Reggie said Veritaseum is Skynet for Wall Street!
I take this article to mean that mom and pop still have a ways to go before realizing that there are benefits we VERI insiders are just chomping at the bit for!
There will be advantages to early movers, the benefits of automation are just beginning to be realized!
"I do find it slightly odd,” said the chief operating officer of Europe’s largest bank, referring to its survey of more than 12,000 consumers in 11 countries published Wednesday. Just 7 percent of respondents would trust a robot with their savings, versus the 14 percent willing to submit to a machine for heart surgery."https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-23/hsbc-discovers-consumers-trust-robots-for-surgery-over-savings
I re-watched the presentation on Veritaseum vs a hedge fund.
Turning wallstreet on it's head:
https://youtu.be/7Ex61XG3QEo?t=360Not charging a thing. Only at cost on transactions.
We will charge you 3% research and 2% engineering:
https://youtu.be/7Ex61XG3QEo?t=4001 and 10 % fees in Hedge Fund vs Veritaseum of 3 and 2 % fees:
https://youtu.be/7Ex61XG3QEo?t=430Only way to get this access is, the financial machine will digest research and buy tokens. Research is this machine. Actually buys tokens, it has confidence in.
https://youtu.be/7Ex61XG3QEo?t=816Once the offering is done, reserve after offering is reserved for institutions:
https://youtu.be/7Ex61XG3QEo?t=876I ran Reggie's scenario, and I come up with a 22% annual return difference on the
$100,000 AUM, with a 300% return:
1&10%......Hedge Fund.....................vs 3&2% for Veritaseum.
Year 1.......After Fees........$369,000.....vs.........$391,000
Year 5.......After Fees $80,389,454......vs....$85,182,322
Can someone from Veritaseum comment on the 3&2, Reggie lumps them together as 5% vs 11% and I think it is important, are we charging 5% on Assets Under Management and including the annual return, or are we breaking them out separately? The difference in a down year would be important.
This article talks about the value proposition of a mutual fund with a low fee:
Dividing 2.1% in fees by the 5.3% expected market return before fees provided a true picture of investor cost. A 5.3% expected (before cost) return divided into 2.1% per year in total costs comes to 40% of expected return lost to expenses.https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2013/05/27/the-heavy-toll-of-investment-fees/#18fbfff818fb