i don't have a comprehension issue
this is your previous words "They don't allow you to set your own custom seed for auto-rolls except for the first roll." which is very different to what you are saying now "My complaint was that the seed was always changing"
I've made both those statements and they don't contradict each other. In the past you could set a custom seed but after the first roll it would dissapear and they would generate one for you after every roll.
in my view i would rather use a different client seed for every roll, using the same one every roll seems much more likely to be "cheatable"
Putting all your trust on the site is more likely to get you cheated. I'm not saying you should use the same client seed forever, but keeping it the same for a short period has virtually no risk if it's strong and truly random.
the rolls ARE verifiably fair (you can see both the seeds and the server seed hash after each roll in the history) and always have been, so it would easily be found if they ever tried to cheat
It was only provably fair if you trusted the site to give you random seeds when they changed them and not predetermined seeds that would be favorable to them.
the very common misunderstanding is that "0% house edge" and "provably fair" guarantees that you cannot ever lose - this is absolutely untrue!
if it was true, then it would also mean that you cannot ever win - and of course then it would be no fun at all!
You are twisting people's words to fit your narrative. Nobody believes that. People were only shocked that they were encountering massive losing streaks so frequently or their long terms stats were so far off from what would be expected from a zero house edge game.
i've answered most of your points previously, so we'd be going around in circles if i continued.
but i think we are just really looking at it the same way but from slightly different angles
the only thing i'm still confused by is this...
"It was only provably fair if you trusted the site to give you random seeds when they changed them and not predetermined seeds that would be favorable to them."
what roll would be favorable to them?
367? 821? 999???
i'm confident that if you ran millions of rolls and kept tally of the numbers rolled they would be randomly distributed between 000 and 999.
also remember that at the point they give you the seeds they have no idea if you will choose high or low, or which multiplier (2x, 10x etc) you will choose?
so there is no way for them to even know which roll would be favorable to them
and even if they somehow could predict it (based on some clever algorithm), then you have always been able to override the client seed with one of your own.
or you could deliberately "reverse" your roll (i.e. roll high instead of low this time) and you would therefore win instead of losing.
so any sort of prediction algorithm could easily be gamed by a smart gambler to work in their favor, and they would wipe out the bank!
it seems simple to me. other dice/multiplier sites use a house edge to make their profit (e.g. freebitcoin has a 5% house edge but no advertising) whilst coinpot has 0% house edge but uses this to attract lots of players who will drive up advert revenue (this is where their profit comes from)
maybe not you, but there are certainly others who post in this thread with their braindead "proof" that the 0% house edge is not real. but they don't consider that it is to coinpots business advantage to ensure a true 0% house edge to keep gamblers happy and returning every day to drive more advertising revenue. same with the challenges system, it's there to keep people playing and claiming from faucets (and viewing ads)
