Topic: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? - page 35. (Read 45532 times)

Of course the personal experiences of the scientists in their scientific investigations are scientific. If they weren't, we wouldn't be able to understand anything about science at all!

The differences between Nam and the States is hygiene. If there weren't any vax in the States, it would be down to 5 per 100,000.

What are you always blabbing about without looking at more than your narrow area. Spread your thinking out to look at more of the picture... or are you really a political troll.

1. Personal experiences are certainly very scientific.

2. Vietnam 24.5 Deaths per 100.000 inhabitants driving, United States   10.6 Was it really that hard to check the statistics? Oh well, for conspiracy theorists probably is, their brain is always trying to fabricate some new conspiracy.

Just got back from a 10 day trip to Vietnam and made a few observations.

1)  High population density and a lot of people everywhere, but I rarely saw anyone with a sniffle.  When I got back to a domestic hop, the airplane was literally a chorus of coughing and sneezing.  I would not rule out the possibility that the fires in the NW were a contributing factor, but I think it safe to say that the U.S. generally is a very sick and weak population.  Is it because to many people take the bait and get bi-monthly 'flu shots' at the grocery store?  Lacking proper scientific data I'll not say, but I will say that the lack of such scientific data is interesting indeed.  To this day there is fierce resistance to any 'total health outcome' studies associated with vaccines.  Why?

2)  People need their shit wired tight to drive safely in Vietnam given the traffic and driving patterns.  I saw not a single accident.  The last leg of my trip was 4 hours of driving on American roads, and it seemed like every 10th car had a dunk behind the wheel.  Were people to drive like this in Vietnam the road would be littered with fatalities.  Could the fact that by most counts well over half of the U.S. population is on prescription meds be associated with this observation about driving skill?  Just wondering.

As usual, you can't stick to the topic. Haven't you ever heard the phrase, "Fight fire with fire?" If you want to go off on a topic of the few people who get poisonously "stabbed" by something in nature, why don't you start such a topic?

The point is that "stabbing" in nature is something that is generally unhealthy for a person. So, why would we think that stabbing the masses with vaccine injections would do anything better, since we aren't nearly as smart as the immune systems nature built into us?

On top of that, you seem to like the mercury that we "stab" into people in the standard injections, even though mercury has been shown to be extremely toxic to our systems. Don't you even relize, that if we can find a way to protect ourselves from mercury injections, that we can find ways to protect ourselves without having the injections at all?

Your twisted mind simply wants to deceive us into thinking that vaccination is safe, when we first trusted, but now are finding out that vaccine safety is unproven at best, and often a lie.

You are showing yourself to be a complete, trolling lie, probably working for Big Pharma, so that the truth can be hidden, and Big Pharma can continue to make more money off millions of people, while damaging these people in other ways so that BF can make even more $billions of these millions of people.

No wonder you talk the way you do. You are making money off the destruction of the health of millions!

There are thousands of different vaccinations available. In some cases, more than a dozen different vaccines are available to protect you from the same disease. And how many of them contain mercury? The presence of mercury in one vaccine should not be used to tarnish the entire vaccination program.

Stick to religion, leave science for smart people. ''Where does something like that happen in nature?'' Poisonous snakes and spiders and fish that do injection, all harm or kill. And even some thorn bushes of various types are poisonous. Essentially there is nothing in nature that suggests injecting somebody to keep him well and safe.

Next time someone allergic to a bee ''injection'' get's ''injected'' tell him not to inject himself with epinephrine, let him die because injecting epinephrine cannot possibly be good because nature shows us it's not.

You are fucking stupid lmao.

You really need to start recognizing the difference between fact and argument. Or are you across the hall from notbatman?

This gotta be up there with the most idiotic arguments in the history.

Most vaccination is effected by sticking a needle into a person. Where does something like that happen in nature? Poisonous snakes and spiders and fish that do injection, all harm or kill. And even some thorn bushes of various types are poisonous. Essentially there is nothing in nature that suggests injecting somebody to keep him well and safe.

At the same time, you can look all over the world and see how nature provides people with teeth, food, a digestive system, and all kinds of immunities in the forms of their natural immune systems. And all of this without injecting them. So, why would injection be better?

Are we improving on nature? Consider. Nature reproduces life in quantities... by the trillions. We can't even figure out how to make one single life form from scratch. Why do we think that we are smart enough to inject people to heal them, when nature - which is a lot smarter than we are - doesn't do that?

Pharmaceuticals are indeed pretty evil sometimes, raising the cost of their products and so on, however from to that to, government controls and makes all vaccines harmful on purpose, is a big leap. Overpopulation? Don't make me laugh, overpopulation is not and will never be a problem. More than half of the population already lives in 2 countries, china and india and they are perfectly fine. Also big difference between those 2 countries even though they have a lot of population indicating how little population affects anything, not to mention that in 50-100 years we will be living on mars ;^)

Why does 'overpopulation' become a fixation of these ultra-wealthy and/or 'elite' people then?  It clearly is if you study their work even a little bit.

You also have to be willingly blind to not notice that sick people in America are a cash cow of epic proportions to the medical/industrial complex as well an increasingly significant portion of our economy generally.  Hi medical bills also happen to be a great way to siphon the lifes savings of the middle class into the hands of the upper class.  This may be an accident of fate, but I doubt that it goes unnoticed by the beneficiaries.

Why do you even bother, these people are deaf and so deep in their echo chambers. Everything is a conspiracy, everyone is out to kill them. Leave them to their paranoia.

There is nothing to gain from poisoning and killing us, nothing.

Hmmm. Deoderants.  Who do you suppose owns controlling interest in Unilever Corporation?  I doubt it is mother Theresa.  I'd be surprise if Prince Bernhard or his 'house' didn't have at least a voice in the activities of this multinational corporation.

You know Prince Bernhard, right?  Or is cousin Prince Philip?


Not sure how you got such great confidence in these types of 'leaders'.  I'm still guessing that you are a garden variety retard rather than someone who agrees with the ways and means of these evil fucks.

Oh come on! Lead isn't a problem. Just watch this Youtube video from Aswan Egypt starting about 18 minutes and 45 seconds in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwKZ_KdP8YQ&t=0m1125s.

Aluminium and lead was also present in a ton of things everyone uses everyday, like deodorants, I guess the government is making deodorants with poisonous materials on purpose too, am I right?

A 'conspiracy' is just two or more people having a plan which doesn't benefit everyone and which they keep secret.  To deny that this happens is absurd.

A 'theory' is the post enlightenment method of discovering factual truth.  Nothing to be ashamed of at all.  Just the opposite in fact.

The gluing of these two words together into the string 'conspiracy theory' and demonizing it was demonstrably a psychological construct to help preserve and expand their existing power structure in the U.S..  The tactic targets the weak minded, and it works like a dream!  The trouble is that not everyone is weak minded.  What's a good social engineer to do?  Getting mercury, fluoride, aluminum, lead, etc into the central nervous system of most of the peeps?  Perhaps.

A conspirator is somebody who names people who disclose his conspiracy, conspiracy theorists.

This is the problem with conspiracy theorists, you go to google, find a link that supports your conspiracy, come back post it here and call it evidence, never mind the thousands of studies showing vaccines are safe, never mind the thousands of websites, you find 1 or 2 that support your conspiracy, WELP IT MUST BE TRUE THEN HURR DURR.

No one is saying all vaccines are 100% safe, we are humans, we don't make perfect things, I'm sure some of them contain things that might not be healthy, it happens with everything, drugs and medicine for instance. You agree that steroids are a necessity to cure or treat a lot of different diseases, yet we all know they have awful side effects, does that mean the government is making them like that on purpose to kill us or whatever you think they are doing?

Do you eat fish? It contains mercury too, in high doses mercury clearly is bad, however in small doses does nothing to your body. God should have protected us from this, anyways, right?