If you need check any scams project, just find on bitcointalk, many people make posts about scams projects
Logically no one wants a scam project, although in the bitcointalk forums lately there are many scam projects, but not all of them are scams, you can find out by making a little research on the projects that are in this bitcointalk. 
Topic: Useless projects! - page 4. (Read 2467 times)
Well based on my experience, I think 1 out of 20 projects still continue they promised developments after fundraising. Investors are in a huge loss because of this failed or useless projects abandoned by the team after fundraising. Mostly binance IEO continues to enhance their tech in the long run.
Hello, I would like to know which projects have really achieved their goals after an ICO/IEO/ITO. Is there a page or statistics about it?
I don’t have data on the most successful ICOs, but there are lots of them that are being successful even after their ICO is completed. Talking about the best projects of all time that kept succeeding even after the ICO, there are lot of data on that. First of we have Ethereum which we all know this day as the second best cryptocurrency and also the second most popular coin in the market.The ICO was in 2014 and after the ICO they have grown too big. Others are NEO, Spectre coin, IOTA, and a lot of others that have been really good. I doubt there are still good projects like these ones that we are going to see again🤔 it’s definitely going to take a long time if actually there’s going to be any.
Coinmartketcap has statistics on the ROI since ICO for each coin. You could have a look at it.
However, it may not be entirely accurate simply looking off the ROI because of the fact that BTC has risen so much in the past few years. If you really want to dig deeper then you need to look further than just the ROI, and compare whether or not the ICO has outperformed growth in BTC prices over the same period.
But yes, a lot of projects do not deliver on any of their promises, and that's just their nature.
However, it may not be entirely accurate simply looking off the ROI because of the fact that BTC has risen so much in the past few years. If you really want to dig deeper then you need to look further than just the ROI, and compare whether or not the ICO has outperformed growth in BTC prices over the same period.
But yes, a lot of projects do not deliver on any of their promises, and that's just their nature.
For ITO, I have heard that there's one that launched this 2019. Is there one?
I could vividly remember few projects achieved this and some even did without ICO or IEO, but some without raising the stated amount still made it to this level, I know quite some projects like that.
What are those projects then? the listed projects above were one of the most successful ones.If you need check any scams project, just find on bitcointalk, many people make posts about scams projects
And we have the Scam Accusations too. 
I could vividly remember few projects achieved this and some even did without ICO or IEO, but some without raising the stated amount still made it to this level, I know quite some projects like that.
This is interesting and could help as we have many scam projects out there and alot hoping to scam too, best is to do serious research before investing to avoid being scammed by projects without good plans in Cryptocurrency market. Do not even go by mere hype but good and personal research would be the best and will help aid it.
-snip-
Poor market conditions have caused many products from ICO and IEO to sink on the exchange. That is very sad.But there are some things that maybe we will not blame bad market conditions when there are many who are interested in the products being marketed. Regardless of market conditions, if demand for products increases, the price may not be too low or at least stable or increase from ICO prices.
Some examples of token/ coins that still have high ROI that I know after the ICO is finished.
- Tron
- ChainLink
- IOTA
- Waves
- BAT
- And etc
It is just that we have to know what are the risks of investing and trading, consider everything before deciding to start investing and trading. After we understand and make a decision, we must not complain and feel disappointed because they failed. Nobody forces us to invest and trade, it is our own choice and we will take our own risk.
I think its quite hard to check a project still follow their roadmap or not. Most of project show investors a wonderful roadmap, but after ICO they did not teach investors how to keep track the project. I think the only way to do this is trying to find many source of news, test their products release, active in their community channel, follow dev on their social network to see what they are doing.
looking for updated information is really needed when we invest, without finding out information we can lose funds and also the latest news about the project invested. because not all projects have an active team in providing information, and sometimes the information provided is also buried when in their media community. sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 250
—RUSHMOON — Automatic LP & Yield Farm & AMM on BSC
I think its quite hard to check a project still follow their roadmap or not. Most of project show investors a wonderful roadmap, but after ICO they did not teach investors how to keep track the project. I think the only way to do this is trying to find many source of news, test their products release, active in their community channel, follow dev on their social network to see what they are doing.
join Become an investor in Carnomaly - the most advanced online digital platform in the automotive market, bridging the gap between cryptocurrency and the automotive industry. http://t.me/Carnomaly
If you need check any scams project, just find on bitcointalk, many people make posts about scams projects
This year, almost 90% of projects have failed, such as fraudulent projects, not achieving sales targets and others, perhaps this is caused by the impact of so many fraudulent projects that were present in 2018, so many investors are now losing trust in developers, and the impact is huge. Even potential projects ultimately fail to develop their projects due to the lack of funds. In this year, only a few projects can succeed and develop in my opinion, and one of them is BCNEX.
Scam in 2018 did have a fairly long impact, specifically that we can see this year. where the project is increasingly decreasing demand, from IEO investment also declined, it is bad but I think this is a cycle that is happening.This year, almost 90% of projects have failed, such as fraudulent projects, not achieving sales targets and others, perhaps this is caused by the impact of so many fraudulent projects that were present in 2018, so many investors are now losing trust in developers, and the impact is huge. Even potential projects ultimately fail to develop their projects due to the lack of funds. In this year, only a few projects can succeed and develop in my opinion, and one of them is BCNEX.
Scam in 2018 did have a fairly long impact, specifically that we can see this year. where the project is increasingly decreasing demand, from IEO investment also declined, it is bad but I think this is a cycle that is happening. 
This year, almost 90% of projects have failed, such as fraudulent projects, not achieving sales targets and others, perhaps this is caused by the impact of so many fraudulent projects that were present in 2018, so many investors are now losing trust in developers, and the impact is huge. Even potential projects ultimately fail to develop their projects due to the lack of funds. In this year, only a few projects can succeed and develop in my opinion, and one of them is BCNEX.
Tezos is a very good project. Recently, it has risen very well. IEO investments are now very risky. The project in IEO is well priced. After a day there can be big declines. Now it is necessary to invest more carefully. I'm studying old projects. ETH ZEC LTC ..
And most of these projects copies use cases from other projects, so pathetic we have no regulation to dictate bad projects and we have been victim many times.
I think there there is a regulation but the problem is when you are seeing a scam ico located in another country and that will be so difficult to bring them all into the court caused by the differences between the regulation in any countries. This is the real problem. STO has its advantage. But I don't think that majority of investors are going to invest on a project that is fully regulated, just saying. Those whales really know how to play the game, and as much as we all know that they can manipulate the price, we can't really stop them. We just really need to do our due diligence before we invest on useless project. We need to do everything in our control not to be scam by those dubious people.
Nowadays almost every project is not achieving its goals in ICO, IEO, and ITO because of the lack of interest of investors due to various projects was a scam in 2017 to 2019, so few projects achieved their goals like Pundix .
Some projects which do IEO on reputable exchanges still achieve their goals, although some exchanges lie about IEO selling out when it's not true. However, I'm happy that investors are now wiser and understand that most of these projects are just out to make money and nothing more. They've been more of useless altcoin projects with no vision to fulfill what's on road map over time😁, I really hope that changes soon. It's funny how a project will come up with an MVP with no plan to release an actual product, how will adoption be fostered? 
And most of these projects copies use cases from other projects, so pathetic we have no regulation to dictate bad projects and we have been victim many times.
The regulation will not solve the mentioned problems, the new industries cannot be predicted correctly. The new projects without the uniques idea occupy the crypto market and the major altcoins are created by the owners for taking the money out of the investors's pocket. In another case, it is not expected to see every project should have different ideas, maybe the same idea can be applied in other means. And most of these projects copies use cases from other projects, so pathetic we have no regulation to dictate bad projects and we have been victim many times.
I think there there is a regulation but the problem is when you are seeing a scam ico located in another country and that will be so difficult to bring them all into the court caused by the differences between the regulation in any countries. This is the real problem. Jump to: