2 more pages on ignore. enviroment, politics, bla, bla, bla. So many sick people around here. It's time for infofront to take some action 
delete, ban, delete, ban.
delete, ban, delete, ban.Wallobserver is going down the drain...once more.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 14009. (Read 26732332 times)
May 04, 2018, 09:31:30 AM
Wallobserver is going down the drain...once more.
May 04, 2018, 09:27:40 AM
May 04, 2018, 09:25:19 AM
2 more pages on ignore. enviroment, politics, bla, bla, bla. So many sick people around here. It's time for infofront to take some action delete, ban, delete, ban.
delete, ban, delete, ban.Wallobserver is going down the drain...once more.
May 04, 2018, 09:18:22 AM
in further security theatre
feds may not be watching your private moments any more, but China knows your private key
feds may not be watching your private moments any more, but China knows your private key
May 04, 2018, 09:17:32 AM
There are interesting theories going around about NASA
For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean
You know like with the moon landings.
For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean
You know like with the moon landings.Of course they are fake. Area 51 is off-limits to anyone, and it is in Nevada, which have the same arid soil of Mars. You just take some pictures there and add a red tint, then you have Mars.
anything secret is more about sexual slaves than anything related to national security... you know the NSA knew full well for harvey weinstein... since long long long... guess who too had access to the facebook sexual market with priority and prior conditionning of the target... looking at snowden
...they are traitors. ALL OF THEM.
May 04, 2018, 09:14:27 AM
There are interesting theories going around about NASA
For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean You know like with the moon landings.
For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean
You know like with the moon landings.Of course they are fake. Area 51 is off-limits to anyone, and it is in Nevada, which have the same arid soil of Mars. You just take some pictures there and add a red tint, then you have Mars.
May 04, 2018, 09:04:25 AM
It's shit like this that keeps me up at night.
Cold sweats and all.
How the fuck can I ever know my Bitcorns are truly secure running on Intel ?
I get nervous every time I need to type in my decryption key to send a payment.
Terrifying.
they own everything not made in china
.you know to get owning they offer underage sex slaves... or shit load of fiat, or threat...
americans /= humans.
May 04, 2018, 08:24:50 AM
to log those who inquire about jeffrey epstein videos records and notebooks... those files have more values than the entire crypto market cap (even 10x more).
it's known since p2p music video sharing was attacked by the mpaa (aka the hollywood pedo rapists) using the milenium digital acts... your cave didn't have internet back then?
May 04, 2018, 08:04:52 AM
Didn't 98% of the scientific community at the time agree that Galileo was wrong?
In science it doesn't matter how many agrees with you, it only matters if you are right. If a hypothesis will become a theory or not is not decided by majority vote, but by if you can prove your hypothesis or not.
And so far the IPCC haven't been able to prove the hypothesis, quite the opposite, every model so far has been wrong.
Galileo invented the scientific method, so there were no "scientists" before him, just "men of science".
Scientifically, I think ipcc isn't performing so bad ( https://www.google.it/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate), I don't know any alternative model or better explanation, and of course you cannot "prove" a model, just test it, but you can make a lot of experiments (I.e. adding co2 to a simulated ecosystem), and as far as I know they are all confirming the mainstream theory. That could be false, right, but it's the best theory out there
don't confuse science and the religion of science. there is no majority in science. If all the members of the ipcc killed their families first, I would believe them... otherwise, less urgent than killing hillary and obama and their agents.
Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.
So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.
Can't do that with crappy science.
There are interesting theories going around about NASA
For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean
You know like with the moon landings.Yeah those moon landings were all faked.
The earth is flat.
There’s a space alien being kept at Area 51 and the government is keeping it secret.
There’s a bunch of You Tube vids about it so it must be true.
And there’s a big invisible sky fairy too....
everyone knows that the big btc farms are on the moon... so noobs to not know it
. 
May 04, 2018, 08:04:35 AM
We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.
If you believe the data/outcome of the Calhoun's rats experiment can also apply to humans, then the reason for the dropping reproduction rate starts to make sense.
But it's more than just available space, or the amount comfortable space, that one lives in. The rats didn't have to "purchase" their real estate, they just laid claim to it. However, humans do. Also the rats didn't have to "work" for any resources. Humans do.
Too many offspring are not just a drain on their parents comfort of life level, but also their available resources/wealth. Thus too many offspring now pose a risk to the parent's longevity through a chance at comfortable retirement.
Notice how the wealthy elite still seem happy and healthy while having a boat load of children? Yeah there's a reason for that.
"Don't have more children than you can afford (either while married or through divorce)" is now becoming a major thing. And in the West it'll only get worse when people are more overworked and underpaid, taxes and inflation continue to increase, income levels peak, debt levels peak, and large, comfortable homes become astronomically unaffordable for most couples. Actually we are already there.
May 04, 2018, 08:04:20 AM
Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.
So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.
Can't do that with crappy science.
There are interesting theories going around about NASA
For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean
You know like with the moon landings.Yeah those moon landings were all faked.
The earth is flat.
There’s a space alien being kept at Area 51 and the government is keeping it secret.
There’s a bunch of You Tube vids about it so it must be true.
And there’s a big invisible sky fairy too....
May 04, 2018, 07:22:32 AM
Didn't 98% of the scientific community at the time agree that Galileo was wrong?
In science it doesn't matter how many agrees with you, it only matters if you are right. If a hypothesis will become a theory or not is not decided by majority vote, but by if you can prove your hypothesis or not.
And so far the IPCC haven't been able to prove the hypothesis, quite the opposite, every model so far has been wrong.
Galileo invented the scientific method, so there were no "scientists" before him, just "men of science".
Scientifically, I think ipcc isn't performing so bad ( https://www.google.it/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate), I don't know any alternative model or better explanation, and of course you cannot "prove" a model, just test it, but you can make a lot of experiments (I.e. adding co2 to a simulated ecosystem), and as far as I know they are all confirming the mainstream theory. That could be false, right, but it's the best theory out there
May 04, 2018, 06:52:34 AM
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.
We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
exactly, how the feminist agenda should work. brainless things, unable to be mothers or wives, pretending to be men, while having none of the courage, strengh or determination, to foster the centralization of defense for them to rape impunitly.
100% by design.
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.
We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.
by design, remember the first rule... in startrek... bring unvicilized that didn't yet did their homework to evolve, to ensure the destruction of all safety nets, and the heritage fought over centuries against the feudalist order.
voting rights to women will be remember as the biggest mistake of all time.
nothing disgust me more than "western liberated females"... those are the plague, that will end the west for a long time...
how many females own bitcoin? how many females provide liquidity with their own money? lol... they can't compete in anything against men... they aren't design for that... from chess to asic design...
look at all those females ceo? appart wetting before musk they are useless bioids destroying what generations of men build before them.
listen to the ex wife of alex jones if you want to have an idea...
conformism is in their dnas.
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.
We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.
Birth rate, not population. And even then it's only because they count the immigrants, actual swedish birth rate is much lower than this.
when you own state purse a demographic strategy to defeat the natives, what can the natives do? fight? lol, the cops and others law enforcement agencies in the west have been brainwashed and contaminated in believing in the female utopia...
female marines... LoL...
himmlers and co are still laughing in their tombs at the idea... stoping the wehrmacht with girls? hehehee... we saw how it worked in the street of berlin against the russian males
. 
May 04, 2018, 06:48:00 AM
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.
We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.
Birth rate, not population. And even then it's only because they count the immigrants, actual swedish birth rate is much lower than this.
May 04, 2018, 06:42:54 AM
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.
We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.
May 04, 2018, 06:37:35 AM
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.
We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
May 04, 2018, 06:36:08 AM
Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.
So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.
Can't do that with crappy science.
Nothing state sponsored is trustworthy.
May 04, 2018, 06:26:07 AM
Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.
So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.
Can't do that with crappy science.
There are interesting theories going around about NASA
For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean
You know like with the moon landings.Yeah those moon landings were all faked.
The earth is flat.
There’s a space alien being kept at Area 51 and the government is keeping it secret.
There’s a bunch of You Tube vids about it so it must be true.
And there’s a big invisible sky fairy too....
May 04, 2018, 06:25:47 AM
The price is nice and steady around $9,650. Just waiting for the next pump 
it may be a fart
It is a ripper
all rocket launch start with what apprears to be a fart at first... and then ....
Whoever conceived this crap should put their money where their mouths are and start by ending their own cancerous existence.
This:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
If we're talking Logan's Run type culling bullshit, then good luck with that.
you should read all the others 10 objectives. 9 have are almost fullfilled in the west and usa. However the language one... doesn't work apparently.
Whoever conceived this crap should put their money where their mouths are and start by ending their own cancerous existence.
This:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
If we're talking Logan's Run type culling bullshit, then good luck with that.
Balance with Nature
We act more like a virus than a natural inhabitant
Remember we are running out of resources too many people
As they keep telling us
The most precious resource water we are running out of
ROFL
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170412-is-the-world-running-out-of-fresh-water
Where does fresh water come from. sometimes you need a gun...
And one thing we really are running out of is fish. If the descriptions of early american explorers and settlers are to be believed, we have maybe 1% of 1% of what used to live in the sea. If we go much further then most of it is not coming back.
Agree, not to say any of these things are not happening, actually the opposite, they are happening by design
Ecology, sustainability and environment issues were well known over 50 years ago, even 50000 years ago
Do you think anybody has actually done anything?
...."What do we think of the Georgia Guidestones?"....
It is being fully implemented and it is not what the stone says that will be implemented but a New World Order that will create what the stone says.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations
Remember in the Western world you do not get to vote on foreign policy, only domestic
all western ruling class are about raping physically or looting... nothing else. they are only round eyes.
in the western world you are nothing. try to jail hillary and you will see... even the potus is too afraid...
the west has fallen, reequilibrate and laugh and enjoy their demise... because one day those protecting hillary will die, and then chelsea and her offspring will be fair game... and lot of suffering for many logged kids... that will have grown up... war, is an endless process.
and as the round eyes know nothing else, they will perish by it. so is life, so is destiny.
2 more pages on ignore. enviroment, politics, bla, bla, bla. So many sick people around here. It's time for infofront to take some action delete, ban, delete, ban.
delete, ban, delete, ban.go back to provide liquidity.
Jump to: