Erling Haaland gave Manchester City an edge, but of it had not been for the support from those player's, he wouldn't have scored so much goals, and if you check, most of em are completely tap in goals. He wouldn't have been able to create so much chances for himself alone.
In big games, Haaland was not very active and had Manchester city not had other very good players that can perform in top games, they would have been failed by the dependence on Haaland. Players that were very important for Manchester City last season that deserve to be as recognized as Haaland are Rodri who scored an important goal against Bayern Munich and in the final, Bernando Silva played well also against Real Madrid, De Bruyne was also good, also Grealish and Gundogan. As some of these players have left, Manchester City will need to make things happen in those areas where those players player very well.You are neglecting the impact that a player like Haaland has even when he doesn't score. Do you know what it costs a team to neutralize Haaland for a whole game? If an opponent has to dedicate their players, or resources if you will, to neutralize Haaland, that also means that other players from Manchester City will have more time and space to create chances for either other players than Haaland or themselves. It was not like Haaland was just bad and period. Haaland was keeping several players busy who were supposed to prevent him from scoring and they did that well. But who cares at Manchester City when other players can do the job as well then?
christiano ronaldo 
