Pages:
Author

Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] - page 37. (Read 1153678 times)

sr. member
Activity: 353
Merit: 250
Zichain
Great guide samr7!!!
 I am trying to configure my one with http://brainwallet.org/ but site seems off line... Anyone know why?


Brainwallet.org is no longer functional because Its not secure , see this reddit post : https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3g7bpa/brainwallet_shut_down_permanently_due_to/
If you insist on using it then you should check github , you might find some forks from the official repository and run it locally from your PC.
full member
Activity: 269
Merit: 101
Great guide samr7!!!
 I am trying to configure my one with http://brainwallet.org/ but site seems off line... Anyone know why?
legendary
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1122
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.

Is this the GPU you would suggest?

http://m.ebay.ca/itm/AMD-Radeon-R9-Nano-VisionTek-4GB-/322347235890?nav=SEARCH

I see lots of different GPUs with R9 Nano in the title so can't really figure out what I'm looking for.

Some people have gotten rx480's to work, so that might be the best option these days.  The new AMD Vega line is also coming out soon, which could be a great vanity miner if it's affordable...

So what I linked to, that's a rx480? When I just search R9 Nano I get so many options with diamond this sapphire this... I don't understand any of it.

Any experience with external GPUs (eGPUs?)?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Can anybody tell me what i have to do to get the programm running?

C:\Users\xxxxxxxxxxxx\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen.exe -v -d 1 1Bastian

  0: [Intel(R) Corporation] Intel(R) HD Graphics
  1: [Intel(R) Corporation]         Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1037U @ 1.80GHz
I don't think oclvanitygen will work on Intel HD Graphics. That leaves CPU-only, which is a lot slower, but should work. Try vanitygen.exe instead of "ocl".
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.

Is this the GPU you would suggest?

http://m.ebay.ca/itm/AMD-Radeon-R9-Nano-VisionTek-4GB-/322347235890?nav=SEARCH

I see lots of different GPUs with R9 Nano in the title so can't really figure out what I'm looking for.

Some people have gotten rx480's to work, so that might be the best option these days.  The new AMD Vega line is also coming out soon, which could be a great vanity miner if it's affordable...
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Can anybody tell me what i have to do to get the programm running?


C:\Users\xxxxxxxxxxxx\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen.exe -v -d 1 1Bastian
Prefix difficulty:         873388193410 1Bastian
Difficulty: 873388193410
Device:         Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1037U @ 1.80GHz
Vendor: Intel(R) Corporation (8086)
Driver: 1.1.0.0
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 (Build 71409)
Max compute units: 2
Max workgroup size: 1024
Global memory: 2147352576
Max allocation: 536838144
OpenCL compiler flags: -DDEEP_PREPROC_UNROLL
Compiling kernel, can take minutes...failure.
clBuildProgram: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE
Build log:
Compilation started
:173:19: error: constant address space qualified variables are required to be in
itialized
Compilation failed
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Intel(R) Corporation] Intel(R) OpenCL
  0: [Intel(R) Corporation] Intel(R) HD Graphics
  1: [Intel(R) Corporation]         Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1037U @ 1.80GHz
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 1
Did you have any progress on this?
Please, come to this report, may be together we can fix it!
https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/issues/84

I have a problem after using the make command to build it from the source see the error below..

Code:
:~/Desktop/vanitygen-master$ make
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall   -c -o vanitygen.o vanitygen.c
In file included from vanitygen.c:32:0:
pattern.h:54:12: error: field ‘vxc_bntarg’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bntarg;
            ^~~~~~~~~~
pattern.h:55:12: error: field ‘vxc_bnbase’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bnbase;
            ^~~~~~~~~~
pattern.h:56:12: error: field ‘vxc_bntmp’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bntmp;
            ^~~~~~~~~
pattern.h:57:12: error: field ‘vxc_bntmp2’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bntmp2;
            ^~~~~~~~~~
vanitygen.c: In function ‘vg_thread_loop’:
vanitygen.c:134:21: error: ‘BN_MASK2’ undeclared (first use in this function)
    if ((rekey_at == BN_MASK2) || (rekey_at > rekey_max))
                     ^~~~~~~~
vanitygen.c:134:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
: recipe for target 'vanitygen.o' failed
make: *** [vanitygen.o] Error 1
legendary
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1122
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.

Is this the GPU you would suggest?

http://m.ebay.ca/itm/AMD-Radeon-R9-Nano-VisionTek-4GB-/322347235890?nav=SEARCH

I see lots of different GPUs with R9 Nano in the title so can't really figure out what I'm looking for.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I have a problem after using the make command to build it from the source see the error below..

Code:
:~/Desktop/vanitygen-master$ make
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall   -c -o vanitygen.o vanitygen.c
In file included from vanitygen.c:32:0:
pattern.h:54:12: error: field ‘vxc_bntarg’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bntarg;
            ^~~~~~~~~~
pattern.h:55:12: error: field ‘vxc_bnbase’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bnbase;
            ^~~~~~~~~~
pattern.h:56:12: error: field ‘vxc_bntmp’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bntmp;
            ^~~~~~~~~
pattern.h:57:12: error: field ‘vxc_bntmp2’ has incomplete type
  BIGNUM    vxc_bntmp2;
            ^~~~~~~~~~
vanitygen.c: In function ‘vg_thread_loop’:
vanitygen.c:134:21: error: ‘BN_MASK2’ undeclared (first use in this function)
    if ((rekey_at == BN_MASK2) || (rekey_at > rekey_max))
                     ^~~~~~~~
vanitygen.c:134:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
: recipe for target 'vanitygen.o' failed
make: *** [vanitygen.o] Error 1
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.
What kind of speed does it do?
I searched the thread and see you commenting on it's efficiency but I am looking at speed.
Thanks,
Dave

I run mine underclocked, but still get 48Mkey/s.  I'm sure it is possible to get a slightly faster card, if you don't mind spending double on electricity and enjoy heat.

Hello, I was generating with my gpu but i'm not sure where the privatekey and publickey are stored, all i get is this:

Quote
C:\Users\John\Desktop\OCL VANITY>oclvanitygen -D 0:0 -i 1ROLL
Difficulty: 132052112
[29.41 Mkey/s][total 50331648][Prob 31.7%][50% in 1.8s]
atch idx: 0
CPU hash: 1b545ac2d80b34568c240a91df74rag708vvbdc2
GPU hash: 64b0a2ffac6c544edbc3552e3cb3a1adc623dcac
Found delta: 4160432 Start delta: 67108234

What you just posted shows that you were at about 31.7% chance of finding a private key at that point. When it stops you'll have your public and private keys. It looks like you were doing something fairly simple so I'm assuming it should be done by now, right?

I had to enable -S safe mode to make it display privatekeys, but now it's only half the speed, 14mkey/s , would you know if it's possible to get full speed without -S mode and still display privatekeys? It only shows me the CPU and GPU hash like my earlier post. Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Split-key vanity generation is much slower
I've read this before, but it's not what I experience. I just tested it, for both vanitygen and oclvanitygen, and I see now difference in speed (key/s).

Quote
and doesn't enable you to search for multiple addresses at once.
It does, but they'll all work with the same public key. I use it to search for either one of several possible prefixes. For example: 1NAME 1Name 1name.
It's not as fun as just taking a list with 8000 long words as input though.

I can't speak for your experience, only the facts.  Split key generation is slower because of the added process.  Your example of using the same public key for multiple split keys also restricts your search, meaning you cannot perform any other vanity searches not using that specific public key alongside it.  That makes split key generation slow and expensive to the point where I don't believe it makes sense for individuals to utilize it, or pooled miners to attempt profits mining vanity addresses.  It's a lose lose situation for everyone involved.


I have been looking through the pages and pages of this post again.
I can't seem to find a list that I thought I remembered, is there a complete one that lists all the current cards and their speeds?
Or to make my life easier, if cost was no object what is the fastest card for generation?

Looking for 1 card not a rig.

Thanks,
Dave

The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.

my 480s work.. and my 470s.. i get around 35mk/s with them.. 140-150mk/s for all 4.. 2 470s and 2 480s.


you need to edit a file in the folder. it was posted a couple pages back..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16917413


edit, actually if you dont use the -S option its double this speed.. and my tests show the key works?

legendary
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1122
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.
What kind of speed does it do?
I searched the thread and see you commenting on it's efficiency but I am looking at speed.
Thanks,
Dave

I run mine underclocked, but still get 48Mkey/s.  I'm sure it is possible to get a slightly faster card, if you don't mind spending double on electricity and enjoy heat.

