Pages:
Author

Topic: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits - page 16. (Read 39050 times)

legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 5874
light_warrior ... 🕯️
[...]
You are right ... from my own experience I can say that I rarely go beyond my usual sections, I would even say that in this respect I am very limited, since I mainly visit only Collectibles, Meta, Reputation, Bitcoin Dev/Discussion/Legal and Gambling sections, (therefore, while I do not imagine myself as a good merit source). Although, I was going to answer you to your reasoning about errors, but I interrupted myself ... since everyone has their own set of criteria for evaluating a particular message, which is formed for different reasons, for this it makes no sense to talk about it. At least until the person involved in the discussion feels the burden of being a source on himself. Tongue
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2371
I'm flabbergasted as to how you're aware of that fact (which I wasn't even aware of).  How does one go about looking up that fact?
Theymos doesn't "airdrop" sMerit, he resets your amount to the maximum whenever it's increased or decreased. In case it isn't obvious: ideally, you spend about 33 sMerit each day, so they're replenished at the same rate 30 days later. You'll get there, but it feels like a burden to see it up to 200 again right after you thought you were almost done Wink

Quote
I'm not sure I'll be able to distribute 1000 merits/month
would personally prefer that source sMerit allocation is distributed every month instead of 30 days after you spend it. I think this would be especially beneficial for those sources that spend a decent amount of the month without any source sMerit. If I run out of source and personal sMerit, I am not going to necessarily know when some of my source sMerit is replenished without looking, so I may end up sitting on source sMerit for a number of days, even if I see posts I want to merit.

The above means that source merit is effectively replenished less frequently than once every 30 days because source sMerit will not necessarily get spent the day it is replenished. Different sources could have their source sMerit replenished on different days, and the amount of source sMerit available to the merit source could be changed to their monthly allocation on whatever day of the month. That way sources who have run out of sMerit to give out will know they have sMerit to give on whatever day their allocation is replenished.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
[...]
Man, do you know why I adore you? I adore you for your walls of text, because bumping into your messages, I have to close all extraneous tabs to focus on this reading. But no matter how you or I feel, I think in your reasoning, there is something that I think you missed. Firstly, in order not to be depressed, I think you should not treat this business as a job, then for you it will not be a burden. And as I said earlier, you yourself must calculate your strength, even if you want to squeeze into a 30-day period (if you don't have time, just increase the spread of merit per post).

I confess, looking at the leaderboards you mentioned, I can only say that I was not impressed by the amount of merit they sent, but in a good sense of the word, I envy these guys, because I understand how much free time it takes to read thousands of posts. Although I agree with you regarding a group of people who use the forum space incorrectly or unethically, for by meriting the posts of trolls, shillas, and other people of this category, you are kind of encouraging them to continue this behavior. But for me the main ... thing is that I would feel that there is a living person on the other side, only then can I appreciate the message.

Just to be clear, for the most part, I personally have not been depressed by the various feelings of burden that might come (from time to time) of sending out smerits, but you can imagine a system that has been in place for about 3.5 years is not going to always have persons who might not go through moods that might either relate to forum activity or activity outside of the forum (if such a thing actually exists?).

Also, it may be worth it for me to reiterate that there can be variations of practices in regards to how much some smerit source members are ready, willing or able to venture outside of their usual stomping grounds in terms of if they want to spread smerits wider and wider... and also whether mistakes might sometimes happen in terms of giving out smerits to forum members who might neither be genuine or even a real person.. Sometimes it can be difficult to measure those kinds of matters, and there does not even seem to be any kind of rule that smerit source members should attempt to make meaningful attempts to figure out if their smerits are being sent to shills, trolls, disingenuine persons or even non-persons, even if some smerit source members might determine that they do want to send merits to those kinds of members who they suspect of falling into such categories.

I mentioned that on a personal level I do attempt to balance on the side of sending smerits for a post that might be on the margins rather than holding back, but sure if I am very tired on one day, I might even choose not to attempt to read any forum posts because I might feel that I might not have enough attention span to actually be able to even meet my own discretionary standards in regards to determining if a post (or members) reaches a threshold for me to send an smerit to a post that the member had made.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 5874
light_warrior ... 🕯️
[...]
Man, do you know why I adore you? I adore you for your walls of text, because bumping into your messages, I have to close all extraneous tabs to focus on this reading. But no matter how you or I feel, I think in your reasoning, there is something that I think you missed. Firstly, in order not to be depressed, I think you should not treat this business as a job, then for you it will not be a burden. And as I said earlier, you yourself must calculate your strength, even if you want to squeeze into a 30-day period (if you don't have time, just increase the spread of merit per post).

I confess, looking at the leaderboards you mentioned, I can only say that I was not impressed by the amount of merit they sent, but in a good sense of the word, I envy these guys, because I understand how much free time it takes to read thousands of posts. Although I agree with you regarding a group of people who use the forum space incorrectly or unethically, for by meriting the posts of trolls, shillas, and other people of this category, you are kind of encouraging them to continue this behavior. But for me the main ... thing is that I would feel that there is a living person on the other side, only then can I appreciate the message.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
@fillippone
i dont talk about you, you are a merits-crazy, not for ego but because u are a nerd like me

I see in general that some members of the community in the international sections bully, for no reason whatsoever, without thinking and without reading


I only think about distributing the merits I have
if I have 2 or 200 it doesn't change, it just changes the amount of work for me

There is a certain amount of truth in what you are saying babo, because I have been expanding my involvement across the forum ever since about early January 2018 in order to attempt to come across forum members that I had not previously known and even to try to get acquainted with newbie members.  

I surely have always had an intention to NOT be sending smerits to forum members who seem to be shills, trolls or otherwise using the forum for disingenuous purposes - while at the same time, trying to error on the side of sending an smerit (or more) if there seems to be some kind of value, contribution or thought that is contained in the post whether or not I agree with the content of the post or even whether or not I like the forum member overall.... so surely, the longer that any of us serves in smerit source positions we are likely going to be revising our own ways of thinking about doing the tasks of sending smerits, and sometimes some of the source members are going to get overwhelmed by the task of having a decently "large" bank of source smerits to send every 30 days or fail /refuse to send smerits that come to them (maybe not even any fault of their own in terms of being able to keep up, but such smerit source member does not necessarily want to be involved in such kinds of endeavors of figuring out which members or posts are "deserving" of an smerit (or more) from the discretionary standpoint of the smerit source member).

So yeah, for example if your smerit source amount doubles, then theoretically it could create double the work, or maybe there might be some kind of compromise approach that the source member might attempt to make to lower the barrier to the kinds of post/members to send smerits or perhaps just double the quantity of smerits that such smerit source member sends per post.  

To date, theymos has been pretty good about completely leaving these kinds of considerations up to the smerit source members to figure out what kind of systems that they are going to employ to distribute their source smerits, and he seems to have also been pretty willing to giving oil to squeaky wheels - and surely, I have no problem with that because there if the forum member has not really shown any kind of abusive personality disorder - even if each of us might not exactly agree with what appears to be the smerit sending thresholds of such forum members, when they are squeaking about wanting more smerits to distribute they are at least proclaiming (through such squeakenings hahahahahha) that they are more than willing to send out way more smerits than their then current smerit allocation is allowing them to be able to accomplish.

Probably also theymos has ways of being able to monitor whether some smerit source members are sending out their smerits in a fairly soon manner after replenishing their source merits or if they are having source smerits decaying after 30 days for lack of use or that it takes some members in the ballpark of close to 30 days to spend from their replenished smerit source supply.

On a personal level, I do try to spend my source merit replenishments in a fairly prompt timeframe from when they are replenished, but believe it or not, I also do have a life outside of the forum, so sometimes it might take me a week or so to get my source smerits down to zero.. and so if my smerit source balance lingers for a longer period of time with a higher balance, I do tend to want to attempt to bring it down to zero, and sure, maybe I am pressured into considering if I need to alter my method of sending out smerits.. which also could be felt as a kind of work to figure out a system that is comfortable for me and my availability to read and perhaps even to reflect upon the content of the posts of other forum members.

Believe it or not, we are around 3.5 years of this smerit system, so I guess that some success can be considered in terms that the recent changes that theymos chose to make to the smerit system were in the ballpark of incrementalistic increases in the already existing system and the smerit source base rather than going down the path of some kind of a total revision.. A sign of success?  the whole smerit system seems to be kind of working.. at least, from my vantage point of what the smerit/merit system is (and attempts to incentivize) and the recent changes that theymos chose to make to such system.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
I think I have a mid range monthly allowance from theymos (judging by convos I’ve had with other merit sources).
I’m always in the top 10-15 monthly table for generosity (sending merit). Some sources must be really cheap at handing out merit to other posters though because looking through the most recent monthly tables there are some sources that I 100% know have a higher allowance than me but are well below me in generosity. Hmmmmm
 !!!!!
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I'm flabbergasted as to how you're aware of that fact (which I wasn't even aware of).  How does one go about looking up that fact?
Theymos doesn't "airdrop" sMerit, he resets your amount to the maximum whenever it's increased or decreased. In case it isn't obvious: ideally, you spend about 33 sMerit each day, so they're replenished at the same rate 30 days later. You'll get there, but it feels like a burden to see it up to 200 again right after you thought you were almost done Wink

It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down.
(click for context)
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 4343
The hacker spirit breaks any spell
@fillippone
i dont talk about you, you are a merits-crazy, not for ego but because u are a nerd like me

I see in general that some members of the community in the international sections bully, for no reason whatsoever, without thinking and without reading


I only think about distributing the merits I have
if I have 2 or 200 it doesn't change, it just changes the amount of work for me
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
the rest are just tricks or ways to feed an ego


Then, you must think my ego is as vast as the f.king Pacific Ocean, Babo, when in reality I take this MS role as a service for the community, as you suggested, by the way.

Of course I feel 1000 merits/mo are a tough task, but I think that with some time I will get used to this, and I will be able to evenly distribute this across many posts and users.

In fact I am “feeling the pressure” to distribute my stash, exactly the same feeling I had back when I was created MS, but I guess It is temporary, and the stress about the meriting process will soon disappears and I will be able to manage all the aspects of my “forum life”. Creating good content included.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 4343
The hacker spirit breaks any spell
Hmm.  I hope you're wrong, because if you're right then Theymos's recent changes will have been for naught, and I do believe that his intention was to increase the number of merits being distributed.

The thing is that increased the bank for everyone, not for individuals. I would agree with the statement of fillippone, if, for example, didn’t increase the bank for me, but fillippone and you and those merit sources, who were in 9-10th place, would be increased. This month will pass, the next one, and it is unlikely that we will see me or the same fillippone in the 10-15th place. We will still be in the top-5, because we both gave out intensively and continue to distribute intensively. The only difference will be other figures, before were 500-600 merits per month, now  will be 1000-1100.

I honestly have not been included in the refill, but I don't care

I don't have an ego to feed, the merits I have I distribute, if I have less or more, I distribute the same

what changes, changes for (deserving) users

we always remember the reason why the system was born (criticized at the beginning and defended by me with a sword) the system is used to avoid account farming

---
the rest are just tricks or ways to feed an ego

honestly having 1000 merits would be exhausting for me, I would feel compelled to distribute them all
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 5213
As you guys are talking about new merit sources, I am proud to inform you that I am one of them. I am really happy that theymos trusted me and appointed me as a new merit source. I hope I deserve it.
In the next month, you will probably see my username in the top positions (maybe, the top 50).
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
I'm off to a rip-roaring start, but if members like LoyceV, Ratimov, fillipone, and others have gotten more sMerits to give out
For the record: my source sMerit is 850 per month, less than your 1000 Smiley
Again, I'm flabbergasted as to how you're aware of that fact (which I wasn't even aware of).  How does one go about looking up that fact?

And for the record:  You've earned far more merits than me and my guess is that you haven't used up all of your personal sMerits.  Also, I'm not sure I'll be able to distribute 1000 merits/month--but I'm sure as hell going to try.  I say that in a lighthearted manner, because I don't view this as a competition, though I would like to be a better, more generous merit source.

It is unlikely that we will see any drastic changes. Those people who gave out the most, they are already in the top positions. These are the people whose bank of merit was 300-500 merit every month. Now, when the bank of merit has increased, the numbers on the list will be larger, and the people will be the same.
Hmm.  I hope you're wrong, because if you're right then Theymos's recent changes will have been for naught, and I do believe that his intention was to increase the number of merits being distributed.

Edit:

As you guys are talking about new merit sources, I am proud to inform you that I am one them. I am really happy that theymos trusted me and appointed me as a new merit source. I hope I deserve it.
In the next month, you will probably see my username in the top positions.
Feels good, doesn't it?  Congrats on being tapped to be a merit source, and I do hope you rise to the top of the most generous merit-givers list!  I wouldn't even feel bad if you soared past me, since the whole point is handing out merits to members deserving of them.  Best of luck to you.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I'm off to a rip-roaring start, but if members like LoyceV, Ratimov, fillipone, and others have gotten more sMerits to give out
For the record: my source sMerit is 850 per month, less than your 1000 Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Perhaps my detection algorithm will soon spot all of them. Smiley
Assuming the new merit sources are enthusiastic about their new positions and hand out tons of merits, you should have no problem.  I'd be very interested to see who the new sources are.

Probably new merit sources are enthusiastic, also old MS will be lured into meriting sprees to fully use their new, increased stash, even if it could be a cumbersome task for many of us. As I understand, there was an hard limit, maybe with some exceptions ( @suchmoon , are you there?), to 1000 smerits, with increases ranging from 2x to 5x the previous allowances. In this way I guess we will see a reshuffle, as many MS who were previously capped are now able to be unrestricted meriting.
We will see.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
Ah, bumped back down to my usual (or thereabout) position, #16.  I should get a jersey with that number printed on the back.

The results for July should be interesting, seeing how Theymos upped the sMerit allocation of existing merit sources and added some new ones.  I'm off to a rip-roaring start, but if members like LoyceV, Ratimov, fillipone, and others have gotten more sMerits to give out, there's probably no chance in hell I'm going to even get close to my record position in May.  But who's keeping score anyway, right?  Heh heh.

As always, thank you to Coin-1 for updating this thread.  I always look forward to seeing how I did as a merit source for the previous month.

Perhaps my detection algorithm will soon spot all of them. Smiley
Assuming the new merit sources are enthusiastic about their new positions and hand out tons of merits, you should have no problem.  I'd be very interested to see who the new sources are.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
Monthly update.

Yet another 13 thousand merits were sent to different users in 8 thousand transactions.

Statistics for June 2021 have also been posted. It goes without saying that the leader is LoyceV. Ratimov and El duderino_ swapped places in this TOP-200. Cool



I just looked at Merit Stats and noticed that theymos recently appointed 14 new merit sources and increased the total generation by 12968 (+62%) sMerit per 30 days. Perhaps my detection algorithm will soon spot all of them. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
I am really looking forward next month's chart.
I guess a lot will change and we will see some big shift in the top positions.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
These are the monthly statistics for June 2021 below.



The most generous users giving merits (June 2021)

User nameSent meritsReceived meritsGenerosity
1)LoyceV814 (in 208 txns to 123 users)124 (in 75 txns from 46 users)752 (max 752)
2)Ratimov601 (in 419 txns to 158 users)177 (in 112 txns from 70 users)512 (max 513)
3)El duderino_565 (in 142 txns to 69 users)235 (in 144 txns from 54 users)447 (max 449)
4)fillippone470 (in 220 txns to 72 users)140 (in 98 txns from 34 users)400 (max 400)
5)JayJuanGee455 (in 447 txns to 144 users)172 (in 97 txns from 41 users)369 (max 369)
6)ETFbitcoin378 (in 283 txns to 122 users)31 (in 23 txns from 20 users)362 (max 362)
7)nutildah393 (in 68 txns to 56 users)96 (in 41 txns from 31 users)345 (max 346)
8)DdmrDdmr335 (in 299 txns to 107 users)96 (in 61 txns from 28 users)287 (max 288)
9)vapourminer281 (in 264 txns to 168 users)34 (in 28 txns from 14 users)264 (max 264)
10)LFC_Bitcoin306 (in 192 txns to 76 users)101 (in 55 txns from 31 users)255 (max 259)
11)xandry237 (in 113 txns to 70 users)13 (in 13 txns from 6 users)230 (max 230)
12)o_e_l_e_o275 (in 132 txns to 93 users)103 (in 76 txns from 36 users)223 (max 224)
13)Vispilio204 (in 73 txns to 43 users)5 (in 5 txns from 5 users)201 (max 201)
14)hugeblack196 (in 57 txns to 49 users)12 (in 9 txns from 6 users)190 (max 191)
15)paxmao210 (in 124 txns to 66 users)45 (in 35 txns from 18 users)187 (max 189)
16)The Pharmacist248 (in 105 txns to 66 users)123 (in 43 txns from 26 users)186 (max 192)
17)qwk189 (in 143 txns to 43 users)43 (in 32 txns from 19 users)167 (max 167)
18)bitmover192 (in 129 txns to 63 users)56 (in 35 txns from 23 users)164 (max 164)
19)Royse777171 (in 23 txns to 23 users)25 (in 17 txns from 16 users)158 (max 160)
20)Vlad2Vlad156 (in 13 txns to 7 users)6 (in 2 txns from 2 users)153 (max 153)
21)Halab144 (in 53 txns to 34 users)20 (in 15 txns from 9 users)134 (max 134)
22)CryptopreneurBrainboss152 (in 101 txns to 58 users)43 (in 31 txns from 21 users)130 (max 132)
23)1miau133 (in 75 txns to 37 users)29 (in 17 txns from 8 users)118 (max 120)
24)suchmoon117 (in 13 txns to 12 users)30 (in 23 txns from 20 users)102 (max 102)
25)Welsh111 (in 35 txns to 28 users)27 (in 16 txns from 11 users)97 (max 98)
26)Buchi-8896 (in 90 txns to 41 users)10 (in 10 txns from 7 users)91 (max 91)
27)OgNasty131 (in 44 txns to 43 users)79 (in 32 txns from 26 users)91 (max 91)
28)Quickseller93 (in 32 txns to 30 users)9 (in 8 txns from 8 users)88 (max 88)
29)DarkStar_90 (in 20 txns to 16 users)13 (in 11 txns from 8 users)83 (max 83)
30)Coolcryptovator85 (in 28 txns to 24 users)14 (in 13 txns from 11 users)78 (max 78)
31)tyz79 (in 47 txns to 27 users)5 (in 5 txns from 4 users)76 (max 76)
32)Jet Cash65 (in 4 txns to 4 users)4 (in 3 txns from 3 users)63 (max 63)
33)philipma195787 (in 44 txns to 32 users)48 (in 43 txns from 19 users)63 (max 63)
34)mole081567 (in 67 txns to 51 users)16 (in 15 txns from 10 users)59 (max 61)
35)EFS55 (in 32 txns to 20 users)154 (max 54)
36)klarki62 (in 40 txns to 33 users)17 (in 12 txns from 7 users)53 (max 53)
37)MasterMined71050 (in 1 txn)050 (max 50)
38)krogothmanhattan50 (in 9 txns to 9 users)050 (max 50)
39)Daniel9154 (in 43 txns to 27 users)12 (in 10 txns from 7 users)48 (max 48)
40)cabalism1346 (in 7 txns to 6 users)4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)44 (max 44)
41)Foxpup46 (in 14 txns to 8 users)3 (in 1 txn)44 (max 44)
42)BobLawblaw50 (in 1 txn)11 (in 7 txns from 7 users)44 (max 46)
43)babo58 (in 38 txns to 12 users)32 (in 16 txns from 7 users)42 (max 42)
44)Heisenberg_Hunter42 (in 37 txns to 21 users)6 (in 5 txns from 5 users)39 (max 40)
45)Hueristic59 (in 58 txns to 33 users)39 (in 24 txns from 12 users)39 (max 40)
46)malevolent37 (in 20 txns to 17 users)037 (max 37)
47)Husna QA42 (in 42 txns to 31 users)12 (in 12 txns from 9 users)36 (max 36)
48)SyGambler27 (in 5 txns to 5 users)2 (in 1 txn)26 (max 27)
49)Mitchell30 (in 14 txns to 9 users)8 (in 3 txns from 3 users)26 (max 26)
50)revelacaogr23 (in 7 txns to 1 user)023 (max 23)
51)cAPSLOCK89 (in 43 txns to 26 users)135 (in 97 txns from 33 users)21 (max 25)
52)amishmanish38 (in 23 txns to 22 users)37 (in 23 txns from 11 users)19 (max 19)
53)OmegaStarScream34 (in 17 txns to 16 users)33 (in 16 txns from 13 users)17 (max 20)
54)shahzadafzal39 (in 33 txns to 15 users)51 (in 38 txns from 17 users)13 (max 17)
55)friends198014 (in 12 txns to 10 users)2 (in 1 txn)13 (max 13)
56)evilgreed12 (in 4 txns to 2 users)012 (max 12)
57)marcus_of_augustus33 (in 2 txns to 2 users)42 (in 28 txns from 16 users)12 (max 17)
58)Silberman22 (in 22 txns to 7 users)21 (in 20 txns from 6 users)11 (max 12)
59)Syke12 (in 3 txns to 3 users)111 (max 12)
60)rdluffy20 (in 19 txns to 13 users)19 (in 15 txns from 9 users)10 (max 11)
61)vnvizow9 (in 1 txn)09 (max 9)
62)BlackHatCoiner51 (in 46 txns to 31 users)84 (in 54 txns from 28 users)9 (max 11)
63)$crypto$10 (in 8 txns to 6 users)19 (max 9)
64)speedy9639 (in 3 txns to 2 users)09 (max 9)
65)madmartyk10 (in 1 txn)19 (max 9)
66)Trofo18 (in 16 txns to 11 users)17 (in 17 txns from 11 users)9 (max 10)
67)blucepheus9 (in 4 txns to 3 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)8 (max 9)
68)RickDeckard11 (in 6 txns to 6 users)6 (in 3 txns from 3 users)8 (max 8)
69)W Jr.18 (in 18 txns to 12 users)20 (in 18 txns from 13 users)8 (max 10)
70)colires8 (in 4 txns to 4 users)08 (max 8)
71)Plutosky43 (in 19 txns to 12 users)69 (in 39 txns from 9 users)8 (max 11)
72)tokeweed10 (in 6 txns to 5 users)3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)8 (max 9)
73)devollito8 (in 2 txns to 1 user)08 (max 8)
74)TimeTeller8 (in 8 txns to 8 users)08 (max 8)
75)GazetaBitcoin10 (in 1 txn)5 (in 4 txns from 3 users)7 (max 9)
76)PrimeNumber732 (in 24 txns to 20 users)50 (in 24 txns from 12 users)7 (max 7)
77)RapTarX7 (in 3 txns to 3 users)07 (max 7)
78)tranthidung32 (in 22 txns to 19 users)49 (in 15 txns from 14 users)7 (max 11)
79)OROBTC11 (in 11 txns to 8 users)7 (in 4 txns from 2 users)7 (max 8)
80)BrewMaster10 (in 10 txns to 10 users)5 (in 4 txns from 4 users)7 (max 7)
81)VoskCoin7 (in 3 txns to 1 user)07 (max 7)
82)infofront9 (in 9 txns to 7 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)7 (max 7)
83)TanteStefana27 (in 2 txns to 2 users)16 (max 7)
84)NotATether76 (in 57 txns to 48 users)140 (in 72 txns from 32 users)6 (max 11)
85)seek3r11 (in 10 txns to 6 users)9 (in 7 txns from 4 users)6 (max 6)
86)OcTradism9 (in 3 txns to 3 users)6 (in 5 txns from 4 users)6 (max 6)
87)Darker4510 (in 7 txns to 6 users)7 (in 6 txns from 5 users)6 (max 7)
88)BitMaxz9 (in 9 txns to 6 users)5 (in 5 txns from 5 users)6 (max 6)
89)hd497286 (in 6 txns to 5 users)06 (max 6)
90)robelneo7 (in 5 txns to 5 users)16 (max 6)
91)bitbollo21 (in 14 txns to 10 users)30 (in 17 txns from 7 users)6 (max 12)
92)mprep24 (in 7 txns to 7 users)36 (in 11 txns from 10 users)6 (max 6)
93)win win win5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
94)MrCryptHodl8 (in 2 txns to 1 user)6 (in 2 txns from 2 users)5 (max 5)
95)FP91G10 (in 10 txns to 4 users)9 (in 8 txns from 5 users)5 (max 5)
96)xSkylarx5 (in 3 txns to 3 users)05 (max 5)
97)Agrawas5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
98)TheArchaeologist5 (in 2 txns to 2 users)05 (max 5)
99)dkbit9842 (in 40 txns to 25 users)73 (in 43 txns from 28 users)5 (max 8)
100)zettelkasten5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
101)Phil_S12 (in 3 txns to 3 users)14 (in 13 txns from 9 users)5 (max 7)
102)owlcatz7 (in 6 txns to 6 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)5 (max 5)
103)hilariousandco13 (in 6 txns to 6 users)15 (in 5 txns from 5 users)5 (max 12)
104)TwitchySeal10 (in 5 txns to 5 users)9 (in 4 txns from 4 users)5 (max 5)
105)buzay4 (in 1 txn)04 (max 4)
106)Parazyd10 (in 9 txns to 9 users)11 (in 9 txns from 7 users)4 (max 4)
107)Apocalipsa8 (in 3 txns to 3 users)7 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 5)
108)Saoha4 (in 2 txns to 1 user)04 (max 4)
109)Unbunplease25 (in 24 txns to 12 users)41 (in 30 txns from 9 users)4 (max 6)
110)polluks4 (in 4 txns to 4 users)04 (max 4)
111)Upgrade0026 (in 14 txns to 13 users)43 (in 28 txns from 17 users)4 (max 5)
112)Ultegra1345 (in 4 txns to 4 users)14 (max 4)
113)perfect9994 (in 2 txns to 2 users)04 (max 4)
114)iv4n5 (in 5 txns to 5 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 4)
115)Bttzed037 (in 7 txns to 7 users)6 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 4)
116)lossnet14 (in 14 txns to 12 users)20 (in 9 txns from 5 users)4 (max 4)
117)tbct_mt25 (in 4 txns to 2 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 4)
118)F2b9 (in 9 txns to 7 users)9 (in 5 txns from 3 users)4 (max 4)
119)strawbs8 (in 6 txns to 3 users)7 (in 7 txns from 3 users)4 (max 5)
120)Globb05 (in 1 txn)14 (max 4)
121)mindrust7 (in 6 txns to 6 users)6 (in 4 txns from 4 users)4 (max 7)
122)asche5 (in 1 txn)14 (max 4)
123)ChipMixer7 (in 2 txns to 2 users)5 (in 3 txns from 3 users)4 (max 6)
124)Bitinity5 (in 3 txns to 3 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 4)
125)LUCKMCFLY27 (in 27 txns to 13 users)45 (in 38 txns from 11 users)4 (max 5)
126)Abdussamad4 (in 2 txns to 2 users)04 (max 4)
127)DrBeer5 (in 3 txns to 2 users)14 (max 4)
128)buwaytress21 (in 20 txns to 15 users)33 (in 22 txns from 9 users)4 (max 8)
129)bitebits38 (in 31 txns to 11 users)68 (in 44 txns from 17 users)4 (max 5)
130)Nomad884 (in 2 txns to 2 users)04 (max 4)
131)bitcoincidence8 (in 5 txns to 1 user)7 (in 7 txns from 4 users)4 (max 6)
132)ChiBitCTy9 (in 7 txns to 6 users)9 (in 6 txns from 6 users)4 (max 4)
133)splawik215 (in 1 txn)2 (in 1 txn)4 (max 4)
134)Paashaas36 (in 34 txns to 19 users)64 (in 42 txns from 17 users)4 (max 7)
135)LeGaulois28 (in 28 txns to 24 users)47 (in 25 txns from 18 users)4 (max 7)
136)dbshck4 (in 1 txn)04 (max 4)
137)TheBeardedBaby5 (in 5 txns to 5 users)14 (max 4)
138)Pierre 24 (in 4 txns to 4 users)13 (max 4)
139)oryhp3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
140)MK-7410 (in 10 txns to 10 users)13 (in 10 txns from 10 users)3 (max 6)
141)anoncoiner233 (in 3 txns to 3 users)03 (max 3)
142)PaperWallet4 (in 2 txns to 2 users)13 (max 4)
143)Charles-Tim44 (in 41 txns to 25 users)82 (in 53 txns from 33 users)3 (max 5)
144)Beparanf4 (in 4 txns to 4 users)13 (max 3)
145)Swordsoffreedom3 (in 2 txns to 2 users)03 (max 3)
146)FinneysTrueVision12 (in 12 txns to 12 users)17 (in 4 txns from 3 users)3 (max 3)
147)HavucHamdi#3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
148)Fortify4 (in 2 txns to 2 users)2 (in 2 txns from 1 user)3 (max 3)
149)Yaplatu7 (in 7 txns to 4 users)8 (in 4 txns from 3 users)3 (max 5)
150)Oasisman3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)03 (max 3)
151)e-coinomist3 (in 2 txns to 2 users)03 (max 3)
152)doomloop3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
153)skarais8 (in 8 txns to 8 users)9 (in 7 txns from 4 users)3 (max 5)
154)tuvok0073 (in 3 txns to 2 users)03 (max 3)
155)bitcoinst3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
156)bkbirge3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)03 (max 3)
157)MishaMuc6 (in 5 txns to 3 users)6 (in 6 txns from 5 users)3 (max 3)
158)triat3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
159)Thekool1s3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)03 (max 3)
160)Flangler4 (in 4 txns to 4 users)13 (max 3)
161)irfan_pak109 (in 6 txns to 6 users)11 (in 9 txns from 9 users)3 (max 4)
162)reddish1113 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
163)ingiltere4 (in 4 txns to 4 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)3 (max 4)
164)MarioV3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)03 (max 3)
165)foroplus4 (in 3 txns to 3 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)3 (max 3)
166)BitcoinPenny3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
167)NotFuzzyWarm7 (in 7 txns to 7 users)7 (in 5 txns from 5 users)3 (max 3)
168)roycilik7 (in 7 txns to 6 users)8 (in 4 txns from 1 user)3 (max 4)
169)imhoneer7 (in 7 txns to 6 users)8 (in 6 txns from 5 users)3 (max 5)
170)mhanbostanci4 (in 4 txns to 4 users)2 (in 1 txn)3 (max 3)
171)ralle146 (in 4 txns to 4 users)6 (in 6 txns from 2 users)3 (max 5)
172)didio2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
173)Pablo james2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
174)TangentC4 (in 1 txn)4 (in 2 txns from 2 users)2 (max 2)
175)gov5 (in 3 txns to 2 users)5 (in 3 txns from 2 users)2 (max 3)
176)Myrina8 (in 8 txns to 8 users)12 (in 12 txns from 9 users)2 (max 2)
177)Frank AlpenCoin2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
178)Lorence.xD3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)2 (in 1 txn)2 (max 2)
179)Lordhermes3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)12 (max 2)
180)bullrun2020bro10 (in 10 txns to 6 users)15 (in 14 txns from 8 users)2 (max 6)
181)perla2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
182)ESG2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
183)baro772 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
184)jqprez2 (in 2 txns to 1 user)02 (max 2)
185)Farma2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
186)SquallLeonhart3 (in 1 txn)12 (max 2)
187)Raja Singa2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
188)Hypnosis002 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
189)WunderSchwein2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
190)michellee2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
191)Vaskiy2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
192)stoos2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
193)TheAndy5002 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
194)jokers104 (in 4 txns to 4 users)4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)2 (max 2)
195)MIner14482 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
196)SirLancelot2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
197)Vishnu.Reang5 (in 3 txns to 3 users)6 (in 2 txns from 2 users)2 (max 4)
198)pawanjain3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)12 (max 2)
199)arcmetal2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
200)sbogovac3 (in 3 txns to 3 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)2 (max 2)



In June 2021 total sent 13289 merits (in 8038 txns to 1431 users):
  • 3% to Newbies: 360 merits (to 240 users)
  • 4% to Jr. Members: 568 merits (to 192 users)
  • 8% to Members: 1086 merits (to 216 users)
  • 6% to Full Members: 790 merits (to 146 users)
  • 12% to Sr. Members: 1631 merits (to 180 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 1937 merits (to 195 users)
  • 52% to Legendaries: 6917 merits (to 355 users)

Total user count on July 1, 2021:
  • 2879 Legendaries (1530 of them sent merits)
  • 3844 Hero Members (1604 of them sent merits)
  • 9149 Sr. Members (3077 of them sent merits)
  • 18497 Full Members (5610 of them sent merits)
  • 31598 Members (9086 of them sent merits)
  • 20452 Jr. Members (2628 of them sent merits)
  • about two millions newbies
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
As I can see, in May 2021, you managed to shoot for being #5 on this list. So you are much closer to the leader of this TOP-200. Congratulations on your new ATH! Cool
Yeah, I was just writing a post about it and then clicked back to page 1 of this thread and lost everything I wrote for some reason.  I'm very happy I made it to #5 this time around, though I'm 99% sure I'll be back at #11 or so next month.  Some members have taken me up on my standing offer of a post review via PM, which made it easier to spread out the merits in May (or at least more of them to fewer members).

I don't think I'm ever going to approach LoyceV or the other consistent leaders of merit-giving--but that's quite all right by me.  It isn't a contest that I intend to win, and I'm happy that there are members giving out way more merits than I do from month to month.  That keeps the whole system working, and I definitely want to see the merit system functioning smoothly and hope that it's a permanent fixture on the forum.

Thanks once again for keeping the list updated, Coin-1.  Much appreciated.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
The main list on the front page of this thread is now up to date as for June 11, 2021.

So far 39,240 users have sent 909,160 merits in 493,276 transactions.

I also published monthly statistics for May 2021. LoyceV still leads this TOP-200. El duderino_ and Ratimov took 2nd and 3rd positions respectively.



Oh yeah, #11 baby!!  I'm in no way shooting for being #1 on this list, but I do like to see some improvement from time to time, since it's a measure of how well I'm doing as a merit source.  I've been on a tear this month so far, too, so I'm looking forward to next month's results.  Hopefully I'll be at least near #11 and if so, I'll be happy with that.

As I can see, in May 2021, you managed to shoot for being #5 on this list. So you are much closer to the leader of this TOP-200. Congratulations on your new ATH! Cool



I have a suggestion if you don't mind, I didn't familiarize who are those merits source members that included on your list.  It seems good if you will indicate right beside the user's name the word "Merit Source" to determine that they're a member of our merit sources.

A long time ago, I explained how detected merit sources are indicated in these lists:

I will write the known merit sources in bold.

Thus, if the user's name is written in regular font, then he/she is not a known merit source (or a former merit source).
Pages:
Jump to: