I don't think previous bet was a clarified bet either, which seems necessary, and there was a bit of a problem with the short timeline for the actual bet that was running, even with some lack of the clarification, but just for the sake of compromise, I would like to make the following suggestion.
If the BTC price goes below $7,625.25 on Stamp in February any time before midnight UT on February 28, then you, 600Watt, would have to pay dooglus the full amount that you had originally agreed to, which was .2 BTC, right? Otherwise, if the BTC price does not go below $7,625.25 on Stamp, before midnight UT on February 28th, then you 600Watt don't have to pay anything to dooglus on the bet. Even though I think that the amount is too much (but you, 600watt did originally suggest a bet for .2 BTC)...
This kind of new clarified arrangement (or something similar) would keep the spirit of the original unclaried bet while giving some additional time for the clarification of any bet terms while adding the new current low of $7625.25 as the low that would need to be watched to determine whether 600Watt has to pay any BTC to dooglus or not.. Such terms (or something like that) would seem fair and "gentlemanly" to me, and does not seem escrow is necessary, unless you guys change your mind on that part.
I like your idea. thanks for contributing. the only thing is: if it is a "lose only" bet for me, I´d rather reduce it to 0.1 btc. if it would be done in a way that I could also gain when I win the bet, 0.2 btc are ok. after all the odds are against me winning this bet anyway.
so let's do it as you proposed, but with 0.1 btc.