Hello, I was generating with my gpu but i'm not sure where the privatekey and publickey are stored, all i get is this:

Quote
C:\Users\John\Desktop\OCL VANITY>oclvanitygen -D 0:0 -i 1ROLL
Difficulty: 132052112
[29.41 Mkey/s][total 50331648][Prob 31.7%][50% in 1.8s]
atch idx: 0
CPU hash: 1b545ac2d80b34568c240a91df74rag708vvbdc2
GPU hash: 64b0a2ffac6c544edbc3552e3cb3a1adc623dcac
Found delta: 4160432 Start delta: 67108234

What you just posted shows that you were at about 31.7% chance of finding a private key at that point. When it stops you'll have your public and private keys. It looks like you were doing something fairly simple so I'm assuming it should be done by now, right?
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.
What kind of speed does it do?
I searched the thread and see you commenting on it's efficiency but I am looking at speed.
Thanks,
Dave

I run mine underclocked, but still get 48Mkey/s.  I'm sure it is possible to get a slightly faster card, if you don't mind spending double on electricity and enjoy heat.

Hello, I was generating with my gpu but i'm not sure where the privatekey and publickey are stored, all i get is this:

Quote
C:\Users\John\Desktop\OCL VANITY>oclvanitygen -D 0:0 -i 1ROLL
Difficulty: 132052112
[29.41 Mkey/s][total 50331648][Prob 31.7%][50% in 1.8s]
atch idx: 0
CPU hash: 1b545ac2d80b34568c240a91df74rag708vvbdc2
GPU hash: 64b0a2ffac6c544edbc3552e3cb3a1adc623dcac
Found delta: 4160432 Start delta: 67108234
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Hello, i'm interested in using my r9 280x to generate keys, would you have any idea how many keys I can generate? Thanks!


Edit: I was able to run it, currently getting 29mkey/s


oclvanitygen -D 0:0 -i 1Bitcoin
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.
What kind of speed does it do?
I searched the thread and see you commenting on it's efficiency but I am looking at speed.
Thanks,
Dave

I run mine underclocked, but still get 48Mkey/s.  I'm sure it is possible to get a slightly faster card, if you don't mind spending double on electricity and enjoy heat.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.
What kind of speed does it do?
I searched the thread and see you commenting on it's efficiency but I am looking at speed.
Thanks,
Dave
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
I have been looking through the pages and pages of this post again.
I can't seem to find a list that I thought I remembered, is there a complete one that lists all the current cards and their speeds?
Or to make my life easier, if cost was no object what is the fastest card for generation?

Looking for 1 card not a rig.

Thanks,
Dave

  Somebody created a Vanitygen page on the Bitcoin Wiki which contains a table with information that will help answer your question.   Most of the footnotes link back to threads (or posts I guess) that can be found here Wink

 
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Split-key vanity generation is much slower
I've read this before, but it's not what I experience. I just tested it, for both vanitygen and oclvanitygen, and I see now difference in speed (key/s).

Quote
and doesn't enable you to search for multiple addresses at once.
It does, but they'll all work with the same public key. I use it to search for either one of several possible prefixes. For example: 1NAME 1Name 1name.
It's not as fun as just taking a list with 8000 long words as input though.

I can't speak for your experience, only the facts.  Split key generation is slower because of the added process.  Your example of using the same public key for multiple split keys also restricts your search, meaning you cannot perform any other vanity searches not using that specific public key alongside it.  That makes split key generation slow and expensive to the point where I don't believe it makes sense for individuals to utilize it, or pooled miners to attempt profits mining vanity addresses.  It's a lose lose situation for everyone involved.


I have been looking through the pages and pages of this post again.
I can't seem to find a list that I thought I remembered, is there a complete one that lists all the current cards and their speeds?
Or to make my life easier, if cost was no object what is the fastest card for generation?

Looking for 1 card not a rig.

Thanks,
Dave

The fastest and most efficient card for use with vanitygen is hands down the R9 Nano.  Unless you can get a 480 to work, which I have yet to see outside of the claim on the wiki.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
I have been looking through the pages and pages of this post again.
I can't seem to find a list that I thought I remembered, is there a complete one that lists all the current cards and their speeds?
Or to make my life easier, if cost was no object what is the fastest card for generation?

Looking for 1 card not a rig.

Thanks,
Dave
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Split-key vanity generation is much slower
I've read this before, but it's not what I experience. I just tested it, for both vanitygen and oclvanitygen, and I see no difference in speed (key/s).

Quote
and doesn't enable you to search for multiple addresses at once.
It does, but they'll all work with the same public key. I use it to search for either one of several possible prefixes. For example: 1NAME 1Name 1name.
It's not as fun as just taking a list with 8000 long words as input though.
Pages:
Jump to: