Coin
Explanation
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19212. (Read 26608807 times)
February 24, 2016, 03:00:47 AM
February 24, 2016, 02:56:17 AM
Wow 2 nights in a row. Just got home from the bar to see I missed the action again.
Maybe it'll still be low enough in the morning to buy the dip.
Don't ever go to a bar no more! Maybe it'll still be low enough in the morning to buy the dip.
We had a hell of dump actually.
I'm having a coffee trying to recover from both a sleepless night and a misty morning with low btc
price>>>Don't ever go to a bar no more!<<<
That's like telling a fish not to swim.
>>>I'm having a coffee trying to recover from both a sleepless night and a misty morning with low btc
price<<<I'm having dinner trying to recover from a night of drinking and hoping I'll still be able to buy BTC below $220 in the morning (crack of noon EST). No chix tonite. Maybe I'll wake up early.
Not looking good so far.
February 24, 2016, 02:40:47 AM
My target of ~410 reached. And back up. Enjoy.
My bets are on a continuation of the uptrend after retracing to ~410 maybe?
February 24, 2016, 02:12:38 AM
Wow 2 nights in a row. Just got home from the bar to see I missed the action again.
Maybe it'll still be low enough in the morning to buy the dip.
Don't ever go to a bar no more! Maybe it'll still be low enough in the morning to buy the dip.
We had a hell of dump actually.
I'm having a coffee trying to recover from both a sleepless night and a misty morning with low btc
price February 24, 2016, 02:00:51 AM
February 24, 2016, 01:59:17 AM
Wow 2 nights in a row. Just got home from the bar to see I missed the action again.
Maybe it'll still be low enough in the morning to buy the dip.
Maybe it'll still be low enough in the morning to buy the dip.
February 24, 2016, 01:39:49 AM
Can't keep doing this, people will start running out of weed. Then this thread will be complete crap
February 24, 2016, 01:33:03 AM
February 24, 2016, 01:16:34 AM
February 24, 2016, 01:12:14 AM
February 24, 2016, 01:00:49 AM
February 24, 2016, 12:42:00 AM
im buying another 2000$ worth tomorrow if price still low, and my bids dont fill overnight.
just saying...
just saying...
February 24, 2016, 12:23:13 AM
im buying another 2000$ worth tomorrow if price still low, and my bids dont fill overnight.
just saying...
just saying...
February 24, 2016, 12:06:37 AM
February 24, 2016, 12:00:50 AM
February 23, 2016, 11:16:01 PM
February 23, 2016, 11:06:20 PM
How is it that we bitcoiners can't behave ourselves?
Fine, stealing from each other, that's natural, I'm good with that. But why stab each other with comically oversized butcher knives?
First Adam tries to lure me behind some Cnadian gas station, now this KNC knifing. Please tell me the mainstream press is lying to us again, because this is too much, can't even fall asleep now...
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nsd.se%2Fnyheter%2Fboden%2Fextra-har-intraffade-mordforsoket-9861329.aspx&edit-text=&act=url
And, from the same page:
It's really true then, the world outside US has gone straight to Hell. Gender-fluid fish molesters? Really? What's wrong with you people?!
If I didn't read it with my own eyes, I wouldn't have believed it.
No wonder Mr. Trump wants to build a wall topped with curare-and-rabies-soaked razor wire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq1B3Hgclyo Fine, stealing from each other, that's natural, I'm good with that. But why stab each other with comically oversized butcher knives?
First Adam tries to lure me behind some Cnadian gas station, now this KNC knifing. Please tell me the mainstream press is lying to us again, because this is too much, can't even fall asleep now...
Quote from: Google translate
According guardians have witnesses reported that the suspect was sitting astride the victim. In this situation he should have cut him with two deep stab in the chest with a knife. Around 15 people gathered in the scuffle.
- So there is a greater amount of people and the excitement is tense. As it had happened as people were outraged.
The accused man should have behaved calmly towards the guards.
- He did not resist when he was given the handcuffs and then as la to him in our input bus.
The perpetrator was handed over to the police when they appeared on the scene. The arrested man is in his 40s and is suspected of attempted murder or attempted manslaughter, or aggravated assault.
http://www.nsd.se/nyheter/boden/extra-har-intraffade-mordforsoket-9861329.aspx- So there is a greater amount of people and the excitement is tense. As it had happened as people were outraged.
