Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 1501. (Read 26709326 times)

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

I dont have any proves but i can confirm exphorizon is holding a ton of BTC and he only make all this post for trolling and make a laugh until he wait to the super pump of BTC.

I think you may have missed the fact he posted a Loser calling someone else a loser gif.

I generally don't like seeing peops on ignore quoted but this was pure gold, he literally owned himself.

Maybe you should rethink your statement?

Try to consider (if you can?) a couple of seemingly relevant and material facts, and consider "loser" versus "not a loser" status.

Fact:  On purpose, I am a coiner.

Fact:  On purpose, you are a no coiner.

Yes, it seems that there are decent odds that BTC prices could experience a bit of a correction from here - especially since we have already experienced quite a bit of UPpity in a pretty short period of time (like just around 2 weeks) going from around $26,800 to $35,968 (which is right around 34% of UPpity), yet at the same time, we have seen periods of time in bitcoin's history in which it does not do any retrace or any meaningful partial retrace of 8% to 10% in order that some folks might feel like buying on the dip.. and so even though we have gotten right around a 5% retrace down to $34,132, sometimes the BIGGER retraces do not end up happening, and at the same time, there are likely some shorts building up that might also serve as fuel to continue some kind of a path UPpity.. whether that is merely going back into the $36ks or maybe taking us up to $40k or even further,

and surely I personally (as a kind of layman SOMA imitator wannabe) am not really expecting a whole hell of a resistance below no man's land, which starts right around $55k, but the mere fact that there might not be a lot of resistance between here and $55k-ish does not even probably give greater than 40% odds that we go up from here rather than experiencing some kind of a wee widdo bit more of a correction, so it may well be that the odds are on your side eXPHorizon (you little twat) that some amount of down before up might well be more probable than going up before up... whether the odds are as high as 60% might be difficult to determine, but they surely are not even close to as certain as your sorcerer wannabe attempts are making them out to be.

Are you regretting, yet, that you have failed and/or refused to buy ur lil selfie some cornz?  It must not be pleasant being both a no coiner and a loser wannabe troll participating in a bitcoin thread like this one, no?

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Bljatcoin is about to be crashed by The Sun. Ita fonna disrupt the shjat out of it

Yup, like I said, Impossible!

I have no idea what you just said hisslyness, but sounds good to me.  Easy-peasy.


Surely BIG blocker (and shitcoiner) nutjob ideas are still around us and even within various bitcoin circles..

If you had not realized erre, no rush and no emergency is currently present.  And, also it is quite possible that digits are going to start to be recognized lower than a satoshi, which is already being done on the lightning network (down to 3 digits further).. and likely such recognition is also going to take place on the main blockchain too.. Hard to know when exactly, but mining rewards become sub satoshi in terms of their number of digits down in around 2048.. .. About a month ago, in another thread, I had been involved in some discussion of tail emission ideas on the BTC blockchain.. and even my own suggestion for a possible need to start to recognize digits down greater than 8 digits on the main blockchain.

And, yeah lightning network, if you had not heard of it is already one of the possible transaction ways with bitcoin on a second layer... . if you had not realized..and there also might well develop a variety of other ways of transacting with bitcoin, whether on the main layer or various second and third and fourth layers in the next 30 years as you projected out there as a kind of timeline in which there might need to be recognition of sub satoshi digits.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Seems to me that the mempool was often congested, i don't think all of these are attacks by a maleficient entity

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Here is my coffee hypotesis:

The year is 2053. Dollar and Euros are long gone, so are the so-called "central bank cryptoassets",  that's because a system based on trust is no longer an option, people want only something that have value. Bitcoin, gold, even bullets and cigarettes are commonly used and daily traded for goods.

In that very probable scenario I enter in a bar and order a coffee using bitcoin. A coffee is worth way less than a Satoshi, so the barman hold me half a sovereign of gold and  a cigarette as rest.

This is simply not feasible if we don't implement a working ln so we have to hurry up

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

like, i didnt even get to step zero. and my next 5 steps consisted of reading the answers on how tf you guys get this stuff. so yeah easy 5 steps for me too lol just wait for the answer

congrats  thats seriously impressive.

Amazing work, hisslyness!

I don't know the cost, but in the past it has been punitive. I remember the attack during the fork was said to have cost a significant sum.

The behaviour of the mempool seems unnatural for a weekend, therefore most likely an attack. Sure some exchanges occasionally adjust things on weekends due to the lower demand for blockspace but I don't think this is what's happening as they usually don't try to drive the fee higher.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com