Topic: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? - page 31. (Read 45532 times)

With such rhetoric you could block any arguments coming your way, really. What do you mean, those that thrive would not have existed, how do you know that? Based on studying 600+ children in a country where there is tenths of millions of them? I know that thanks to the vaccination i didn't have to spend months lying in bed with some kind of outdated illness, and i wouldn't want my kids to suffer those too. So your argument is really null, because there is neither point, nor sense behind it.

Pharma killing people, mcdonalds killing people, coca cola killing people, deodorant producers killing people (they add metals into their products) etc etc.

And YOU pick on ME for showing how cops are worse than ISIS! But all the while you are happy with Big Pharma killing off thousands of people and using disease eradication as an excuse. You are about as big of a hypocrite as can be!

Again, that's a quote from your study that you said was so amazing.

In other words, by paralyzing and killing a ton of Indian darkies the important people have been spared?  I see.  I'll fully understand the machete wound across the faces of your type when your corpses are dumped into the pit and won't hold it against them.  Hell, I might even help.  I just hope they don't mistake me for you.  I mean I'm assuming you are an entitled white man/women (if there is a difference any more) who get all excited by the eugenics folks's propaganda.  Seems that 99% of you folks are.

And as you pointed out, "... drastically reducing the global spread of this disease ..." through, as the rest of the article pointed out, reducing the population via vaccine... even if such isn't what the authors had in mind to show.

It's a quote from your article, or rather the study you mentioned. They clearly say that vaccines helped even though the recent doses have to be fixed.

LOL! We aren't supposed to be reducing the population as a method for reducing or stopping the spread of diseases.

''5. Conclusions
The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV.''

Oh, so they have paralyzed a ton of darkies with NOTpolio?  Who knew?  Oh that's right...us 'crazy conspiracy theorists.'  You know; the ones who actually read scientific papers.

The death and paralysis is absolutely not polio if it came from a polio vaccine.  By definition!  And besides it's a kinder gentler death and paralysis if the UN and Bill Gates gives it to you.  Brown people don't mind being paralyzed like us white folk, and there are way to many of them anyway all living there in India and breeding like rabbits.  Thankfully there are plenty of corrupt darkies who will take a pay-off to kill their own.

BTW, look at those women in the picture playing roulette with that poor kid.  I can absolutely see why they call us 'white devils.'  Ten bucks says that those hideous creatures are thinking about their next spirit cooking dinner and the yummy 'walnut sauce' they are going to enjoy.

491,000 Children Paralyzed Over 17 Years, Indian Polio Vaccine Program Study Suggests







Read more at http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/491000-children-paralyzed-over-17-years-indian-polio-vaccine-program-study-sugges.

Fast food, bad genes, too much TV, video games, pesticides, plastics – name the environmental factor and it has been implicated in the surge of sickness, although none adequately explains the scale or scope of the epidemic. There is one exposure, however, that has evaded the search, despite that children have received it by direct injection in steadily accumulating doses far beyond anything past generations ever saw: 50 doses of 14 vaccines by age six, 69 doses of 16 pharmaceutical vaccines containing powerfully immune-altering ingredients by age 18.

Doctors inevitably have a relatively high IQ in order to get through med school, but they are not super-human.  Not even close.  In med school they don't necessarily become even proficient in most fields.  They might have touch on the subject of vaccination for one day of one class.  In order to pass the mid-term they just have to repeat a few fundamental 'truths' about how great vaccination is.  This because most medical schools are funded by people who get rich off of the status quo in allopathic medicine.

Doctors also don't have to keep current in all branches of medical science.  In fact it would be impossible.  Some doctors are fascinated by their occupation and read broadly about it as a passion.  Others are more interested in their golf game.

At the end of the day, an intelligent person from another field can easily eclipse most licensed medical doctor in knowledge of a particular field of medicine with a week or two of study.  This doesn't make them 'as good as' a doctor because they will still lack the breadth of knowledge that most doctors have by virtue of years of study and practice, but it makes them perfectly qualified to speak intelligently on a subject such as vaccination.

Much of my most valuable information about vaccinations and some of the problems with them come from medical doctors and research scientists who, after years of experience, 'flipped' and no longer believe some of the stuff they were supposed to believe in order to be issued a degree and license.  Inevitably these are people with the half a lecture in immunology under their belt AND a lot of first-hand medical experience AND a great deal of extra independent study to confirm their suspicions and catch up on the in-depth scientific aspects of the field.

Unfortunately when a doctor or scientist goes against the flow, it has very negative consequences for their livelihood.  Only a tiny fraction of truly special people are willing to do this.  And only a tiny fraction of the general public notices, recognizes, and appreciates their work and their sacrifices.  At the end of the day, though, someone like Dr. Suzanne Humphries will save orders of magnitude more pain and suffering by putting out the information she knows on videos with only a couple thousand views than she ever could if she kept her $300,000 year job as a nephrologist.

http://drsuzanne.net/dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccines-vaccination/

I was really informed by this article. It was helpful anyway. And now am reading reviews and critics about it and one says " My child got super super autisimed by vaccines and bled to death from the needle when i ripped his band aid off. Also all of my other children got murcury and aluminium poisining and died im sad ): so then it went on and more of them were dead so so sad"

I think the advancement of anesthesiology is not that develop considering that there were lots of factors involved by applying this vaccines into human body. Medicine ethics will still be reign on this part.

Lets be serious here, vaccines have helped us to eradicate  terrible diseases  such as the small pox or polio, you DO understand this is no coincidence right? Millions of lives have been saved thanks to vaccination. If you personally know a doctor, please - DO ask him/her to tell you an option on the topic!

In the 21st century, vaccination is the best way to  avoid being sick. I always choose vaccination against being sick.

The 'whole thread' eh?

Funny there are no 'total health outcome' studies which employ proper multivariate analysis in order to substantiate the claim.  But when we are have someone as wise as Moloch to bless us with his wisdom, who needs science, right?  Part of any decent study of this nature would be to publish the protocols along with the data and 'the maths.'  In other words the study would be 'open.'

Actually there are a fair number of studies which claim to find that the unvaccinated are much lower in a variety of expensive, life-long, and debilitating medical conditions than those who've received a 'full' vaccine schedule as instructed by corp/gov.  For some reason corp/gov is very resistant to sponsoring or certifying such studies themselves even though it would be fairly simple to do.  Who knows why?

We all have a pretty good idea why such studies will never be done, and if they are, they won't be done properly.  If such a study ever was done only a tiny fraction of the really clueless would opt for any shots for their kids.  Fact is, vaccinations really are an appropriate tool for certain things and it is worth the risk in certain instances, but the abuse that already occurred means that in terms of having a responsible program for the actual good of society, 'that ship has sailed.'

This whole thread can be explained by the simple fact that people who don't get their children vaccinated, also don't visit the doctor as often

When you visit the doctor often, the doctor finds things wrong with you... that's literally his job

If you don't visit the doctor, he can't find anything wrong with you, so there is obviously lower "diagnosed" problems with unvaccinated children because they haven't been to the doctor... the doctor can't find a problem if he never investigates the child, but that doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist, only that it was not diagnosed

There is also a problem with doctors misdiagnosing certain conditions like ADD/ADHD.  Ritalin companies would pay doctors kickbacks for each prescription they wrote... and write prescriptions they did... over 6 million kids were prescribed medication for ADHD... as if hyperactivity isn't normal for children

Well, that's what they cannot stop talking about.  And it's the 'problem' that they throw money at.

Most of the eugenically minded are of the 'resource based economy' mindset.  The U.N. is their center-mass.  In that case, any more Flips than are needed to harvest their pineapples are to many.  You gotta keep this 'excess' peeps alive and happy enough to not join the NPA and burn down your shit.  Doing so under a situation where there are excess peeps means burning the resources under their control at an inefficient and unnecessary rate.

Another class are the 'debt-backed' economic model crowd.  These would be the so-called 'international bankers' who've been on-top for a few hundred years but who's current cash cow (the post Brenton-Woods petro-dollar) is due for a re-set.  They don't have an issue with to many people.  In fact, the more the merrier..as long as they will go into debt slavery and make their interest payments.

Even while they jostle for position both groups scratch one-another's backs since it is mutually beneficial to them.  The real PTB folks have bets on both groups since it isn't clear who is going to win.