Pages:
Author

Topic: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits - page 15. (Read 39050 times)

jr. member
Activity: 48
Merit: 10

Finally, please forget about merit and don't post for merit,KingsDen. Giving merit to newcomers can indeed inspire them. But it’s more important for me to thank the old members who patiently answered our questions. This is the biggest concern for the newcomers.

Thanks to those who have answered my questions @DdmrDdmr,@mocacinno,@NeuroticFish,@ETFbitcoin etc. whether you have given me merit or not (to be honest, I really don’t care about this)

PastorNick I think if you have a girlfriend, she will definitely lose to you in some ways, such as quarrels,
Your thoughts are clear, well-founded, and you use very accurate words, which makes it awkward for partners who engage in fake actions.
In the past two days, you are like a brown candy, just sticking to KingsDen's body. I think now KingsDen wants to get rid of you, but your attributes are not so easy to get rid of.

But I agree with you very much, communicate sincerely, send posts with real content, and be a real person.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino

Well said, all of it.  I would also like to add that Newbies and other lower-ranked members shouldn't think that giving merit to merit sources or Legendary members is going to increase their own chances of receiving merits. 

Personally, I don't want anyone I've helped out with merits to merit me back, because 1) It doesn't look good, and people could see it as some sort of kickback (which I've never engaged in), and 2) I don't need merits to rank up or sMerits to give out (usually; sometimes I run low, but not lately). 

If I see a Newbie/Jr. Member who's giving all of his merits to merit sources, it makes me just a wee bit suspicious that they're trying to curry favour, and that could be the case in some instances, or it could genuinely be that they think they're meriting the best posts.  But either way, IMO merits should be "paid forward" to other lower-ranked members who make good posts.  Merits serve as a 'like' on this forum, but everyone knows that they also serve a more important function, and that is to facilitate the ranking up process.
jr. member
Activity: 43
Merit: 35
Apart from the fact that legendaries are more likely to be good content posters, let us consider this;
The merit sources who also are more of legendaries have been here for a long time. They have been meeting one another here for many years, apart from the content of the posts, they have falling inlove with the writing patterns of one another, their tones, how humorous, commanding or entertaining they will be. So, meriting such posts becomes a habit, most times without paying attention to the contents.

That is adaptation, a strong human character you cannot undermined. For the newbies or low ranking members to have such a share, they must last longer here and develop a unique writing style lovable by many.

Secondly, the law of reciprocation is indirectly playing out. Merit seems to flow to those who has the ability and enablement to reciprocate. A Merit source can easily give out 50merits to a legendary fellow, knowing too well that it is cyclical, re-genaratable and reciprocal.

Finally, I believe merit sources do not give higher merits to lower ranking members because they believe they may abuse the smerits they will have as a result of the given merits. It's somewhat showing that the merit system works in conjunction with the trust system. If you are trusted, you are trusted with merits too. Knowing too well you may not play the hide and seek game with your alt on merit issuance.

I am of the opinion that lower ranking member(s) who is able to produce a few quality posts, can be trusted and has a decent history of smerit allocation should benefit evenly because they are the future of bitcointalk.
Thank you!
Maybe you can start with yourself instead of blaming the source of merit.

What you really care about is not how many merits the legend gives to newbies, what you care most is how many merits the legend gives you.

Legendary      54      78.26%   
HeroMember      5      7.25%   
Sr.Member      5      7.25%   
FullMember      1      1.45%   
Member      1      1.45%   
Jr.Member      2      2.90%   
Newbie      1      1.45%   


Let us analyze your data:

  • You have sent a total of 97 merits, of which only 1 went to Newbie (me).Account for 1.45% of your total number of merits.
  • Corresponding to this is that you sent a legend to 54 merits, Accounting for 78.26% of your total number of merits.

You even posted this post before:[NEWBIES] Earn your first Merit..But obviously this is a show, except for a merit you gave me, you haven’t given a merit to any new’bie before.

I am now a little skeptical that you are posting just for merit. Please do not deliberately publish some content that merit source likes, do not perform, please be the real man!

They are indeed worthy of so many merits, but please follow your advice first: pay more attention to newcomers

 Data as of 8/20/2021


Also thank DdmrDdmr for recommending his tableau data to me:
If you don’t want to manually create the stats, or wish to surpass the 120 day limit on the profile’s history, you can always use these, which provide similar information.
https://public.tableau.com/shared/TSJC4KK9G?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link


Finally, please forget about merit and don't post for merit,KingsDen. Giving merit to newcomers can indeed inspire them. But it’s more important for me to thank the old members who patiently answered our questions. This is the biggest concern for the newcomers.

Thanks to those who have answered my questions @DdmrDdmr,@mocacinno,@NeuroticFish,@ETFbitcoin etc. whether you have given me merit or not (to be honest, I really don’t care about this)
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1079
Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹
I personally give not too many shits about whether they redistribute (even though again, redistribution is not a non-zero factor, but it just does not carry a lot of weight in my thinking about whether or not to send an smerit or perhaps a few smerits.

Actually, it does not carry much weight and doesn't need much emphasis, however it's worthy to be noted. It actually boils down to individual differences and approaches to the forum.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124

Apart from the fact that legendaries are more likely to be good content posters, let us consider this;
The merit sources who also are more of legendaries have been here for a long time. They have been meeting one another here for many years, apart from the content of the posts, they have falling inlove with the writing patterns of one another, their tones, how humorous, commanding or entertaining they will be. So, meriting such posts becomes a habit, most times without paying attention to the contents.
Although the hero or legendary members who have been on the forum from a long time and tend to know each other will not give any merit to other if the post quality don't match the meriting criteria or is not of that quality.The writing patterns fan following is obviously there like @JJG is famous for his long and elaborated wall of text giving replies in depth and explaining the other members but you can't say he is writing something off-topic or dragging up the topic so if other legendary members merit that post it's fine and worth it.They might give some extra merits compared to newbie account but not on the verge of ignorance.

Secondly, the law of reciprocation is indirectly playing out. Merit seems to flow to those who has the ability and enablement to reciprocate. A Merit source can easily give out 50merits to a legendary fellow, knowing too well that it is cyclical, re-genaratable and reciprocal.
Sometimes merit sources help each other if they eun out of merits to allocate the same to other quality posts on the forum.We can't say they are abusing the system but in the end they are not going to hoard them but spend all of them as they will regenerate them next month.You can see most of the sources are ready to help new members also to rank them up only if they gave good out of their posts and contribute effectively.

Finally, I believe merit sources do not give higher merits to lower ranking members because they believe they may abuse the smerits they will have as a result of the given merits. It's somewhat showing that the merit system works in conjunction with the trust system. If you are trusted, you are trusted with merits too. Knowing too well you may not play the hide and seek game with your alt on merit issuance.
Like many new members have got many merits for their posts like @Rainbowkun,@Kaggie and you yourself why? Because you all have contributed for the same.You will find many such members in local sub-boards also with 30-40 activity and more than 200 merits gained with account registration this year only.This is because they are getting merits from legendary and sources.

I am of the opinion that lower ranking member(s) who is able to produce a few quality posts, can be trusted and has a decent history of smerit allocation should benefit evenly because they are the future of bitcointalk.
Thank you!
No doubt they are future of the forum but it needs to be tested that whether the future is in safe hands or not and that takes time to judge the writing style of newbies account and if they continue to the same and effective posting the rewards and rank up are on your way.

I'll admit I know which Hero & Legendary members tend to make quality posts, but I try not to merit them often, and if I do give them merits, it's usually a small number.  I do try to save merits for lower-ranked members, and I love it when I can help a deserving individual rank up.
I have noticed the same thing that you help most of the members who are quality posters and contributing to the forum and left with little merits to rank up you help them by giving them required merits.Every member have his different approach of sending smerits and the main purpose is to merit the good posts in any way you can do.Your way of helping inspires lot.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I think it could be argued that generally, legendaries are more likely to be posting better content, but without going through each post, that would likely be hard to accurately predict.

Apart from the fact that legendaries are more likely to be good content posters, let us consider this;
The merit sources who also are more of legendaries have been here for a long time. They have been meeting one another here for many years, apart from the content of the posts, they have falling inlove with the writing patterns of one another, their tones, how humorous, commanding or entertaining they will be. So, meriting such posts becomes a habit, most times without paying attention to the contents.

That is adaptation, a strong human character you cannot undermined. For the newbies or low ranking members to have such a share, they must last longer here and develop a unique writing style lovable by many.

Secondly, the law of reciprocation is indirectly playing out. Merit seems to flow to those who has the ability and enablement to reciprocate. A Merit source can easily give out 50merits to a legendary fellow, knowing too well that it is cyclical, re-genaratable and reciprocal.

Finally, I believe merit sources do not give higher merits to lower ranking members because they believe they may abuse the smerits they will have as a result of the given merits. It's somewhat showing that the merit system works in conjunction with the trust system. If you are trusted, you are trusted with merits too. Knowing too well you may not play the hide and seek game with your alt on merit issuance.

I am of the opinion that lower ranking member(s) who is able to produce a few quality posts, can be trusted and has a decent history of smerit allocation should benefit evenly because they are the future of bitcointalk.
Thank you!

Something seems wrong with your "love" theory, and also how much importance you are placing on the reciprocal nature theory.  I am not suggesting that neither of those exist, but you seem to be give quite a bit of weight to those ideas - that I consider a bit much..

Also, something about your theory of redistribution is off.  I do understand that members have mentioned redistribution as their motives, but I doubt that too many members give as many shits about redistribution as they are making out to be... either the post that is being merited (or the member) is good and deserving of merit or not.. I personally give not too many shits about whether they redistribute (even though again, redistribution is not a non-zero factor, but it just does not carry a lot of weight in my thinking about whether or not to send an smerit or perhaps a few smerits.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1079
Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹
...I do try to save merits for lower-ranked members, and I love it when I can help a deserving individual rank up.

You have proven this, and your record is straight about this and I believe some other merit sources share in your ideology. I admit that the ability to notice a quality post is easy and everyone can do so, but the ability to define the future of a newbie or a lower ranking member needs a little of psychology, since there is not ample statistics (yardstick) to measure.

But every merit source is different in their approach to the "job", and I'm not sure how much can be generalized about them as far as who they distribute merits to...

But every job has specifications and/or KPI, which is the bases of the job. Everyone's approach should not deviate extensively from the job specifications. This might be far from reality if it's an unmonitored work without pay. To the best of my knowledge, the merit system is working well, I am also a testimony, but my concern was when I saw data showing 50% merit allocation to Legendaries.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
I am of the opinion that lower ranking member(s) who is able to produce a few quality posts, can be trusted and has a decent history of smerit allocation should benefit evenly because they are the future of bitcointalk.
I assume you mean those lower-ranked members can be trusted with sMerits if they have a history of....something?  Even if that were true, most Newbie/Jr. Member/Member-ranked users haven't gotten a lot of merits to begin with, so they don't have a demonstrable history of using the merit system appropriately.

I'll admit I know which Hero & Legendary members tend to make quality posts, but I try not to merit them often, and if I do give them merits, it's usually a small number.  I do try to save merits for lower-ranked members, and I love it when I can help a deserving individual rank up.

But every merit source is different in their approach to the "job", and I'm not sure how much can be generalized about them as far as who they distribute merits to.  One thing I think is true is that there are a number of them who actively help members rank up.  The problem is--and always has been--that most Newbies and Jr. Members post complete crap.  There are exceptions of course, but if you're wondering why most members of those ranks aren't receiving tons of merits, that's the reason.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1079
Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹
I think it could be argued that generally, legendaries are more likely to be posting better content, but without going through each post, that would likely be hard to accurately predict.

Apart from the fact that legendaries are more likely to be good content posters, let us consider this;
The merit sources who also are more of legendaries have been here for a long time. They have been meeting one another here for many years, apart from the content of the posts, they have falling inlove with the writing patterns of one another, their tones, how humorous, commanding or entertaining they will be. So, meriting such posts becomes a habit, most times without paying attention to the contents.

That is adaptation, a strong human character you cannot undermined. For the newbies or low ranking members to have such a share, they must last longer here and develop a unique writing style lovable by many.

Secondly, the law of reciprocation is indirectly playing out. Merit seems to flow to those who has the ability and enablement to reciprocate. A Merit source can easily give out 50merits to a legendary fellow, knowing too well that it is cyclical, re-genaratable and reciprocal.

Finally, I believe merit sources do not give higher merits to lower ranking members because they believe they may abuse the smerits they will have as a result of the given merits. It's somewhat showing that the merit system works in conjunction with the trust system. If you are trusted, you are trusted with merits too. Knowing too well you may not play the hide and seek game with your alt on merit issuance.

I am of the opinion that lower ranking member(s) who is able to produce a few quality posts, can be trusted and has a decent history of smerit allocation should benefit evenly because they are the future of bitcointalk.
Thank you!
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1150
There is no list or anything, but even if there were, you wouldn't be on it. You send merits regularly depending on how many sMerits you have (obviously), and that's the way it should be. I guess you are just one of those who I have missed. If you believe you have been unfairly overlooked, don't hesitate to write down some of the posts you think deserve (more)merits in the report posts to merit sources thread. Just mention me or quote one of my posts so that I get the notification and can take a look at them. 
Pmalek, I want to thank you in advance for the offer. But I really don't know which post are worth reporting to the merit source in the thread. Since this merit system exists, I have never felt any merit source unfairness towards me and I don't feel them ignore my post. While it's true that I haven't earned merit from all merit source, I realize that's not a fault as the system is inherently unmoderated and not all post I make are up to the standard they expect. Instead, you can also check out some of the thread I made or my old post if you have some spare time and I would really appreciate it.

For all the merit that I get now, it's purely the assessment of forum users whether they are the merit source or other merit users in my post. Never complained about the system even though I had difficulty on a different level compared to most of the other forum contributors in terms of merit earning.
staff
Activity: 3304
Merit: 4115
(not to mention the fact that there are more significant factors that repel newbies).
No doubt, I don't think too many newbies receiving merit in the first place would complain about the amount that they received. However, I thought it was an interesting enough observation to comment on. My mind kind of wanders towards the fact users are wary of rewarding too much merit to new users, that might have a small sample size of posts, rather than any other reason.

What is clear about the new allocation of merit is there's a lot more merit circulating about, which is probably better from everyone's perspective. It remains to be seen though, that if the merit sources will be able to regularly spend 4 figure merits each period. I suspect there will be a drop off, due to the excitement for a lack of a better word this time around.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 5874
light_warrior ... 🕯️
[...] 50% of the merit circulation going to legendaries makes sense, however I do believe that might be because there's some bias creeping in. I feel like some users are less willing to reward newbies with high amounts, because there's not enough data available to determine whether they would be a contributing user in the long term.
I would say that this is a double-edged sword, since ironically adequate beginners who have already figured out the intricacies of the work of the merit system may also feel biased towards themselves if sources and users of higher rank ignore the messages of newcomers believing that "encouraging a newbie post in may end up being wasted merit." Everything will come down to the idea of the expediency of spending time on the forum, it will come down to a thought that will eventually become a repulsive factor. Although by and large it is not important, because the less we talk about it, the better m'system works, (not to mention the fact that there are more significant factors that repel newbies).
staff
Activity: 3304
Merit: 4115
In July 2021 total sent 26411 merits (in 13235 txns to 2037 users):
  • 3% to Newbies: 810 merits (to 517 users)
  • 4% to Jr. Members: 1068 merits (to 296 users)
  • 9% to Members: 2479 merits (to 306 users)
  • 8% to Full Members: 2010 merits (to 216 users)
  • 11% to Sr. Members: 2808 merits (to 246 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 4044 merits (to 246 users)
  • 50% to Legendaries: 13192 merits (to 423 users)
Although, I'm not one for taking into consideration the rank of the user I'm meriting or at least I try to be conscious about being non bias. I would like to see the distribution a little better than this personally. 50% of the merit circulation going to legendaries makes sense, however I do believe that might be because there's some bias creeping in. I feel like some users are less willing to reward newbies with high amounts, because there's not enough data available to determine whether they would be a contributing user in the long term.

This is probably backed up by the fact that 517 newbies received merit, and only 423 legendaries received merit, however the amount of merits was significantly larger when being sent to legendary accounts. I think it could be argued that generally, legendaries are more likely to be posting better content, but without going through each post, that would likely be hard to accurately predict.

legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
I hope I'm never one of those you mean though I haven't gotten one from you so far.  Wink
There is no list or anything, but even if there were, you wouldn't be on it. You send merits regularly depending on how many sMerits you have (obviously), and that's the way it should be. I guess you are just one of those who I have missed. If you believe you have been unfairly overlooked, don't hesitate to write down some of the posts you think deserve (more)merits in the report posts to merit sources thread. Just mention me or quote one of my posts so that I get the notification and can take a look at them. 
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1150
~Snip
If receiving merits makes you happy, then make other forum users happy as well. I don't reward merit-hoarders.[/i]"
I hope I'm never one of those you mean though I haven't gotten one from you so far.  Wink

So far, I've only received 649 merit from 90 profile and managed to send 317 sMerit to 111 profile. Right now I only have a few sMerit left and I think it will run out soon when I get a post it deserve to give. Never thought that stockpiling sMerit was good, I wouldn't because it could prevent this system from working as it should. Although in the end the users could ignore the sMerit he had, it wouldn't benefit him at all.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
We all need to keep circulating them in order to keep the system alive and well. 
Since I always check if users participate in regular merit distribution before meriting their post, I have considered posting a reminder to those users if their merit-worthy post is in a thread that am replying in. Something along the lines of "merits are not meant to be hoarded but distributed to those who deserve them. If receiving merits makes you happy, then make other forum users happy as well. I don't reward merit-hoarders."
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Wow! I see 4-digit generosity indices on the list! fillippone is the leader of this TOP-200.


Wow, I have been waiting for this update since the MS increase. Glad I managed to top the chart, for once, even settling the ATH. Wow.
I hope I will be able to raise the bar even more, but I think it will not be easily doable, without playing with stashes backlog..

Anyway, seeing so many 4 digits MS makes me think the step was in the right direction, even if I hope these merits will trickle down the merit economy triggering an infinite series of merits!
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
I'm flabbergasted as to how you're aware of that fact (which I wasn't even aware of).  How does one go about looking up that fact?
Theymos doesn't "airdrop" sMerit, he resets your amount to the maximum whenever it's increased or decreased. In case it isn't obvious: ideally, you spend about 33 sMerit each day, so they're replenished at the same rate 30 days later. You'll get there, but it feels like a burden to see it up to 200 again right after you thought you were almost done Wink
Guess I missed your response last month, as I hadn't checked this thread since.  I used the term "airdropped" because I got 1000 sMerits dumped on me all at once, so I thought it was the most appropriate term.  As it stands right now in the month after that, my sMerits are being refilled gradually again.

These are the monthly statistics for July 2021 below.
Woot!  I'll take that 6th position for July, and gladly.  I thought I might be able to hand out the entire 1000 merits, but I fell a little bit short.  Be that as it may, I'm happy that merit distribution was up for the month overall.  We all need to keep circulating them in order to keep the system alive and well. 
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
Monthly update.

During the entire existence of the merit system, 40,181 users sent 948,406 merits in 514,199 transactions.

I also posted stats for July 2021. Wow! I see 4-digit generosity indices on the list! fillippone is the leader of this TOP-200. Ratimov is rated second. hugeblack took third position.

Congratulations on the new ATH! Cool



Perhaps my detection algorithm will soon spot all of them. Smiley
Assuming the new merit sources are enthusiastic about their new positions and hand out tons of merits, you should have no problem.  I'd be very interested to see who the new sources are.

My detection algorithm has already spotted 11 new merit sources:
1. pooya87
2. hosseinimr93
3. BlackHatCoiner
4. shahzadafzal
5. TryNinja who is active on the Portuguese local board
6. NeuroticFish who is active on the Romanian local board
7. Julien_Olynpic who is active on the Russian local board
8. Pmalek who is active on the Croatian local board
9. dkbit98 who is also active on the Croatian local board
10. mikeywith who is active on the Arabic local board
11. NotATether who is also active on the Arabic local board

So I have updated the full list of detected merit sources.

3 new merit sources have not yet been detected. Perhaps they were all Legendaries on the day the merit system was introduced, so their generosity threshold exceeds 200 sMerits. I will add their usernames to the appropriate list if my algorithm spots them in the future.



As you guys are talking about new merit sources, I am proud to inform you that I am one of them. I am really happy that theymos trusted me and appointed me as a new merit source. I hope I deserve it.
In the next month, you will probably see my username in the top positions (maybe, the top 50).

Yes, your current generosity index is 53. You were a Sr. Member on January 24, 2018, so my algorithm pretty quickly identified you as a new merit source. Wink
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
These are the monthly statistics for July 2021 below.



The most generous users giving merits (July 2021)

User nameSent meritsReceived meritsGenerosity
1)fillippone1340 (in 384 txns to 137 users)428 (in 192 txns from 74 users)1126 (max 1126)
2)Ratimov1282 (in 793 txns to 373 users)345 (in 206 txns from 102 users)1109 (max 1110)
3)hugeblack1131 (in 271 txns to 150 users)78 (in 39 txns from 27 users)1092 (max 1092)
4)Welsh1104 (in 193 txns to 104 users)114 (in 63 txns from 37 users)1047 (max 1049)
5)ETFbitcoin1116 (in 589 txns to 233 users)155 (in 56 txns from 40 users)1038 (max 1039)
6)The Pharmacist930 (in 312 txns to 125 users)184 (in 99 txns from 55 users)838 (max 838)
7)xandry842 (in 338 txns to 209 users)33 (in 24 txns from 11 users)825 (max 825)
8)El duderino_930 (in 213 txns to 102 users)248 (in 123 txns from 48 users)806 (max 806)
9)JayJuanGee801 (in 675 txns to 208 users)197 (in 117 txns from 42 users)702 (max 703)
10)LoyceV825 (in 180 txns to 119 users)391 (in 160 txns from 68 users)629 (max 631)
11)EFS520 (in 128 txns to 64 users)12 (in 2 txns from 2 users)514 (max 514)
12)klarki507 (in 199 txns to 104 users)19 (in 15 txns from 11 users)497 (max 498)
13)vapourminer480 (in 313 txns to 188 users)34 (in 23 txns from 14 users)463 (max 463)
14)DdmrDdmr498 (in 265 txns to 124 users)296 (in 156 txns from 57 users)350 (max 350)
15)o_e_l_e_o476 (in 126 txns to 92 users)305 (in 138 txns from 58 users)323 (max 324)
16)dkbit98388 (in 126 txns to 76 users)165 (in 74 txns from 33 users)305 (max 307)
17)nutildah384 (in 62 txns to 46 users)160 (in 83 txns from 51 users)304 (max 305)
18)paxmao350 (in 228 txns to 127 users)103 (in 58 txns from 29 users)298 (max 313)
19)pooya87382 (in 167 txns to 91 users)169 (in 104 txns from 41 users)297 (max 299)
20)LFC_Bitcoin382 (in 198 txns to 95 users)172 (in 96 txns from 46 users)296 (max 296)
21)bitmover327 (in 187 txns to 78 users)79 (in 57 txns from 34 users)287 (max 287)
22)1miau296 (in 148 txns to 61 users)53 (in 42 txns from 19 users)269 (max 269)
23)Julien_Olynpic319 (in 124 txns to 47 users)135 (in 67 txns from 24 users)251 (max 253)
24)NotATether334 (in 134 txns to 97 users)224 (in 108 txns from 43 users)222 (max 224)
25)OgNasty249 (in 71 txns to 63 users)72 (in 35 txns from 27 users)213 (max 214)
26)Pmalek304 (in 212 txns to 113 users)188 (in 87 txns from 51 users)210 (max 210)
27)Vispilio203 (in 59 txns to 36 users)3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)201 (max 201)
28)NeuroticFish256 (in 104 txns to 67 users)110 (in 60 txns from 26 users)201 (max 201)
29)Halab210 (in 74 txns to 58 users)48 (in 22 txns from 15 users)186 (max 186)
30)mole0815171 (in 161 txns to 84 users)33 (in 29 txns from 21 users)154 (max 155)
31)Vlad2Vlad153 (in 15 txns to 6 users)4 (in 1 txn)151 (max 151)
32)CryptopreneurBrainboss209 (in 147 txns to 74 users)146 (in 74 txns from 41 users)136 (max 136)
33)Coolcryptovator131 (in 54 txns to 44 users)43 (in 30 txns from 22 users)109 (max 109)
34)BlackHatCoiner214 (in 130 txns to 70 users)215 (in 109 txns from 43 users)106 (max 106)
35)HCP140 (in 47 txns to 36 users)70 (in 40 txns from 19 users)105 (max 113)
36)shahzadafzal123 (in 83 txns to 36 users)54 (in 30 txns from 17 users)96 (max 96)
37)Husna QA96 (in 95 txns to 55 users)24 (in 15 txns from 8 users)84 (max 84)
38)krogothmanhattan83 (in 11 txns to 10 users)4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)81 (max 81)
39)hosseinimr93126 (in 126 txns to 67 users)110 (in 54 txns from 36 users)71 (max 71)
40)mikeywith106 (in 55 txns to 23 users)81 (in 26 txns from 14 users)65 (max 66)
41)Quickseller69 (in 32 txns to 30 users)8 (in 6 txns from 5 users)65 (max 65)
42)Buchi-8872 (in 69 txns to 28 users)20 (in 20 txns from 6 users)62 (max 62)
43)suchmoon95 (in 48 txns to 36 users)75 (in 41 txns from 27 users)57 (max 59)
44)OmegaStarScream80 (in 27 txns to 25 users)47 (in 22 txns from 14 users)56 (max 56)
45)amishmanish85 (in 40 txns to 36 users)59 (in 26 txns from 14 users)55 (max 59)
46)Royse77762 (in 14 txns to 13 users)15 (in 7 txns from 7 users)54 (max 54)
47)Hueristic98 (in 98 txns to 47 users)87 (in 46 txns from 16 users)54 (max 54)
48)Bitcoin SV50 (in 1 txn)050 (max 50)
49)jimlite50 (in 1 txn)050 (max 50)
50)tyz54 (in 31 txns to 14 users)12 (in 11 txns from 10 users)48 (max 48)
51)franky175 (in 2 txns to 2 users)57 (in 30 txns from 16 users)46 (max 56)
52)Foxpup89 (in 46 txns to 17 users)89 (in 18 txns from 15 users)44 (max 44)
53)TryNinja80 (in 58 txns to 27 users)71 (in 38 txns from 24 users)44 (max 51)
54)babo81 (in 56 txns to 24 users)79 (in 37 txns from 10 users)41 (max 42)
55)mprep45 (in 10 txns to 8 users)8 (in 5 txns from 5 users)41 (max 41)
56)fr4nkthetank41 (in 1 txn)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)40 (max 40)
57)cabalism1341 (in 26 txns to 26 users)140 (max 40)
58)Daniel9154 (in 36 txns to 20 users)34 (in 21 txns from 10 users)37 (max 37)
59)Jet Cash59 (in 4 txns to 4 users)47 (in 22 txns from 17 users)35 (max 53)
60)Sweetbtc30 (in 3 txns to 3 users)030 (max 30)
61)Qunenin30 (in 3 txns to 3 users)030 (max 30)
62)SyGambler40 (in 4 txns to 4 users)21 (in 5 txns from 4 users)29 (max 36)
63)marcus_of_augustus70 (in 3 txns to 3 users)82 (in 42 txns from 17 users)29 (max 30)
64)malevolent35 (in 11 txns to 10 users)14 (in 6 txns from 4 users)28 (max 28)
65)dbc2332 (in 13 txns to 9 users)13 (in 7 txns from 5 users)25 (max 26)
66)Globb030 (in 3 txns to 3 users)9 (in 5 txns from 4 users)25 (max 25)
67)BTCLiz25 (in 20 txns to 16 users)6 (in 6 txns from 4 users)22 (max 22)
68)redhack21 (in 6 txns to 6 users)021 (max 21)
69)DogecoinMachine20 (in 3 txns to 2 users)119 (max 19)
70)DarkStar_28 (in 7 txns to 7 users)19 (in 14 txns from 14 users)18 (max 19)
71)LeGaulois34 (in 34 txns to 28 users)31 (in 13 txns from 8 users)18 (max 18)
72)yahoo6227827 (in 7 txns to 5 users)17 (in 7 txns from 7 users)18 (max 21)
73)AverageGlabella22 (in 9 txns to 8 users)9 (in 5 txns from 5 users)17 (max 17)
74)Mitchell18 (in 8 txns to 4 users)2 (in 1 txn)17 (max 17)
75)AlcoHoDL25 (in 21 txns to 9 users)20 (in 16 txns from 8 users)15 (max 15)
76)Beparanf16 (in 12 txns to 8 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)14 (max 14)
77)jokers1037 (in 12 txns to 7 users)48 (in 22 txns from 11 users)13 (max 21)
78)BrewMaster22 (in 19 txns to 16 users)20 (in 12 txns from 8 users)12 (max 12)
79)FP91G17 (in 13 txns to 5 users)12 (in 10 txns from 6 users)11 (max 11)
80)Macadonian14 (in 4 txns to 3 users)5 (in 3 txns from 3 users)11 (max 12)
81)Bitinity14 (in 11 txns to 7 users)6 (in 6 txns from 5 users)11 (max 11)
82)posternat10 (in 1 txn)010 (max 10)
83)Pierre 219 (in 15 txns to 7 users)17 (in 12 txns from 9 users)10 (max 11)
84)D. Lerk10 (in 1 txn)010 (max 10)
85)Agrawas10 (in 2 txns to 2 users)010 (max 10)
86)yurez16 (in 16 txns to 11 users)12 (in 10 txns from 6 users)10 (max 11)
87)Hobo6610 (in 1 txn)010 (max 10)
88)Captain-Cryptory32 (in 19 txns to 14 users)43 (in 23 txns from 10 users)10 (max 17)
89)F2b11 (in 11 txns to 9 users)110 (max 10)
90)New.in.trading9 (in 1 txn)09 (max 9)
91)batesresearch10 (in 1 txn)19 (max 10)
92)tokeweed9 (in 7 txns to 4 users)09 (max 9)
93)GazetaBitcoin36 (in 3 txns to 2 users)55 (in 4 txns from 4 users)8 (max 10)
94)Obito12 (in 6 txns to 6 users)7 (in 4 txns from 3 users)8 (max 8)
95)tvplus00617 (in 13 txns to 11 users)17 (in 7 txns from 5 users)8 (max 8)
96)Silberman31 (in 31 txns to 13 users)45 (in 32 txns from 12 users)8 (max 8)
97)alexrossi31 (in 10 txns to 8 users)46 (in 21 txns from 7 users)8 (max 8)
98)bitbollo30 (in 19 txns to 13 users)44 (in 11 txns from 7 users)8 (max 9)
99)revelacaogr10 (in 4 txns to 1 user)3 (in 1 txn)8 (max 8)
100)mhanbostanci15 (in 13 txns to 9 users)14 (in 6 txns from 4 users)8 (max 8)
101)TimeTeller9 (in 9 txns to 9 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)8 (max 8)
102)famososMuertos31 (in 30 txns to 23 users)48 (in 30 txns from 11 users)7 (max 9)
103)GrosWesh7 (in 7 txns to 6 users)07 (max 7)
104)iv4n9 (in 8 txns to 7 users)4 (in 4 txns from 3 users)7 (max 7)
105)Paolo.Demidov28 (in 16 txns to 5 users)42 (in 24 txns from 8 users)7 (max 10)
106)xhomerx1050 (in 40 txns to 25 users)86 (in 38 txns from 15 users)7 (max 8)
107)Mr. Big7 (in 2 txns to 2 users)07 (max 7)
108)vv18119 (in 18 txns to 14 users)24 (in 20 txns from 12 users)7 (max 7)
109)dbshck8 (in 1 txn)17 (max 7)
110)s0nix6 (in 5 txns to 3 users)06 (max 6)
111)Disruptivas18 (in 17 txns to 8 users)24 (in 22 txns from 10 users)6 (max 12)
112)Richy_T13 (in 13 txns to 10 users)14 (in 13 txns from 8 users)6 (max 6)
113)GamblingSiteFinder6 (in 5 txns to 5 users)06 (max 6)
114)MoparMiningLLC26 (in 20 txns to 15 users)39 (in 14 txns from 13 users)6 (max 7)
115)MinoRaiola21 (in 20 txns to 13 users)29 (in 21 txns from 7 users)6 (max 6)
116)Becassine10 (in 6 txns to 4 users)7 (in 3 txns from 2 users)6 (max 6)
117)sirazimuth17 (in 16 txns to 9 users)22 (in 18 txns from 11 users)6 (max 6)
118)qwk20 (in 13 txns to 9 users)27 (in 16 txns from 6 users)6 (max 19)
119)BobLawblaw12 (in 2 txns to 2 users)11 (in 6 txns from 6 users)6 (max 12)
120)Digital_Lord5 (in 2 txns to 1 user)05 (max 5)
121)Dimasin6 (in 1 txn)2 (in 1 txn)5 (max 5)
122)bitampcom5 (in 2 txns to 2 users)05 (max 5)
123)Oneandpure5 (in 2 txns to 1 user)05 (max 5)
124)tazmantasik5 (in 2 txns to 1 user)05 (max 5)
125)astraleureka5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
126)Coyster31 (in 28 txns to 18 users)51 (in 24 txns from 12 users)5 (max 11)
127)realdantreccia10 (in 3 txns to 2 users)10 (in 2 txns from 2 users)5 (max 8)
128)UserU11 (in 10 txns to 9 users)11 (in 11 txns from 10 users)5 (max 5)
129)agustina25 (in 5 txns to 4 users)05 (max 5)
130)Truthchanter5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
131)Trading5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
132)ekiller7 (in 7 txns to 7 users)3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)5 (max 6)
133)hanspeter776 (in 2 txns to 2 users)15 (max 5)
134)teeGUMES7 (in 2 txns to 2 users)4 (in 2 txns from 2 users)5 (max 5)
135)bct_ail12 (in 10 txns to 9 users)13 (in 11 txns from 9 users)5 (max 5)
136)Heisenberg_Hunter7 (in 5 txns to 5 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)5 (max 5)
137)Goran_18 (in 8 txns to 7 users)25 (in 15 txns from 6 users)5 (max 6)
138)devollito5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
139)EdenHazard5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
140)Nomad885 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
141)Dabs24 (in 12 txns to 10 users)37 (in 24 txns from 9 users)5 (max 6)
142)Rollbit Razer5 (in 1 txn)14 (max 4)
143)pealr124 (in 2 txns to 2 users)04 (max 4)
144)jaberwock6 (in 2 txns to 2 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 5)
145)cryptomaniac_xxx7 (in 5 txns to 4 users)6 (in 3 txns from 3 users)4 (max 4)
146)Swordsoffreedom4 (in 4 txns to 3 users)04 (max 4)
147)Review Master5 (in 5 txns to 4 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 4)
148)Indymoney4 (in 2 txns to 1 user)04 (max 4)
149)pakhitheboss6 (in 4 txns to 4 users)4 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 5)
150)devans5 (in 1 txn)14 (max 4)
151)ivan19754 (in 3 txns to 3 users)04 (max 4)
152)tweetious5 (in 5 txns to 5 users)14 (max 4)
153)mindrust8 (in 5 txns to 5 users)7 (in 5 txns from 5 users)4 (max 4)
154)Similificator5 (in 4 txns to 4 users)14 (max 5)
155)DrBeer14 (in 8 txns to 7 users)19 (in 9 txns from 6 users)4 (max 4)
156)nullCoiner9 (in 7 txns to 7 users)10 (in 10 txns from 7 users)4 (max 4)
157)xzone18 (in 17 txns to 12 users)27 (in 13 txns from 5 users)4 (max 4)
158)ralle1411 (in 5 txns to 4 users)14 (in 13 txns from 7 users)4 (max 6)
159)checkmatesir3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
160)wallet4bitcoin3 (in 2 txns to 2 users)03 (max 3)
161)KaliLinux4 (in 3 txns to 3 users)2 (in 1 txn)3 (max 3)
162)oryhp4 (in 2 txns to 2 users)13 (max 4)
163)BTC_Mouse3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
164)Yogee7 (in 7 txns to 7 users)7 (in 5 txns from 3 users)3 (max 3)
165)r34tr783tr783 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
166)blue Snow9 (in 9 txns to 8 users)12 (in 11 txns from 8 users)3 (max 4)
167)bullrun2020bro43 (in 32 txns to 12 users)79 (in 49 txns from 18 users)3 (max 4)
168)baro774 (in 3 txns to 3 users)13 (max 3)
169)Blockchayne3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
170)panjay3 (in 3 txns to 2 users)03 (max 3)
171)Gozie5110 (in 6 txns to 5 users)13 (in 9 txns from 8 users)3 (max 4)
172)Bohdan8205 (in 3 txns to 3 users)4 (in 1 txn)3 (max 3)
173)haloxon4 (in 4 txns to 4 users)13 (max 3)
174)creep_o9 (in 9 txns to 6 users)12 (in 5 txns from 2 users)3 (max 3)
175)davis1965 (in 5 txns to 4 users)4 (in 3 txns from 1 user)3 (max 3)
176)BADecker5 (in 1 txn)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)3 (max 4)
177)YuginKadoya4 (in 3 txns to 2 users)2 (in 1 txn)3 (max 3)
178)foroplus8 (in 5 txns to 4 users)10 (in 9 txns from 5 users)3 (max 3)
179)Abdussamad10 (in 7 txns to 5 users)14 (in 9 txns from 7 users)3 (max 4)
180)LTU_btc4 (in 4 txns to 4 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)3 (max 3)
181)ChiBitCTy7 (in 7 txns to 7 users)7 (in 4 txns from 4 users)3 (max 3)
182)imhoneer12 (in 12 txns to 6 users)18 (in 9 txns from 6 users)3 (max 3)
183)onurgozupek3 (in 1 txn)03 (max 3)
184)Timelord206713 (in 13 txns to 12 users)20 (in 11 txns from 8 users)3 (max 3)
185)alegotardo14 (in 13 txns to 6 users)22 (in 18 txns from 8 users)3 (max 4)
186)impulse7092 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
187)Felimon2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
188)notasimp4 (in 4 txns to 3 users)3 (in 1 txn)2 (max 2)
189)EYC_ONE5 (in 4 txns to 3 users)6 (in 4 txns from 4 users)2 (max 2)
190)Bizoran2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
191)curious droid5 (in 5 txns to 5 users)6 (in 4 txns from 2 users)2 (max 5)
192)UKprod6 (in 4 txns to 4 users)8 (in 5 txns from 5 users)2 (max 2)
193)dezoel3 (in 2 txns to 2 users)12 (max 2)
194)fortune10022 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
195)TangentC2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
196)Luqman2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
197)Ancienot2 (in 1 txn)02 (max 2)
198)MiaAndTheMarbles2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
199)Frank AlpenCoin2 (in 2 txns to 2 users)02 (max 2)
200)Altryist12 (in 11 txns to 8 users)19 (in 12 txns from 8 users)2 (max 3)



In July 2021 total sent 26411 merits (in 13235 txns to 2037 users):
  • 3% to Newbies: 810 merits (to 517 users)
  • 4% to Jr. Members: 1068 merits (to 296 users)
  • 9% to Members: 2479 merits (to 306 users)
  • 8% to Full Members: 2010 merits (to 216 users)
  • 11% to Sr. Members: 2808 merits (to 246 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 4044 merits (to 246 users)
  • 50% to Legendaries: 13192 merits (to 423 users)

Total user count on August 1, 2021:
  • 2884 Legendaries (1536 of them sent merits)
  • 3853 Hero Members (1617 of them sent merits)
  • 9145 Sr. Members (3078 of them sent merits)
  • 18504 Full Members (5625 of them sent merits)
  • 31696 Members (9142 of them sent merits)
  • 20854 Jr. Members (2635 of them sent merits)
  • about two millions newbies
Pages:
Jump to: