What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70%Impressive speeds...Gonna stop gaming and test mining now.
Topic: Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source - page 128. (Read 415451 times)
December 19, 2014, 12:03:33 PM
Impressive speeds...Gonna stop gaming and test mining now.
December 19, 2014, 11:47:06 AM
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70%I am about to build some more rigs and will love to know, so far the winner is 750ti, but a 1600Kh on a single card is tempting!
but power consumption is the most important thing 
a 750ti is rated 60W at 55% that's 33W by 3 ~100W (people with watt-meter should confirm though)
It means stay away from the 780ti
(and I am a big fan of the 780ti...)prices might go down on GPU cards in general although people said that couple of times this year and nothing.. that is because of us miners! we are the demand and keep prices where they are
December 18, 2014, 11:29:53 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
This is not working to cure cancer, this is making money; it is business. Sharing an advantage simply causes the public to destroy any possibility of profit until only those paying 5 cents per kWh or less can make anything, and them only pennies.
I should probably attached my new kernel message to this thread, if I want people to notice
new kernel for the version in github/djm34 http://ge.tt/41D9Y872/v/0?c
(it should work with metallicjames is you use in lyra2RE.cl the blake256 code of metallicjames version.
current hashrate on my 290x at 1030/1250 with -g2 -I20 -w64 1.46MH/s (average after stabilization) was 1.32MH/s before
donation welcomed: VyF9fXUSt5iZH6GuA8WvUw4NrVhcybMiLA
(even though it was a paid job... vtc has fall off) so please makes updating the code worthy...
please also report problems as well as your speed (I can't reach the 1500MH mem clock... so I am a little curiou
now on topics, we will see if Wolf0 is wrong or not from the donation... and by giving a faster kernel to everyone...
It's not working together - it's the "community" of miners wanting devs' skilled work for nothing, and when the dev is no longer useful, throwing them away like so much trash.
December 19, 2014, 11:38:05 AM
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70%I am about to build some more rigs and will love to know, so far the winner is 750ti, but a 1600Kh on a single card is tempting!
but power consumption is the most important thing a 750ti is rated 60W at 55% that's 33W by 3 ~100W (people with watt-meter should confirm though)
It means stay away from the 780ti
(and I am a big fan of the 780ti...) 
December 19, 2014, 11:22:55 AM
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70%I am about to build some more rigs and will love to know, so far the winner is 750ti, but a 1600Kh on a single card is tempting!
but power consumption is the most important thing December 19, 2014, 11:08:09 AM
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70%are you serious ? that is a lot on a single card! I mean hash horse power congrats!
yeah so that is ~ 519$ on egg .. let me see .. 750 ~140$ I think at 620 kh/s (no oc ) yeah so one needs 2.5 x 750 ti to have one 780 ti... so thats like 350$ .. but still.. only single PCI so you can pack more.. very nice regardless congrats again on the choice, smart
let me see amp needed (Watts) on 780 ... reason I went with 750 like a year ago.. is electricity.. really adds up.. over time
I ment kh/s above of course mh/s would haha be awesome.. but in my dreams
also thinking to undervolt and overvolt thru BIOS.. a dont want to destabilize the system one really has to know what one is doing with Linux..
yeah so 250 W on the 780.. so in my case I would pack two of them for 3 x 750 (hash power wise) but would need to bump my power supply no big deal but maybe this post here helps someone building a rig or planning for one
spec on 780
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-780/specifications
spec on 750:
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-750/specifications
what is really nice with 780 is for extra dollars (power supply) cooling system cost wont increase as seems temperature spec is the same for both cards that despite > 2 x as many CUDA cores! great achievement by Nvidia.. here
anyways have a great time mining dont worry too much because of VERT price.. everyone is in the same boat and just be patient
December 18, 2014, 10:56:58 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
This is not working to cure cancer, this is making money; it is business. Sharing an advantage simply causes the public to destroy any possibility of profit until only those paying 5 cents per kWh or less can make anything, and them only pennies.
What? So I should give away work for free and be homeless because it makes the world a better place? This is the way the world works - if you know the rules to the game, play.
December 19, 2014, 07:41:40 AM
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70% December 19, 2014, 07:20:51 AM
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
December 19, 2014, 06:42:56 AM
committed, I changed the integer type for the target and forgot about it... sorry about that.
should work now
here the windows binaries with latest version: http://ge.tt/5zIW3972/v/0?c
should work now
here the windows binaries with latest version: http://ge.tt/5zIW3972/v/0?c
Thank you djm34! I've got some increase, but the most interesting part - take a look at WU!
280x hynix, 815/1500 -g 2 -X 256 -w 64 -no-submit-stale
drivers 13.12 (so I can lower clocks) + 14.6 bins
before:
after:
December 19, 2014, 05:09:57 AM
So, tell me one more time, why are you not switching Monocle/ZeroVert to Lyra2?
The idea of the merged mining was to decentralize mining by giving incentive to p2pool mining (yea, I know that didnt go exactly as planned).
Now we have nothing to merge mine, Monocle is getting de-listed from the ONLY exchange that offered it and it seems that nobody, except bengtåke, gives a fuck about it.
It was somehow obvious that Monocle will be abandoned as soon as ZeroVert appeared, but now it seems that the latter was also neglected.
Whats up?
The idea of the merged mining was to decentralize mining by giving incentive to p2pool mining (yea, I know that didnt go exactly as planned).
Now we have nothing to merge mine, Monocle is getting de-listed from the ONLY exchange that offered it and it seems that nobody, except bengtåke, gives a fuck about it.
It was somehow obvious that Monocle will be abandoned as soon as ZeroVert appeared, but now it seems that the latter was also neglected.
Whats up?
December 18, 2014, 10:44:40 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
This is not working to cure cancer, this is making money; it is business. Sharing an advantage simply causes the public to destroy any possibility of profit until only those paying 5 cents per kWh or less can make anything, and them only pennies.
December 19, 2014, 04:31:46 AM
okay guys.
seems we have reached the bottom on about 9k.
how much hashrate do we have all together?
seems we have reached the bottom on about 9k.
how much hashrate do we have all together?
Not one miner left on suprnova, but according to the wallet we have about 3GH/s in nethash...
December 19, 2014, 04:29:29 AM
okay guys.
seems we have reached the bottom on about 9k.
how much hashrate do we have all together?
seems we have reached the bottom on about 9k.
how much hashrate do we have all together?
December 19, 2014, 03:31:13 AM
Is there a need in updating the Android Wallet for the fork?
December 18, 2014, 10:33:03 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
This is not working to cure cancer, this is making money; it is business. Sharing an advantage simply causes the public to destroy any possibility of profit until only those paying 5 cents per kWh or less can make anything, and them only pennies.
December 18, 2014, 11:37:21 PM
James and vert devs
Is coinme by vertpunk online wallet still functioning? I have been trying to contact its support for days but not getting any response.. can you help? I have 2 incoming transactions missing..happened right after the fork..
Is coinme by vertpunk online wallet still functioning? I have been trying to contact its support for days but not getting any response.. can you help? I have 2 incoming transactions missing..happened right after the fork..
December 18, 2014, 11:28:19 PM
Has anyone successfully got a local p2pool working? Below is what I am getting. I did have a problem with miner in Linux, but I got that all worked out.
Thanks
Here is how I am starting up p2pool.
run_p2pool.exe --net vertcoin2 -f 0 -a VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce -n 87.236.196.77
3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:38.910000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:38.910000 Hash: fa7a7fdb9f6e66efd272fc7f31889e37ff7aa68293358aa5d152ac47dd65df44 2014-12-18 20:55:38.910000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:39.317000 Outgoing connection to peer 87.236.196.77:9347 established. p2pool version: 1300 '788d44e-dirty' 2014-12-18 20:55:39.509000 Peer 87.236.196.77:9347 misbehaving, will drop and ban. Reason: share PoW invalid 2014-12-18 20:55:39.509000 Bad peer banned: ('87.236.196.77', 9347) 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 Lost peer 87.236.196.77:9347 - Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 > in handle_share_hashes: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 > Traceback (most recent call last): 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 > Failure: twisted.internet.error.ConnectionAborted: Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:39.523000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.523000 Hash: 4623b201b2a7c0c15ff4893e51e85451c4652a53cfa2a4dac67fea8d438ac341 2014-12-18 20:55:39.523000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:39.696000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.696000 Hash: a149590edb4a401f9e818da45b2424926f6003cf9d811d7b8417fb9a3a213010 2014-12-18 20:55:39.696000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:39.697000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.697000 Hash: 50e1551066cb46e5c260504df432c8f5ae5ad6608e209a1352b020f6f6b0d35d 2014-12-18 20:55:39.697000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:41.391000 New work for worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce! Difficulty: 0.000061 Share difficulty: 0.000244 (speed 0.000000) Total block value: 50.000000 VTC including 0 transactions 2014-12-18 20:55:42.281000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.281000 Hash: 88bb47db6f147b5b5ef6e0f69526e88545266a5b23fd30452eeb9bdc7cfb7f5c 2014-12-18 20:55:42.281000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:42.563000 Outgoing connection to peer 87.236.196.77:9347 established. p2pool version: 1300 '788d44e-dirty' 2014-12-18 20:55:42.699000 Peer 87.236.196.77:9347 misbehaving, will drop and ban. Reason: share PoW invalid 2014-12-18 20:55:42.699000 Bad peer banned: ('87.236.196.77', 9347) 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 Lost peer 87.236.196.77:9347 - Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 > in handle_share_hashes: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 > Traceback (most recent call last): 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 > Failure: twisted.internet.error.ConnectionAborted: Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:42.872000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.872000 Hash: d1404ba41448ccd5ce784f91e171d3824d8cbdfd754a2ca5f7dbfc4b1f3b15dc 2014-12-18 20:55:42.872000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:42.873000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.873000 Hash: ac9d510fbc70d6eb1f6106040a6e7f748b0d108a88797488e1adb325a4e7c3f0 2014-12-18 20:55:42.873000
Thanks
Here is how I am starting up p2pool.
run_p2pool.exe --net vertcoin2 -f 0 -a VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce -n 87.236.196.77
3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:38.910000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:38.910000 Hash: fa7a7fdb9f6e66efd272fc7f31889e37ff7aa68293358aa5d152ac47dd65df44 2014-12-18 20:55:38.910000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:39.317000 Outgoing connection to peer 87.236.196.77:9347 established. p2pool version: 1300 '788d44e-dirty' 2014-12-18 20:55:39.509000 Peer 87.236.196.77:9347 misbehaving, will drop and ban. Reason: share PoW invalid 2014-12-18 20:55:39.509000 Bad peer banned: ('87.236.196.77', 9347) 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 Lost peer 87.236.196.77:9347 - Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 > in handle_share_hashes: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 > Traceback (most recent call last): 2014-12-18 20:55:39.510000 > Failure: twisted.internet.error.ConnectionAborted: Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:39.523000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.523000 Hash: 4623b201b2a7c0c15ff4893e51e85451c4652a53cfa2a4dac67fea8d438ac341 2014-12-18 20:55:39.523000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:39.696000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.696000 Hash: a149590edb4a401f9e818da45b2424926f6003cf9d811d7b8417fb9a3a213010 2014-12-18 20:55:39.696000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:39.697000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:39.697000 Hash: 50e1551066cb46e5c260504df432c8f5ae5ad6608e209a1352b020f6f6b0d35d 2014-12-18 20:55:39.697000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:41.391000 New work for worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce! Difficulty: 0.000061 Share difficulty: 0.000244 (speed 0.000000) Total block value: 50.000000 VTC including 0 transactions 2014-12-18 20:55:42.281000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.281000 Hash: 88bb47db6f147b5b5ef6e0f69526e88545266a5b23fd30452eeb9bdc7cfb7f5c 2014-12-18 20:55:42.281000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:42.563000 Outgoing connection to peer 87.236.196.77:9347 established. p2pool version: 1300 '788d44e-dirty' 2014-12-18 20:55:42.699000 Peer 87.236.196.77:9347 misbehaving, will drop and ban. Reason: share PoW invalid 2014-12-18 20:55:42.699000 Bad peer banned: ('87.236.196.77', 9347) 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 Lost peer 87.236.196.77:9347 - Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 > in handle_share_hashes: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 > Traceback (most recent call last): 2014-12-18 20:55:42.700000 > Failure: twisted.internet.error.ConnectionAborted: Connection was aborted locally, using. 2014-12-18 20:55:42.872000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.872000 Hash: d1404ba41448ccd5ce784f91e171d3824d8cbdfd754a2ca5f7dbfc4b1f3b15dc 2014-12-18 20:55:42.872000 Target: 3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 2014-12-18 20:55:42.873000 Worker VwV2J84P8mQggWgUv8ubCf6nJuAXHNoUce submitted share with hash > target: 2014-12-18 20:55:42.873000 Hash: ac9d510fbc70d6eb1f6106040a6e7f748b0d108a88797488e1adb325a4e7c3f0 2014-12-18 20:55:42.873000
December 18, 2014, 08:58:51 PM
Hello, I just found out, what is going on?, did anyone see this post?: http://www.simplemulti.com/news
profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
profitability in http://www.whattomine.com/ went down far below X11, what happened?.
Quoted from Reddit...
"It is a problem with the pool implementation, the algo is fine.
Lyra2RE has a different share difficulty than scrypt-n, you've probably noticed your miner (correctly) submitting fractional shares, whereas scrypt-n utilized integers. But since Lyra2re uses a different share difficulty, the code that rejects low diff shares has to be modified as well.
Its completely our fault for not realizing this needed to be changed, but I'm guessing this part wasn't included in the stratum mining code, and that is why it is an issue for several other pools.
The effect of this was that most low difficulty shares would be incorrectly accepted as valid ones, which causes pools to calculate & display the hashrate far higher than it actually is.
I feel I should point out that there are very few miners who would 'accidentally' benefit from this. Because it requires your miner to not only submit its low diff shares (the default is to dump them), but also have a large number of low diff shares to start with. Normally doing these two things will get you quickly banned from a pool, because you're effectively spamming invalid shares."
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/2po6te/lyra2re_difficulty_exploit_is_this_a_problem_of/cmys1cg
Thank you jamesl22, crystal clear, nothing wrong with the algo, good to hear that
December 18, 2014, 10:13:27 AM
what a terrible !!!
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
280X doing 480kh/s on Neoscrypt!!!!!
i will research
he rewrote special kernel himself and not for public
information like this can cause coin value to plummet at the very least temporarily, no one wants to mine biased coin by localized (hidden) advantage in the mining software by few (or worse by one)
(above is not in the regards to VERT) many seek to find an advantage some kind of pattern, but even if they find an advantage they are shooting themselves in the foot as any sudden spike in the hash rate will cause a concern and worry, best is to achieve equilibrium from low to high to very high difficulty
hence call to any looking at lyra2 on a deep level or even as trivial as GPU settings for maximum performance or mining pools discovering ways to smooth out their operations all findings should be shared in public
I have example of at least 3 top coins in the 50 top market cap that suffered very negative consequences by not following above suggestion
Except there is no algo that doesn't have non-public advantages, so...
Jump to: