Pages:
Author

Topic: Vanity Pool - vanity address generator pool - page 3. (Read 148044 times)

copper member
Activity: 909
Merit: 2301
Quote
I've never tried Segwit vanity myself, but "1taproot" would take 45 days for 50% chance on my old laptop GPU.
You probably miscalculated something (or maybe I am extremely lucky), because when using vanitybech it took me one week per address on my CPU. One Segwit char means five bits, so seven chars means 35 bits, around 32 bits per day, so around 8 days.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
I can't tell you if VanitySearch will work on that GPU though.

It will work, the P100 has a high enough CUDA compete cap to run Vanitysearch.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Is it possible to get bech32 address in this pool? Now I am mining "bc1qtapr00t" on my CPU, but willing to pay someone for a few hundred of such vanity addresses.
DarkStar_ tried to use split key on Segwit addresses. It looks like it's possible, but you'll need to put the private keys back together in VanitySearch yourself. For a couple hundred addresses that might be too much.

I've never tried Segwit vanity myself, but "1taproot" would take 45 days for 50% chance on my old laptop GPU. Have you considered a pay by the hour VPS with GPU? I've looked into Scaleway a while back, but never tried it.
I can't tell you if VanitySearch will work on that GPU though.
copper member
Activity: 909
Merit: 2301
Quote
It's ironic to generate Bech32 v0 (bc1q) address with prefix "tapr00t" because Taproot use Bech32 v1 (bc1p).
As long as taproot is not active, using bc1p address is nonstandard and any miner could take that coins without any signatures. Also, it is the only way I know about to show support for taproot without being a miner and without increasing transaction size.
copper member
Activity: 909
Merit: 2301
Is it possible to get bech32 address in this pool? Now I am mining "bc1qtapr00t" on my CPU, but willing to pay someone for a few hundred of such vanity addresses.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
No new messages since a while, has anyone used it in 2021 ?

The Pool should still be up, haven't heard of anyone complain about it in awhile.

Just because some of us have given up trying to connect to your pool (or having been unable to submit a result when one is found) does not equate to "no one having any complaints"

It might be worth checking in on this thread once in a while given the last time you posted in this thread was 2018-05-20, 07:10:04.  (i.e. three years and three days ago)

 Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 313
No new messages since a while, has anyone used it in 2021 ?

The Pool should still be up, haven't heard of anyone complain about it in awhile.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
No new messages since a while, has anyone used it in 2021 ?
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 669
Sorry, I have no experience with that particular software. I'm using old-school vanitygen, which is written in C.

A segmentation violation usually means the application has tried to write (and possibly read) an area of memory that is outside the area allocated to it. "addr=0x8" looks like an odd address to be accessing.

I don't know much about Go - is the source compiled to an executable? If so, there may be problems using a newer compiler to build from older source (or vice versa).

Yes, the source code it's compiled to an executable.
I will try to use an older version of GO if the executable it works I will let you know.
Also, I'll try to push the instructions on Github to ease the work to anyone.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
After a successful compilation on Linux, I modified address.text with my bitcoin address but running /miner.go I got this error.

Code:
Starting the work!
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x8 pc=0x4d9bc0]
[...]
Can you help me, please?

Sorry, I have no experience with that particular software. I'm using old-school vanitygen, which is written in C.

A segmentation violation usually means the application has tried to write (and possibly read) an area of memory that is outside the area allocated to it. "addr=0x8" looks like an odd address to be accessing.

I don't know much about Go - is the source compiled to an executable? If so, there may be problems using a newer compiler to build from older source (or vice versa).
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 669
snip

After a successful compilation on Linux, I modified address.text with my bitcoin address but running /miner.go I got this error.

Code:
Starting the work!
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x8 pc=0x4d9bc0]

goroutine 1 [running]:
math/big.(*Int).Mul(0xc0001239d8, 0x0, 0xc0001239f8, 0xc0001239f8)
/usr/local/go/src/math/big/int.go:168 +0xd0
bitelliptic.(*BitCurve).addJacobian(0xc00041c0f0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc000123a98, 0xc0002338a0, 0xc0002338c0, 0xc000123a98, 0xc0002338c0, 0x20, 0x0)
/usr/local/go/src/bitelliptic/bitelliptic.go:79 +0x156
bitelliptic.(*BitCurve).Add(0xc00041c0f0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc0002338a0, 0xc0002338c0, 0x0, 0x0)
/usr/local/go/src/bitelliptic/bitelliptic.go:67 +0xa2
main.main()
/root/Downloads/Split-Vanity-Miner-Golang-master/src/cmd/miner.go:97 +0xa0f

Can you help me, please?

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
September 11, 2019, 12:15:06 PM
Can anyone verify this is still up and running ?
I'd like to attempt a few of these with 6x  tesla v100s
Is the reward automated or manual releases?.


I just compiled oclvanitygen/oclvanityminer for fun - to see how many years my humble card would take to solve even the simplest work on offer - and it seems to be functional. It fetches a pattern from the server which is also listed on the website.

It looks like oclvanityminer automatically pays out (you specify the address as part of the commandline), but whether the backend at the pool still works, I can't say for sure.

So does this mean the requester's BTC stays tied up in the pool indefinitely, until (and only if) a prefix is matched and claimed? For some of them, it seems improbable a solution will be found, such as '1qwertyuiop' (approximately 221000 years at 1 Mkey/sec). I guess if you had 1000 participants at 500 Mkey/sec each you could crack it, but I presume pool activity sort of died off around the time people stopped mining Bitcoin with GPUs.

...

Things didn't look good when I started poking around the solved page - most solutions from 2013 or 2014 - but then I found one that was solved only a couple of weeks ago. Was it you? If so, please confirm it all works.

https://vanitypool.appspot.com/checkSolved?key=1zarodinu:048217EB1EA44C4737383DCC86B57A08BF81EEBDA8F9DB16ED9BDB5D5E391C892B2A607134CB008 1B626FA5742532A75EC2ED42B07B9F26A6303BC733C1ECDB332
hero member
Activity: 1439
Merit: 513
Can anyone verify this is still up and running ?
I'd like to attempt a few of these with 6x  tesla v100s
Is the reward automated or manual releases?.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓

The main pool is running at:
http://vanitypool.appspot.com/

Just some nitpicking, is it http://vanitypool.appspot.com/ or https://vanitypool.appspot.com/

I've started a [list] VanityGen Wallet Generation - threads, how to & links - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/list-vanitygen-wallet-generation-threads-how-to-links-5151346 to list the various threads and external links etc and would just like to get it right.
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 738
Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com
The Pool should still be running, although sometimes we seem to get some API errors from the wallet API provider we're using.
good to hear it's still running Smiley
I suggest on the available work page, make it sortable by reward or lavishness
and solved work page should also display solved date info and sortable by solved date and pattern
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 313
The Pool should still be running, although sometimes we seem to get some API errors from the wallet API provider we're using.
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 738
Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com
Arulbero asks for an interesting question. Compress and uncompressed Krys are allowed ?
ThePiachu and answer please on this
my next question is, Are all addresses which exist at this moment on your pool is uncompressed?
is this pool actually still working? you might want to confirm it first before wasting resources
eventhough OP's last active in march 2018, his last post was in 2016 and rarely post
if you guys into this kind of work might as well just open a thread in Marketplace > Services
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
PC repair master, engeneer, radioamateur
Arulbero asks for an interesting question. Compress and uncompressed Krys are allowed ?
ThePiachu and answer please on this
my next question is, Are all addresses which exist at this moment on your pool is uncompressed?
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
PC repair master, engeneer, radioamateur
Hi dear dev, ThePiachu, I have some questions, answer on it please.
I'm using
C:\Vanitygen PLUS v1.53>oclvanityminer.exe -p 0 -d 0 -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com/ -a 157cehkJ1sVkpiTHSjD69CkbvZCYjxbkL1
Searching for pattern: "1BETBTCcom" Reward: 0.200000 Value: 0.000068 BTC/Mkey
Difficulty: 2938077882634386
1)Why it is searching only for 1 address and why 1BETBTCcom?
2)Can it search several addresses at the same time?
3)Or can I maually choose which addresses it must search at the same time?
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Need a option on there for public keys that are like
1Joe1Katz1
I have 1Joe1Katz from the vanity pool with the public key 04536B7B0FB183B193084AE76097508CEC6A98625577E1CC6B01CCAA82EE7BB4BEF509043A0AD24 0E1F3EDF6ECE11554ED50E6851171A7D78E478DA27ACF010E36

Since the key lengths over 8 chars like 1Joe1Katz1 you should be able to create alternate smaller ones with Case options
Pages:
Jump to: