Topic: Up Like Trump - page 22. (Read 572791 times)

When did the Pope started praising Trump? Francis is still pissed at Trump, after the latter refused to import unwashed hordes of barbarians from Syria to the United States. He is also not happy about Trump deporting the illegal Mexicans. And even after Sean Spicer held a compromise meting with Francis, the Pope was hell bent on bashing Trump.

FYFY too.

Gray vs yellow, yellow vs gray...

You know what they say...

Close enough for government work!

FTFY  

 

The money will come eventually from the duties being levied on products from Mexico. But the wall needs to be constructed immediately. And for that he needs money from the treasury. This amount will be reimbursed once the duties start kicking in.

All presidents are under lots of pressure. Trump has the advantage. His hair is already gray.

Said types seem more and more to be vocally happy with the people Trump is dumping being dumped (e.g., Bannon) and with the people he(?) is installing in being put in (e.g., Gen. Kelly.)

Trump is under significant pressure to be sure.  He may or may not have some sort of a master plan, and even if he does, it may or may not work.  Ultimately, all I really hoped for is that a Trump POTUS would slow things down a bit vs. a Hilary POTUS, and I do believe that his presidency is achieving that so far.  More and more I sense that people ware waking up, and whatever breather Trump has given us may be enough of a boost.  Time will tell.

I'm all for a wall around Washington DC. The country needs protection from this bunch of morons around there. And we can run the country fine from somewhere else, because we've got internet.

When the pope, soros and jeb start praising Trump you'll know he has become a globalist.

I'm a relatively significant taxpayer, and since Trump broached the subject of the wall in the first place it made sense to me that I pay for it.  And it made sense to me more generally since illegal immigration issues have been a hassle for most of my life...although it used to be a corp/Repub thing to want cheap labor who couldn't stand up for themselves.  The reason I want to pay for it (as a U.S. taxpayer) is that I want the U.S. to have full control over it.

Unlike Israel's walls, which I've agree with in principle from a systems analysis point of view, I think the U.S. owned and payed for wall should be built in U.S. territory.  I don't think we should parcel up Mexico with various walls which we control.  If Mexico wishes to have a wall which they control, they can build a parallel one on their side of the border.

I imagine that Trump thought he could (and indeed could if he wished) have Mexico begging to fund the wall in exchange for various joint-management agreements and associated trade concessions.  I hope he does not because it makes our hand stronger that way (if Trump is even for real and not a globalist douche which the jury is still out on in my mind.)

BTW, I hope that as soon as the Mexico wall is underway work is started on the Canadian wall.  Truedue (and the dumb-fucks who voted for him and his type) seem to be on track to turn Canada into a globalist disaster and will need one there as well.  Thank God for the Atlantic ocean which helps buffer against the disease that afflicts Europe.

I think after more troops in afghanistan trump should gradually increase troops in iraq and syria too.

There wont be success if the US doesnt has enough boots on the ground.


Maybe there is actually some light

Trump Is Winning The Statue War


Polling gives reason for skepticism. An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll last week found that 62% of respondents thought statues honoring leaders of the Confederacy should “remain as a historical symbol.” Only 27% of those polled wanted the statues removed, and presumably they vote Democratic anyway. Perhaps party leaders see this issue as a way to motivate the minority base that failed to energize for Hillary Clinton, but even among African Americans, a 44% plurality said let the statues stay. So it’s just bad politics.

It gets worse. Once the issue was uncorked, it ballooned out of control. Last week, Trump wondered aloud where the iconoclastic movement would end, asking rhetorically, “Is it George Washington next week, and is it Thomas Jefferson the week after?” Right on cue, a Chicago pastor wants Washington’s name removed from a park, and Al Sharpton comes out against the Jefferson memorial.

This after protesters in New York City suggested last fall taking down a statue of Theodore Roosevelt. Last week, a bust of Abraham Lincoln — really? Lincoln? — was set ablaze. Demolish Mount Rushmore and radicals can smite all four of these presidents at once.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/08/25/trump-winning-statue-war-ames-robbins-column/595178001/



-------------------------------
Reason Trumps Feelings...
 

I don't want Jesse Jackson or Maxine Waters or Obama counting my money.

The swamp. It is a problem in human nature. When you look back the same phenomenon happened over and over again. The communist believers, if there weren't so eager to erase History (another one of their built in features), would have known about the soviet union's implosion. It was because of their ideology, yes, but the massive corruption was the real cause of it. Everybody who was somebody and their mistresses ended up in the Nomenklatura's club.

On a personal note I believe Google may be into thinking something like this: Communism is the ultimate goal and is feasible if the human element (politburo's corruption) is out of the equation, and if the centralization is replaced with an AI. The problem is humans are still coding their own bias into the system...

Some very creative minds thought about this and made a movie called The Matrix. The system is failing over and over again, but needs the fundamental element that will reboot it, over and over again, so heaven on earth can be, again, "reality"...

Racist-in-Chief

"in their desperation, they turned to man they didn't fully understand."