hashrate on GTX 970 ??
and is there a a table where i can see each card and its hashrate
Topic: Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source - page 130. (Read 415451 times)
December 18, 2014, 10:57:32 AM
December 18, 2014, 10:55:28 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
This is not working to cure cancer, this is making money; it is business. Sharing an advantage simply causes the public to destroy any possibility of profit until only those paying 5 cents per kWh or less can make anything, and them only pennies.
I should probably attached my new kernel message to this thread, if I want people to notice
new kernel for the version in github/djm34 http://ge.tt/41D9Y872/v/0?c
(it should work with metallicjames is you use in lyra2RE.cl the blake256 code of metallicjames version.
current hashrate on my 290x at 1030/1250 with -g2 -I20 -w64 1.46MH/s (average after stabilization) was 1.32MH/s before
donation welcomed: VyF9fXUSt5iZH6GuA8WvUw4NrVhcybMiLA
(even though it was a paid job... vtc has fall off) so please makes updating the code worthy...
please also report problems as well as your speed (I can't reach the 1500MH mem clock... so I am a little curiou
now on topics, we will see if Wolf0 is wrong or not from the donation... and by giving a faster kernel to everyone...
December 18, 2014, 10:50:24 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
This is not working to cure cancer, this is making money; it is business. Sharing an advantage simply causes the public to destroy any possibility of profit until only those paying 5 cents per kWh or less can make anything, and them only pennies.
December 18, 2014, 10:45:21 AM
How long does it take to transfer vert?
I've been waiting for last 8 hours and still hasn't shown in my exchange account. I see it in blockexplorer though.
I've been waiting for last 8 hours and still hasn't shown in my exchange account. I see it in blockexplorer though.
December 18, 2014, 10:42:04 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
This is not working to cure cancer, this is making money; it is business. Sharing an advantage simply causes the public to destroy any possibility of profit until only those paying 5 cents per kWh or less can make anything, and them only pennies.
December 18, 2014, 10:35:28 AM
I know you guys switched to the new mining algorithm a while ago, but I just completed a brief article on Lyra2RE , which you can find here.
December 18, 2014, 10:28:52 AM
new kernel for the version in github/djm34 http://ge.tt/41D9Y872/v/0?c
(it should work with metallicjames is you use in lyra2RE.cl the blake256 code of metallicjames version.
current hashrate on my 290x at 1030/1250 with -g2 -I20 -w64 1.46MH/s (average after stabilization) was 1.32MH/s before
donation welcomed: VyF9fXUSt5iZH6GuA8WvUw4NrVhcybMiLA
(even though it was a paid job... vtc has fall off) so please makes updating the code worthy...
please also report problems as well as your speed (I can't reach the 1500MH mem clock... so I am a little curious)
(it should work with metallicjames is you use in lyra2RE.cl the blake256 code of metallicjames version.
current hashrate on my 290x at 1030/1250 with -g2 -I20 -w64 1.46MH/s (average after stabilization) was 1.32MH/s before
donation welcomed: VyF9fXUSt5iZH6GuA8WvUw4NrVhcybMiLA
(even though it was a paid job... vtc has fall off) so please makes updating the code worthy...
please also report problems as well as your speed (I can't reach the 1500MH mem clock... so I am a little curious)
December 17, 2014, 03:27:42 PM
Is this the new ftc thread ?
closing in: 1.46MH/s at 1030/1250 (r9 290x)
closing in: 1.46MH/s at 1030/1250 (r9 290x)
It's the new GPU mining thread!
December 18, 2014, 10:28:08 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
December 18, 2014, 10:08:18 AM
Hello, I just found out, what is going on?, did anyone see this post?: http://www.simplemulti.com/news
profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
the price from 15K sat dropped to 9k,but hashrate not.profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
maybe like someone said here, xmas, they need to cash out to buy presents :LOLI think hashrate dropped almost 30% (unless verters pool had the numbers wrong, it was 3900M now says 2700M, also difficulty I recall, went up to 145, now is around 100.
but I am more concerned about the low diff exploit that simplemulti is talking about.
I have seen verters pool to usually stays in around 400% shares, sometimes as high as 800%, that is way unusual right?, i mean, that's a really really bad luck
December 17, 2014, 10:27:48 AM
Erm, anybody have a website that calculate the profit for this? Is this better then x11? 
I think better than x11, worse than neoscrypt, last I checked.
@Wolf0 , there seem to not be working CUDA neoscrypt miner, I got it to work with OpenCL but with a penalty of course
Feathercoin paid the man , the developer to develop OpenCL but he aint a CUDA developer..
soo FTC is excluding 100's of miners from the process for more a month now
Wrong. They paid me, and I am a CUDA developer. I just don't like to
you mean you have working neoscrypt CUDA miner ? link please ?
No, I mean I wrote the opencl you're using.
oo wow, its a pleasure, great work as said.. now you are less anonymous, to use OpenCL with CUDA cards should be outlawed
Vehre wrote the original opencl, I rewrote it to work with newer drivers and around 2.5x faster or so.
December 18, 2014, 09:39:27 AM
Hello, I just found out, what is going on?, did anyone see this post?: http://www.simplemulti.com/news
profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
the price from 15K sat dropped to 9k,but hashrate not. profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
December 18, 2014, 09:24:08 AM
Hello, I just found out, what is going on?, did anyone see this post?: http://www.simplemulti.com/news
profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
December 17, 2014, 10:24:27 AM
Erm, anybody have a website that calculate the profit for this? Is this better then x11?
I think better than x11, worse than neoscrypt, last I checked.
@Wolf0 , there seem to not be working CUDA neoscrypt miner, I got it to work with OpenCL but with a penalty of course
Feathercoin paid the man , the developer to develop OpenCL but he aint a CUDA developer..
soo FTC is excluding 100's of miners from the process for more a month now
Wrong. They paid me, and I am a CUDA developer. I just don't like to
you mean you have working neoscrypt CUDA miner ? link please ?
No, I mean I wrote the opencl you're using.
December 18, 2014, 08:53:13 AM
@ ASIC miners. When you have quite finished dumping, please could we have our coin back? kthanxbye
December 18, 2014, 07:07:53 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
December 17, 2014, 10:19:46 AM
Erm, anybody have a website that calculate the profit for this? Is this better then x11?
I think better than x11, worse than neoscrypt, last I checked.
@Wolf0 , there seem to not be working CUDA neoscrypt miner, I got it to work with OpenCL but with a penalty of course
Feathercoin paid the man , the developer to develop OpenCL but he aint a CUDA developer..
soo FTC is excluding 100's of miners from the process for more a month now
Wrong. They paid me, and I am a CUDA developer. I just don't like to
December 18, 2014, 07:00:25 AM
people reduce rewards per block or even total supply all the time... not saying should be done or anything, it should be listened to however by all involved with VERT arguments pro and against given, it is no big deal to give suggestions in fact it is healthy
this is very well established coin , very solid blockchain and nodes, strong development team so it is not at all necessary to solve exactly what ? that the market price plateaued, 99% of coins market prices plateaued
Friday upon us yet ?
this is very well established coin , very solid blockchain and nodes, strong development team so it is not at all necessary to solve exactly what ? that the market price plateaued, 99% of coins market prices plateaued
Friday upon us yet ?
December 18, 2014, 05:21:23 AM
minimum x10 decrease block reward is the only solution now.
however it should be applied before hardfork.
ok man, thanks for the sharp perspective and brilliant suggestionhowever it should be applied before hardfork.
now off you fuck
you're welcome)
and don't
December 18, 2014, 05:18:01 AM
minimum x10 decrease block reward is the only solution now.
however it should be applied before hardfork.
ok man, thanks for the sharp perspective and brilliant suggestionhowever it should be applied before hardfork.
now off you fuck
Jump to: