Author

Topic: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 152. (Read 433405 times)

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.

well..do you have any POS coin that could do staking on cell/mobile phones?

an android phone is just a linux computer.
you can compile any coin that you can compile on, for example, an ubuntu pc and have all the features.
provided you have enough storage space for the blockchain, that is.

i don`t think you had answered my question about staking

isn't "and have all the features" enough? :-)



i know you can compile any coin that you can compile..my question is: can you compile a POS coin which can staking/minting on cell/mobile phones?if you already do that,please tell me what coin is it,thanks.

I did it with diamond, but I see no reason why it shouldn't work on any linux compilable coin (which are most of them, at least in headless form).
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1000
Peaky Blinder
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.

well..do you have any POS coin that could do staking on cell/mobile phones?

an android phone is just a linux computer.
you can compile any coin that you can compile on, for example, an ubuntu pc and have all the features.
provided you have enough storage space for the blockchain, that is.

i don`t think you had answered my question about staking

isn't "and have all the features" enough? :-)



i know you can compile any coin that you can compile..my question is: can you compile a POS coin which can staking/minting on cell/mobile phones?if you already do that,please tell me what coin is it,thanks.

librex
hero member
Activity: 654
Merit: 500
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.

well..do you have any POS coin that could do staking on cell/mobile phones?

an android phone is just a linux computer.
you can compile any coin that you can compile on, for example, an ubuntu pc and have all the features.
provided you have enough storage space for the blockchain, that is.

i don`t think you had answered my question about staking

isn't "and have all the features" enough? :-)



i know you can compile any coin that you can compile..my question is: can you compile a POS coin which can staking/minting on cell/mobile phones?if you already do that,please tell me what coin is it,thanks.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.

well..do you have any POS coin that could do staking on cell/mobile phones?

an android phone is just a linux computer.
you can compile any coin that you can compile on, for example, an ubuntu pc and have all the features.
provided you have enough storage space for the blockchain, that is.

i don`t think you had answered my question about staking

isn't "and have all the features" enough? :-)
hero member
Activity: 654
Merit: 500
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.

well..do you have any POS coin that could do staking on cell/mobile phones?

an android phone is just a linux computer.
you can compile any coin that you can compile on, for example, an ubuntu pc and have all the features.
provided you have enough storage space for the blockchain, that is.

i don`t think you had answered my question about staking/minting
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.

well..do you have any POS coin that could do staking on cell/mobile phones?

an android phone is just a linux computer.
you can compile any coin that you can compile on, for example, an ubuntu pc and have all the features.
provided you have enough storage space for the blockchain, that is.
hero member
Activity: 654
Merit: 500
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.

well..do you have any POS coin that could do staking on cell/mobile phones?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Do not claim that vanilla is the only coin that can be compiled on other devices like phones.
I myself have compiled more than one coin to my nas and android phone.
Of course it was a headless client but it could share the wallet.dat with my desktop and do everything it's supposed to, including PoS.
hero member
Activity: 654
Merit: 500

This Altcoin world is beyond insane. He didn't expose anyone. It just showed how childish he is. It's not cool, doesn't make sense and has absolutely no benefit for the project.

In the real world nobody would trust this "just a fake, I have the real code" bullshit. Even less if he does it to somehow making fun of other devs on a very strange way (and tbh, the claims of Viz for example were absolutely right. How should he now that John is doing childish shit?).

So, you should grow up. If you want cryptos to play with the big boys, this is not the way how to do business. Might be in your strange developer world, but not in the real world. If your project gets criticized after months of work, improve it. May be hard, but it is the only way.

during the world war2,Russian spy try to steal atomic bomb tech from USA,they did it but it's fake...so they thought USA didn`t actually having the tech of atomic bomb....until they dropped 2 atomic bombs on Japan.....

this is all about strategy.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
This does not make any sense. After talking to John "Who says I am anonymous" Conner, I have sold. I went to trouble to get someone to code review, and there is fake code? It was embarrassing, and I don't even grasp why anyone would do that. This might be the most amazing coin ever, but with him being anon and not wanting anyone else on the team, and being manic depressive, or autistic, or something, it will make things very difficult. Maybe he is a true genius, but these are very bad decisions and they cast too much reasonable doubt about the project. Why would he get more attention after he wasted people's time? That isn't how the world works.

Did you really just diagnose the dev as autistic because you took the initiative to show your friend (Nick Cote?) the code a few months ago and are feeling embarrassed because things didn't pan out the way you wanted it to?

Your projections are your embarrassment.  FPGA mine that...

Edit to add - Regardless of your feelings on how things have occurred, calling out mental illness on someone you know not at all and who is capable of doing something that you aren't is bullshit.


hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
This is getting good now. Will vnl survive.

Also the FUD is getting more intense meanwhile the fattest wallets are still swelling up.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Quote
There are also some false claims such as their staking being more energy efficient, when it is an exact line for line clone of Peercoin, just rewritten in C++ 11.

Videlicet was referring at that time to the code that John Connor had uploaded to github.  John later revealed that it was 'fake' code designed to throw off haters or whatever.

So, videlicet was correct about the code that he saw.  But it turned out that it wasn't the actual code of the coin.  Just a trick to throw off haters/catch people out/waste the time of code reviewers.

No, john was referring to the zerotime test code and fake whitepaper for zerotime, not the committed code that has been open sourced and able to be compiled for some time.


why would a dev post a fake whitepaper / code? fudding his own project? its been bothering me since i read that.

If he's just one person, with the speed he pumps out lines of code, he's truly a genius in my opinion; but sometimes he does things I don't understand, like that.

I believe his reasoning was that he would get a lot of devs to attack him because of obvious flaws and then when the real paper and code were released, they'd have to really look into it.

hmmmm. well its his call, he is the dev, but seems foolish to post fake code, because then you have a 100% chance of bringing FUD to your doorstep.  


But he showed a lot of so called experts were in fact scammy FUDers....you should be calling out them not a John Connor for exposing them....Personally I thought it was a great move. I would do something similar in his position if I had thought of it.

I dont think posting fake code / whitepaper could ever be a "great move" in any situation.


Cause you're just a forum poster who never worked on a project for months to see it attacked by people....like yourself.

Grow up...

This Altcoin world is beyond insane. He didn't expose anyone. It just showed how childish he is. It's not cool, doesn't make sense and has absolutely no benefit for the project.

In the real world nobody would trust this "just a fake, I have the real code" bullshit. Even less if he does it to somehow making fun of other devs on a very strange way (and tbh, the claims of Viz for example were absolutely right. How should he now that John is doing childish shit?).

So, you should grow up. If you want cryptos to play with the big boys, this is not the way how to do business. Might be in your strange developer world, but not in the real world. If your project gets criticized after months of work, improve it. May be hard, but it is the only way.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
Quote
There are also some false claims such as their staking being more energy efficient, when it is an exact line for line clone of Peercoin, just rewritten in C++ 11.

Videlicet was referring at that time to the code that John Connor had uploaded to github.  John later revealed that it was 'fake' code designed to throw off haters or whatever.

So, videlicet was correct about the code that he saw.  But it turned out that it wasn't the actual code of the coin.  Just a trick to throw off haters/catch people out/waste the time of code reviewers.

No, john was referring to the zerotime test code and fake whitepaper for zerotime, not the committed code that has been open sourced and able to be compiled for some time.

why would a dev post a fake whitepaper / code? fudding his own project? its been bothering me since i read that.

If he's just one person, with the speed he pumps out lines of code, he's truly a genius in my opinion; but sometimes he does things I don't understand, like that.

I believe his reasoning was that he would get a lot of devs to attack him because of obvious flaws and then when the real paper and code were released, they'd have to really look into it.

hmmmm. well its his call, he is the dev, but seems foolish to post fake code, because then you have a 100% chance of bringing FUD to your doorstep.  

This does not make any sense. After talking to John "Who says I am anonymous" Conner, I have sold. I went to trouble to get someone to code review, and there is fake code? It was embarrassing, and I don't even grasp why anyone would do that. This might be the most amazing coin ever, but with him being anon and not wanting anyone else on the team, and being manic depressive, or autistic, or something, it will make things very difficult. Maybe he is a true genius, but these are very bad decisions and they cast too much reasonable doubt about the project. Why would he get more attention after he wasted people's time? That isn't how the world works.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 100
Cryptocurrencies since 2013 @cryptoPrecise
We may witness a lot of ETH money to flow into VNL.  
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Just realised ETH has 3500BTC volume on polo. Haha no wonder there is no excitement anywhere else. Shitty gains for that kind of vol too.
Everyone has been waiting for the moment, so they now all have the plans, there is no panic buying, the wave will end soon.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Just realised ETH has 3500BTC volume on polo. Haha no wonder there is no excitement anywhere else. Shitty gains for that kind of vol too.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 100
Cryptocurrencies since 2013 @cryptoPrecise
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
Quote
There are also some false claims such as their staking being more energy efficient, when it is an exact line for line clone of Peercoin, just rewritten in C++ 11.

Videlicet was referring at that time to the code that John Connor had uploaded to github.  John later revealed that it was 'fake' code designed to throw off haters or whatever.

So, videlicet was correct about the code that he saw.  But it turned out that it wasn't the actual code of the coin.  Just a trick to throw off haters/catch people out/waste the time of code reviewers.

No, john was referring to the zerotime test code and fake whitepaper for zerotime, not the committed code that has been open sourced and able to be compiled for some time.

why would a dev post a fake whitepaper / code? fudding his own project? its been bothering me since i read that.

If he's just one person, with the speed he pumps out lines of code, he's truly a genius in my opinion; but sometimes he does things I don't understand, like that.

I believe his reasoning was that he would get a lot of devs to attack him because of obvious flaws and then when the real paper and code were released, they'd have to really look into it.

hmmmm. well its his call, he is the dev, but seems foolish to post fake code, because then you have a 100% chance of bringing FUD to your doorstep.  


But he showed a lot of so called experts were in fact scammy FUDers....you should be calling out them not a John Connor for exposing them....Personally I thought it was a great move. I would do something similar in his position if I had thought of it.

I dont think posting fake code / whitepaper could ever be a "great move" in any situation.


Cause you're just a forum poster who never worked on a project for months to see it attacked by people....like yourself.

Grow up...
full member
Activity: 139
Merit: 100
But he showed a lot of so called experts were in fact scammy FUDers....you should be calling out them not a John Connor for exposing them....Personally I thought it was a great move. I would do something similar in his position if I had thought of it.

What do you mean?  Who did JC expose as a scammy FUDder?
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 100
Cryptocurrencies since 2013 @cryptoPrecise
It has the potential to do a 100x.
Jump to: