Thanks for that back-up, B.C. One the one hand, knowledge is power. But there's a phenomenon in libertarian political dynamics that I have seen over decades: at about this point in a project, there's the temptation to over-reach (humans prefer novelty to endurance . . . ).
Let's not go there!!!
m
Topic: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Hardfork block 1042000 - Merge Mine w/BTC! - page 539. (Read 1047042 times)
January 01, 2015, 09:09:06 PM
January 01, 2015, 09:06:55 PM
BEFORE
AFTER
(It's like being tarred and feathered, except he does it to himself.)
(It's like being tarred and feathered, except he does it to himself.) 
January 01, 2015, 08:29:32 PM
Is the chain still alive? (Wow -- not much information available)
Baby baby steps: taking on a 'new' coin risks diluting Uno; but discussion is worth having (IMHO)
M
agree dont want to dilute $UNOBaby baby steps: taking on a 'new' coin risks diluting Uno; but discussion is worth having (IMHO)
M
downloaded parallel wallet and it couldn't connect to anything...
January 01, 2015, 07:54:23 PM
Is the chain still alive? (Wow -- not much information available)
Baby baby steps: taking on a 'new' coin risks diluting Uno; but discussion is worth having (IMHO)
M
Baby baby steps: taking on a 'new' coin risks diluting Uno; but discussion is worth having (IMHO)
M
January 01, 2015, 06:31:13 PM
paralellcoin was Blazr-style fair launch and nothing wrong with it.
Only 'problems' were: did not attract pump and dumpers or hype because came without much bells and whistles, no roadmap and not much glitter. So it wasn't pumped and dumped and trex delisted it. So fuckin' what?
I'd strongly recommend to get it back on smaller exchange and raise it from there. And note for the future: if you have a serious longterm coin do not list at bittrex only.
I hope that chain is still alive.
Other coins just have too much problems attached to them to make any use of them. If you want a clean coin go to uncle Blazr2 - you don't get fair coins in other places. Period.
Only 'problems' were: did not attract pump and dumpers or hype because came without much bells and whistles, no roadmap and not much glitter. So it wasn't pumped and dumped and trex delisted it. So fuckin' what?
I'd strongly recommend to get it back on smaller exchange and raise it from there. And note for the future: if you have a serious longterm coin do not list at bittrex only.
I hope that chain is still alive.
Other coins just have too much problems attached to them to make any use of them. If you want a clean coin go to uncle Blazr2 - you don't get fair coins in other places. Period.
January 01, 2015, 05:46:39 PM
potato-trader lmao!
Big isn't that good.
Why was parallel coin not good? Because trex delisted it? Are you serious? Get parallel coin back on another exchange. Trex is only good for a week - they don't help new coins to come up. They always delist markets before mature. All they have is pump and dumps.
german thread will be bumped so noobs with no english skills will know where to go
Big isn't that good.
Why was parallel coin not good? Because trex delisted it? Are you serious? Get parallel coin back on another exchange. Trex is only good for a week - they don't help new coins to come up. They always delist markets before mature. All they have is pump and dumps.
german thread will be bumped so noobs with no english skills will know where to go
January 01, 2015, 05:21:14 PM
You guys crack me up!! Evil Potato Man will haunt my dreams.
@ merged-mining Big: had a look. Nuh.
" There are three separate storage sites for the reserves. One private location, one bank deposit box, and one gold vault facility which is independently audited yearly. Based on this coins progression we will also submit ourselves to an independent audit by a CPA firm on yearly basis. Our parent company who has provided the working capital for this project will require us to be audited anyway."
If you're gonna launch a pegged coin, then the details of the resource, right down to the annual maintenance costs, should be public and verifiable. The statement made here only arouses suspicion.
@ Deutsch spraken-ers: I noticed that almost all the folks on the German-language thread post here. Bless you for your bi-linguality. ('Mono-lingualism' is a sad weakness of Australian culture.)
My point is: if you guys want to set up a P-WIP facility for German speakers, in Euros (or Deutschmarks by the end of this year -- hell, who knows?!), that would be a great idea. During one of the earlier 'manual exchange' experiments -- Un-Ex is the 5th! -- we 'X-WIPped' coin (crypto-to-crypto) with South Koreans; and it went quite well.
@ merged-mining Big: had a look. Nuh.
" There are three separate storage sites for the reserves. One private location, one bank deposit box, and one gold vault facility which is independently audited yearly. Based on this coins progression we will also submit ourselves to an independent audit by a CPA firm on yearly basis. Our parent company who has provided the working capital for this project will require us to be audited anyway."
If you're gonna launch a pegged coin, then the details of the resource, right down to the annual maintenance costs, should be public and verifiable. The statement made here only arouses suspicion.
@ Deutsch spraken-ers: I noticed that almost all the folks on the German-language thread post here. Bless you for your bi-linguality. ('Mono-lingualism' is a sad weakness of Australian culture.)
My point is: if you guys want to set up a P-WIP facility for German speakers, in Euros (or Deutschmarks by the end of this year -- hell, who knows?!), that would be a great idea. During one of the earlier 'manual exchange' experiments -- Un-Ex is the 5th! -- we 'X-WIPped' coin (crypto-to-crypto) with South Koreans; and it went quite well.
January 01, 2015, 05:01:17 PM
lol
the evil potatoe-man ; a new meme for uno
i think not to worry, just to chill out. Maybe potato wants to sell more cheap coins? Why not let him sell cheap?
January 01, 2015, 04:41:40 PM
He gives us a time and chance to buy very cheap. Thanks for that.
I wonder how much ammunition this potatohead guy have left?
January 01, 2015, 04:27:06 PM
"Potatoes man" style Dumperamero is still active on Cryptsy .
Is that the market genius that sells 69 UNO at a time?
Z
January 01, 2015, 04:19:33 PM
"Potatoes man" style Dumperamero is still active on Cryptsy .
Is that the market genius that sells 69 UNO at a time?
Z
January 01, 2015, 04:17:30 PM
"Potatoes man" style Dumperamero is still active on Cryptsy .
January 01, 2015, 02:00:05 AM
" In short, you can sell your "cold stored Equity" via DVC."
PM sent. But to make it simple:
250 Uno at a time are 'frozen.' Thus, the 'distributed vault' contains both Uno and silver. 10 DVC are issued for the 250.
We can 'unpack' DVC if needs be -- don't forget that we already have a hefty 'redundancy': there are only 26 ozs' worth of DVC in circulation, but 36 ozs in the vault.
But let us use no further terms, nor allow further complications -- or people simply won't bother.
Uno-in-chunks are 'frozen'; DVC are issued; the possiblity of 'unpacking' is always there.
PM sent. But to make it simple:
250 Uno at a time are 'frozen.' Thus, the 'distributed vault' contains both Uno and silver. 10 DVC are issued for the 250.
We can 'unpack' DVC if needs be -- don't forget that we already have a hefty 'redundancy': there are only 26 ozs' worth of DVC in circulation, but 36 ozs in the vault.
But let us use no further terms, nor allow further complications -- or people simply won't bother.
Uno-in-chunks are 'frozen'; DVC are issued; the possiblity of 'unpacking' is always there.
January 01, 2015, 12:45:04 AM
2. send UNO to new address
3. publish address +How long you pledge not to touch
This is exactly what I've been meaning to propose for months. Never did get around to it. Stunning, really.3. publish address +How long you pledge not to touch
Needless to say, I think this is an excellent idea! Let's do it in March/April.
I like April. 1st or 3rd or 11th or 15th or 20th.
Gives us time to consider our personal budgets [cold stores vs trade-ables]. April 15th might be the easiest to remember and can segway to bi-monthly new entry dates. eg. June15th, Aug15th, Oct15th, Dec15th, Feb15th, April15th.
Also the DVC side needs to be plotted out, terms and conditions. In short, you can sell your "cold stored Equity" via DVC. And buy it back. The tricky part is on custody since the funds are frozen and it makes no sense to thaw them out. So the issuer is the holder "custodian/trustee" but title is transferred by DVC.
My attempt at making sense or nonsense
So it is like buying a future (stock option)? The DVC should be priced in the 1:10 range? 10DVC equity = 1uno :: buy DVC for 0.1uno and redeem or settle for DVC+0.9uno=1UNO paid by custodian. The buyin price is burned into the DVC.
Redeemer can claim on specific dates and at rate 1uno-minus burned buyin price. All this loopy thinking is to reduce risk in case of bad custodians. Which I don't think is a problem for TTs at this stage but when we expand to 50-200 TTs it will be. Best option, low risk so buy in is 0.01 UNO for top rated TTs and something like 0.0075 new TTs.
1. 1cent on the dollar idea, but pay the remainder on redemption claim.
2. DVC floats on freemarket
3. Some DVC are burned buyin price 0.01 / some burned buyin price 0.0075 plus each is backed by specific custodian (just like FDRs) ... so DVC equity is not fungible they vary on the particulars.
THEORY A ... liens on cold stored UN
Means you can borrow against your cold stored UN. But in this case it makes little sense to allow the debtor to hold his own collateral. This requires transfer to an escrow agent, defeating the cold store principle. But TTs could probally figure a way to create an instrument like this in the future.
THEORY B ... yield generating deposits
Your cold stored UN earns you 'credentials' and receive interest (CDs certificates of deposit).
THEORY C ... stock option
You sell a DVC that grants holder the rights to buy UNO at fixed btc/$ @ fixed date.
THEORY D ... stock option << this is what I suggest we test first
You sell a DVC that grants holder the rights to buy UNO at fixed uno @ fixed date. The end result difference in D & B is little.
THEORY E ... stock option
For most trusted 5star TTs ... they hold your UNO 'in trust' and get a small fee ... BUT this is monitored via the blockchain because they have pledge a large sum for a long time ... so to pay you back they can not touch their 'cold stored sum' ... in essence they are the top rate vault keepers ... on the level with UN stored at exchange houses, or eWallets. You pay them 1.005 UNO -to- 0.995 UNO to get a dvc worth 1uno in the future.
December 31, 2014, 11:40:04 PM
@FK: I don't understand the thing about "get more people with Uno wallets on Bittrex. If you trade there, be sure to create a Uno wallet."
@ Benefactor: woo hoo!! Equity DVC (experiment) in April! I will put up 250 Uno (10 DVC? -- 'redundancy'?)
m
@ Benefactor: woo hoo!! Equity DVC (experiment) in April! I will put up 250 Uno (10 DVC? -- 'redundancy'?)
m
December 31, 2014, 11:01:41 PM
2. send UNO to new address
3. publish address +How long you pledge not to touch
This is exactly what I've been meaning to propose for months. Never did get around to it. Stunning, really.3. publish address +How long you pledge not to touch
Needless to say, I think this is an excellent idea! Let's do it in March/April.
December 31, 2014, 06:47:37 PM
I think UNO will now be safe on Bittrex, but lets not let our guard down. I would like to see more "safety" trades to be certain we nail it hard. If you can help make the market here, close the gap, add a few Un to the buy & sell side, that's really what its going to take.
It would also help get more people with Uno wallets on Bittrex. If you trade there, be sure to create a Uno wallet. And while you're at it, go buy a few.
It would also help get more people with Uno wallets on Bittrex. If you trade there, be sure to create a Uno wallet. And while you're at it, go buy a few.
December 31, 2014, 05:15:59 PM
What's up with adding / removing the 41.27525322 order every 15 seconds on Bittrex?
Is this a flaw in the system or what?
Z
I saw that too, must be a glitch because the BTC volume of $UNO remains unchanged even though that order appears and disappears... Is this a flaw in the system or what?
Z
December 31, 2014, 05:13:51 PM
“Everyone can't be a hodler, or there will be no coins to trade. Please consider putting aside a small portion of your stash for trading, to help keep the market liquid for new buyers.” Yes!!!!
(Tee hee – can that include some capital for the Un-Ex liquidity engine?)
@ Whoever put the volume on Bittrex: thanks kindly. Well done.
@ merged-mining: me reading. Me learning.
I would note that names aren’t so important as the ‘stats’ of the coin we choose as a partner.
m
(Tee hee – can that include some capital for the Un-Ex liquidity engine?)
@ Whoever put the volume on Bittrex: thanks kindly. Well done.
@ merged-mining: me reading. Me learning.
I would note that names aren’t so important as the ‘stats’ of the coin we choose as a partner.
m
December 31, 2014, 05:08:29 PM
What's up with adding / removing the 41.27525322 order every 15 seconds on Bittrex?
Is this a flaw in the system or what?
Z
Is this a flaw in the system or what?
Z
Jump to: