Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 17552. (Read 26713510 times)

sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 250
A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards

corrupt miner = "miners who do things that EVERYONE ELSE (users, exchanges, brokers, merchants, investors) in Bitcoin doesn't approve of."


miners wont signal somthing they dont believe in.

maybe you should try to take a more objective view, and realize that asking everyone to bank on an unproven concept is not a viable way forward at this point.

and "everyone else" is not the case in this case, OBVIOUSLY
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
corrupt miners
Define what a "corrupt miner" is. I hope you have something better than "miners who do things that I just don't approve of".

corrupt miner = "miners who do things that EVERYONE ELSE (users, exchanges, brokers, merchants, investors) in Bitcoin doesn't approve of."

You might then say, "yeah, well at that point people will just vote with their feet."

Not if the Bitcoin ecosystem is big enough. Everyone will be too invested in Bitcoin's success at that point. Give miners enough power and control, and it won't matter anymore.
Okay so basically the same thing. If the majority disapproves of whatever then it doesn't matter because they have the majority of the hashpower. It's a shit definition and in practice pretty worthless.

When faced with truth, you troll. 

You want miners to take over centralized control of Bitcoin, at the expense of the rest of the users in the ecosystem. Got it.

Fascist much?

Sorry Ibian, but when r0ach starts making more sense than you, you have to go to my ignore list.
You gave your opinion. I gave my opinion of your opinion. None of that is trolling. Not even your part, or so I choose to presume. If it's not too presumptuous.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031

Well, not sure about USD prices but it looks like BTC will soon get a bump against Sterling.
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
corrupt miners
Define what a "corrupt miner" is. I hope you have something better than "miners who do things that I just don't approve of".

corrupt miner = "miners who do things that EVERYONE ELSE (users, exchanges, brokers, merchants, investors) in Bitcoin doesn't approve of."

You might then say, "yeah, well at that point people will just vote with their feet."

Not if the Bitcoin ecosystem is big enough. Everyone will be too invested in Bitcoin's success at that point. Give miners enough power and control, and it won't matter anymore.
Okay so basically the same thing. If the majority disapproves of whatever then it doesn't matter because they have the majority of the hashpower. It's a shit definition and in practice pretty worthless.

When faced with truth, you troll. 

You want miners to take over centralized control of Bitcoin, at the expense of the rest of the users in the ecosystem. Got it.

Fascist much?

Sorry Ibian, but when r0ach starts making more sense than you, you have to go to my ignore list.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
corrupt miners
Define what a "corrupt miner" is. I hope you have something better than "miners who do things that I just don't approve of".

corrupt miner = "miners who do things that EVERYONE ELSE (users, exchanges, brokers, merchants, investors) in Bitcoin doesn't approve of."

You might then say, "yeah, well at that point people will just vote with their feet."

Not if the Bitcoin ecosystem is big enough. Everyone will be too invested in Bitcoin's success at that point. Give miners enough power and control, and it won't matter anymore.
Okay so basically the same thing. If the majority disapproves of whatever then it doesn't matter because they have the majority of the hashpower. It's a shit definition and in practice pretty worthless.
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
corrupt miners
Define what a "corrupt miner" is. I hope you have something better than "miners who do things that I just don't approve of".

corrupt miner = "miners who do things that EVERYONE ELSE (users, exchanges, brokers, merchants, investors) in Bitcoin doesn't approve of."

You might then say, "yeah, well at that point people will just vote with their feet."

Not if the Bitcoin ecosystem is big enough. Everyone will be too invested in Bitcoin's success at that point. Give miners enough power and control, and it won't matter anymore.
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1016
Been away from here for a few days and I see we are lower in price and it's the same fork bullshit as usual. Wake me up when this is all over.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile

I love using a currency that is decentralised and I can profit from myself via mining or trading. As well I can transfer my money anywhere in the world and buy anything in the world with it.

What a great idea this bitcoin is..
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 612
Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!
This is fucking hilarious.  Bitfury sues to prevent bitcoin from being un-centralized!  This is why I can't stand bitcoin now.  These idiots even think it's supposed to be centralized.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60ast5/bitfury_george_pledges_to_sue_all_involved_with/





Good luck with the lawsuit in China! Cheesy Cheesy ... you will need it!  


http://www.bbc.com/news/business-36200481   (Short version:  "Apple lost trademark lawsuit in China over their own product name.") Cheesy Cheesy


*edit: Keep smoking that hopium r0ach!  Cheesy  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
You are literally complaining that bitcoin is so successful than people other than internet nerds are becoming interested. This is Good News™.

Are you the new worst commenter on the forum?  The entire point of bitcoin is "decentralization".  To mine things like gold you have to go through the government itself and get permits and also deal with entities like the EPA, yet even with all that bureaucracy, gold and silver mining is still more decentralized than bitcoin mining is.  This is not a good thing when "decentralization" is it's entire selling point.
Welcome to the real world. Other people have Agendas. This was never not going to happen.

Please make a comment that makes some type of sense.  You first said I'm "complaining that others besides internet nerds are interested in bitcoin".  LOL, they are not interested in "bitcoin", they're interested in inserting themselves as middlemen and extracting usury and seigniorage fees from you.  The exact thing that bitcoin is supposed to prevent.  If bitcoin developers themselves can't even mine the coin they develop for and have to pay tribute to some cartel, I'm not sure there is much point in this because this thing has clearly gone off the rails.
copper member
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1465
Clueless!
You are literally complaining that bitcoin is so successful than people other than internet nerds are becoming interested. This is Good News™.

Are you the new worst commenter on the forum?  The entire point of bitcoin is "decentralization".  To mine things like gold you have to go through the government itself and get permits and also deal with entities like the EPA, yet even with all that bureaucracy, gold and silver mining is still more decentralized than bitcoin mining is.  This is not a good thing when "decentralization" is it's entire selling point.
Welcome to the real world. Other people have Agendas. This was never not going to happen.


Worse then that....2 camps..both have a big block solution...neither can muster enough to get their way.....but to top it off Bitcoin Core which currently is in control
of the project...does not care about block size increase....thus a stalemate with 1 party just fine if it goes no place.

stagnation Sad

So until both parties come to the table on solutions OTHER then the ones they have already proposed...this could go on for years yet. (assuming BTC price lasts that long)

Thus no communication (beyond twitter wars) no protocol change ..simple as that

(all parties being btc whales from back in the day is not helping this any either..with I'll sink the ship first attitude if I lose from both sides..actions....imho anyway)

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
You are literally complaining that bitcoin is so successful than people other than internet nerds are becoming interested. This is Good News™.

Are you the new worst commenter on the forum?  The entire point of bitcoin is "decentralization".  To mine things like gold you have to go through the government itself and get permits and also deal with entities like the EPA, yet even with all that bureaucracy, gold and silver mining is still more decentralized than bitcoin mining is.  This is not a good thing when "decentralization" is it's entire selling point.
Welcome to the real world. Other people have Agendas. This was never not going to happen.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
You are literally complaining that bitcoin is so successful than people other than internet nerds are becoming interested. This is Good News™.

Are you the new worst commenter on the forum?  The entire point of bitcoin is "decentralization".  To mine things like gold you have to go through the government itself and get permits and also deal with entities like the EPA, yet even with all that bureaucracy, gold and silver mining is still more decentralized than bitcoin mining is.  This is not a good thing when "decentralization" is it's entire selling point.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
This is fucking hilarious.  Bitfury sues to prevent bitcoin from being un-centralized!  This is why I can't stand bitcoin now.  These idiots even think it's supposed to be centralized.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60ast5/bitfury_george_pledges_to_sue_all_involved_with/


You are literally complaining that bitcoin is so successful than people other than internet nerds are becoming interested. This is Good News (Everyone)™.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
This is fucking hilarious.  Bitfury sues to prevent bitcoin from being un-centralized!  This is why I can't stand bitcoin now.  These idiots even think it's supposed to be centralized.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60ast5/bitfury_george_pledges_to_sue_all_involved_with/

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
I'm about to fork my peanut butter sandwich with some jam.  Roll Eyes

Want some?
Depends. What does that do to the peanut's market value?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
I'm about to fork my peanut butter sandwich with some jam.  Roll Eyes

Want some?
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
When the king mixes his old solid gold coins with iron you end up with two different kinds of coins, both with his ugly face on them. That's a fork.

Your definition of being able to "fork" elements on the periodic table is accepted by nobody else on earth besides yourself.  You're just making things up as you go.
For that matter, we have forked gold now. Some of it is mixed with tungsten. Have you had yours checked?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
When the king mixes his old solid gold coins with iron you end up with two different kinds of coins, both with his ugly face on them. That's a fork.

Your definition of being able to "fork" elements on the periodic table is accepted by nobody else on earth besides yourself.  You're just making things up as you go.  All you're doing is describing a king trying to force people off a metals content based currency and onto a fiat currency.  Your argument has no point because nothing actually happened to change the metal.  It's still sitting there the same as before, just someone attempted to steal it through debasement.  Debasing is the same thing as shaving - physically removing a quantity.  Nothing about the metal actually "forked".
Jump to: