Topic: Up Like Trump - page 176. (Read 572883 times)

Where's Trump stand on the regulation of US PMC's ? Or, indeed, US taxpayers money going towards funding them ?

Or doesn't shit like this warrant discussion in media bubble soundbite land ?

Re. Trump pumping US nationalism. There was an old Scottish NUM (National Union of Mineworkers) top brass called Mick MacGahey. Real tough cookie. Anyhow, only reason I mention him is that he made a great quote regarding nationalism. He said , "Nationalism is a bourgeois distraction from class struggle"

Amen sir.

I'm okay with that.  Better than saying he was getting a lot of public opinion polls - wait, those who do that don't say they are doing it, do they?

So you mean, this guy Trump, he ACTUALLY ADMITS TO THINKING THINGS OUT?

Damn....an actual thinker?

That could be trouble....

Someone smart should run the numbers on that "Islam is peace" campaign.

It is in fact a business.

For example, terrorism definitely jacks up oil prices.

And terrorism acts as a blackmail to keep foreign aid coming.

And it takes a lot of people to keep repeating over and over to the world, "Islam is peace."

Yes. They are savvy about this... terrorism business.

Sad, but as I mentioned previously, these events can be predicted.  When the last Islam terrorist bombing starts to fade from the front pages of the newspapers and news blogs, when it is not a subject of daily emoting by the masses of people, that is when the next one will be done.

Engineering of news by evil Muslims.

Donald Trump : I Was Right Brussels Is a Disaster Fox & Friends Interview 3/22/2016


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cq08jaIAJQ

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3503928/Two-explosions-heard-Brussels-Airport.html


Sad.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-22/dozens-killed-and-injured-after-massive-bomb-explosions-rip-through-belgium-airport-

January 2016 – Donald Trump Warned Brussels, Belgium – The New York Times Mocked Him For It…




It was January 27th when Donald Trump gave a stark warning to Brussels Belgium, and the New York Times mocked him for it:


(January 27th New York Times) […] Asked by the Fox Business Network anchor Maria Bartiromo about the feasibility of his proposal to bar foreign Muslims from entering the United States, Mr. Trump argued that Belgium and France had been blighted by the failure of Muslims in these countries to integrate.

“There is something going on, Maria,” he said. “Go to Brussels. Go to Paris. Go to different places. There is something going on and it’s not good, where they want Shariah law, where they want this, where they want things that — you know, there has to be some assimilation. There is no assimilation. There is something bad going on.”

Warming to his theme, he added that Brussels was in a particularly dire state. “You go to Brussels — I was in Brussels a long time ago, 20 years ago, so beautiful, everything is so beautiful — it’s like living in a hellhole right now,” Mr. Trump continued.

For Belgians, already reeling from recent terrorist plots and a chronically dysfunctional government, Mr. Trump’s words were enough to induce a fit of pique worthy, in some cases, of Mr. Trump himself.


http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/03/22/january-2016-donald-trump-warned-brussels-belgium-the-new-york-times-mocked-him-for-it/


--------------------------------------
Foresight: what we need in a president.

New York Times/CBS Poll: 74% of Republicans Don’t Support Cruz, 80% Don’t Support Kasich…







The New York Times / CBS have conducted a new national poll (full pdf below).  The results show candidate Donald Trump has gained an additional 11 points in the past 30 days and now leads with 46% support nationally.

74% of those polled refuse to support Ted Cruz and a full 80% of those polled refuse to support John Kasich.  When you keep in mind this poll is a selected NYT/CBS release, and when you consider this poll does not include independents, a person can reasonably presume the support for Donald Trump is factually much, much higher.

One of the internal poll results the media will refuse to highlight is how futile the #NeverTrump campaign effort has been.   The poll actually shows that more people refuse to ever support Ted Cruz than refuse to support Donald Trump. (see below)

(Via New York Times) The nationwide telephone poll was conducted March 17 to 20 on cellphones and landlines with 1,252 adults, of which 1,058 said they were registered voters, including 362 Republican primary voters and 388 Democratic primary voters. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points for all adults; four points for all voters; six points for Republican primary voters; and six points for Democratic primary voters.

Among Democrats, doubts persist about Mrs. Clinton, with 40 percent of her own party’s primary voters saying she is not honest and trustworthy. She is viewed unfavorably by 52 percent of all voters, among the highest percentage since the question was first asked during the 1992 presidential race.

“I think she’ll say whatever she needs to to get elected, and what she says may not be what she’s planning to do,” said Patricia Lawrence, 55, a Philadelphia Democrat who is supporting Mr. Sanders. “I was concerned already when she was first lady, though I don’t know what it is. I just don’t know, and when we find out, it may be too late.





http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/03/21/new-york-timescbs-poll-74-of-republicans-dont-support-cruz-80-dont-support-kasich/#more-114100


 

I don't believe you'll find good answers to your questions as of now. This is like a computer model of a small tropical storm that may become a hurricane, that may target cuba, or the Florida Keys, that may bring havoc. Too early, not enough data.

We can still make a prediction based on TRUMP's own words and his past political statements for the past 30 years. Those are solid data. All of it on youtube (to see him say the words, not reading what a soros puppet telling you what he meant to say)

This is how the political elites and the donors call We The People. Not smart enough to do the right thing: obey the establishment.

The title was a nice way to send this back at them.

‘Low Information’ Donors: GOP Money Men Waste $520 Million on Now-Dropped Out Candidates Against Donald Trump

Low information people, is that newspeak for idiots??

Perhaps the reason behind why one of the Castro brothers didn't meet Obama was because the Castro boys are as close to Cuban Royalty as you can get.

Let's talk a little bit more seriously about some of the concerns about Donald Trump that people may have (this being the most active thread on the guy.)  I am much more hopeful about him than I thought I would be before studying things, but concerns definatly remain.  Including the very real possiblity that I myself might have been completely chumped (though it seems unlikely given the fairly unmistakable animosity toward him from some of my most bitter enemies.)  Glad to have either pro or con information presented.

---

Even though I'm not 100% sure that Snowden is 100% legit, it does at this point seem likely...  Probably my biggest beef with Trump is his stead-fast and solid negativity toward Snowden.  Often, if one listens carefully to Trump, he is actually give a little bit of flexibility.  Not in the case of Snowden.  And if Snowden is legit, there are some very important reasons why his actions have a lot of positive rationals.

I have some serious concerns that a Trump presidency could be a lot more power-centralized authoritarian than I would like and would respect individual 'liberty' a lot less than I would like.  Generally I have heard Trump say very little about individual liberty.  Hopefully Wilikon can come up with some www-scanning goodness to put my mind a bit more at ease.

I would prefer an authoritarian nationalist regime under Trump than a one-world one under the UN, but both are pretty unpalatable to me.  I see the latter as a given on the course charted by Bush, Obama, Hillary, Gore, Biden, etc, and the same under the Republican puppets albeit perhaps a bit farther out.

---

My best hope for Trump is that he actually does see the reality and the danger of the NWO project _and_ had decided to fight it for real.  Unfortunately, to have a snowballs chance of doing so will require a great deal of cunning and a lot of trade-offs in terms of 'bringing to justice' some of the perps.  Simply uttering some stary-eyed vision of an ideal world will not get the job done.  Deals will have to be made.

As I've alluded to before, finding people who both agree in principle with the destruction of the NWO project AND have the insights and connections to pull it off will probably be necessary.  With this in mind, what do people think about the guy's trial-balloons about NATO and his foreign policy advisers.  Quite frankly, a quick glance at the names and resumes is not exactly what I would consider reassuring.  Anyone stumbled across some critical analysis of this?

And we have yet another legendary counterexample to present to the folks who think that money and marketing are magic. Edsel, New Coke, 2016 Republican primary...

We need these cautionary tales. It's just too easy to be lulled into sliding from common sense [people who've accumulated a lot of dollars are very shrewd in deploying them] to magical thinking [money has a magic power all its own.]

Thanks for the lesson!

Romney. Enough said.

Sad.