Topic: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Hardfork block 1042000 - Merge Mine w/BTC! - page 359. (Read 1047157 times)

guess they both are:

$ unobtanium-cli validateaddress uRqH3DEpoZDNm3HLpDBpZ7fqQX3YmGyWez
{
    "isvalid" : true,
    "address" : "uRqH3DEpoZDNm3HLpDBpZ7fqQX3YmGyWez",
    "scriptPubKey" : "76a9144b9fbc9ed9d3d24f08770d22bbb1faa0400f832488ac",
    "ismine" : true,
    "iswatchonly" : false,
    "isscript" : false,
    "pubkey" : "03cce8007a92987c48b42c0db33bc8d193ba4bff7031a7ede3708b5a7ba7348c98",
    "iscompressed" : true
}
$ unobtanium-cli validateaddress ufNnML1Yz4jWN1ykkDuWZPZx5iaiAp4Fc5
{
    "isvalid" : true,
    "address" : "ufNnML1Yz4jWN1ykkDuWZPZx5iaiAp4Fc5",
    "scriptPubKey" : "76a914e02ebc4b85cecb4420700b8fb89653e3b6489e7888ac",
    "ismine" : true,
    "iswatchonly" : false,
    "isscript" : false,
    "pubkey" : "035b8dd664a641a4cd9f92ebf1d3b3db5da4b2978aac0698ce74c5261c8b2a9e5f",
    "iscompressed" : true
}

Thanks. I'll get that updated.

So ufNnML1Yz4jWN1ykkDuWZPZx5iaiAp4Fc5 isn''t yours? I found in the generation value in blocks listed as mined by xpool at https://www.xpool.ca/blocks/UNO  Maybe you reinstalled a wallet or something.

thanks for hanging in there with us. I truly appreciate it.

uRqH3DEpoZDNm3HLpDBpZ7fqQX3YmGyWez is xpool.ca

http://www.xpool.ca/blocks/UNO

Noo-Wallet Info posted on Twitter, Reddit Unobtanium, and Cryptocointalk

Price is the key indicator. At .0115 this morning.

Ian and I will be in the Unobtanium-Paper-Wallet Development Facility -- aka, his kitchen -- later this morning.

8bitcoder, you are a legend; and welcome to John.

Go, us!!

IMZ Mark

Here are the major Uno miners that the rockchain has revealed. We don't know all of their names, but we can see the addresses they are mining to. There are at least 8 that are putting up some decent hash, and I am also discovering a few solo miners.  4 of the pools are unknown.

If any pools want to claim the addresses, let me know.  Being listed in the extraction chart is free publicity. If I have made any mistakes here, I'd be glad to correct them.

uRqH3DEpoZDNm3HLpDBpZ7fqQX3YmGyWez - xpool (confirmed)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?uRqH3DEpoZDNm3HLpDBpZ7fqQX3YmGyWez.htm

ufNnML1Yz4jWN1ykkDuWZPZx5iaiAp4Fc5 (xpool.ca confirmed)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?ufNnML1Yz4jWN1ykkDuWZPZx5iaiAp4Fc5.htm

uKS2r2f6Gm5eGZmkpbjxcdoTnZqtX2zLbT   - mmpool?
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?uKS2r2f6Gm5eGZmkpbjxcdoTnZqtX2zLbT.htm

uMMpGeLg4t34HHNjHxHQiHvkhWLPsxUBnD - Give-me-coins.com
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?uMMpGeLg4t34HHNjHxHQiHvkhWLPsxUBnD.htm

uNabfcvmAf1sDt3uuC9EU4wGFQznS1Keyy - ispace.co.uk
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?uNabfcvmAf1sDt3uuC9EU4wGFQznS1Keyy.htm

ug9fMRQ8Re6ruoy64QqezRQPbwR8oQtWQ2 - 1 unknown
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?ug9fMRQ8Re6ruoy64QqezRQPbwR8oQtWQ2.htm

uSXJidkK3iRR7dvMSnZDFuRgxX4FPyLVLR  2 unknown
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?uSXJidkK3iRR7dvMSnZDFuRgxX4FPyLVLR.htm

uQHi71TxcqrVmPkF9AedU2JycWk4hQ6S7z - 3 unknown
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?uQHi71TxcqrVmPkF9AedU2JycWk4hQ6S7z.htm

uaS6ZBtWVFNQvR3g9ZNxiX54aWX6johcHH  4 unknown
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/address.dws?uaS6ZBtWVFNQvR3g9ZNxiX54aWX6johcHH.htm




Solo Miners with recent blocks?

uQHi71TxcqrVmPkF9AedU2JycWk4hQ6S7z

Thanks for the update.  I'll keep an eye out here for info.

Unknown is not one pool, but several.

I have working with Chainz to see if we can identify, or at least break out some of the bigger miners.
So far we have been able to id xpool, give-me-coins, and mmpool.  I have collected addresses for several others, and maybe we'll be able soon to id by payout address (if not by name) so we can at least get a picture of the mining distribution.

I'm planning to mine at all of the known pools. I'm currently on mmpool. I like that the setup is easy and I can download the coins I mine.  The recently found 4 bitcoin blocks in a week, but historically they seem to find about 1 per month. I'm ok with waiting, because it's fun to suddenly get a big payment. mmpool has also been very active here.  

In the merge mine world there are different approaches... some do the conversion of the mm coins directly to bitcoin or other supported payout coins. I prefer the Uno fairy dust, but not everyone does.

Hello all....

Has anyone found any updated info on which pool is the unknown one listed here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/#!extraction??

I'd like to be able to mine, and not be part of a pool that takes weeks to just find one block.

Thanks.

Ok, Squeeky Wheels...  today is your day.

8bitcoder, a good friend of the Unobtanium community, has compiled a 32-bit wallet for you.

http://unobtanium.uno/download/Unobtanium-0.10b-Win.zip
This will become the primary wallet download for Uno until further notice.

The 64bit wallet has been renamed and moved to http://unobtanium.uno/download/Unobtanium-0.10b-Win64.zip

I have tested the 32bit wallet and it works fine for me.  Based on our previous experience with 8bitcoder, his trusted position as the dev of Myriad coin and the green virus total results, I've already added it to Unobtanium.uno

Show 8bitcoder your appreciation for both 32 and 64 bit wallets by sending a tip to his Uno address, uZSab1bmd3Rbr3zYGHjP1GQ2sbqqjFvtNG

Let me know if you experience any problems.

--
+1 to Learminer's comments.

Thanks to those who have already stepped up to offer your talents to the Uno community the past month. Dispite the stumble, May was transformative for Uno in many powerful ways.  I invite anyone who has skills (marketing, technical, Linux, coding, development, etc) to get active and make good things happen for Uno.

It wasn't possible to predict both devs would be unresponsive/indisposed at the same time. Very inconvenient. I hope I don't spill any secrets when i say that FK actually did prepare a contingency plan, but that fell through too, so there really was a lot of bad luck involved! Anyway, he has been busting his ass making things right and has already achieved much. Please don't forget we're all volunteers, doing this on our own time. This is not meant as an excuse, errors were made, but that is human.

As you can see by the addition of CaptChadd we're already actively recruiting additional devs for UNO, so that the work can get better distributed and we don't get into situations again where we rely on the availability of a single person. This is only the beginning, and everybody is invited to do his or her part in making the future UNO even better than the past...

As for the 32bit people, it won't be long, I'm fairly sure of that!


Slightly OT:
I actually tried setting up a Windows dev environment to compile the wallets - it was worth an attempt but I failed. Tracking down all the dependencies in their required versions is already hard, when the error messages just wouldn't go away and google couldn't help I gave up. Really made me appreciate the great tools for dependency management, deployment etc. that I've got for my webdev jobs, so much more comfortable. I'll keep looking for a good guide to try again.

yes, lets vilify everyone who has had their uno shanghai'd by terrible dev conduct.


at you 32bit guys, i wish i could assist - i really do.

IME, its the squeaky wheels that get the grease.

go right to the source, make your feelings heard but remain mature & polite.


this among other things should NOT have been overlooked!!

Man gotta game! Man gotta game!

I KNOW!  It's like . . .  people are still using Windows!!??

you're not missing anything, it is blowing my mind too. 

Wow... April 2015 and people still have 32 bit Windows? Just... why? That's like complaining someone isn't making an Apple ][gs version of the wallet, either. Where's my ProDOS Uno-wallet!!?>!

You're not missing anything.  What can we do, but be patient and wait.  Along these lines - I sent 40 $UNO from Bittrex to Coins-e exchange that haven't arrived for more than a week.  I assume it's related to this issue.

Hang in there.

Dawn here. Gonna read every single link this morning.

@ SirSmokes: thanks for your thoughts. No. Wasn't over-thinking it. The problem is very real.

" . . . if bitcoin can be derailed by one individual, better it happen now than 10 years later."

+1

I'm having the same problem, MichaelNZ. It seems that the "developers" created a hard fork but didn't provide a Win 32 wallet along with it. That's completely mind-blowing to me, as Win 32 wallets were being used by many people I'm sure. Unless I'm missing something . . .

@ MichaelNZ

The wallet won't fully sync because the newer wallet version is a fork, and as far as I know there isn't a 32-bit Windows version yet.


EDIT: The only temporary solution that I know off the top of my head is to run a 64-bit VMware image or similar, and honestly that isn't a great solution. :/