Topic: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? - page 30. (Read 45532 times)

And you know, the money they are being paid by outside interests to publish their lies. And the money they will receive by using their lies to pursue sham legal action:

https://www.thelancet.com/pb-assets/Lancet/extras/statement20Feb2004web.pdf


And all he had to do was subject some innocent children to "highly invasive" procedures without ethical approval. There's another term for in the medical community for sticking needles in patients without their consent or approval. It's called assault. This man assaulted children for his own financial gain.

He definitely sounds like an honest, stand-up guy. Someone whose opinion you could definitely put a "high value" on.

If by 'paid by' you mean 'allowed to maintain and grow their careers and retain their government chartered licenses to practice' then yes; you hit the nail on the head.

''There are many 'doctors and scientists' in the world who have studied the issues, found that they don't align with the corp/gov party line, and published their findings in various formats.'' Yeah the other 99% are paid by the government to lie to us :^)

There are many 'doctors and scientists' in the world who have studied the issues, found that they don't align with the corp/gov party line, and published their findings in various formats.  There would be more if it were not so dangerous to one's career, and in some cases to one's life, but still there are plenty.  These are the people I listen to mostly.  At least I put a high value on the information they bring because they have nothing to gain from providing accurate information...except perhaps their dignity and their souls...and have a hell of a lot to lose.

Of course if you define 'quack' as anyone who doesn't align themselves to the corp/gov party line then you have a circular chain of reason going on and there is basically no hope that you will be able to pull anything of value out of such a muddled mess.  Or more accurately, there is only one conclusion you will draw, and it is inevitable that you will draw it.  Just you have.  That is the design goal of this (and many other) social engineering operations.

You seem to be interested only in the small evidence you need for your own arguments, ignoring the 99.99% of all the evidence for the specific problem. For example evolution, 99.99% of evidence is in favor of evolution yet you keep focusing on the 0.01%. Same here. You would rather believe a few nutjobs and conspiracy theorists than all the doctors/scientists in the world.

Sounds like you aren't interested in proof, or even evidence. Contradicting your own nature, eh? Maybe it's the Russian STDs infecting your brain.

Maybe it's the Russian STDs infecting his brain.

Sounds like you can't accept reality.

Sounds like you might have looked at the bibliography of one of them. LOL!

 

The sources for "Doctors Against Vaccines" include a small handful of quacks, including such illustrious characters as:

1 - A guy who believes the Soviet Union tried to impose its ideology on the US by surreptitiously introducing STDs in to the US
2 - A guy who decided that vaccines cause diabetes because he did an experiment with diabetic-prone mice
3 - A guy who believes in Chemtrails
4 - A guy who had his license removed and was struck off the medical register for falsifying study data

And yet those are the ones you trust. Conveniently ignoring the 99.99% of doctors who aren't morons.

Honestly, if you totally believe the testimony of some nutjob who thinks the Soviets are trying to give us all herpes, you are beyond hope.

Doctors Against Vaccines - Hear From Those Who Have Done the Research







Read more at https://globalwarming-arclein.blogspot.com/2018/09/doctors-against-vaccines-hear-from.html.

We’re assured vaccines are “safe and effective” even though public health officials acknowledge they sometimes have serious side-effects including death and despite the troubling fact that no long-term study of their effects on overall health has ever been conducted.  Remarkably, not a single published study has ever compared vaccinated kids to unvaccinated kids to see who is healthier years after the shots. Until now.

Vaccinated Baby Syndrome (VBS) Vaccines are Biological Weapons - https://www.real.video/5835560015001.

Just FYI, I'm heavily vaccinated myself.  From the 'headstart' program, from the army, and from the army during Gulf-I where they were almost certainly doing a large amount of development work on various techniques.  I've never felt that it did me any lasting harm, but even relatively harmful shots are not going to negatively effect most people.  That's just the way maths works.  Rigorous studies are the way to sort these things out.  Soldiers are nearly ideal guinea pigs for a bunch of reasons.  I may have a naturally good immune system and not subject to some of the problems that some percentage of people are, or I may have been part of a control group.  Or the army may have decided not to fuck up people with a high ASVAB score in case they needed to use us for other things.  Impossible to know for sure.

I will say that I was as sick as a dog for the whole month after the shots.  That was as long as I was in when I got recalled for Bush's oil war.  Thankfully I never got 'gulf war syndrome' some of which very well may be associated with experiments to use squalene as a killed virus vaccine adjuvant.  This compound is chemically related to the substance that lubricates a person's joints, and if your immune system is trained to attack it (autoimmunity) it is fairly obvious that you are in for a world of hurt vis-a-vis joint problems.  Interestingly the 2018 flu vaccine customized for old people is using it as an adjuvant again.  I guess it's easier for 70 year olds to write off their arthritis to old age where is it is a little more problematic for 20-something ex vets.  Either way, the pharma companies get rich.

Yep, also vaccinated and had no problems at all, I'm probably part of the elite

There were three things that Bertrand Russell projected for use by the elite in order to control the masses in future 'scientific' societies.  These are:

 - Diet
 - Injection
 - Injunction (e.g., forced vaccination in order to attend school or have a job.)

These were to be 'combined at an early age' to produce the kinds of citizens that the elite wished to have.

Many people sense that there is something going wrong with the plebs these days where 70% of Americans and 50% of kids are on some sort of prescription medication among other problems.  There is no logical reason to believe that it is exclusively one thing which is producing these problems.

I am vaccinated and I don't have any problem at this point, we are getting sick because of the food we intake every day especially if we eat food that is prone in preservatives so I think don't blame it on the vaccine.

Introduce the vaccination just at the right time, when the peoples' immune systems are overcoming the disease, and it looks like the vaccination works. The medical often does that just to make vaccines look good.

Even if the vaccination works, the cured people of the medical countries are finding out that they are way more unhealthy in many ways because of the vaccines. Part of this is because the vaccines should be stopped once they have done their work, and not used for prevention.

One of the greatest protections from diseases is hygiene. When the medical introduces hygiene at the same time they introduce vaccines, people think it is the vaccines, and the records go down saying that it was the vaccines. But nobody can really tell. We are finding that it was the hygiene rather than the vaccines.

Good nutrition and hygiene are way better than good vaccines, but most vaccines are simply poison in part. There are very few good vaccines.