As I already explained, they controlled the DOJ and the FBI with their own criminally complicit minions,so no, they wouldn't have been prosecuted, that is until Trump got in and cleaned house. There is a plethora of evidence against the Bidens, Killery and others publicly available. What is the evidence against Trump? Please do tell, I have been waiting 3 years to hear one single scrap of evidence of his guilt. I look forward to the cricket sounds.
I'm talking about now.
Trump has been in office for almost 3 year.
Why isn't Hillary locked up?
Why hasn't Trump appointed an independent prosecutor like he promised?
Imagine how happy it would make his base.
Why do you think nobody is pushing this issue? Why isn't Hannity and Tucker bringing it up?
I think it's because they know the answer.
What is the evidence against Trump? Please do tell, I have been waiting 3 years to hear one single scrap of evidence of his guilt. I look forward to the cricket sounds.
Well, for starters he tried to hide the 140k hush money payment from the FEC by having his lawyer make the payment with a shell company. He then repaid the lawyer monthly for the next year.
Whether you like it or not, this is a federal crime, and there's more than a scrap of evidence.
I don't know, it might have something to do with cleaning house in the DOJ, the FBI, as well as the courts, not to mention the unrelenting politically motivated investigations and media hype, not to mention the fact that if he came out right away and prosecuted her leftards completely believing he is literally Hitler would then start a civil war over it. He is slowly building the narrative and acclimating the public to the facts to prevent domestic upheaval. Tucker and Hannity are on a leash, like anyone who is on an establishment network is. They don't have the freedom to go that far even if they wanted to.
Oh you mean the money he paid from his own funds to prevent a stripper with a multiple felon lawyer from attempting to smear him in public by turning his personal life into a circus, having absolutely nothing to do with election funds? The money that has already been investigated and ruled as not a violation of the law, you mean that hush money?
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/403072-did-president-trump-violate-campaign-finance-laws?amp
This is actually a good impartial read regarding the "hush money" situation.
Like the author, I am quite versed in criminal law and a fair amount of civil law. But "Campaign Finance Laws" are a strange twisted beast that I never bothered to decipher.
I know for a fact that offering cash in exchange for a signed NDA is not a crime. I can see an issue if one used monies raised for a campaign to pay a personal debt or to exchange for an NDA. But I see no issue if personal monies were used to facilitate the NDA. I'm not sure where the campaign finance law was violated. Someone didn't disclose something. Ok. A rich guy screwed a hot chick. Not surprised at all.
But, in the true art of the deal, he only paid $130,000 of his own money to make the deal. How much did the Congress spend of TAXPAYER money to settle their indiscretions? $17 Million. https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/16/politics/settlements-congress-sexual-harassment/index.html
Another case of: it's ok for everyone else to do to, but if Trump does it.... game on.
