaging in 'bounty stakes trading 2.0' to make it attractive for hunters. This is why
2. If bounty got to success, but hunter did not supply related altcoins (for any reason).Consequences:
For Stakes BuyersNo any consequences, because Tokpie will supply related altcoins to stakes buyers.
How? Tokpie will have 48 hours to buy the required amount of altcoins in the free market and deliver them to stakes buyers. See clause 11 in the article:
https://tokpie.io/blog/bounty-stakes-trading-2-0-introduction/For HuntersSuch bad hunter will lose collateral in full and will be added into the blacklist (could not work with Tokpie anymore).
1. If a bounty got to fail seems very logical, really loved it.
2. If bounty got to success, but hunter did not supply related altcoins (for any reason) seems also nice but with some questions. First of all, some bounties just doens't shot the final results. They put some stakes but at the end, they just lock their spreadsheet and newer opens them. How will you watch this kind of bounties? Besides that, it also seems very great.
Overall, i can't wait to use 2.0
Several technics will be used to get final bounty results for such hidden bounty campaign (which are rare):
- as you can see in
clause 15, a "minimal coordination" with listed projects will be taking place. The core motivation to collaborate for projects is decreasing the price dump when exchange.
- some Tokpie team members can participate in such bounties to investigate (double check) a real stake-to-token conversion rate. We expect a very low percentage of such "hidden" bounty campaigns, so such surveillance will not be difficult.
By the way..what do you think will be a good title template for stakes listed under 'Bounty Stakes Trading 2.0'?
For example, for 'original bounty stakes trading' stakes titles we use this template:
[Project's token symbol]_[Stake]_[bounty campaign category]
Some ideas we have:
a) [Project's token symbol]_[Stake]_[
Collateralized]_[bounty campaign category]
a) [Project's token symbol]_[Stake]_[
Collat]_[bounty campaign category]
a) [Project's token symbol]_[Stake]_[
CBO]_[bounty campaign category] where CBO means
Collateralized Bounty ObligationPlease choose a one that you like or offer your preferable template for 'Bounty Stakes Trading 2.0'