VanBitCracken - a program to use for 32 BTC challenge (supports RTX 30xx cards) - page 9.

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 10:40:01 PM

I released version 1.1; will print keys found to "KeysFound.txt" if user forgets to add -o option or pause at end of batch file. Try with no -o

https://github.com/WanderingPhilosopher/VanBitCrakcenS/releases/tag/1.1

Actually it will print KeysFound.txt whether -o was used or not, but a fail safe for now.

Now I roll back to using version 1.0
I use -o output for save result that save difference key

version 1.1 not save from command -o output
but every thing move to save on KeysFound.txt

lostrelic

jr. member

Activity: 32

Merit: 1

Any chance of step by step guide to run this i cant even get it to run. Ive downloaded all files but not sure what to do after sorry if its simple just wanted to test my 3080 on it. Thanks lostrelic

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 10:40:01 PM

I released version 1.1; will print keys found to "KeysFound.txt" if user forgets to add -o option or pause at end of batch file. Try with no -o

https://github.com/WanderingPhilosopher/VanBitCrakcenS/releases/tag/1.1

Actually it will print KeysFound.txt whether -o was used or not, but a fail safe for now.

Thank you very much for fast update

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: fxsniper on April 02, 2021, 10:35:38 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 10:13:08 PM

I'll look into it fxsniper...I do understand the concern.
Also, since you are using a 1050, you should be able to use full address and gain speed.

I try again program work fine result

output.txt
1Be2UF9NLfyLFbtm3TCbmuocc9N1Kduci1 9DE820A7C

actually this is user error, user forget use output option to save result

so, make it both print out to default is better (and make option for don't print out)
make program to feel better use
if user error still work fine

1. default ==> printout output when found key

2. no use any option = default => printout

3. use option -o output.txt ==> do both
save result to output.txt
and print output

4. if use option -noprint will no print on screen

5. or warning no output setting

because if missing it is found key but make it Waste of time a lot
user error, but don't blame user

thank for update

I released version 1.1; will print keys found to "KeysFound.txt" if user forgets to add -o option or pause at end of batch file. Try with no -o

https://github.com/WanderingPhilosopher/VanBitCrakcenS/releases/tag/1.1

Actually it will print KeysFound.txt whether -o was used or not, but a fail safe for now.

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 10:13:08 PM

I'll look into it fxsniper...I do understand the concern.
Also, since you are using a 1050, you should be able to use full address and gain speed.

I try again program work fine result

output.txt
1Be2UF9NLfyLFbtm3TCbmuocc9N1Kduci1 9DE820A7C

actually this is user error, user forget use output option to save result

so, make it both print out to default is better (and make option for don't print out)
make program to feel better use
if user error still work fine

1. default ==> printout output when found key

2. no use any option = default => printout

3. use option -o output.txt ==> do both
save result to output.txt
and print output

4. if use option -noprint will no print on screen

5. or warning no output setting

because if missing it is found key but make it Waste of time a lot
user error, but don't blame user

thank for update

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: fxsniper on April 02, 2021, 10:06:25 PM

Code:

VanBitCrackenS1 -t 0 -gpu -gpuId 0 -r 150000 --keyspace 800000000:FFFFFFFFF 1Be2UF9NLfyLFbtm3TCbmuocc9
VanBitCrackenS v1.0
Keyspace start=800000000
Keyspace   end=FFFFFFFFF
Difficulty: 49015701099621550400511978774011251513098240
Search: 1Be2UF9NLfyLFbtm3TCbmuocc9 [Compressed]
Started at Sat Apr  3 08:45:35 2021
CPU threads used: 0
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce GTX 1050 (5x128 cores) Grid(40x512)
67.027 MK/s (GPU 67.027 MK/s) (2^31.85) [00:00:56 Elapsed Time][0]
65.763 MK/s (GPU 65.763 MK/s) (2^37.13) [00:37:06 Elapsed Time][1]
[EXIT] Reached end of keyspace.

Finish at Sat Apr  3 09:22:44 2021

compare
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti use time 1 second

my GTX 1050 use time near 1 hour for scan all key space

Can possible to print out key if not use options output
or print both may be safety

Scan found key but not use -o out.txt for save it make mission key

I'll look into it fxsniper...I do understand the concern.
Also, since you are using a 1050, you should be able to use full address and gain speed.

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Code:

VanBitCrackenS1 -t 0 -gpu -gpuId 0 -r 150000 --keyspace 800000000:FFFFFFFFF 1Be2UF9NLfyLFbtm3TCbmuocc9
VanBitCrackenS v1.0
Keyspace start=800000000
Keyspace   end=FFFFFFFFF
Difficulty: 49015701099621550400511978774011251513098240
Search: 1Be2UF9NLfyLFbtm3TCbmuocc9 [Compressed]
Started at Sat Apr  3 08:45:35 2021
CPU threads used: 0
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce GTX 1050 (5x128 cores) Grid(40x512)
67.027 MK/s (GPU 67.027 MK/s) (2^31.85) [00:00:56 Elapsed Time][0]
65.763 MK/s (GPU 65.763 MK/s) (2^37.13) [00:37:06 Elapsed Time][1]
[EXIT] Reached end of keyspace.

Finish at Sat Apr  3 09:22:44 2021

compare
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti use time 1 second

my GTX 1050 use time near 1 hour for scan all key space

Can possible to print out key if not use options output
or print both may be safety

Scan found key but not use -o out.txt for save it make mission key

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Thank you WanderingPhilospher for VanBitCracken

my test for small GPU

Code:

VanBitCrackenS1 -t 0 -gpu -gpuId 0 -r 150000 --keyspace d555555555555400:ffffffffffffffff -o output.txt -i input.txt 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
VanBitCrackenS v1.0
Keyspace start=D555555555555400
Keyspace   end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Search: 11 prefixes (Lookup size 1) [Compressed]
Started at Sat Apr  3 08:11:22 2021
CPU threads used: 0
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce GTX 1050 (5x128 cores) Grid(40x512)
68.915 MK/s (GPU 68.915 MK/s) (2^29.64) [00:00:12 Elapsed Time][194]

I scan by strategy search (random keyspace) not scan by power of GPU my GPU is very very small

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 03:59:50 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 03:51:42 PM

In smaller range with mulitple prefixes, I actually drop the x grid size.

I match it up with the actual x size. So for 3070 it is 46 so I put in a -g 46. But you can tweak to your liking. Have you tried one prefix/address?

If it could use full address and search for RIPE, would be faster.

in full address

C:\VanBitCracken\VanBitCrackenS1.exe -gpu --keyspace 8000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
VanBitCrackenS v1.0
Keyspace start=8000000000000000
Keyspace end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Difficulty: 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Search: 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN [Compressed]
Started at Sat Apr 3 02:26:04 2021
CPU threads used: 5
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (38x128 cores) Grid(304x512)
794.487 MK/s (GPU 775.923 MK/s) (2^32.19) [00:00:06 Elapsed Time][0]GPUEngine: Launch: misaligned address

Finish at Sat Apr 3 02:26:13 2021

Right, as I said, must use string vs full address. I usally chop 7 to 8 characters off.
That's what I don't get. Everyone trying to tweak the other program which won't even run with updated drivers, with any 20xx or 30xx cards, and try to fix the misaligned address issue. Where as VS/VBC only has the issue of using full address. Maybe everyone loves the "stride" version as you stated Cheesy

Anywho, hopefully someone figures it all out or Jean Luc comes back to save the day!

Quote

Can you release 512, 256 and 128 also

I ran those for comparisons but the 512 always got through a range faster. I even recompiled newer version where you could manually enter -g x,y and it didn't even perform as well.

zahid888

member

Activity: 282

Merit: 20

the right steps towerds the goal

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 03:51:42 PM

In smaller range with mulitple prefixes, I actually drop the x grid size.

I match it up with the actual x size. So for 3070 it is 46 so I put in a -g 46. But you can tweak to your liking. Have you tried one prefix/address?

If it could use full address and search for RIPE, would be faster.

in full address

C:\VanBitCracken\VanBitCrackenS1.exe -gpu --keyspace 8000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
VanBitCrackenS v1.0
Keyspace start=8000000000000000
Keyspace end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Difficulty: 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Search: 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN [Compressed]
Started at Sat Apr 3 02:26:04 2021
CPU threads used: 5
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (38x128 cores) Grid(304x512)
794.487 MK/s (GPU 775.923 MK/s) (2^32.19) [00:00:06 Elapsed Time][0]GPUEngine: Launch: misaligned address

Finish at Sat Apr 3 02:26:13 2021

Can you release 512, 256 and 128 also

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 03:53:03 PM

I am very happy Cheesy

if --stride has also enabled here it would be icing on the cake Grin

Honestly, I never understood the point of stride. I was always "afraid" I would "stride" right over the key!

I prefer random over stride. May have to get with Pawgo; I know he has implemented a stride function in one of JLPs other programs. If it's something easy, I could possibly implement, but I haven't even thought about it since I really didn't understand the "why" behind it.

zahid888

member

Activity: 282

Merit: 20

the right steps towerds the goal

I am very happy Cheesy

if --stride has also enabled here it would be icing on the cake Grin

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 03:44:28 PM

https://imgur.com/PnFz735

In smaller range with mulitple prefixes, I actually drop the x grid size.

I match it up with the actual x size. So for 3070 it is 46 so I put in a -g 46. But you can tweak to your liking. Have you tried one prefix/address?

If it could use full address and search for RIPE, would be faster.

zahid888

member

Activity: 282

Merit: 20

the right steps towerds the goal

https://imgur.com/PnFz735

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 02:42:16 PM

Is it working with full prefixes Huh

No, for now, if you are using a 30xx card, you will have to use an address string, not the full address. Example: Use 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51 instead of full address 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN

But you can still use input file with many addresses you just have to cut off last 7-8 characters of address.

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 02:40:04 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 02:36:57 PM

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 02:36:21 PM

Its just awesome speed is bit low maybe i have to play with -g please suggest best grid size ??

What is your card and speed?

here is my benchmark

C:\Users\VanBitCrackenS1.exe -t 0 -gpu -g 256 -i C:/puzzleprefix.txt -o C:/Result.txt --keyspace A36D5FE700000000:A36D5FE7ffffffff
VanBitCrackenS v1.0
Keyspace start=A36D5FE700000000
Keyspace end=A36D5FE7FFFFFFFF
Search: 13 prefixes (Lookup size 13) [Compressed]
Started at Sat Apr 3 01:04:43 2021
CPU threads used: 0
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (38x128 cores) Grid(256x512)
714.845 MK/s (GPU 714.845 MK/s) (2^32.00) [00:00:06 Elapsed Time][0]
[EXIT] Reached end of keyspace.

Finish at Sat Apr 3 01:04:51 2021

8 seconds to get through the range? May need to open it up a bit. Also, the MKey/s rate will drop when the program is getting ready to roll over to the next keys and then pick right back up. Try adding -r if you try a larger range.

zahid888

member

Activity: 282

Merit: 20

the right steps towerds the goal

Is it working with full prefixes Huh

zahid888

member

Activity: 282

Merit: 20

the right steps towerds the goal

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on April 02, 2021, 02:36:57 PM

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 02:36:21 PM

Its just awesome speed is bit low maybe i have to play with -g please suggest best grid size ??

What is your card and speed?

here is my benchmark

C:\Users\VanBitCrackenS1.exe -t 0 -gpu -g 256 -i C:/puzzleprefix.txt -o C:/Result.txt --keyspace A36D5FE700000000:A36D5FE7ffffffff
VanBitCrackenS v1.0
Keyspace start=A36D5FE700000000
Keyspace end=A36D5FE7FFFFFFFF
Search: 13 prefixes (Lookup size 13) [Compressed]
Started at Sat Apr 3 01:04:43 2021
CPU threads used: 0
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (38x128 cores) Grid(256x512)
714.845 MK/s (GPU 714.845 MK/s) (2^32.00) [00:00:06 Elapsed Time][0]
[EXIT] Reached end of keyspace.

Finish at Sat Apr 3 01:04:51 2021

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: zahid888 on April 02, 2021, 02:36:21 PM

Its just awesome speed is bit low maybe i have to play with -g please suggest best grid size ??

What is your card and speed?

Try -gpu -g 256 -gpuId 0 (or -g 512, or -g 1024)

zahid888

member

Activity: 282

Merit: 20

the right steps towerds the goal

Its just awesome speed is bit low maybe i have to play with -g please suggest best grid size ??

Topic: VanBitCracken - a program to use for 32 BTC challenge (supports RTX 30xx cards) - page 9. (Read 5673 times)