Topic: TT-Miner 2022.4.1 KAWPOW, PROGPOW, ETHASH, ETCHASH, EPIC, SHA512256D, GHOSTRIDER - page 46. (Read 132259 times)
March 23, 2019, 03:00:23 AM
My 2080Ti shows 7700 Mh/s in miner console, but mintpond shows only 5000 Mh/s. With Cryptodredge miner I was getting almost the same results in mintpond like it was shown in console.
March 23, 2019, 02:55:36 AM
hi, i like your miner but when the ver. advance
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
Thanks for the report. I'll look into this. You are on MTP? MintPond / 2miners / zerg?? Do you have logfiles created? Do you run a single instance of TT on you computer or more?
hi, algo MTP. no logfiles created. yes single instance.
Can you please create a logfile. You have to add -logpool to your command line. As soon as you see this reconnection bug, please stop the miner and send me the logfile. You will find that in the Logs folder.
Thanks for reporting
March 23, 2019, 02:52:26 AM
hi, i like your miner but when the ver. advance
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
Thanks for the report. I'll look into this. You are on MTP? MintPond / 2miners / zerg?? Do you have logfiles created? Do you run a single instance of TT on you computer or more?
hi, algo MTP. no logfiles created. yes single instance.
March 22, 2019, 09:59:51 AM
When I run on intensity 24 miner shows strange hash rate #’s. 3.3mhs on a 1070. Poolside is less I’m pretty sure.
Is -i 24 too much?
Is -i 24 too much?
As long as the system is stable I would at least wait for a first hashrate indication from the pool. I expect that the hashrate starts high and gets lower after some time - that is what I see here on my system. Just let it run and see how it goes. Please share any results - want to know how this develops.
Thanks.
March 22, 2019, 09:35:23 AM
When I run on intensity 24 miner shows strange hash rate #’s. 3.3mhs on a 1070. Poolside is less I’m pretty sure.
Is -i 24 too much?
Is -i 24 too much?
March 22, 2019, 06:49:09 AM
income is very good last few days on mintpond, i'm using 3001 port and intensity 20, today installed new 319.67 CRD as well but only WDDM 2.3 on windows 10 1709, i will upgrade to 1903 build in summer, cuda 10.1 working fine as well, no stability problems using TDP 70%+memory 0 and some core oc, works fine around 1500-1700MHZ on 1080-1080Ti
Hi- thanks that you take your time for these reports!
March 22, 2019, 06:46:25 AM
income is very good last few days on mintpond, i'm using 3001 port and intensity 20, today installed new 319.67 CRD as well but only WDDM 2.3 on windows 10 1709, i will upgrade to 1903 build in summer, cuda 10.1 working fine as well, no stability problems using TDP 70%+memory 0 and some core oc, works fine around 1500-1700MHZ on 1080-1080Ti, i'm mining around 30 hours without system restart and not a single problem and hashrate dropping
March 22, 2019, 06:04:53 AM
hi, i like your miner but when the ver. advance
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
Thanks for the report. I'll look into this. You are on MTP? MintPond / 2miners / zerg?? Do you have logfiles created? Do you run a single instance of TT on you computer or more?
March 22, 2019, 05:35:01 AM
hi, i like your miner but when the ver. advance
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
the same problem still occur and even serious
GPU nounce (stop working) will happen when switch back from dev mining mode (not every time but it randomly happen)
it happen in my pure gtx 1060
and pure gtx 1070 rig
another problem is that it wont automatic reconnect after my line drop
March 20, 2019, 08:23:20 PM
yesterday i tested 3001 port with higher network difficulty and got 0.75 zcoins in 28 hours of mining, it's around 0.64 zcoins in 24 hours, i don't think that's because they lowered difficulty good luck + higher efficiency got higher Round Est. average on each block + 77.5% luck + 52 mined blocks in 24 hours 0 orphan ones, that's very good results indeed, but sometimes it makes only 0.0008-0.00085 bitcoins daily (only 0.5-0.55), sometimes higher than 0.0010 on my rig (0.6-0.65)
March 20, 2019, 04:03:55 PM
Any way to add a CPU priority setting 1-5 like crypto dredge? Would be great. Thanks for your hard work on this! Love the miner.
Thanks - happy if you like the miner.
So what is the effect you are locking for? Do you want to mine while doing other work on you PC?
March 20, 2019, 03:36:44 PM
Any way to add a CPU priority setting 1-5 like crypto dredge? Would be great. Thanks for your hard work on this! Love the miner.
March 19, 2019, 11:18:29 AM
Hi,
I didn't made any tests, but I guess that the relative maximum for intensity will not change if you use higher power limits. The difficulty comes from the pool. Since the MTP solutions size if more than 200k I prefer higher diffs - so you can save a lot of bandwidth for 'important' traffic on your line. Sending a single solution per minute is fine from my point of view - but there are surly other positions out there.
I didn't made any tests, but I guess that the relative maximum for intensity will not change if you use higher power limits. The difficulty comes from the pool. Since the MTP solutions size if more than 200k I prefer higher diffs - so you can save a lot of bandwidth for 'important' traffic on your line. Sending a single solution per minute is fine from my point of view - but there are surly other positions out there.
I didn't change the power limit all of them are set to 100%. Anyway thanks for your answer about the difficulty I thought that I can manually set it to higher diff to make it stable and little hashrate improvement.
-i 20 gridsize 4096 normal works
-i 21 gridsize 8192 & not not enough virtual memory
I'm not getting this error when increasing the intensity I'm using awesomeminer but I don't see the error the same as the image.-i 21 gridsize 8192 & not not enough virtual memory
-i 21 is honestly not working to me -i 20 is working fine to me same as the intensity 19. Do you know some command for reducing gridsize without using the intensity?
Hi,
you can use -gs 4069 to set the grid size to 4096. Please keep in mind that you have to remove the intensity command from the command line if you want to use grid size. Grid size gives you a much finder tool to get the sweet point of your system. Intensity works with power of 2 steps which may get very big for large intensities (20 and more)
Let me know if that helps?
March 19, 2019, 11:13:32 AM
@TrailingStop,
TT-Miner has issue mining MTP (ZCoin) at "2miners' pool (xzc.2miners.com:8080).
Miner is hashing, but no shares accepted. Thus pool shows zero hashrate of the miner.
I tried v2.1.17 up to v2.1.19, and it has the same issue.
I'd also tried CryptoDredge, and it runs smoothly at that pool.
Please kindly fix it ASAP.
I hate to use slower miner just because the fastest one has issue with certain pools.
Thank you.
TT-Miner has issue mining MTP (ZCoin) at "2miners' pool (xzc.2miners.com:8080).
Miner is hashing, but no shares accepted. Thus pool shows zero hashrate of the miner.
I tried v2.1.17 up to v2.1.19, and it has the same issue.
I'd also tried CryptoDredge, and it runs smoothly at that pool.
Please kindly fix it ASAP.
I hate to use slower miner just because the fastest one has issue with certain pools.
Thank you.
Hi- there shouldn't be any issue with 2miners. There is a bug in their stratum-protocol, therefor I cannot assign a share to a GPU and cannot show the full-turn time of a solution. But anything else should work. Do you have the same issues with mintpond or zergpool?
Can you please send me the log - maybe I see there some more information what is going on there?
March 19, 2019, 10:29:38 AM
1. OK - so no new file for each day?
2. what can I see if api-bind works? What program do I need to use this? What is the benefit/function of api-bind? Why and how do you want to use it?
2. what can I see if api-bind works? What program do I need to use this? What is the benefit/function of api-bind? Why and how do you want to use it?
1. Could you please just implement that anything passed afer -log is used for the log file name? No need for the fancy logic here. If log exists - append to the end.
2. Honestly - just ignore it. If dude has problems explaining what he needs it's not your fault neither is your obligation to do some research.
1. I have a rig configured of 14 GPUs, a set of 1070x8 and another 1080x6.
Can't run all at once because it will crash. So configure to have two processes run per set.
With the default log set, I ended up having just 1 log file for both processes which ever run second.
In this case, I would have log file for second process but lost the first.
2. Yeah! As a developer, he likes to be challenges so I did just that so he can do better each time.
So, just shut your mouth
if you do not know nothing about what others are saying. March 19, 2019, 10:13:18 AM
@TrailingStop,
TT-Miner has issue mining MTP (ZCoin) at "2miners' pool (xzc.2miners.com:8080).
Miner is hashing, but no shares accepted. Thus pool shows zero hashrate of the miner.
I tried v2.1.17 up to v2.1.19, and it has the same issue.
I'd also tried CryptoDredge, and it runs smoothly at that pool.
Please kindly fix it ASAP.
I hate to use slower miner just because the fastest one has issue with certain pools.
Thank you.
TT-Miner has issue mining MTP (ZCoin) at "2miners' pool (xzc.2miners.com:8080).
Miner is hashing, but no shares accepted. Thus pool shows zero hashrate of the miner.
I tried v2.1.17 up to v2.1.19, and it has the same issue.
I'd also tried CryptoDredge, and it runs smoothly at that pool.
Please kindly fix it ASAP.
I hate to use slower miner just because the fastest one has issue with certain pools.
Thank you.
March 19, 2019, 10:02:58 AM
Hi,
I didn't made any tests, but I guess that the relative maximum for intensity will not change if you use higher power limits. The difficulty comes from the pool. Since the MTP solutions size if more than 200k I prefer higher diffs - so you can save a lot of bandwidth for 'important' traffic on your line. Sending a single solution per minute is fine from my point of view - but there are surly other positions out there.
I didn't made any tests, but I guess that the relative maximum for intensity will not change if you use higher power limits. The difficulty comes from the pool. Since the MTP solutions size if more than 200k I prefer higher diffs - so you can save a lot of bandwidth for 'important' traffic on your line. Sending a single solution per minute is fine from my point of view - but there are surly other positions out there.
I didn't change the power limit all of them are set to 100%. Anyway thanks for your answer about the difficulty I thought that I can manually set it to higher diff to make it stable and little hashrate improvement.
-i 20 gridsize 4096 normal works
-i 21 gridsize 8192 & not not enough virtual memory
I'm not getting this error when increasing the intensity I'm using awesomeminer but I don't see the error the same as the image.-i 21 gridsize 8192 & not not enough virtual memory
-i 21 is honestly not working to me -i 20 is working fine to me same as the intensity 19. Do you know some command for reducing gridsize without using the intensity?
March 19, 2019, 09:53:25 AM
-i 20 gridsize 4096 normal works
-i 21 gridsize 8192 & not not enough virtual memory
-i 21 gridsize 8192 & not not enough virtual memory
March 19, 2019, 09:20:27 AM
Can you recommend if what settings is the best to improve hashrate performance even the power consumption is high?
Editing the intensity the hashrate shows 0 to me only intensity 19 and 20 is working fine but it needs to close and open again until the hashrate shows the total hashrate of the card.
How about editing the difficulty? Any thoughts?
Editing the intensity the hashrate shows 0 to me only intensity 19 and 20 is working fine but it needs to close and open again until the hashrate shows the total hashrate of the card.
How about editing the difficulty? Any thoughts?
Hi,
I didn't made any tests, but I guess that the relative maximum for intensity will not change if you use higher power limits. The difficulty comes from the pool. Since the MTP solutions size if more than 200k I prefer higher diffs - so you can save a lot of bandwidth for 'important' traffic on your line. Sending a single solution per minute is fine from my point of view - but there are surly other positions out there.
March 19, 2019, 08:53:38 AM
Can you recommend if what settings is the best to improve hashrate performance even the power consumption is high?
Editing the intensity the hashrate shows 0 to me only intensity 19 and 20 is working fine but it needs to close and open again until the hashrate shows the total hashrate of the card.
How about editing the difficulty? Any thoughts?
Editing the intensity the hashrate shows 0 to me only intensity 19 and 20 is working fine but it needs to close and open again until the hashrate shows the total hashrate of the card.
How about editing the difficulty? Any thoughts?
Jump to: