Topic: Unmoderated XC thread - page 38. (Read 57227 times)

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:59:09 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

It finally all fits like puzzle pieces.

The dev paid loljosh .7/.8 btc to make a x11 coin for him, see pics for proof.

Since loljosh made it, that's why the dev didn't use github, see github for proof.

Also why there isn't any shred of evidence of a working anonymity system, see the coin itself for proof.

Must Read

Quote from: Joshuar on May 31, 2014, 07:04:48 PM

More Random FUD

MrWhale,

Since you don't seem to have any understanding of what the term "trustless" means, I'll explain it to you. It's impossible to do trustless mixing with the way XC works.

It's obvious that it's just a normal mixer that was implemented in a decentralized way. So it must work like this:

1.) Your client connects to a mixer node
2.) Your client sends money to the mixer node, then asks it to send money to another address
3.) Your money gets deposited into the mixers pool of funds
4.) Then the miner sends out the money to the address you specified

The problem is the node doesn't have to send the money, then you've just lost the money you sent. What if I ran a node and messed with the code to collect money but not send any out?

Darksend is "trustless" because it requires signatures from everyone involved to make the transaction valid. There is no opportunity to lose money at any point during the process.

The testnet is functioning as it should the last block has been found literally 2 seconds ago, your theory isn't true, I am afraid.

Read the above comment please, your coin, XC, is not trustless, aka, your XC can be stolen from the true dev(loljosh) if he was malicious.

Good luck with being a DRK bagholder sir, I won't discuss interesting matters with an ignorant troll.

Ok, goodluck with you as well, I hope your XC will not be stolen by the dev since it's not a trustless system, but goodluck.

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 07:02:50 PM

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:59:09 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

It finally all fits like puzzle pieces.

The dev paid loljosh .7/.8 btc to make a x11 coin for him, see pics for proof.

Since loljosh made it, that's why the dev didn't use github, see github for proof.

Also why there isn't any shred of evidence of a working anonymity system, see the coin itself for proof.

Must Read

Quote from: battbot on May 31, 2014, 07:03:26 PM

More Random FUD

MrWhale,

Since you don't seem to have any understanding of what the term "trustless" means, I'll explain it to you. It's impossible to do trustless mixing with the way XC works.

It's obvious that it's just a normal mixer that was implemented in a decentralized way. So it must work like this:

1.) Your client connects to a mixer node
2.) Your client sends money to the mixer node, then asks it to send money to another address
3.) Your money gets deposited into the mixers pool of funds
4.) Then the miner sends out the money to the address you specified

The problem is the node doesn't have to send the money, then you've just lost the money you sent. What if I ran a node and messed with the code to collect money but not send any out?

Darksend is "trustless" because it requires signatures from everyone involved to make the transaction valid. There is no opportunity to lose money at any point during the process.

The testnet is functioning as it should the last block has been found literally 2 seconds ago, your theory isn't true, I am afraid.

Read the above comment please, your coin, XC, is not trustless, aka, your XC can be stolen from the true dev(loljosh) if he was malicious.

Good luck with being a DRK bagholder sir, I won't discuss interesting matters with an ignorant troll.

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

XC testnet blockexplorer seems to be up again, for those interested: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

now the trolls are quiet because they can't think of anything else, than wrong code etc. this pretty much confirms the code is real.

Joshuar

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

eidoo wallet

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 07:02:50 PM

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:59:09 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

It finally all fits like puzzle pieces.

The dev paid loljosh .7/.8 btc to make a x11 coin for him, see pics for proof.

Since loljosh made it, that's why the dev didn't use github, see github for proof.

Also why there isn't any shred of evidence of a working anonymity system, see the coin itself for proof.

Must Read

More Random FUD

MrWhale,

Since you don't seem to have any understanding of what the term "trustless" means, I'll explain it to you. It's impossible to do trustless mixing with the way XC works.

It's obvious that it's just a normal mixer that was implemented in a decentralized way. So it must work like this:

1.) Your client connects to a mixer node
2.) Your client sends money to the mixer node, then asks it to send money to another address
3.) Your money gets deposited into the mixers pool of funds
4.) Then the miner sends out the money to the address you specified

The problem is the node doesn't have to send the money, then you've just lost the money you sent. What if I ran a node and messed with the code to collect money but not send any out?

Darksend is "trustless" because it requires signatures from everyone involved to make the transaction valid. There is no opportunity to lose money at any point during the process.

The testnet is functioning as it should the last block has been found literally 2 seconds ago, your theory isn't true, I am afraid.

Read the above comment please, your coin, XC, is not trustless, aka, your XC can be stolen from the true dev(loljosh) if he was malicious.

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

XC testnet blockexplorer seems to be up again, for those interested: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:59:09 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

It finally all fits like puzzle pieces.

The dev paid loljosh .7/.8 btc to make a x11 coin for him, see pics for proof.

Since loljosh made it, that's why the dev didn't use github, see github for proof.

Also why there isn't any shred of evidence of a working anonymity system, see the coin itself for proof.

Must Read

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:59:09 PM

More Random FUD

MrWhale,

Since you don't seem to have any understanding of what the term "trustless" means, I'll explain it to you. It's impossible to do trustless mixing with the way XC works.

It's obvious that it's just a normal mixer that was implemented in a decentralized way. So it must work like this:

1.) Your client connects to a mixer node
2.) Your client sends money to the mixer node, then asks it to send money to another address
3.) Your money gets deposited into the mixers pool of funds
4.) Then the miner sends out the money to the address you specified

The problem is the node doesn't have to send the money, then you've just lost the money you sent. What if I ran a node and messed with the code to collect money but not send any out?

Darksend is "trustless" because it requires signatures from everyone involved to make the transaction valid. There is no opportunity to lose money at any point during the process.

The testnet is functioning as it should the last block has been found literally 2 seconds ago, your theory isn't true, I am afraid.

Joshuar

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

eidoo wallet

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

It finally all fits like puzzle pieces.

The dev paid loljosh .7/.8 btc to make a x11 coin for him, see pics for proof.

Since loljosh made it, that's why the dev didn't use github, see github for proof.

Also why there isn't any shred of evidence of a working anonymity system, see the coin itself for proof.

Must Read

More Random FUD

MrWhale,

Since you don't seem to have any understanding of what the term "trustless" means, I'll explain it to you. It's impossible to do trustless mixing with the way XC works.

It's obvious that it's just a normal mixer that was implemented in a decentralized way. So it must work like this:

1.) Your client connects to a mixer node
2.) Your client sends money to the mixer node, then asks it to send money to another address
3.) Your money gets deposited into the mixers pool of funds
4.) Then the miner sends out the money to the address you specified

The problem is the node doesn't have to send the money, then you've just lost the money you sent. What if I ran a node and messed with the code to collect money but not send any out?

Darksend is "trustless" because it requires signatures from everyone involved to make the transaction valid. There is no opportunity to lose money at any point during the process.

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

It finally all fits like puzzle pieces.

The dev paid loljosh .7/.8 btc to make a x11 coin for him, see pics for proof.

Since loljosh made it, that's why the dev didn't use github, see github for proof.

Also why there isn't any shred of evidence of a working anonymity system, see the coin itself for proof.

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

Joshuar

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

eidoo wallet

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

It finally all fits like puzzle pieces.

The dev paid loljosh .7/.8 btc to make a x11 coin for him, see pics for proof.

Since loljosh made it, that's why the dev didn't use github, see github for proof.

Also why there isn't any shred of evidence of a working anonymity system, see the coin itself for proof.

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 06:55:05 PM

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

its working again, you can check on my timezone +1 GMT.
http://www.imgur.com/dQAPCTB

Propulsion

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

The Buck Stops Here.

So let me get this straight? XC's only proof at anonymity is a youtube video?

A testnet block explorer and Transaction ID of said "Anonymous Transaction" still have not been provided.

Finally the dev has never addressed why he paid loljosh to make the coin. Speaking on that, why is the dev not able to use github? See what I'm implying is: Surely if this great XC dev can make a 100% anonymous currency, he would be able to use github and not pay loljosh to clone a coin.

Joshuar

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

eidoo wallet

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:45:09 PM

Quote from: Joshuar on May 31, 2014, 06:44:36 PM

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:40:15 PM

Quote from: Joshuar on May 31, 2014, 06:44:36 PM

The testnet block explorer was up for hours and verified by comm members:
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26yubh/block_explorer_for_yesterdays_test/

The only reason it was taken down is because testing is now over for the new wallet release tomorrow.

So by reading the timestamps in the reddit thread, the block explorer was active for around an hour then taken down? Hard to verify anything within an hour. What's the use of it if it was just active for an hour or perhaps not even up at all since everyone complains in that thread that it didn't work.

This, +1. Those "XC Guys" are just trying to get new bagholders to buy in so they can cash out...Don't be fooled

mmmmmmh, that pretty funny actually. Here look: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

You know what's even more funny.. This..

The site is not up, who are you trying to fool..

lol it was up for a very short period of time.

Hmm, must of been in the milliseconds range..

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:40:15 PM

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 31, 2014, 06:40:15 PM

The testnet block explorer was up for hours and verified by comm members:
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26yubh/block_explorer_for_yesterdays_test/

The only reason it was taken down is because testing is now over for the new wallet release tomorrow.

So by reading the timestamps in the reddit thread, the block explorer was active for around an hour then taken down? Hard to verify anything within an hour. What's the use of it if it was just active for an hour or perhaps not even up at all since everyone complains in that thread that it didn't work.

This, +1. Those "XC Guys" are just trying to get new bagholders to buy in so they can cash out...Don't be fooled

mmmmmmh, that pretty funny actually. Here look: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

You know what's even more funny.. This..

The site is not up, who are you trying to fool..

lol it was up for a very short period of time.

Joshuar

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

eidoo wallet

The testnet block explorer was up for hours and verified by comm members:
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26yubh/block_explorer_for_yesterdays_test/

The only reason it was taken down is because testing is now over for the new wallet release tomorrow.

So by reading the timestamps in the reddit thread, the block explorer was active for around an hour then taken down? Hard to verify anything within an hour. What's the use of it if it was just active for an hour or perhaps not even up at all since everyone complains in that thread that it didn't work.

This, +1. Those "XC Guys" are just trying to get new bagholders to buy in so they can cash out...Don't be fooled

mmmmmmh, that pretty funny actually. Here look: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

You know what's even more funny.. This..

The site is not up, who are you trying to fool..

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

The testnet block explorer was up for hours and verified by comm members:
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26yubh/block_explorer_for_yesterdays_test/

The only reason it was taken down is because testing is now over for the new wallet release tomorrow.

So by reading the timestamps in the reddit thread, the block explorer was active for around an hour then taken down? Hard to verify anything within an hour. What's the use of it if it was just active for an hour or perhaps not even up at all since everyone complains in that thread that it didn't work.

This, +1. Those "XC Guys" are just trying to get new bagholders to buy in so they can cash out...Don't be fooled

mmmmmmh, that pretty funny actually. Here look: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

Joshuar

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

eidoo wallet

The testnet block explorer was up for hours and verified by comm members:
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26yubh/block_explorer_for_yesterdays_test/

The only reason it was taken down is because testing is now over for the new wallet release tomorrow.

So by reading the timestamps in the reddit thread, the block explorer was active for around an hour then taken down? Hard to verify anything within an hour. What's the use of it if it was just active for an hour or perhaps not even up at all since everyone complains in that thread that it didn't work.

This, +1. Those "XC Guys" are just trying to get new bagholders to buy in so they can cash out...Don't be fooled

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000