Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16229. (Read 26610297 times)

legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1130

Fake blood, fake wounds and bad acting aside. Funny thing is, not one of those supposed 'deceased' victims in that Liveleak video are one of the actual people listed in the final obituary.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/10/us/las-vegas-shooting-victims/

Not one. But does America care? Does the world care? Apparently not. We're all ok with crisis actors being passed off as real dead people and then not showing up in the official obituary list.  Roll Eyes

The funniest youtube video (now taken down) I saw was when Mike Cronk's buddy Rob Macintosh was supposedly hit 3 times in the chest from 300 yards away. Yeah, right. And then Mike visited him the next day in the hospital's IC unit after Rob's emergency "surgery". Rob was fully awake, conscious, no oxygen concentrator, no IV drip, and the equipment wasn't even hooked up to him.  Roll Eyes

Edit: Here's a follow up on Rob's story. Notice the magically moving injuries! What an amazing recovery from those 3 gunshots to the chest!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWwEduID5O0

What drugs are you taking? I can reccomend

hahahahaha FTFY ^

Crisis Actors are notoriously awful!  That's what you get for $20/hour, with no acting training.

Yeah, the guy's buddy was hit THREE times in the CHEST, they miraculously found a *spare wheelbarrow* in downtown Vegas, then pushed him over a fence and then under a fence & he's perfectly fine!  

All it takes is a simple search for "Las Vegas Shooter Fraud."  Lots of vids removed from the WWW, but lots remaining.

Total False Flag Attack.  

RIP to all the real victims, including the patsy Paddock.

3 weeks 'til next BTC ATH  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278

I voted for Gary Johnson. But I do understand the votes for Trump.

However, you might want to reconsider in the future. Not voting for the libertarian candidate because you believe they "have no chance of winning" is not really helping the cause btw.

I.E., if no one votes for the third party for fear of losing, then a negative feedback loop is constantly reinforced every 4 years and thus the Libertarian party's chances of winning will never grow, because their percentage of overall votes will never grow.

Despite this behavior, though, the Lib party's percentage of votes is growing. The near term goal is to gain enough %  of the votes to where the Lib party can no longer be ignored by the establishment.

Torque: how can any libertarian support a candidate who supports forced vaccination of children?  https://www.oathkeepers.org/mike-adams-libertarian-presidential-candidate-favors-forced-vaccines/

He clarified that position:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/08/25/gary-johnson-changes-his-mind-on-mandato

Also, please don't make me have to go dig up at least 5-6 stances on things held by either Trump or Hillary that would make the average person want to vomit themselves. These party candidates are not 'perfect' in all their views, far from it. If you are waiting around for that 'perfect libertarian candidate', you're gonna be waiting a long time. Possibly forever.

Ok, at the risk of being reprimanded for going off-topic, I'm a full blooded Alex Jones Info-warrier and I am proud of it, and I don't agree with anyone 100%, but with Alex it's probably the high nineties, and his information which is usually accurate: https://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-exposes-pro-amnesty-libertarian-gary-johnson/  Gary Johnson was Anti-Gun, Pro-TPP, Pro-Amnesty.  Now Pro-Amnesty I understand you may be against national borders if you are maybe an anarchist, but I believe in national sovierenty as a practical necessity and we can agree to disagree.  I believe we do ourselves a great dis-service when we vote by political party.  Just the fact that Trump is most vehimently hated by the rest of the establishment republicans clearly indicates he has the right people as his enemies!  Supporting any candidate just to advance a particular party, I think that is a mistake.
I have a locked room test. If I was locked in a room with person X, how well would I sleep?

Alex Jones is like an angry bulldog. I would sleep extremely well with someone like that watching over me.

Hillary would knife me in my sleep.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
I get that.  I also get wanting to throw an orange spanner in the works, and Ms Clinton represented the status quo establishment at it's worst to be sure.
That swamp drainin' seems to have been an empty marketing ploy however.
We need something...stronger.
Wake me up when you go full nazi.
https://i.imgur.com/9m4knah.jpg

Sorry, what are we talking about here ?


Money.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
So does anyone have some juicy TA? Cause I need to see some TA.

Complete with graphs, random drawn lines, and such.

How can we track price if we don't have some graphs? Anyone? Bueller?

mh. it looks like the bull trend is holding.




https://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-technical?cid=49798

but most of the posters on tradinview are bearish:
https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/BTCUSD/

which for me is a good sign. I get nervous when everybody and their aunt is hyperbullish.
member
Activity: 232
Merit: 29

I voted for Gary Johnson. But I do understand the votes for Trump.

However, you might want to reconsider in the future. Not voting for the libertarian candidate because you believe they "have no chance of winning" is not really helping the cause btw.

I.E., if no one votes for the third party for fear of losing, then a negative feedback loop is constantly reinforced every 4 years and thus the Libertarian party's chances of winning will never grow, because their percentage of overall votes will never grow.

Despite this behavior, though, the Lib party's percentage of votes is growing. The near term goal is to gain enough %  of the votes to where the Lib party can no longer be ignored by the establishment.

Torque: how can any libertarian support a candidate who supports forced vaccination of children?  https://www.oathkeepers.org/mike-adams-libertarian-presidential-candidate-favors-forced-vaccines/

He clarified that position:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/08/25/gary-johnson-changes-his-mind-on-mandato

Also, please don't make me have to go dig up at least 5-6 stances on things held by either Trump or Hillary that would make the average person want to vomit themselves. These party candidates are not 'perfect' in all their views, far from it. If you are waiting around for that 'perfect libertarian candidate', you're gonna be waiting a long time. Possibly forever.

Ok, at the risk of being reprimanded for going off-topic, I'm a full blooded Alex Jones Info-warrier and I am proud of it, and I don't agree with anyone 100%, but with Alex it's probably the high nineties, and his information which is usually accurate: https://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-exposes-pro-amnesty-libertarian-gary-johnson/  Gary Johnson was Anti-Gun, Pro-TPP, Pro-Amnesty.  Now Pro-Amnesty I understand you may be against national borders if you are maybe an anarchist, but I believe in national sovierenty as a practical necessity and we can agree to disagree.  I believe we do ourselves a great dis-service when we vote by political party.  Just the fact that Trump is most vehimently hated by the rest of the establishment republicans clearly indicates he has the right people as his enemies!  Supporting any candidate just to advance a particular party, I think that is a mistake.
STT
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1454
So does anyone have some juicy TA? Cause I need to see some TA.

Complete with graphs, random drawn lines, and such.

How can we track price if we don't have some graphs? Anyone? Bueller?

Heres a graph as requested with OBV indicator.   4730 as a target overhead, fib line but more relevant nearterm are recent support and trend I think. 4551 is 76% retracement of the bigger fall recently on PBOC news
member
Activity: 231
Merit: 43
Were having difficulty passing $4400 why is that?
http://index.bithumb.com/coinsdaq/index.php?coin=BTC

The resistance is at 5 million Korean wassnames.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 4738
diamond-handed zealot
snappy fucking dressers

my momma always said, if you can't say anything nice...
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 5429
So does anyone have some juicy TA? Cause I need to see some TA.

Complete with graphs, random drawn lines, and such.

How can we track price if we don't have some graphs? Anyone? Bueller?
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
I get that.  I also get wanting to throw an orange spanner in the works, and Ms Clinton represented the status quo establishment at it's worst to be sure.

That swamp drainin' seems to have been an empty marketing ploy however.

We need something...stronger.


Wake me up when you go full nazi.



But they do have nice uniforms.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 4738
diamond-handed zealot
.stronger.


Wake me up when you go full nazi.



"stronger" was probably a poor choice of words, I can see how that was ambiguous

I meant it in the sense of "more disruptive", not "trains run on time" 

Thanks for calling that out.
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 5429

I voted for Gary Johnson. But I do understand the votes for Trump.