The accused man should have behaved calmly towards the guards.
- He did not resist when he was given the handcuffs and then as la to him in our input bus.
The perpetrator was handed over to the police when they appeared on the scene. The arrested man is in his 40s and is suspected of attempted murder or attempted manslaughter, or aggravated assault.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nsd.se%2Fnyheter%2Fboden%2Fextra-har-intraffade-mordforsoket-9861329.aspx&edit-text=&act=url
And, from the same page:
It's really true then, the world outside US has gone straight to Hell. Gender-fluid fish molesters? Really? What's wrong with you people?!
If I didn't read it with my own eyes, I wouldn't have believed it.
No wonder Mr. Trump wants to build a wall topped with curare-and-rabies-soaked razor wire.
February 23, 2016, 11:00:49 PM
February 23, 2016, 11:00:15 PM
Regarding incentives, what about this line of reasoning:
If you were say a cryptograher/coder and you worked on Bitcoin, but wanted to create your own cryptocoin, and watch it gain popularity after you made it, Would you have any incentive at all to sabotage the current frontrunner by objecting to any and all reasonable proposals for improvement?
If you knew that even a tiny minority of dissent in the community could shutdown those improvements, and that your sabotage would likely succeed, would that maybe give you added temptation?
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but since we are supposed to look for attack vectors and vulnerabilities, is this not a concern? If not, why not? Are all developers and POTENTIAL developers above reproach? Should they be?
If you were say a cryptograher/coder and you worked on Bitcoin, but wanted to create your own cryptocoin, and watch it gain popularity after you made it, Would you have any incentive at all to sabotage the current frontrunner by objecting to any and all reasonable proposals for improvement?
If you knew that even a tiny minority of dissent in the community could shutdown those improvements, and that your sabotage would likely succeed, would that maybe give you added temptation?
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but since we are supposed to look for attack vectors and vulnerabilities, is this not a concern? If not, why not? Are all developers and POTENTIAL developers above reproach? Should they be?
You would do it with the risk of killing yourself in the process, first cryptos need to grow and become popular and their presence in the society reaches a no return point, then you can use Machiavellic plans to kill BTC and make your own currency the top one
Right, I agree most would think this way, but would they ALL think this way? Does nobody ever make the choice to rule in Hell rather than serve in heaven? To be the Big Fish in a small pond even if it means muddier water? Is there any procedure or rule in place to prevent this from happening? If so, what is it and if not why not?
And how popular would Crypto have to be before our hypothetical Machiavilli judged his plan would be fruitful? The point where our chief competition (the Banks) invest substantially in blockchain technology? I ask because it seems like that's already happening.
Trying to think like an evil person, and knowing that network effects can be very strong, I would assume there is a rather limited window of opportunity to pull off this scheme and it would be better to err on the side of being too early than too late.
February 23, 2016, 10:47:12 PM
Regarding incentives, what about this line of reasoning:
If you were say a cryptograher/coder and you worked on Bitcoin, but wanted to create your own cryptocoin, and watch it gain popularity after you made it, Would you have any incentive at all to sabotage the current frontrunner by objecting to any and all reasonable proposals for improvement?
If you knew that even a tiny minority of dissent in the community could shutdown those improvements, and that your sabotage would likely succeed, would that maybe give you added temptation?
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but since we are supposed to look for attack vectors and vulnerabilities, is this not a concern? If not, why not? Are all developers and POTENTIAL developers above reproach? Should they be?
If you were say a cryptograher/coder and you worked on Bitcoin, but wanted to create your own cryptocoin, and watch it gain popularity after you made it, Would you have any incentive at all to sabotage the current frontrunner by objecting to any and all reasonable proposals for improvement?
If you knew that even a tiny minority of dissent in the community could shutdown those improvements, and that your sabotage would likely succeed, would that maybe give you added temptation?
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but since we are supposed to look for attack vectors and vulnerabilities, is this not a concern? If not, why not? Are all developers and POTENTIAL developers above reproach? Should they be?
You would do it with the risk of killing yourself in the process, first cryptos need to grow and become popular and their presence in the society reaches a no return point, then you can use Machiavellic plans to kill BTC and make your own currency the top one
Jump to: