Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] - page 30. (Read 1152908 times)
SI there nay guide to use Vanitygen for altcoin ?
Plowed back through (very quickly) to see if there was a working windows binary with support for compressed keys but couldn't find anything.
No reason (especially nowadays) to NOT use compressed keys to save a few bytes.
TIA!
No reason (especially nowadays) to NOT use compressed keys to save a few bytes.
TIA!
There are some forks that support compressed keys (such as ExploitAgency's), although I've run into CPU / GPU hash mismatch errors when attempting compressed key generation using the modified oclvanitygen.
Thanks for the reply - I guess I'll stick with the larger keys to be safe...
is there a way to make it show all Adresses generated "live" in the Terminal ?......For "Eye candy" 
millions of keys a second?
i dont think the terminal can show that much before it will crash.
maybe a way to limit it, 5 addresses per second, stop displaying more then 100 addresses in one session ?
is there a way to make it show all Adresses generated "live" in the Terminal ?......For "Eye candy"
millions of keys a second?
i dont think the terminal can show that much before it will crash.
is there a way to make it show all Adresses generated "live" in the Terminal ?......For "Eye candy"
Plowed back through (very quickly) to see if there was a working windows binary with support for compressed keys but couldn't find anything.
No reason (especially nowadays) to NOT use compressed keys to save a few bytes.
TIA!
No reason (especially nowadays) to NOT use compressed keys to save a few bytes.
TIA!
There are some forks that support compressed keys (such as ExploitAgency's), although I've run into CPU / GPU hash mismatch errors when attempting compressed key generation using the modified oclvanitygen.
Plowed back through (very quickly) to see if there was a working windows binary with support for compressed keys but couldn't find anything.
No reason (especially nowadays) to NOT use compressed keys to save a few bytes.
TIA!
No reason (especially nowadays) to NOT use compressed keys to save a few bytes.
TIA!
I know the wiki lists a good amount of GPUs and how they perform but does anyone have another list or anywhere else where more GPUs were consolidated showing their performances? I'm still looking for some casual address finding of my own and my CPU won't cut it if I need anything 5 characters or higher (case sensitive).
ill tell you there is a HUGE difference between my r9 380 and my rx 470 and 480s..
the r9 380 only does around 22-25Mk/s
even tho it mines ethereum at about the same speed as the rx cards..
with the price of the rx 470 cards being less than 150$ id just those.
Thanks,
Dave
about 155Mk/s for 2
I know the wiki lists a good amount of GPUs and how they perform but does anyone have another list or anywhere else where more GPUs were consolidated showing their performances? I'm still looking for some casual address finding of my own and my CPU won't cut it if I need anything 5 characters or higher (case sensitive).
ill tell you there is a HUGE difference between my r9 380 and my rx 470 and 480s..
the r9 380 only does around 22-25Mk/s
even tho it mines ethereum at about the same speed as the rx cards..
with the price of the rx 470 cards being less than 150$ id just those.
Thanks,
Dave
I know the wiki lists a good amount of GPUs and how they perform but does anyone have another list or anywhere else where more GPUs were consolidated showing their performances? I'm still looking for some casual address finding of my own and my CPU won't cut it if I need anything 5 characters or higher (case sensitive).
ill tell you there is a HUGE difference between my r9 380 and my rx 470 and 480s..
the r9 380 only does around 22-25Mk/s
even tho it mines ethereum at about the same speed as the rx cards..
with the price of the rx 470 cards being less than 150$ id just those.
I know the wiki lists a good amount of GPUs and how they perform but does anyone have another list or anywhere else where more GPUs were consolidated showing their performances? I'm still looking for some casual address finding of my own and my CPU won't cut it if I need anything 5 characters or higher (case sensitive).
Still working today very cool. 
Hello guys, I just couldn't make this work on mac.
I've downloaded the file on the first page then couldn't make it happen.
Can anybody help me.
Thank you
I've downloaded the file on the first page then couldn't make it happen.
Can anybody help me.
Thank you
Since today oclvanitygen.exe is registered as a virus when using AVIRA anti-virus software when using high macroheuristics.
that is because its a compiled exe..
its just false positive.
Since today oclvanitygen.exe is registered as a virus when using AVIRA anti-virus software when using high macroheuristics.
the rx 480 should get you around 160 Mkey/s
Do you have an rx480? I have 4 and none of them are getting close to 160Mkey/s...
i have 2. sorry 2 of them get 160. so 96 for one is a good number..
i havent really used this program for awhile, the new drivers are busted.. it goes for about 15 minutes and just stops..
That makes more sense.
I've also found the new included software package to be configurable enough where you don't need to use afterburner anymore.
the rx 480 should get you around 160 Mkey/s
Do you have an rx480? I have 4 and none of them are getting close to 160Mkey/s...
i have 2. sorry 2 of them get 160. so 96 for one is a good number..
i havent really used this program for awhile, the new drivers are busted.. it goes for about 15 minutes and just stops..
here is a screenshot.
the rx 480 should get you around 160 Mkey/s
Do you have an rx480? I have 4 and none of them are getting close to 160Mkey/s...
To all of you who is still having problems with random abortion, there's a "workaround" you can use to not have uncontrolled abortions while not in front of your PC:
I wrote myself a program which automatically presses the "[CTRL]+C"-Keys 2 times with 1 second delay between and then pressing the up-key combined enter. This is having a manually settable interval.
This works pretty good since all generated hashes are just a "probability" and every hash you hash could be the wanted hash and there's no difference between stopping and starting over and over again or letting it run.
If you can't believe it unseen just try it with something which achieves 50% after 5 to 10 minutes.
That's not a beautiful solution but this will prevent you from unpredictable driver crashes like I get when my oclvanitygen fails while using windows. Also it protects you from unwanted disruptions longer than the set interval.
Shout if you can't program this for windows yourself, then I'll provide a solution via github for you.
~Style
I wrote myself a program which automatically presses the "[CTRL]+C"-Keys 2 times with 1 second delay between and then pressing the up-key combined enter. This is having a manually settable interval.
This works pretty good since all generated hashes are just a "probability" and every hash you hash could be the wanted hash and there's no difference between stopping and starting over and over again or letting it run.
If you can't believe it unseen just try it with something which achieves 50% after 5 to 10 minutes.
That's not a beautiful solution but this will prevent you from unpredictable driver crashes like I get when my oclvanitygen fails while using windows. Also it protects you from unwanted disruptions longer than the set interval.
Shout if you can't program this for windows yourself, then I'll provide a solution via github for you.
~Style
I run my gpu's headless rackmounted with my other servers, and the 4u's arent on sliders. Too much of a hassle to drag an lcd out and install windows for testing, or to do a headless windows install and vnc or something. Will build an amd pc eventually, im just an nvidia fan since the tdp is better. I figured theres enough community to test amd from all the miners. EDIT: And to clarify I don't have an AMD card to test right now. Feel free to donate .
. Jump to: