You explain to me how they can do that and still be called a real escrow service?
Sure. It's very simple.
If one of the parties in the escrow has not been acting in good faith, they cancel the whole thing, which means returning the BTC to the market.
A completely legitimate decision.
Again, this is not a mechanical process, no matter how much you try to represent it as such.
You clearly don't understand how an escrow works.
There are terms. If those terms are met, the terms are met.
It's very simple. Like I said, it's really easy for smart people to all of a sudden have clouded thinking when they stand to lose money.
There really is no opinion to he had here. We are dealing in plain facts. Bittrex can't break the terms of the agreement because of facts outside of the agreement have come to light.
We are dealing in facts here. There is no disputing them. It's black and white if you like it or not.
No, that's no how an escrow works. You're simply wrong.
It's not a mechanical process. It wasn't the first time you said it, and it's still not.
Contracts are made to be pretty mechanical in nature. That is why they are there.
You thinking that Bittrex can just step in and say "nope, were not honoring the contract" is foolish at best.
