Topic: [UNMODERATED] CLUSTERCOIN Topic [OPEN DISCUSSION] - page 2. (Read 7465 times)
He's probably not online because theirs no need to be. I'm sure he's feeling pretty confident he's going to get the funds released to him then after cashing out he will eventually be back for another similar coin release where this thread happens all over again with different people.
Any Updates?
Suspiciously quiet, nothing official since "waiting for PoD".
the dev ain't be online for 12 hours, run away before getting 350 btc, I hope
Any Updates?
Suspiciously quiet, nothing official since "waiting for PoD".
Any Updates?
if bank finds a scammer, the bank should terminate the agreement. WTF the informal agreement between the scammer dev and bittrex? Why bittrex terminate the agreement in the obvious scam case.
It is their job to give the "crook" our BTC, like it or not.
This is what we asked Bittrex to do. Plain and simple
It's black and white. No gray area here. Either the clusterfuck followed the terms or he didn't.
All the rest is just bullshit. Plain and simple. I would get my 2 BTC back if Bittrex did the WRONG thing.
But I don't think they will, they are the escrow and they are going to do their job as such. This is what we want them to do.
What don't people get about that? I guess when people stand to lose money they will convince themselves of anything. LOL
This is what we asked Bittrex to do. Plain and simple
It's black and white. No gray area here. Either the clusterfuck followed the terms or he didn't.
All the rest is just bullshit. Plain and simple. I would get my 2 BTC back if Bittrex did the WRONG thing.
But I don't think they will, they are the escrow and they are going to do their job as such. This is what we want them to do.
What don't people get about that? I guess when people stand to lose money they will convince themselves of anything. LOL
It's nice that you'd like to eliminate the gray area here, but just because you say there isn't one doesn't make it so.
Sorry about that.
Im not getting rid of the gray area, there isn't one. It black and white, 3 checkboxes, are there checks in each box?
Hey, I'm pissed to but there is nothing Bittrex can do if you ask me. Tell me something that makes sense, and Im behind you.
I don't want to lose my BTC either
Your kind is whats wrong with this world, defending a clear scam here and just letting it happen because we're robots
So some people here think the scammer will bring Bittrex up before court and are worried because they are such a nice exchange?
That's ridiculous.
Whom are you defending? Bittrex, the scammer or both?
Some posts give a deep insight...
Only scammed customers might bring Bittrex up before court and noone else!
(No, I didn't buy into these scams)
That's ridiculous.
Whom are you defending? Bittrex, the scammer or both?
Some posts give a deep insight...
Only scammed customers might bring Bittrex up before court and noone else!
(No, I didn't buy into these scams)
Scammed customers sue Bittrex? please send me the drugs you're on lol
Bittrex is the escrow, following the terms of the agreement.
The scammer is slick, he has multiple scams ongoing it seems
But there is no actual proof, or let's have it, so we can all get our BTC back
That's the problem, it looks like this, or looks like that, Proof is what is needed, and the Cluster dev gets nothing.
I'm just sick of people blaming the escrow, we made a deal with a scammer, there were terms, shitty terms.
I will learn for this and never agree to such terms again. But it's too late, he got by BTC from the looks of it.
Cluster blockchain, what was I thinking, how did I fall for that? Money. If it was real, I would have made a lot of money.
Damn
You want me to send you the drugs I'm on?
Took me like five minutes to recognise that this coin was shit.
If anyone takes drugs here then it's you.
So some people here think the scammer will bring Bittrex up before court and are worried because they are such a nice exchange?
That's ridiculous.
Whom are you defending? Bittrex, the scammer or both?
Some posts give a deep insight...
Only scammed customers might bring Bittrex up before court and noone else!
(No, I didn't buy into these scams)
That's ridiculous.
Whom are you defending? Bittrex, the scammer or both?
Some posts give a deep insight...
Only scammed customers might bring Bittrex up before court and noone else!
(No, I didn't buy into these scams)
Scammed customers sue Bittrex? please send me the drugs you're on lol
Bittrex is the escrow, following the terms of the agreement.
The scammer is slick, he has multiple scams ongoing it seems
But there is no actual proof, or let's have it, so we can all get our BTC back
That's the problem, it looks like this, or looks like that, Proof is what is needed, and the Cluster dev gets nothing.
I'm just sick of people blaming the escrow, we made a deal with a scammer, there were terms, shitty terms.
I will learn for this and never agree to such terms again. But it's too late, he got by BTC from the looks of it.
Cluster blockchain, what was I thinking, how did I fall for that? Money. If it was real, I would have made a lot of money.
Damn
So some people here think the scammer will bring Bittrex up before court and are worried because they are such a nice exchange?
That's ridiculous.
Whom are you defending? Bittrex, the scammer or both?
Some posts give a deep insight...
Only scammed customers might bring Bittrex up before court and noone else!
(No, I didn't buy into these scams)
That's ridiculous.
Whom are you defending? Bittrex, the scammer or both?
Some posts give a deep insight...
Only scammed customers might bring Bittrex up before court and noone else!
(No, I didn't buy into these scams)
you wont need to to a 51% attack....get everyone mining it to raise difficulty to a high level then leave...it is simple but not enough people interested..carry on whining
get everyone mining it to raise difficulty to a high level then leave, and what will be the result?
1) There is no legally binding contract, this was confirmed by richie. It is an completely informal gentleman's agreement (at best) between "Dev"/Bittrex. Anyone saying the "dev" can sue for breach of contract is an idiot, there is no contract to breach.
2) Anyone saying "bitcoin isn't money" in the USA legal system is also an idiot. Go look up the Trendon Shavers case, lawyers pulled that defense and judge threw it out straight away. When it comes down to it, the assigned judge decides what is money, not some random lawyer or internet trolls take on the lack of written law. DPR case has also had that defense thrown out. It's safe to say if this ever made a court the "bitcoin is not money" defense would yet again be tossed out as it has been in every single other BTC related case.
The above are facts, rather than opinions, you can verify for yourself.
2) Anyone saying "bitcoin isn't money" in the USA legal system is also an idiot. Go look up the Trendon Shavers case, lawyers pulled that defense and judge threw it out straight away. When it comes down to it, the assigned judge decides what is money, not some random lawyer or internet trolls take on the lack of written law. DPR case has also had that defense thrown out. It's safe to say if this ever made a court the "bitcoin is not money" defense would yet again be tossed out as it has been in every single other BTC related case.
The above are facts, rather than opinions, you can verify for yourself.
+1
you wont need to to a 51% attack....get everyone mining it to raise difficulty to a high level then leave...it is simple but not enough people interested..carry on whining
1) There is no legally binding contract, this was confirmed by richie. It is an completely informal gentleman's agreement (at best) between "Dev"/Bittrex. Anyone saying the "dev" can sue for breach of contract is an idiot, there is no contract to breach.
2) Anyone saying "bitcoin isn't money" in the USA legal system is also an idiot. Go look up the Trendon Shavers case, lawyers pulled that defense and judge threw it out straight away. When it comes down to it, the assigned judge decides what is money, not some random lawyer or internet trolls take on the lack of written law. DPR case has also had that defense thrown out. It's safe to say if this ever made a court the "bitcoin is not money" defense would yet again be tossed out as it has been in every single other BTC related case.
The above are facts, rather than opinions, you can verify for yourself.
2) Anyone saying "bitcoin isn't money" in the USA legal system is also an idiot. Go look up the Trendon Shavers case, lawyers pulled that defense and judge threw it out straight away. When it comes down to it, the assigned judge decides what is money, not some random lawyer or internet trolls take on the lack of written law. DPR case has also had that defense thrown out. It's safe to say if this ever made a court the "bitcoin is not money" defense would yet again be tossed out as it has been in every single other BTC related case.
The above are facts, rather than opinions, you can verify for yourself.
there is still only 1 address mining this coin...the devs... it will only take 1.5TH to do a 51% attack...if everyone started mining for 15 mins if would raise difficulty level up so dev would be unable to keep the blockchain going..you would end up with a non syncing wallet and maybe a better chance of a refund
good idea, who can help us to 51% attack this shit coin blockchain, tks. If the blockchain not working, we will get refund
Guys.. Let's focus on the task at hand. Namely fucking over the ClusterCoinDev's plans at early retirement. I don't give a shit if he has a solid deal. I think he's a douchebag who deserves to get shivved.
Contracts are made to be pretty mechanical in nature. That is why they are there.
You thinking that Bittrex can just step in and say "nope, were not honoring the contract" is foolish at best.
Contracts are declared void due to misrepresentation all the time.
We're at a stage where you have no idea at all what you're talking about, so I'm moving on.
Bitcycle,
"Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." –Mark Twain
I better not be one of the stupid people youre referring to, I hope that is not the case.
i tell ya that
stop trolling a serious conversation!!
who the hell you calling stupid?
Who the hell are you?
Make a point or get the hell out of here weirdo.
Who the hell are you?
Make a point or get the hell out of here weirdo.
Contracts are made to be pretty mechanical in nature. That is why they are there.
You thinking that Bittrex can just step in and say "nope, were not honoring the contract" is foolish at best.
Contracts are declared void due to misrepresentation all the time.
We're at a stage where you have no idea at all what you're talking about, so I'm moving on.
Yeah, you move on my friend.
You are out of you're league here, sorry for your loss
Pretty weak exit btw
Try to have some class
Contracts are made to be pretty mechanical in nature. That is why they are there.
You thinking that Bittrex can just step in and say "nope, were not honoring the contract" is foolish at best.
Contracts are declared void due to misrepresentation all the time.
We're at a stage where you have no idea at all what you're talking about, so I'm moving on.
LOL that might be a good idea for you to bow out here yes
you just got schooled LMFAO
To act like youre leaving because someone else doesn't know what they are talking about is so funny
You ever make it past the 8th grade lol
their is nothing that Bittrex can do here.
This won't be any more true the 100th time you say it.
BTW, I have no money at stake in this instance. But I'm tired of scammers, and action needs to be taken to stop them whenever possible.
It's possible here.
You clearly don't understand how the law works
NO, Nothing can be done here or Bittrex would have done something to help there customers. Don't you think?
Jump to: