Pages:
Author

Topic: [Updated August 2023] How many banned users have you merited? - page 2. (Read 2158 times)

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
There are at least two more evidence that @vphasitha01 has never permanent banned.
(1) We have never seen ban appeal for that account <...>

Actually, the appeal topic was created by this user with the result that the ban has been lifted: Ban Appeal from a Member [vphasitha01]
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 4085
Farewell o_e_l_e_o
~ If a Mod can confirm vphasitha01 is still not banned, I'll remove him from [ LIST] Banned users. Since he last posted in November, he might have been banned again.

vphasitha01 posted a comment in the last month, so this user is not banned.
There are at least two more evidence that @vphasitha01 has never permanent banned.
(1) We have never seen ban appeal for that account.
(2) That account sent first sMerit after months, on 20th August 2019, here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52204192
I read somewhere months ago that permanent banned accounts are unable to send sMerits to others (after theymos stepped in and reverted merit transactions from abused accounts months ago). I just read, and honestly did not see original post on restriction on ability to send sMerits from perma-banned accounts. So, by the way, if someone know it, please share it here. I much appreciated your help.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
~ If a Mod can confirm vphasitha01 is still not banned, I'll remove him from [ LIST] Banned users. Since he last posted in November, he might have been banned again.

vphasitha01 posted a comment in the last month, so this user is not banned.
STT
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1454
I love stats so I appreciate all the efforts made on lists, graphs even and data collected like this.
Quote
that many Newbies have been banned after receiving Merit

I wont regret giving Merits to newbies for making a good forum post especially those with zero Merit because I think thats the first purpose of the Merit, to kick start people in the right direction on the forum.    I do think Merit system might be slightly illiquid in circulating Merit but its deliberately deflationary I guess.     Merit to lowest post counts, newbie accounts has got to be the most risky allocation of Merits because those profiles are new, unknown to the forum and the main danger I think is that they made a good post but they took it from somewhere else and its not their content.

The sort by percentage long list is the one I rate as it seems to correlate far more with bad instances and that catching upto the issuer as well.   Also I'm much lower by percentage so I prefer that one Tongue
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I will like to see in a new list in which you can maintain List of unbanned user to track these kind of cases. You can start with ChiBitCTy that still show in your report as merit sent to banned user.
I'll run an update Smiley

Quote
I will be surprised if vphasitha01 is banned for plagiarism because he is fully aware of rules and preached them to others also.
If you notice he posted just 3 post (that is also for betting, not in forum discussion) in his last 15 days before he stopped posting completely.
If he posts again, I'll remove him from my banned-list.

Updated list
    1. 60 (57.69%) banned users merited by foserfox Banned! (details) (this user was banned already when I started this topic, and since then 15 more accounts merited by him have also been banned)
    2. 42 (11.66%) banned users merited by EFS (details)
    3. 35 (5.03%) banned users merited by paxmao (details)
    4. 35 (4.54%) banned users merited by dbshck (details)
    5. 35 (3.93%) banned users merited by OgNasty (details)
    6. 29 (5.06%) banned users merited by chimk (details)
    7. 29 (12.03%) banned users merited by teramit (details)
    8. 26 (4.18%) banned users merited by bones261 (details)
    9. 25 (22.12%) banned users merited by MalReynolds (details)
   10. 19 (6.29%) banned users merited by xandry (details)
   11. 19 (10.85%) banned users merited by klarki (details)
   12. 18 (3.19%) banned users merited by JayJuanGee (details)
   13. 17 (14.40%) banned users merited by hugeblack (details)
   14. 17 (13.70%) banned users merited by TimeTeller (details)
   15. 16 (80.00%) banned users merited by lowbander80 (details)
   16. 16 (69.56%) banned users merited by FinFx (details)
   17. 16 (3.71%) banned users merited by Jet Cash (details)
   18. 16 (1.67%) banned users merited by suchmoon (details)
   19. 15 (3.96%) banned users merited by The Pharmacist (details)
   20. 15 (20.00%) banned users merited by by rallier (details)
   21. 15 (2.98%) banned users merited by Vod (details)
   22. 15 (2.35%) banned users merited by vapourminer (details)
   23. 15 (13.39%) banned users merited by mhanbostanci (details)
   24. 14 (8.28%) banned users merited by Halab (details)
   25. 14 (32.55%) banned users merited by ancientcoins (details)
   26. 13 (6.34%) banned users merited by QuestionAuthority (details)
   27. 13 (3.53%) banned users merited by TMAN (details)
   28. 13 (11.92%) banned users merited by johhnyUA (details)
   29. 13 (10.07%) banned users merited by WhiteManWhite (details)
   30. 13 (1.66%) banned users merited by LoyceV (details)
   31. 12 (9.67%) banned users merited by RodeoX (details)
   32. 12 (6.70%) banned users merited by Vadi2323 (details)
   33. 12 (4.85%) banned users merited by mindrust (details)
   34. 12 (2.79%) banned users merited by qwk (details)
   35. 12 (19.04%) banned users merited by yo-blin (details)
   36. 12 (18.46%) banned users merited by dumbtool45 Banned! (details)
   37. 12 (18.46%) banned users merited by ekiller (details)
   38. 12 (12.24%) banned users merited by tokeweed (details)
   39. 11 (61.11%) banned users merited by MoreFun (details)
   40. 11 (4.54%) banned users merited by xtraelv (details)
   41. 11 (3.20%) banned users merited by DdmrDdmr (details)
   42. 11 (28.94%) banned users merited by unamis76 (details)
   43. 11 (23.40%) banned users merited by Yury1 Banned! (details)
   44. 11 (16.66%) banned users merited by MorpheWQ (details)
   45. 10 (6.99%) banned users merited by esmanthra (details)
   46. 10 (6.66%) banned users merited by tyz (details)
   47. 10 (43.47%) banned users merited by cacucacok91 (details)
   48. 10 (38.46%) banned users merited by mstfprcn Banned! (details)
   49. 10 (34.48%) banned users merited by lemonrabid (details)
   50. 9 (8.41%) banned users merited by iCEBREAKER (details)
   51. 9 (5.52%) banned users merited by STT (details)
   52. 9 (40.90%) banned users merited by ATMcoin Banned! (details)
   53. 9 (37.50%) banned users merited by ladydark (details)
   54. 9 (31.03%) banned users merited by krisnt80 Banned! (details)
   55. 9 (29.03%) banned users merited by KosmoKisa (details)
   56. 9 (23.68%) banned users merited by cryptolord2077 (details)
   57. 9 (2.77%) banned users merited by LFC_Bitcoin (details)
   58. 9 (2.01%) banned users merited by DarkStar_ (details)
   59. 9 (19.56%) banned users merited by ajochems (details)
   60. 9 (17.30%) banned users merited by Moloch (details)
   61. 9 (12.32%) banned users merited by Zz (details)
   62. 9 (10.97%) banned users merited by RegulusHr Banned! (details)
   63. 9 (10.84%) banned users merited by Slow death (details)
   64. 8 (9.30%) banned users merited by poptop (details)
   65. 8 (72.72%) banned users merited by Charloz24 Banned! (details)
   66. 8 (7.47%) banned users merited by pandukelana2712 (details)
   67. 8 (61.53%) banned users merited by xsentus (details)
   68. 8 (50.00%) banned users merited by marcous (details)
   69. 8 (44.44%) banned users merited by roll on (details)
   70. 8 (42.10%) banned users merited by smutexar Banned! (details)
   71. 8 (36.36%) banned users merited by Criptomen Banned! (details)
   72. 8 (33.33%) banned users merited by Vinylriff Banned! (details)
   73. 8 (29.62%) banned users merited by 3x2 (details)
   74. 8 (21.05%) banned users merited by ui_zakharchenko Banned! (details)
   75. 8 (16.66%) banned users merited by Slark (details)
   76. 8 (14.81%) banned users merited by V1saya (details)
   77. 8 (13.55%) banned users merited by BitcoinTurk (details)
   78. 8 (12.50%) banned users merited by Vlad2Vlad (details)
   79. 8 (11.59%) banned users merited by PHI1618 (details)
   80. 7 (9.09%) banned users merited by kryptqnick (details)
   81. 7 (7.07%) banned users merited by seoincorporation (details)
   82. 7 (7.07%) banned users merited by Buchi-88 (details)
   83. 7 (63.63%) banned users merited by Liza Soberano Banned! (details)
   84. 7 (53.84%) banned users merited by Star_Bucks (details)
   85. 7 (46.66%) banned users merited by Gummybear67 Banned! (details)
   86. 7 (43.75%) banned users merited by Early_Waffle Banned! (details)
   87. 7 (4.72%) banned users merited by mole0815 (details)
   88. 7 (4.00%) banned users merited by marlboroza (details)
   89. 7 (36.84%) banned users merited by tema (details)
   90. 7 (35.00%) banned users merited by QellDroma Banned! (details)
   91. 7 (33.33%) banned users merited by LiluSG (details)
   92. 7 (31.81%) banned users merited by BravO_o Banned! (details)
   93. 7 (3.86%) banned users merited by nutildah (details)
   94. 7 (3.04%) banned users merited by o_e_l_e_o (details)
   95. 7 (29.16%) banned users merited by gileri Banned! (details)
   96. 7 (25.92%) banned users merited by PavelRostov (details)
   97. 7 (24.13%) banned users merited by ovcijisir (details)
   98. 7 (2.77%) banned users merited by krogothmanhattan (details)
   99. 7 (19.44%) banned users merited by snakey (details)
  100. 7 (16.66%) banned users merited by voteformeg (details)
  101. 7 (15.55%) banned users merited by fruit (details)
  102. 7 (14.00%) banned users merited by leonello (details)
  103. 7 (12.28%) banned users merited by AlyattesLydia (details)
  104. 7 (12.06%) banned users merited by SyGambler (details)
  105. 6 (8.45%) banned users merited by odolvlobo (details)
  106. 6 (60.00%) banned users merited by magmar Banned! (details)
  107. 6 (6.59%) banned users merited by Gleb Gamow (details)
  108. 6 (6.25%) banned users merited by Wekkel (details)
  109. 6 (50.00%) banned users merited by rolik2001 (details)
  110. 6 (50.00%) banned users merited by Kuala Lumpur Banned! (details)
  111. 6 (5.55%) banned users merited by Husna QA (details)
  112. 6 (5.17%) banned users merited by Piggy (details)
  113. 6 (5.08%) banned users merited by rickbig41 (details)
  114. 6 (46.15%) banned users merited by gunhell16 (details)
  115. 6 (40.00%) banned users merited by G.Butrik Banned! (details)
  116. 6 (40.00%) banned users merited by Webcelerator (details)
  117. 6 (4.41%) banned users merited by Coolcryptovator (details)
  118. 6 (4.37%) banned users merited by theyoungmillionaire (details)
  119. 6 (33.33%) banned users merited by Creol Banned! (details)
  120. 6 (31.57%) banned users merited by FiboNacchi Banned! (details)
  121. 6 (3.72%) banned users merited by malevolent (details)
  122. 6 (3.65%) banned users merited by pooya87 (details)
  123. 6 (27.27%) banned users merited by reddish111 (details)
  124. 6 (23.07%) banned users merited by aliyagiz207 (details)
  125. 6 (21.42%) banned users merited by BitmarkInvest (details)
  126. 6 (21.42%) banned users merited by Incognito01 (details)
  127. 6 (20.00%) banned users merited by slackovic (details)
  128. 6 (2.88%) banned users merited by iasenko (details)
  129. 6 (2.66%) banned users merited by d5000 (details)
  130. 6 (2.64%) banned users merited by mprep (details)
  131. 6 (17.64%) banned users merited by Reid (details)
  132. 6 (17.64%) banned users merited by Rinder Banned! (details)
  133. 6 (16.66%) banned users merited by Branko (details)
  134. 6 (16.21%) banned users merited by delfastTions (details)
  135. 6 (15.00%) banned users merited by Bolt Brownie (details)
  136. 6 (15.00%) banned users merited by el kaka22 (details)
  137. 6 (15.00%) banned users merited by explorder (details)
  138. 6 (12.50%) banned users merited by zanzibar Banned! (details)
  139. 6 (11.76%) banned users merited by Ranyar (details)
  140. 6 (10.71%) banned users merited by Elwar (details)
  141. 6 (10.71%) banned users merited by examplens (details)
  142. 6 (10.52%) banned users merited by Daniel91 (details)
  143. 5 (9.61%) banned users merited by kzv (details)
  144. 5 (8.92%) banned users merited by diks (details)
  145. 5 (8.62%) banned users merited by Mrpumperitis (details)
  146. 5 (71.42%) banned users merited by miha74 Banned! (details)
  147. 5 (71.42%) banned users merited by avtandil Banned! (details)
  148. 5 (7.46%) banned users merited by BrewMaster (details)
  149. 5 (7.46%) banned users merited by vlad230 (details)
  150. 5 (50.00%) banned users merited by Beefcake (details)
  151. 5 (50.00%) banned users merited by Afina_22 Banned! (details)
  152. 5 (5.61%) banned users merited by sapta (details)
  153. 5 (5.43%) banned users merited by philipma1957 (details)
  154. 5 (5.31%) banned users merited by kenzawak (details)
  155. 5 (5.26%) banned users merited by Micio (details)
  156. 5 (5.05%) banned users merited by BTCforJoe (details)
  157. 5 (45.45%) banned users merited by Maryshka91 (details)
  158. 5 (45.45%) banned users merited by gorkem Banned! (details)
  159. 5 (45.45%) banned users merited by willdono (details)
  160. 5 (41.66%) banned users merited by agentx44 (details)
  161. 5 (41.66%) banned users merited by craked5 (details)
  162. 5 (41.66%) banned users merited by cheezcarls (details)
  163. 5 (41.66%) banned users merited by myortvyje Banned! (details)
  164. 5 (4.76%) banned users merited by CjMapope (details)
  165. 5 (4.54%) banned users merited by Searing (details)
  166. 5 (4.38%) banned users merited by krishnapramod (details)
  167. 5 (38.46%) banned users merited by hajimasan (details)
  168. 5 (38.46%) banned users merited by ymemey (details)
  169. 5 (33.33%) banned users merited by wnj4 (details)
  170. 5 (31.25%) banned users merited by mostkey (details)
  171. 5 (31.25%) banned users merited by cryptofrka (details)
  172. 5 (31.25%) banned users merited by YulyNov (details)
  173. 5 (3.96%) banned users merited by Raja_MBZ (details)
  174. 5 (3.96%) banned users merited by mdayonliner (details)
  175. 5 (3.93%) banned users merited by Globb0 (details)
  176. 5 (3.90%) banned users merited by bitmover (details)
  177. 5 (3.28%) banned users merited by gentlemand (details)
  178. 5 (3.18%) banned users merited by joniboini (details)
  179. 5 (26.31%) banned users merited by inthelongrun (details)
  180. 5 (26.31%) banned users merited by aoihs00 (details)
  181. 5 (25.00%) banned users merited by mastica (details)
  182. 5 (21.73%) banned users merited by Winged13 (details)
  183. 5 (21.73%) banned users merited by bitpazari Banned! (details)
  184. 5 (21.73%) banned users merited by Klara_karlovna (details)
  185. 5 (20.00%) banned users merited by Topknotbam (details)
  186. 5 (2.97%) banned users merited by infofront (details)
  187. 5 (2.94%) banned users merited by Hueristic (details)
  188. 5 (2.36%) banned users merited by Flying Hellfish (details)
  189. 5 (19.23%) banned users merited by sabx01 (details)
  190. 5 (19.23%) banned users merited by Gerhald (details)
  191. 5 (17.85%) banned users merited by RuSS512 Banned! (details)
  192. 5 (17.85%) banned users merited by ingiltere (details)
  193. 5 (15.62%) banned users merited by dannybrown (details)
  194. 5 (15.62%) banned users merited by winspiral (details)
  195. 5 (14.70%) banned users merited by Rhego Banned! (details)
  196. 5 (14.28%) banned users merited by MetalEngine (details)
  197. 5 (13.88%) banned users merited by tyKiwanuka (details)
  198. 5 (13.51%) banned users merited by yussuf89 (details)
  199. 5 (12.82%) banned users merited by ophyrim (details)
  200. 5 (12.50%) banned users merited by ace4549 Banned! (details)
(I've cut it short here, I'll post the full list in Archival, sorted by percentage.
There are some problems with my script, and I don't really have time to fix it now, so no further updates Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 395
I am alive but in hibernation.
Unfortunately bpip and maybe LoyceV system do not track these "unbanned"  changes.
Unbans aren't published in modlog. If a Mod can confirm vphasitha01 is still not banned, I'll remove him from [ LIST] Banned users. Since he last posted in November, he might have been banned again.

I will like to see in a new list in which you can maintain List of unbanned user to track these kind of cases. You can start with ChiBitCTy that still show in your report as merit sent to banned user.

I will be surprised if vphasitha01 is banned for plagiarism because he is fully aware of rules and preached them to others also.
If you notice he posted just 3 post (that is also for betting, not in forum discussion) in his last 15 days before he stopped posting completely.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Unfortunately bpip and maybe LoyceV system do not track these "unbanned"  changes.
Unbans aren't published in modlog. If a Mod can confirm vphasitha01 is still not banned, I'll remove him from [ LIST] Banned users. Since he last posted in November, he might have been banned again.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 2061
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
@r1s2g3, Likely somebody had reported him a second time for plagiarism.

I'm pretty positive he is currently banned and him not posting for almost five months now would explain that.

One is sent to vphasitha01, I remember his 'ranking up' thread, didn't know he was banned...

I obviously missed his first ban/unban story too.
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 395
I am alive but in hibernation.

  158. 5 (3.96%) banned users merited by mdayonliner (details)

Help me to understand. All these members are permanently banned?

I see BTCeminjas, iqrasalsabila, vphasitha01 had quite good activities in the forum and not only received merit from me but also from other users. They were doing very well in the forum.

I know vphasitha01  was permanently banned for plagiarism charges but later unbanned after finding that Medium article was plagiarized and source put by   vphasitha01  was correct one. Unfortunately bpip and maybe LoyceV system do not track these "unbanned"  changes.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43350300
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I have new Merit data, but it takes many posts (in Archival) to create an update. If anyone's interested in an update (now or 6 months from now), just ask.
Bump Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 4085
Farewell o_e_l_e_o
I guessed that its inevitable to see merit sources part of the list here, you may never know and control what members will do after they receive the merit/s you have sent to them. It is like most of them are likely to plagiarize more after they become more desperate on receiving more merits.
This is what I called their merited posts like pseudo-qualitied ones.
The orginial purpose of merit system is giving constructive, high qualited posts merits as rewards for their contributions to the forum.
Therefore, it is reasonable and acceptable if merit sources simply and immediately send their sMerits to high qualitied, constructive posts.
Due to massive abusements and autobanned merit-receivers, I think it should be better if merit sources spend a couple of seconds to scan post histories of posters if merit sources saw their likely constructive posts.
It's not required by theymos, of course, and as I pointed out above, it's not main tasks of merit sources.
Anyway, if merit sources have spare time, they should scan post histories before sending their sMerits away.
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
To my surprise as well Foxpup even though is a top 5 merit sender in the forum didn't show up in the top 200 of the list he was in fact ranked 5041st with 3 banned users (one of which is zentdex), the only thing I can think of why he has a few banned user under his name is he does a thorough background check before he sends some merit to the user.
Correct. Every time I find a post by a newbie worth meriting, I first check if it's plagiarised. More often than not it is, with the result that the user gets banned instead of merited. I'll also check the rest of their post history for consistency, on the assumption (which is almost always correct) that a lone good post amongst a large number of shitposts is plagiarised even if I can't prove it.

Foxpup has "only" merited 265 unique users, but indeed, his 1.13% puts him almost at the bottom of the list.
I'm actually disappointed that so few users survive my checks, but being at the bottom isn't always a bad thing. Grin

I was at 5% which is better then the 11% average. I also  have not had one in a while.

I used to go through long lists of newbies in an effort to help them when they lost rank.

I think four of my bad ones were from the lists I checked.

The list had 5000 names and I went through thousands of names. Found very few to merit and it looks like they turned bad anyway.
hero member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 655
To my surprise as well Foxpup even though is a top 5 merit sender in the forum didn't show up in the top 200 of the list he was in fact ranked 5041st with 3 banned users (one of which is zentdex), the only thing I can think of why he has a few banned user under his name is he does a thorough background check before he sends some merit to the user.
Correct. Every time I find a post by a newbie worth meriting, I first check if it's plagiarised. More often than not it is, with the result that the user gets banned instead of merited. I'll also check the rest of their post history for consistency, on the assumption (which is almost always correct) that a lone good post amongst a large number of shitposts is plagiarised even if I can't prove it.
Just by confirming what I thought you made me imagine how much time and effort you give before you even send merits away to members. With that kind of low percentage it only means that you never let your guard down when it comes to newbies, the 3 banned users you have given merits to (zentdex, rickadone, and LuanX3) are all  high ranking members which I myself don't even expect plagiarising content. I wouldn't even consider this a mistake as you don't expect them to do this kind of things.
legendary
Activity: 4542
Merit: 3393
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
To my surprise as well Foxpup even though is a top 5 merit sender in the forum didn't show up in the top 200 of the list he was in fact ranked 5041st with 3 banned users (one of which is zentdex), the only thing I can think of why he has a few banned user under his name is he does a thorough background check before he sends some merit to the user.
Correct. Every time I find a post by a newbie worth meriting, I first check if it's plagiarised. More often than not it is, with the result that the user gets banned instead of merited. I'll also check the rest of their post history for consistency, on the assumption (which is almost always correct) that a lone good post amongst a large number of shitposts is plagiarised even if I can't prove it.

Foxpup has "only" merited 265 unique users, but indeed, his 1.13% puts him almost at the bottom of the list.
I'm actually disappointed that so few users survive my checks, but being at the bottom isn't always a bad thing. Grin
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
the only thing I can think of why he has a few banned user under his name is he does a thorough background check before he sends some merit to the user.
Foxpup has "only" merited 265 unique users, but indeed, his 1.13% puts him almost at the bottom of the list.

And as I said before: there's no shame in this list as long as you're a good user Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 655
I guessed that its inevitable to see merit sources part of the list here, you may never know and control what members will do after they receive the merit/s you have sent to them. It is like most of them are likely to plagiarize more after they become more desperate on receiving more merits. To my surprise as well Foxpup even though is a top 5 merit sender in the forum didn't show up in the top 200 of the list he was in fact ranked 5041st with 3 banned users (one of which is zentdex), the only thing I can think of why he has a few banned user under his name is he does a thorough background check before he sends some merit to the user.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I have new Merit data, but it takes many posts (in Archival) to create an update. If anyone's interested in an update (now or 6 months from now), just ask.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
I known.
I don't know how the graph creator made it, but the graph should have two x-axis scales, right?
The current one is likely for un-banned newbies, I guess.
There are two graphs overlap each other, but it should have two x-axis scales.
Only the lighter color represents banned Newbies, so the small top of the graph.
It would indeed be better to draw them at the bottom of the graph.
Or if only one x-axis scale used, the graph (lighter color) for banned newbies should be in the bottom, below the darker one, as you said.

Yes, I used the same X-axis scale in the chart above. As a result, I aggregated the number of banned and non-banned users.

I can create a new chart that shows only the lines with a transparent background. In this case, I will not aggregate the values, so the line showing banned users will be drawn below the line showing non-banned users.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 4085
Farewell o_e_l_e_o
I known.
I don't know how the graph creator made it, but the graph should have two x-axis scales, right?
The current one is likely for un-banned newbies, I guess.
There are two graphs overlap each other, but it should have two x-axis scales.
Only the lighter color represents banned Newbies, so the small top of the graph.
It would indeed be better to draw them at the bottom of the graph.
Or if only one x-axis scale used, the graph (lighter color) for banned newbies should be in the bottom, below the darker one, as you said.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
you stated there are 1934 newbies got banned, but the chart shows nearly 10k newbies got banned.
Only the lighter color represents banned Newbies, so the small top of the graph.
It would indeed be better to draw them at the bottom of the graph.
Pages:
Jump to: