Pages:
Author

Topic: 'Trump Designates Antifa "A Terrorist Organization"' - page 10. (Read 3247 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
He's been caught. Truly senseless behavior, but historical studies of mob behavior should lead one to expect nothing less.

His Facebook profile is still public, LOL:

https://www.facebook.com/jessetag

Regardless of what people's political beliefs are - and I truly could care less what they are as everybody just reinforces their own beliefs here and there's nothing to be learned from that - we can all agree that its a crazy world we live in; especially because you can read the social media pages of attempted murderers.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
....
Putting my conspiratard cap on for a moment: it wouldn't surprise me if Trump's campaign, some right wing group, or even ZeroHedge themselves sent this guy (and others) into a protest to fire some bullets on camera.

Regardless of his actual intentions, I hope they catch him and he faces justice.

He's been caught. Truly senseless behavior, but historical studies of mob behavior should lead one to expect nothing less.

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
More "peaceful protest"

"Man Shot After Protester Fires Handgun Into SUV During Utah BLM Protest"

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/antifa-terrorist-fires-handgun-suv-during-utah-blm-demonstration

Great idea fucking retards. Now people terrified of getting pulled out of a car and murdered by a violent mob is now going to be fearful of getting shot so they are more likely to just plow through you when you surround vehicles to intimidate and attack people. Then when there are a lot more violent mobbing idiots flattened you will claim it is "right wing white supremacists" ramming down poor "peaceful protestors". Eventually people are going to have enough of your revolutionary cosplay and you will start getting your throats slit and your heads popped, then it will be too late to call a time out in your little LAARPing game.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
... ..yeah the same NYTimes that Maggie Haberman works for Grin Those stories were about to be leaked anyway and it was important they were controlled. You take control of a "controversy" by looking transparent up to the point of being almost biased against while at the same time dissipating gradually.It's a complex technique and very effective on ignorant humans who cannot rationalize or aggregate and correlate information effectively....

You mean, like New Yorkers?
hero member
Activity: 1459
Merit: 973


The same NYTimes that first broke the story about the Clintons Whitewater Development corp. and almost 20 years later Hillary's private email server and then put it on the front page every day for like a week?



ROFL ..yeah the same NYTimes that Maggie Haberman works for Grin Those stories were about to be leaked anyway and it was important they were controlled. You take control of a "controversy" by looking transparent up to the point of being almost biased against while at the same time dissipating gradually.It's a complex technique and very effective on ignorant humans who cannot rationalize or aggregate and correlate information effectively.Works everytime Smiley


.....meanwhile in other "alternative" news "Hispanic YouTuber Posts Disturbing Video Saying “We Need To Kill White People”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/hispanic-youtuber-posts-disturbing-video-saying-need-kill-white-people/
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
"ANTIFA literally doesn't exist" is something ANTIFA supporters like to say because they like to pretend it is an ideology and not an organization, so I don't know how much of a troll that is. That seems like they literally support ANTIFA regardless of it being a character or not.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/crackdown-feds-have-indicted-more-than-50-individuals-for-rioting-during-george-floyd-protests

At least 50 people are facing Federal riot charges for inciting or committing violent acts during national anti-racism protests, according to the Department of Justice, and more arrests are yet to come. So far, however, none of the individuals taken into DOJ custody have official ties to any “Antifa-type” organization.

“The federal charges cover a variety of alleged criminal behavior — including impersonating a US Marshal in Florida, aiming a laser at a police aircraft in Wisconsin and inciting a riot in Illinois that caused damage to more than 50 businesses,” the New York Post reported Friday, based on a cache of documents released to CBS reporter Catherine Herridge.

Most of the arrests — at least 40 of the 53 — were for violent acts, including tossing Molotov cocktails into law enforcement vehicles and into the front windows of stores and other businesses and toppling “historically significant” statutes on federal land.

“Of the 51 cases, spread across 18 states, brought by the Justice Department thus far, 20 involve allegations related to arson; 16 involve the illegal possession of a firearm, more often than not by a felon; another eight people face charges related to inciting a riot or civil disorder,” Forbes added.

Although Attorney General William Barr and President Donald Trump have suggested there will be a major investigation into “Antifa” and other anarchist groups, none of the individuals rounded up and charged by the DOJ in recent days are listed as having direct connections to any organized crime or domestic terror group, something a number of left-leaning outlets have pointed out.

“Attorney General William Barr has blamed anti-fascist activists for violence during protests over George Floyd’s death. But records show no sign of Antifa links in Justice Department cases,” NPR crowed late last week. “Federal arrests show no sign that Antifa plotted protests,” added The New York Times.

But at this point, Barr told Fox News, arrests are being made on acts of violence, and the DOJ isn’t focusing on connecting anyone in custody to a larger, national anarchist movement — yet.

“We have some investigations underway, very focused investigations on certain individuals that relate to Antifa,” Barr said. “But in the initial phase of identifying people and arresting them, they were arrested for crimes that don’t require us to identify a particular group or don’t necessitate that.”

Those arrests may come later, as the DOJ establishes connections between rioters and national organizations or, simply, national organizers who encouraged individual Antifa-type organizations to take advantage of the largely peaceful anti-racism protests to incite riots and cause violence. The DOJ appears to be focusing on Antifa almost as an organized crime entity, investigating sources of funding.

“Some of it relates to an Antifa. Some of it relates to groups that act very much like an Antifa. As I said, there’s a witch’s brew of extremist groups that are trying to exploit this situation on all sides,” Barr added.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
You got trolled, she's in character.


"ANTIFA literally doesn't exist" is something ANTIFA supporters like to say because they like to pretend it is an ideology and not an organization, so I don't know how much of a troll that is. That seems like they literally support ANTIFA regardless of it being a character or not.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
I was sliding anything if you look at my post in context:

.....

Already did and my objection stands. So, what's your opinion about these hundreds being indicted for the riots, violence and such?  Is more planned?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I was sliding anything if you look at my post in context:


Democrats are wading in to the fray and demanding answers over Sinclair’s close ties to the Trump administration, which, they say, could mean the group is getting preferential treatment.
The New York Times refers to the group as a “conservative giant” that, since the Bush presidency, has used its 173 television stations “to advance a mostly right-leaning agenda”.


Meanwhile ............The New York Times has defended a new member of its editorial board who wrote inflammatory tweets about white people.

Ms Jeong (aka Filthy Racist Scumbag) wrote in one tweet from July 2014: "Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men."

One online critic posted a selection of Ms Jeong's other tweets, which contain obscenities.

"Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins," she said in December 2014.

The South Korea-born journalist, who was raised in the US, also used the hashtag "#CancelWhitePeople" and complained about "white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants".

She attended Harvard Law School and has previously written for the Atlantic, Motherboard, the Washington Post and the New York Times Magazine.

In a statement on Thursday, the newspaper's corporate communications team said Ms Jeong's "journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her the subject of frequent online harassment.

That is also a good point. It is more than just a left bias, it is an ESTABLISHMENT bias. Anyone who is trying to change the establishment gets a two ton thumb put on the scales against them.

The same NYTimes that first broke the story about the Clintons Whitewater Development corp. and almost 20 years later Hillary's private email server and then put it on the front page every day for like a week?

Regardless, trying to classify the NYTimes as if it's just a single entity is almost as silly as doing it with the entire 'media'.  You need to be able to find individual journalists that are objectively trustworthy and connected.



https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/08/mediacloud


legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
But let's see if his post about HC gets deleted as being off topic in a thread about Trump and Antifa.

You know what is funny about that stupid fucking chart he thinks proves his point is if you have more than two brain cells to rub together, you will realize simply breaking the topics into more subsections doesn't mean there was less negative coverage of Trump, it just means they covered more topics. Additionally a sentence count is in no way an indicator of the sentiment of the contents.

I noticed that and defined it as an attempt at topic diversion, but a pretty fucking stupid one.

It's all about us not setting on a path of enumerating each and every one of the fucking zombie anarchidiots allied with the Democratic movement who are being prosecuted, which is 100% in line with the thread OP topic.

This and the details of the indictments will show lots of connections that many would not like revealed. Their problem not ours.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
While getting spies on by the CCP (aka, while browsing tic tok), I came across a video that pretty much proves everything you need to know about antifa

Take a look.

https://m.tiktok.com/v/6842879260848344326.html

You got trolled, she's in character.
As far as I can tell, she is accurately portraying pretty much every Antifa member.

copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
While getting spies on by the CCP (aka, while browsing tic tok), I came across a video that pretty much proves everything you need to know about antifa

Take a look.

https://m.tiktok.com/v/6842879260848344326.html

You got trolled, she's in character.
As far as I can tell, she is accurately portraying pretty much every Antifa member.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
While getting spies on by the CCP (aka, while browsing tic tok), I came across a video that pretty much proves everything you need to know about antifa

Take a look.

https://m.tiktok.com/v/6842879260848344326.html

You got trolled, she's in character.
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
While getting spies on by the CCP (aka, while browsing tic tok), I came across a video that pretty much proves everything you need to know about antifa

Take a look.

https://m.tiktok.com/v/6842879260848344326.html
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
But let's see if his post about HC gets deleted as being off topic in a thread about Trump and Antifa.

You know what is funny about that stupid fucking chart he thinks proves his point is if you have more than two brain cells to rub together, you will realize simply breaking the topics into more subsections doesn't mean there was less negative coverage of Trump, it just means they covered more topics. Additionally a sentence count is in no way an indicator of the sentiment of the contents.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
[Look at this tiny area of focus and ignore the whole]

You have a habit of not actually addressing the premise and just sliding the topic using a myopic cherry picking type argument.

But let's see if his post about HC gets deleted as being off topic in a thread about Trump and Antifa.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
[Look at this tiny area of focus and ignore the whole]

You have a habit of not actually addressing the premise and just sliding the topic using a myopic cherry picking type argument.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Democrats are wading in to the fray and demanding answers over Sinclair’s close ties to the Trump administration, which, they say, could mean the group is getting preferential treatment.
The New York Times refers to the group as a “conservative giant” that, since the Bush presidency, has used its 173 television stations “to advance a mostly right-leaning agenda”.


Meanwhile ............The New York Times has defended a new member of its editorial board who wrote inflammatory tweets about white people.

Ms Jeong (aka Filthy Racist Scumbag) wrote in one tweet from July 2014: "Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men."

One online critic posted a selection of Ms Jeong's other tweets, which contain obscenities.

"Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins," she said in December 2014.

The South Korea-born journalist, who was raised in the US, also used the hashtag "#CancelWhitePeople" and complained about "white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants".

She attended Harvard Law School and has previously written for the Atlantic, Motherboard, the Washington Post and the New York Times Magazine.

In a statement on Thursday, the newspaper's corporate communications team said Ms Jeong's "journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her the subject of frequent online harassment.

That is also a good point. It is more than just a left bias, it is an ESTABLISHMENT bias. Anyone who is trying to change the establishment gets a two ton thumb put on the scales against them.

The same NYTimes that first broke the story about the Clintons Whitewater Development corp. and almost 20 years later Hillary's private email server and then put it on the front page every day for like a week?

Regardless, trying to classify the NYTimes as if it's just a single entity is almost as silly as doing it with the entire 'media'.  You need to be able to find individual journalists that are objectively trustworthy and connected.



https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/08/mediacloud

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Democrats are wading in to the fray and demanding answers over Sinclair’s close ties to the Trump administration, which, they say, could mean the group is getting preferential treatment.
The New York Times refers to the group as a “conservative giant” that, since the Bush presidency, has used its 173 television stations “to advance a mostly right-leaning agenda”.


Meanwhile ............The New York Times has defended a new member of its editorial board who wrote inflammatory tweets about white people.

Ms Jeong (aka Filthy Racist Scumbag) wrote in one tweet from July 2014: "Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men."

One online critic posted a selection of Ms Jeong's other tweets, which contain obscenities.

"Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins," she said in December 2014.

The South Korea-born journalist, who was raised in the US, also used the hashtag "#CancelWhitePeople" and complained about "white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants".

She attended Harvard Law School and has previously written for the Atlantic, Motherboard, the Washington Post and the New York Times Magazine.

In a statement on Thursday, the newspaper's corporate communications team said Ms Jeong's "journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her the subject of frequent online harassment.

That is also a good point. It is more than just a left bias, it is an ESTABLISHMENT bias. Anyone who is trying to change the establishment gets a two ton thumb put on the scales against them.
hero member
Activity: 1459
Merit: 973


Since nearly all media has a heavy leftist bias, straining to silence any views outside of their preferred framework, I find it rather hilarious you suggest I "google it". Speaking of boogeymen, the media is constantly talking about right wing extremism, but I rarely see it. I do however CONSTANTLY see leftist violence, and then see the media make excuses for it, or just ignore it completely.



Democrats are wading in to the fray and demanding answers over Sinclair’s close ties to the Trump administration, which, they say, could mean the group is getting preferential treatment.
The New York Times refers to the group as a “conservative giant” that, since the Bush presidency, has used its 173 television stations “to advance a mostly right-leaning agenda”.


Meanwhile ............The New York Times has defended a new member of its editorial board who wrote inflammatory tweets about white people.

Ms Jeong (aka Filthy Racist Scumbag) wrote in one tweet from July 2014: "Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men."

One online critic posted a selection of Ms Jeong's other tweets, which contain obscenities.

"Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins," she said in December 2014.

The South Korea-born journalist, who was raised in the US, also used the hashtag "#CancelWhitePeople" and complained about "white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants".

She attended Harvard Law School and has previously written for the Atlantic, Motherboard, the Washington Post and the New York Times Magazine.

In a statement on Thursday, the newspaper's corporate communications team said Ms Jeong's "journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her the subject of frequent online harassment.
Pages:
Jump to: