https://twitter.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/1735005414276878729
I don't like this.
--snip--
it smells like a rehypothecation fest waiting to happen.
From what I've read about "in kind" vs "in cash" is that "in cash" has an additional intermediary which is licensed to buy and keep in cold storage the coins. This will increase the fees, that's why Blackrock insisted on their "in kind" model. But SEC obviously insisted to include also to add the "in cash" option in order to include other major institutions like large banks which don't have a licence to buy and keep the coins. This has nothing to do with derivatives. Now practically everyone can participate in the ETF's, which is even better. Of course, I'm not a financial expert, I just read carefully all tweets from financial experts, which I can't trust 100% of course. SEC concerns are that there will be no way for some company to issue fake shares with no real purchase, to keep the coins in cold, not hot wallets and that nobody on the chain would be able to sell custumer's coins without their knowledge. All this is very positive IMO and shows the real change of SEC's attitude towards spot ETF's. The last minute ammendmets is a clear indicator that the approval will be issued in less than a month, probably around the 8th Jan 2024. Gensler last comment today seems to confirm this expectation:
https://twitter.com/JSeyff/status/1735006033997648371
Good research, thanks ivomm!