It's not a question of whether they're exciting or not. It's a matter of being very efficient in your playing style. It's not a question of whether they're exciting or not. It's a matter of being very efficient in your playing style. Tactically, the English game is quite good and able to overcome obstacles.
Now, Denmark's game won't be easy. Denmark are playing really well!
I think we are going to see an excellent football game.
England vs Denmark
I believe we will have a good football game. Both teams are playing well and beautiful football.
Then I guess we totally have a different understanding of what beautiful football is. I don't disagree that efficient playing styles can win more frequently than not. Which is what Greece discovered in 2004 EURO, what City discovers once they get their season dusted. Which is what Italy used to be... until this tournament. But I don't equate efficient with beautiful normally. Good luck to you!
I'm more sympathetic to Denmark, attacking football is always more interesting to watch than a strategic team that plays a match in anticipation of an opponent's mistake. England is a very strong team, but I wanted to see the Danish team in the final. I like the way they conduct this tournament, uncompromising team, is exciting.
This is what I mean. Beautiful football to me is exciting football. And football that is efficient, pragmatic, and cold, usually wins trophies a lot more than teams that entertain as a priority.