Hypothetically speaking... I don't like hardforking.
Hypothetically speaking... I hope we are at the code is as it will always be stage ... fixed in stone.
But if a soft option was presented and the miners/pools elected a new standard ... well that's fair and square.
Conceptually I like the ring of 300 years more than 100. Legacy. Our mark on the world of what we left behind for future generations.
--
Personally I'd rather throw in a POS (geared towards seednodes) vs. emission acceleration. That would secure the network with certainty.
That said I still think the network is on track, I hear the IMZ call to react, the better effort is to constantly, day by day, increase the UNO base pair markets.
Hypothetically speaking... I hope we are at the code is as it will always be stage ... fixed in stone.
But if a soft option was presented and the miners/pools elected a new standard ... well that's fair and square.
Conceptually I like the ring of 300 years more than 100. Legacy. Our mark on the world of what we left behind for future generations.
--
Personally I'd rather throw in a POS (geared towards seednodes) vs. emission acceleration. That would secure the network with certainty.
That said I still think the network is on track, I hear the IMZ call to react, the better effort is to constantly, day by day, increase the UNO base pair markets.
Sorry, FK & IMZ, but I have to agree with BN.
Changing shit up on a whim loses respect. Just look at ETH.
Wait !
On the other hand; in 25 years time, if changes were limited to the early days, it might not look too bad?
Or, maybe the coin that learns to change and adapt while retaining value wins?
I don't know. My crystal ball is broken. It's definitely worth further discussion.
Z
P.S. Happy Friday!
Height: 899127 - Hike ~ !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR6pxe8jaMs
Unobtanium: Rare, Fair, Vetted.
-- FK
... is psychopath coin
--fyrstikken
}