However, you might want to reconsider in the future. Not voting for the libertarian candidate because you believe they "have no chance of winning" is not really helping the cause btw.

I.E., if no one votes for the third party for fear of losing, then a negative feedback loop is constantly reinforced every 4 years and thus the Libertarian party's chances of winning will never grow, because their percentage of overall votes will never grow.

Despite this behavior, though, the Lib party's percentage of votes is growing. The near term goal is to gain enough %  of the votes to where the Lib party can no longer be ignored by the establishment.

Torque: how can any libertarian support a candidate who supports forced vaccination of children?  https://www.oathkeepers.org/mike-adams-libertarian-presidential-candidate-favors-forced-vaccines/

He clarified that position:
http://reason.com/blog/2016/08/25/gary-johnson-changes-his-mind-on-mandato

Also, please don't make me have to go dig up at least 5-6 stances on things held by either Trump or Hillary that would make the average person want to vomit themselves. These party candidates are not 'perfect' in all their views, far from it. If you are waiting around for that 'perfect libertarian candidate', you're gonna be waiting a long time. Possibly forever.
member
Activity: 232
Merit: 29

I voted for Gary Johnson. But I do understand the votes for Trump.

However, you might want to reconsider in the future. Not voting for the libertarian candidate because you believe they "have no chance of winning" is not really helping the cause btw.

I.E., if no one votes for the third party for fear of losing, then a negative feedback loop is constantly reinforced every 4 years and thus the Libertarian party's chances of winning will never grow, because their percentage of overall votes will never grow.

Despite this behavior, though, the Lib party's percentage of votes is growing. The near term goal is to gain enough %  of the votes to where the Lib party can no longer be ignored by the establishment.

Torque: how can any libertarian support a candidate who supports forced vaccination of children?  https://www.oathkeepers.org/mike-adams-libertarian-presidential-candidate-favors-forced-vaccines/
legendary
Activity: 4200
Merit: 4887
You're never too old to think young.
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Seems we're stuck going sideways again... currently $4341USD/$5439CAD.

AltCash continues on its way down... currently $357USD/$447CAD.

Seems everyone's waiting. Yawn.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
I get that.  I also get wanting to throw an orange spanner in the works, and Ms Clinton represented the status quo establishment at it's worst to be sure.

That swamp drainin' seems to have been an empty marketing ploy however.

We need something...stronger.


Wake me up when you go full nazi.

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Guys,

Ive been out for couple of weeks. Anything new from Huobi and OkCoin? Are they closing shop by the end of october as mentioned earlier or did they deal with Bank of China?

Thank you in advance for any sourced information on the subject.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 4738
diamond-handed zealot
Please affirm that you are at least a libertarian.
Libertarian, but voted for Trump because the Libertarian candidate had no chance of winning.

I get that.  I also get wanting to throw an orange spanner in the works, and Ms Clinton represented the status quo establishment at it's worst to be sure.

That swamp drainin' seems to have been an empty marketing ploy however.

We need something...stronger.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Were having difficulty passing $4400 why is that?

On mingoossens game i choose January 24 2018 will be the new ATH.

Sorry the list is closed 😬
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 5429
Please affirm that you are at least a libertarian.
Libertarian, but voted for Trump because the Libertarian candidate had no chance of winning.

I voted for Gary Johnson. But I do understand the votes for Trump.

However, you might want to reconsider in the future. Not voting for the libertarian candidate because you believe they "have no chance of winning" is not really helping the cause btw.

I.E., if no one votes for the third party for fear of losing, then a negative feedback loop is constantly reinforced every 4 years and thus the Libertarian party's chances of winning will never grow, because their percentage of overall votes will never grow.

Despite this behavior, though, the Lib party's percentage of votes is growing. The near term goal is to gain enough %  of the votes to where the Lib party can no longer be ignored by the establishment.
Jump to: