freefall speed of collapse, 3x. yeah, 10 seconds quarter mile high to hit the ground (ZERO resistance from existing massive steel columns)....
I'm confused. what are you saying here? 
Topic: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7's Collapse on 9/11 - page 13. (Read 2858 times)
April 13, 2020, 03:03:13 PM
April 13, 2020, 02:13:45 PM
freefall speed of collapse, 3x. yeah, 10 seconds quarter mile high to hit the ground (ZERO resistance from existing massive steel columns)
reported on BBC television (bldg 7) to have collapsed 20 minutes BEFORE it actually did collapse
no airplane parts found at the pentagon
and what part of the pentagon was hit? (by something)
it was where the accountants were working to track D. Rumsfeld's missing 2.3 trillion dollars
just glad someone out there still cares
thanks BD
reported on BBC television (bldg 7) to have collapsed 20 minutes BEFORE it actually did collapse
no airplane parts found at the pentagon
and what part of the pentagon was hit? (by something)
it was where the accountants were working to track D. Rumsfeld's missing 2.3 trillion dollars
just glad someone out there still cares
thanks BD
April 13, 2020, 01:28:41 PM
..get to the finale lightbulb moment where he has been duped and has to admit he is a bored troll. but taking the long route i see it taking him 3+ years to get to that point
He and I have been through these discussions before, but apparently he's forgot.
April 13, 2020, 01:23:09 PM
badecker thinks everything is a movie
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
yea. badecker doesnt understand anything beyond the scripts he has read. he comes back with the same old stuff repeated over and over. not an original thought of his own.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of why ram the planes into the towers, and then explode them. Of course I'd also like to see a demo of nano-thermite (a made-up fantasy thing of course, with mythical properties) mixed in with concrete and the resulting mix passing engineering tests on site, then being exploded decades later.
I think a lot of us have been noticing how difficult it is for you to do research... and even think on your own, a little. Are you still sitting in your dirty diaper, wondering why somebody hasn't changed it yet?
April 13, 2020, 01:21:35 PM
badecker thinks everything is a movie
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
yea. badecker doesnt understand anything beyond the scripts he has read. he comes back with the same old stuff repeated over and over. not an original thought of his own.
Good thing BADecker doesn't have to understand any of it. Loads of people have come out with the understanding, so that anybody who wants to know, can easily see that 9/11 was an inside demolition job.
Since this has been done, it shows that jokers like franky1 and Spendulus are simply the same as climate change deniers.
April 13, 2020, 01:20:01 PM
badecker thinks everything is a movie
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
yea. badecker doesnt understand anything beyond the scripts he has read. he comes back with the same old stuff repeated over and over. not an original thought of his own.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of why ram the planes into the towers, and then explode them. Of course I'd also like to see a demo of nano-thermite (a made-up fantasy thing of course, with mythical properties) mixed in with concrete and the resulting mix passing engineering tests on site, then being exploded decades later.
that will take him a couple months to get to those conspiracy scripts. its why he is staying ignorant and looping with the same old myths from a decade ago.
he is too afraid to move forward and actually find details/give answers.
.. i have seen guys like badecker over the decades and they just cant even bring themselves to move forward and catch up with reality. so i just giving up on asking him to prove his point and instead just trying to catch him out with spoilers of how his conspiracy scripts end.. just to seep him up and get to the finale lightbulb moment where he has been duped and has to admit he is a bored troll. but taking the long route i see it taking him 3+ years to get to that point
April 13, 2020, 01:12:12 PM
badecker thinks everything is a movie
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
yea. badecker doesnt understand anything beyond the scripts he has read. he comes back with the same old stuff repeated over and over. not an original thought of his own.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of why ram the planes into the towers, and then explode them. Of course I'd also like to see a demo of nano-thermite (a made-up fantasy thing of course, with mythical properties) mixed in with concrete and the resulting mix passing engineering tests on site, then being exploded decades later.
April 13, 2020, 01:01:36 PM
badecker thinks everything is a movie
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
yea. badecker doesnt understand anything beyond the scripts he has read. he comes back with the same old stuff repeated over and over. not an original thought of his own.
April 13, 2020, 12:57:58 PM
badecker thinks everything is a movie
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
I said, "Wait, the wtc7 was OVER THREE HUNDRED FEET AWAY!!!! How could falling debris hit it?
Oh, I forgot. Those MASSIVE 22T BEAMS THAT FELL OVER 500 FEET AWAY!
But really heavy stuff from the towers coming down couldn't have been the cause of WTC7 being weakened even though really heavy stuff traveled twice as far, because SHUT UP."
April 13, 2020, 12:54:24 PM
badecker thinks everything is a movie
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else
April 13, 2020, 11:54:38 AM
Notice that franky1 is so steeped in "movie" views, that he can't even recognize what reality is any longer. For him, it will take a collapse of the whole money system of the world before he wakes up. Why might he wake up then? Because of the "pain" in literally having to plant a garden, or hunt with bow and arrow, just to provide himself with his daily food.
If his physical is anything like he shows through his posts that his mentality is, he very likely won't have the strength to farm or hunt, and will die along with the many masses.
If his physical is anything like he shows through his posts that his mentality is, he very likely won't have the strength to farm or hunt, and will die along with the many masses.
April 13, 2020, 11:33:27 AM
im gonna give it 3 years before badecker flip flops his theories.
he will read all the scripts that been debunked years ago. but based on the delay. im giving badecker 3 years before he catches up
we tried to help him out a bit. but it seems he is re hashing old scripts yet doesnt realise how old they are. he thinks he is saying new stuff..
so not just an idiot or deluded but also ignorant
so last chance to speed badecker up with all the conspiracy theories based on the area you seem stuck at in the script
next ou will come across the buildings owner took out large insurance policy
then you will later come across all the actual science and studies where actual facts come out of what happened. where building 7 was not just a random office fire started for no apparent reason
nor was it explosives causing the fire or causing the whole collapse
but it was physical damage from debris hitting it. mixed in with fire that got to the exposed(due to debris damage) columns and expanded them due to heat. which further weakened the columns.
but i feel it will take you 3 years of jumping through all thee scripts your reading before you have the lightbulb moment
he will read all the scripts that been debunked years ago. but based on the delay. im giving badecker 3 years before he catches up
we tried to help him out a bit. but it seems he is re hashing old scripts yet doesnt realise how old they are. he thinks he is saying new stuff..
so not just an idiot or deluded but also ignorant
so last chance to speed badecker up with all the conspiracy theories based on the area you seem stuck at in the script
next ou will come across the buildings owner took out large insurance policy
then you will later come across all the actual science and studies where actual facts come out of what happened. where building 7 was not just a random office fire started for no apparent reason
nor was it explosives causing the fire or causing the whole collapse
but it was physical damage from debris hitting it. mixed in with fire that got to the exposed(due to debris damage) columns and expanded them due to heat. which further weakened the columns.
but i feel it will take you 3 years of jumping through all thee scripts your reading before you have the lightbulb moment
April 13, 2020, 11:04:45 AM
....
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response....
Wait, the wtc7 was OVER THREE HUNDRED FEET AWAY!!!! How could falling debris hit it?the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response....
Oh, I forgot. Those MASSIVE 22T BEAMS THAT FELL OVER 500 FEET AWAY!
But really heavy stuff from the towers coming down couldn't have been the cause of WTC7 being weakened even though really heavy stuff traveled twice as far, because SHUT UP.
Right! Everyday happenings for thousands of years.
Buildings being hit by planes or debris from other falling buildings...
and falling down into their own footprint at almost free-fall speeds...
all neat and cozy-like...
happens all the time, right?
Oh wait. This never happened before. Why did it happen now?
Must be a hyper-spatial vortex in the area of the World Trade Center, and just to prove how good construction really is, it only happened to 3 of the major buildings in the area.
That must be it. A hyper-spacial vortex in New York! One with all the luck in the world so that it got 3 buildings, all within the same little period of time on the same day. Wish I had lottery-winning abilities like that. I'd be richer than a thousand Gate's combined.
April 13, 2020, 10:23:33 AM
....
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response....
Wait, the wtc7 was OVER THREE HUNDRED FEET AWAY!!!! How could falling debris hit it?the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response....
Oh, I forgot. Those MASSIVE 22T BEAMS THAT FELL OVER 500 FEET AWAY!
But really heavy stuff from the towers coming down couldn't have been the cause of WTC7 being weakened even though really heavy stuff traveled twice as far, because SHUT UP.
April 12, 2020, 05:17:13 PM
...
So, what's left.
Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.So, what's left.
If there really was a pay-off, prove it
Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.
Just reporting on what works. The idea that 9/11 wasn't an inside job doesn't work.
Thank you. Since my blurting of insane crap doesn't work, like you said, my stuff is what really happened.
EDIT: I'm starting to feel a little sorry for you with all your pathetic responses.
April 12, 2020, 05:13:30 PM
...
So, what's left.
Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.So, what's left.
If there really was a pay-off, prove it
Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.
Just reporting on what works. The idea that 9/11 wasn't an inside job doesn't work.
April 12, 2020, 05:08:54 PM
...
So, what's left.
Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.So, what's left.
If there really was a pay-off, prove it
Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.
Just reporting on what works. The idea that 9/11 wasn't an inside job doesn't work.
April 12, 2020, 05:01:53 PM
...
So, what's left.
Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.So, what's left.
If there really was a pay-off, prove it
Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.
April 12, 2020, 05:01:35 PM
so if i slapped u with a baseball bad. .. and hours later due to concussion u fell..
you would not link the cause to the baseball bat hit you took earlier?
instead you would say someone must have burned you?
well you would. thats your illogical theory
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response
you would not link the cause to the baseball bat hit you took earlier?
instead you would say someone must have burned you?
well you would. thats your illogical theory
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response
That's the point. It WASN'T fire that brought B-7 down.
The video is inconclusive. You can use your imagination this way or that.
My though is that the whole inside of the building was collapsing from the demolition. We saw the corner collapse the way it did, because it was falling inward... part of the strategy for demolitioning it to fall into its own foot-print.
April 12, 2020, 04:55:01 PM
so if i slapped u with a baseball bad. .. and hours later due to concussion u fell..
you would not link the cause to the baseball bat hit you took earlier?
instead you would say someone must have burned you?
well you would. thats your illogical theory
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response
here
note the black gap down the middle where the debris hit the building and went down through many floors
you would not link the cause to the baseball bat hit you took earlier?
instead you would say someone must have burned you?
well you would. thats your illogical theory
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor
when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response
here
note the black gap down the middle where the debris hit the building and went down through many floors
Jump to: