my favourite part "Evan gonna try to merge"
lol
http://fs2.directupload.net/images/150806/46oh3upx.jpg
Topic: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 164. (Read 433405 times)
August 06, 2015, 04:50:44 AM
August 06, 2015, 04:23:48 AM
I love the part that says "Evan Duffield you will need to sit down for this."
August 04, 2015, 05:25:18 PM
Meanwhile, in China:
VNL 粉丝(7729203) 4:08:30 PM
You can contact yuanbaohui.Their email is [email protected]
https://yuanbaohui.com/coins
3331763418<[email protected]> 4:08:56 PM
OK
莫名(38630610) 4:09:00 PM
china also love you@statdude
welcome to china
That was a proud moment
VNL 粉丝(7729203) 4:08:30 PM
You can contact yuanbaohui.Their email is [email protected]
https://yuanbaohui.com/coins
3331763418<[email protected]> 4:08:56 PM
OK
莫名(38630610) 4:09:00 PM
china also love you@statdude
welcome to china
That was a proud moment You are the man!
August 06, 2015, 04:16:38 AM
|| live in 1hour ||
4:58:09 PM john-connor-afk I just re-spent the same coins (inputs) 150 times in 5 seconds.
4:58:21 PM john-connor-afk They all went into the next block.
4:58:39 PM john-connor-afk This was across the internet.
4:58:50 PM lalalalavanilla nice john !
4:59:05 PM john-connor-afk I can deploy ZT testnet at any time.
4:59:07 PM lalalalavanilla looking forward to play with it
4:59:50 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
4:59:51 PM john-connor-afk "confirmations": 1,
4:59:52 PM john-connor-afk "blockhash": 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,
4:59:53 PM john-connor-afk "blockindex": -1,
4:59:54 PM john-connor-afk "blocktime": -1,
4:59:58 PM justlookin that is fast
5:00:02 PM john-connor-afk See it’s confirmed but not in a block.
5:00:12 PM MasterChang niice
5:00:36 PM john-connor-afk I’ll deploy in one hour.
5:00:42 PM cstewart good work
5:00:57 PM john-connor-afk August 6th 2015
5:03:50 PM john-connor-afk ZT testnet about to prove smoething
5:04:13 PM john-connor-afk Break it, double spend it fork it, good luck.
5:04:19 PM john-connor-afk “split it”
5:04:24 PM john-connor-afk That is my favorite.
5:04:42 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
5:04:46 PM john-connor-afk ^^
5:05:00 PM najzbajs lol
5:05:29 PM john-connor-afk Evan Duffield you will need to sit down for this.
4:58:09 PM john-connor-afk I just re-spent the same coins (inputs) 150 times in 5 seconds.
4:58:21 PM john-connor-afk They all went into the next block.
4:58:39 PM john-connor-afk This was across the internet.
4:58:50 PM lalalalavanilla nice john !
4:59:05 PM john-connor-afk I can deploy ZT testnet at any time.
4:59:07 PM lalalalavanilla looking forward to play with it
4:59:50 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
4:59:51 PM john-connor-afk "confirmations": 1,
4:59:52 PM john-connor-afk "blockhash": 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,
4:59:53 PM john-connor-afk "blockindex": -1,
4:59:54 PM john-connor-afk "blocktime": -1,
4:59:58 PM justlookin that is fast
5:00:02 PM john-connor-afk See it’s confirmed but not in a block.
5:00:12 PM MasterChang niice
5:00:36 PM john-connor-afk I’ll deploy in one hour.
5:00:42 PM cstewart good work
5:00:57 PM john-connor-afk August 6th 2015
5:03:50 PM john-connor-afk ZT testnet about to prove smoething
5:04:13 PM john-connor-afk Break it, double spend it fork it, good luck.
5:04:19 PM john-connor-afk “split it”
5:04:24 PM john-connor-afk That is my favorite.
5:04:42 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
5:04:46 PM john-connor-afk ^^
5:05:00 PM najzbajs lol
5:05:29 PM john-connor-afk Evan Duffield you will need to sit down for this.
He's simple a magician! Great work!
August 06, 2015, 04:05:23 AM
|| live in 1hour ||
4:58:09 PM john-connor-afk I just re-spent the same coins (inputs) 150 times in 5 seconds.
4:58:21 PM john-connor-afk They all went into the next block.
4:58:39 PM john-connor-afk This was across the internet.
4:58:50 PM lalalalavanilla nice john !
4:59:05 PM john-connor-afk I can deploy ZT testnet at any time.
4:59:07 PM lalalalavanilla looking forward to play with it
4:59:50 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
4:59:51 PM john-connor-afk "confirmations": 1,
4:59:52 PM john-connor-afk "blockhash": 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,
4:59:53 PM john-connor-afk "blockindex": -1,
4:59:54 PM john-connor-afk "blocktime": -1,
4:59:58 PM justlookin that is fast
5:00:02 PM john-connor-afk See it’s confirmed but not in a block.
5:00:12 PM MasterChang niice
5:00:36 PM john-connor-afk I’ll deploy in one hour.
5:00:42 PM cstewart good work
5:00:57 PM john-connor-afk August 6th 2015
5:03:50 PM john-connor-afk ZT testnet about to prove smoething
5:04:13 PM john-connor-afk Break it, double spend it fork it, good luck.
5:04:19 PM john-connor-afk “split it”
5:04:24 PM john-connor-afk That is my favorite.
5:04:42 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
5:04:46 PM john-connor-afk ^^
5:05:00 PM najzbajs lol
5:05:29 PM john-connor-afk Evan Duffield you will need to sit down for this.
4:58:09 PM john-connor-afk I just re-spent the same coins (inputs) 150 times in 5 seconds.
4:58:21 PM john-connor-afk They all went into the next block.
4:58:39 PM john-connor-afk This was across the internet.
4:58:50 PM lalalalavanilla nice john !
4:59:05 PM john-connor-afk I can deploy ZT testnet at any time.
4:59:07 PM lalalalavanilla looking forward to play with it
4:59:50 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
4:59:51 PM john-connor-afk "confirmations": 1,
4:59:52 PM john-connor-afk "blockhash": 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,
4:59:53 PM john-connor-afk "blockindex": -1,
4:59:54 PM john-connor-afk "blocktime": -1,
4:59:58 PM justlookin that is fast
5:00:02 PM john-connor-afk See it’s confirmed but not in a block.
5:00:12 PM MasterChang niice
5:00:36 PM john-connor-afk I’ll deploy in one hour.
5:00:42 PM cstewart good work
5:00:57 PM john-connor-afk August 6th 2015
5:03:50 PM john-connor-afk ZT testnet about to prove smoething
5:04:13 PM john-connor-afk Break it, double spend it fork it, good luck.
5:04:19 PM john-connor-afk “split it”
5:04:24 PM john-connor-afk That is my favorite.
5:04:42 PM john-connor-afk "amount": 420,
5:04:46 PM john-connor-afk ^^
5:05:00 PM najzbajs lol
5:05:29 PM john-connor-afk Evan Duffield you will need to sit down for this.
August 06, 2015, 02:22:53 AM
from another thread
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
John has past experience with million node UDP networks, you can be sure he has read up on what he does. Doubt he would skip solving the problems of UDP that a wikipedia can list also.
He modified it to work with a cryptocurrency networks and it will be lossless.
I dont think it will be lossless as such but the packets will still be functional at small level of discrepancy , I know from hanging around IRC that he is very well aware of the loss of data packets using just UDP and has either gone with the more solid RUDP or maybe a combination of UDP and TCP. i don't know if it's one of those or something i have forgotten, it is similar to maidsafe in a way, which also uses RUDP, for the exact same reason of data packets lost with UDP alone
Yeah, meant lossless as in no real chance of missing data by the recipient.
August 06, 2015, 02:09:49 AM
from another thread
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
John has past experience with million node UDP networks, you can be sure he has read up on what he does. Doubt he would skip solving the problems of UDP that a wikipedia can list also.
He modified it to work with a cryptocurrency networks and it will be lossless.
I dont think it will be lossless as such but the packets will still be functional at small level of discrepancy , I know from hanging around IRC that he is very well aware of the loss of data packets using just UDP and has either gone with the more solid RUDP or maybe a combination of UDP and TCP. i don't know if it's one of those or something i have forgotten, it is similar to maidsafe in a way, which also uses RUDP, for the exact same reason of data packets lost with UDP alone
August 06, 2015, 01:37:31 AM
from another thread
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
John has past experience with million node UDP networks, you can be sure he has read up on what he does. Doubt he would skip solving the problems of UDP that a wikipedia can list also.
He modified it to work with a cryptocurrency networks and it will be lossless.
August 05, 2015, 11:45:07 PM
from another thread
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
John can answer this more in depth, but it's a udp/tcp hybrid approach.
August 05, 2015, 11:26:48 PM
from another thread
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
August 05, 2015, 10:40:28 PM
Sorry, but who gives a F that the Chinese don't like the name? Are we going to change the name to something they like because we want to make them invest? If their investment choices are solely based on the name of this coin I'd rather not have them as an investor, easy as that. Look at the fundamentals of Vanillacoin, hell it could have been called "I love the cock coin" and I'd still be all over it and promoting it. Sorry for speaking so bluntly, but this whole appeasement policy over something as futile as a name gets on my nerves.
ironically, it's actually you who is holding onto the word vanilla and giving it more status than it deserves.
Should we call your bluff and call it I love the cock coin? Then let's see you get all worked up...Bitcoin is global and so thinking globally is par the course. China is half the market...
August 05, 2015, 08:58:48 PM
anyone know why the market is down on bittrex
Market is back up on bittrex. No worries
August 04, 2015, 04:15:16 PM
LOL The acceleration Began = Lightning
This rise is relatively so negligible that I don't even consider it.
August 05, 2015, 08:39:12 PM
They've been taking different wallets down lately.. just for maintenance I think.
Polo's is still up by the way. https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_vnl
Polo's is still up by the way. https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_vnl
August 05, 2015, 08:09:29 PM
well... this is scary.
August 04, 2015, 03:58:38 PM
close enough
Little lift off on Polo!
Could we get to 100k soon?
I was pretty on time with my prediction of the big rise
It hasn't yet begun.
August 05, 2015, 07:35:03 PM
anyone know why the market is down on bittrex
August 05, 2015, 07:17:02 PM
^
If you must. I don't support you and I bet most sr./hero members here won't either. Coins are still just soccer teams to people it seems.
gosh it was just a joke you guys are such serious sook bagsIf you must. I don't support you and I bet most sr./hero members here won't either. Coins are still just soccer teams to people it seems.
I thought it was amusing.
It will just come down to the tech anyway, if VNL has the best tech, it wins by default. Different devs have big egos and strong opinions, but if this works out, those of us holding VNL should be very happy.
August 05, 2015, 06:54:27 PM
^
If you must. I don't support you and I bet most sr./hero members here won't either. Coins are still just soccer teams to people it seems.
gosh it was just a joke you guys are such serious sook bags If you must. I don't support you and I bet most sr./hero members here won't either. Coins are still just soccer teams to people it seems.
August 05, 2015, 06:52:58 PM
^
If you must. I don't support you and I bet most sr./hero members here won't either. Coins are still just soccer teams to people it seems.
If you must. I don't support you and I bet most sr./hero members here won't either. Coins are still just soccer teams to people it seems.
Jump to: