I guess it makes sense to support Core if you don't understand how Bitcoin works.
I saw the twins in an interview and they are really amazing , one of the elite of bitcoin, but very good people.
They seem to support core and they have intelligently explained why = DECENTRALIZATION.
Unfortunately classic shills cant understand that a 100 petabyte blockchain will not make bitcoin decentralized.
That's so boring.
Nobody outside small blockers mind is talking about a 100 petabyte blockchain.
If we ever need this space that there will be now way around some kind of centralization, be it lightning, sidechains or blocksize. And, to be honest, if we are in this scenario, a big blocksize may be NOT the most centralized vision.
But that doesn't matter. Nobody is talking aboutz 100 petabyte blocks. End of the story.
Like it or not, even when bitcoin's price was at peak actual use of the currency was mostly from underground markets and various unregulated financial activities. Increasing the block size brings a burden to those hosting nodes and doesn't change bitcoin's potential for real world use. Bitcoin as it stands today is bad for purchasing goods, too slow to walk in a bricks and mortar store expecting to use it to securely purchase. something. The changes that would need to be made for those issues to be addressed haven't been thought out yet but increasing the block size doesn't fix any of them. It's likely that a layer using bitcoin as a settlement layer would be more efficient at providing competitive Financial transaction services rather than attempting to fork bitcoin itself. The latter would likely even turn away some of the current users and having the network shrink can only weaken bitcoin.
