Pages:
Author

Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] - page 40. (Read 1153678 times)

legendary
Activity: 2746
Merit: 1181
Sooo, was the conclusion that no one understand how to fix it,  still?

What a pity you didn't go back and read the thread.  Does it really matter in the larger picture if you loose a Meg or two of hashes with two or more cards?

Hi can you assist with my issue on the program not allowing me to use any of the gpu's while i get that error i posted?

thanks!
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
Sooo, was the conclusion that no one understand how to fix it,  still?

What a pity you didn't go back and read the thread.  Does it really matter in the larger picture if you loose a Meg or two of hashes with two or more cards?
sr. member
Activity: 751
Merit: 253
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?

It "Seems" like the oclvanitygen does not increase rate like we are use to mining with GPU cards. 


I make mention of this effect some dozen pages back...

This thread has reached a natural conclusion and should be locked so that a more relevant one can be started by somebody else (and no, not me...)

Sooo, was the conclusion that no one understand how to fix it,  still?
legendary
Activity: 2746
Merit: 1181
Hi,

I'm having issues with vanitygen using my GPU's

I'm on WIn 10 Enterprise,

I have 3 rigs i've tried.

Rig1: 5x RX480

Rig2: 5x R9 290X

Rig 3: 6X R9 280X

Not sure if Win 10 is the issue, but I have gotten errors on the RX480 rig, which I have heard simply doesn't play well.

But the other 2 rigs, I can see my gpus, and when I select them in a bat file similar to this:


C:\Users\R2\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen.exe -D 0:0 1buckrogers
Difficulty: 10054102514374869638
Compiling kernel, can take minutes...failure.
clBuildProgram: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE
Build log:
C:\Users\R2\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL3888T3.cl:173:19: error: variable in constant address space must be initialized
__constant bignum bn_zero;
                  ^
C:\Users\R2\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL3888T3.cl:173:19: error: constant address space qualified variables are required to be initialized
2 errors generated.

error: Clang front-end compilation failed!
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compiling CL to IR
Device: Hawaii
Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002)
Driver: 2117.13 (VM)
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (2117.13)
Max compute units: 44
Max workgroup size: 256
Global memory: -1073741824
Max allocation: -1073741824
Could not open device '0:0', ignoring
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
  0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  1: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  2: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  3: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  4: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  5: [GenuineIntel] Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G3220 @ 3.00GHz

C:\Users\R2\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>


Not sure why it is returning the error on the gpu, but as a side note, if I just run the:

C:\Users\R2\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>vanitygen64.exe 1buckrogers
Difficulty: 10054102514374869638
[548.54 Kkey/s][total 1977344][Prob 0.0%][50% in 402856.1y]

The cpu portion will run, but obviously I would want to use the GPU's, and have many different rigs to choose from, all are running Win 10 enterprise though.

If anyone has some suggestions, please ...i'm all ears.

thanks!
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?

It "Seems" like the oclvanitygen does not increase rate like we are use to mining with GPU cards. 


I make mention of this effect some dozen pages back...

This thread has reached a natural conclusion and should be locked so that a more relevant one can be started by somebody else (and no, not me...)
sr. member
Activity: 751
Merit: 253
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?

It "Seems" like the oclvanitygen does not increase rate like we are use to mining with GPU cards.  If you get 10Mk/sec with one card, if you double, you get less than 2x10; triple the exact same card you get <3x10.  and the more cards you add, it seems to gain less of the next card you add.

To prove this, in your 4x 280x system, try this:

oclvanitygen -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 -k 1Bitcointalk
Then Record
Speed All4 =

Then each card

oclvanitygen -D 1:0 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D0 =

oclvanitygen -D 1:1 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D1 =

oclvanitygen -D 1:2 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D2 =

oclvanitygen -D 1:3 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D3 =

I bet your speeds
D0+D1+D2+D3 >>>  Speed All4

legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
does anyone know if its possible to search for multiple prefixes when using multiple ECDSA keypairs?

Or is it only possible to generate one of these at a time? When ive searched for my own addresses previously i can obviously seach multiple prefixes but im not sure the method to try and acheive the same reults here.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Was using exactly what I Pasted. I am running Win 7 x64. Maybe the 280X are just slow at finding keys?

You should be getting >80Mkey/s with that setup I would think...

Try running a different instance for each GPU and see if you can determine the problem.  One GPU could be locking up, you could accidentally be using a CPU, etc...  

Another thing if you haven't generated a vanity on that machine before, is to generate a short one and make sure you are getting the public/private key combo as some driver combinations don't return valid keys (if anyone has that issue, search this thread for lifeboat).
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed



 Sorry!  I missed that part.


 
Code:
C:\Users\xhomerx10\Downloads\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen -d 0:0 -k -i 1Blazed

 Are you running in safe mode with the -S switch?  That slows me down to 12Mkeys/s


Was using exactly what I Pasted. I am running Win 7 x64. Maybe the 280X are just slow at finding keys?

How is the performance if you only use the primary?
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed



 Sorry!  I missed that part.


 
Code:
C:\Users\xhomerx10\Downloads\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen -d 0:0 -k -i 1Blazed

 Are you running in safe mode with the -S switch?  That slows me down to 12Mkeys/s


Was using exactly what I Pasted. I am running Win 7 x64. Maybe the 280X are just slow at finding keys?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed



 Sorry!  I missed that part.

 
Code:
C:\Users\xhomerx10\Downloads\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen -d 0:0 -k -i 1Blazed

 Are you running in safe mode with the -S switch?  That slows me down to 12Mkeys/s
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed

legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


 Just tested it to make sure

Code:
Difficulty: 925465219
Pattern: 1Blazed
Address: 1BLAZedY8w6DiBiX1utEzaMPW7jCUJzeoy
Privkey: 5Kk28uFdAt8xwWVLzbvrk3vpypXK4ACJaGamJPmcCW3e9SzR43Y
[26.13 Mkey/s][total 1686110208][Prob 60.3%][75% in 16.4s][Found 1]
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?
sr. member
Activity: 751
Merit: 253
the oclvanitygen code would have to be modified to have suffix search.

Does anyone know how to do that?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Can I have a list of Vanitygen commands?
This gives the available commands:
./vanitygen -h
Code:
./vanitygen -h
Vanitygen 0.22 (OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014)
Usage: ./vanitygen [-vqnrik1NT] [-t ] [-f |-] [...]
Generates a bitcoin receiving address matching , and outputs the
address and associated private key.  The private key may be stored in a safe
location or imported into a bitcoin client to spend any balance received on
the address.
By default, is interpreted as an exact prefix.

Options:
-v            Verbose output
-q            Quiet output
-n            Simulate
-r            Use regular expression match instead of prefix
              (Feasibility of expression is not checked)
-i            Case-insensitive prefix search
-k            Keep pattern and continue search after finding a match
-1            Stop after first match
-N            Generate namecoin address
-T            Generate bitcoin testnet address
-X   Generate address with the given version
-F    Generate address with the given format (pubkey or script)
-P    Specify base public key for piecewise key generation
-e            Encrypt private keys, prompt for password
-E Encrypt private keys with (UNSAFE)
-t   Set number of worker threads (Default: number of CPUs)
-f      File containing list of patterns, one per line
              (Use "-" as the file name for stdin)
-o      Write pattern matches to
-s      Seed random number generator from

Does anyone know how to search for Suffixes instead of Prefixes, using OCLvanitygen?
You can't.
sr. member
Activity: 751
Merit: 253
Does anyone know how to search for Suffixes instead of Prefixes, using OCLvanitygen?

(I know we can use vanitygen -r Bitcoin$ )
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Can I have a list of Vanitygen commands? After I made post #2126, I started my Vanitygen again. With normal commands. It is now at 5.9 percent.
The -i command means that it will run a case insensitive search. So if yo u want it to generate a 1JTK wallet with the "-i" command, it might then generate 1JtK instead. It basically just speeds up the generation time, but you're giving up case sensitivity.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
If you spend several hours getting oclvanitygen working with AMD Radeon 7xxx on 64-bit Linux - Ubuntu 12.04 and Ubuntu 14.04. In the end only the following is needed:
Ubuntu drivers
vanitygen patch
1 userspace library file from AMD APP SDK v2. I created a minimal instruction text file. Maybe this will save someone and some hours of searching the internet.
What do you should to do next is add a note to remove *.oclbin, since ppl with problems already have a compiled OpenCL binary and it wont be regenerated unless the file is missing.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
There are lots of distributed designs out there already, some open source but for CUDA, would need to convert CUDA language to OpenCL language. This would make it easier for those with large farms to utilize an address generator without it being a PITA to setup.Test CPU operation. This command line will generate a Bitcoin addresses beginning with 1ABCD in around a minute or less:
>vanitygen 1ABCD
Test GPU operation. This command line will generate a Bitcoin addresses beginning with 1ABCDE in around a minute, using the first OpenCL device in your system:
>oclvanitygen -d 0 1ABCDE
Pages:
Jump to: