It is now known that some children have a physiology which makes them unable to tollerate the strain of the increasing rate of vaccine injection due to mitocondrial differences in the nervious systems.
This just isn't true. Provide a single peer-reviewed article published in a reputable journal to back up this ridiculous claim. And none of your ramblings change the fact that lumbar punctures
were not indicated.
As noted in Wakefield's defence to the rather obvious charade, he was not 'paid 55k' for this work.
So your defence is "he said he didn't"? Nice.
Also as noted, it was is partner Walker-Smith under who's supervision the testing took place, and he had clear ethical clearance to do the work.
That's not how medical studies work, like, even a little. You have to gain ethics approval from a specific medical ethics board, not just another doctor you are working with. This approval was not secured.
Gathering samples from within the blood-brain barrier is a standard way of understanding what has passed through said barrier and the physiology within. 'Doctor' (chuckle).
A lumbar puncture doesn't "gather samples from within the blood-brain barrier". The blood-brain barrier is entirely within the skull - you know, where the
brain is. The only way to gather samples from within it is a brain biopsy. This is
super basic stuff.
Actually it means that at this point you can paralyze 50,000 people to save 1 person from getting paralyzed.
Again, outright lies. The polio vaccine has a paralysis incidence of 0.0003%. So for 50,000 people to be paralyzed from it, it would have to have been given to almost
17 billion people. I'm not sure if you know this, since apparently you don't know the brain is in the skull, but the number of children in India isn't
quite 17 billion.
Pertussis is NOT the one you want to use as a poster-child for your propaganda, and I've described why earlier in this thread.
We've agreed death rates were largely improving because of better healthcare in general. You are showing me a graph where introduction of vaccines dropped the infection rate to near zero. Again, that's an argument
for vaccines. Now, here's a graph for you:
What happened in 1974? Unfounded fears about the vaccine caused uptake to drop, which was followed by an epidemic of pertussis cases and deaths, before vaccine uptake rose and pertussis cases fell again. And here is what's happening in the US now:
Uneducated morons like you, spreading your unfounded and unscientific fear, are causing pertussis cases to raise again. It won't be long before we see a nation-wide epidemic of at least one completely preventable disease.
Your entire post is a combination of about 50% easily disprovable lies and 50% complete ignorance of medicine, biology and physiology. It's a shame really - because you don't understand medicine
at all, you don't even understand just how stupid the things you are saying are.