Banks have more liabilities than just M1 (checking deposits etc). What about M2? CDs?
DEFINITION of 'M2'
A measure of money supply that includes cash and checking deposits (M1) as well as near money. “Near money" in M2 includes savings deposits, money market mutual funds and other time deposits, which are less liquid and not as suitable as exchange mediums but can be quickly converted into cash or checking deposits.
Yes, money market funds. Ask the people with money market funds at Lehman Bros what happens when they break the buck.
Also, why do you think they suspended mark-to-market accounting? I think you know damn well almost every investment bank has a prop trading desk where they gamble in the markets. And it's the bonds that may prove most problematic. Puerto Rico may end up being worse that Greece.
M1, M2, etc., in no way represent 'liabilities of banks'. They are measures of how much money (in US dollars) exists. M1 is all the money that exists in the form of cash and demand accounts, i.e., all the dollars in the world that are immediately spendable. The other Ms add other money that exists but is not immediately liquid. like bank reserves, savings accounts, CDs, etc.
Your initial claim was basically that banks have 'underperforming loans' that exceed the actual amount of money that even exists. While I guess this is theoretically possible, it seems to me to be highly unlikely.
In any case, the intent of my initial post was not to defend the solvency of the banks, but rather to bring attention to the unnaturally huge amount of excess reserves held by banks now - especially considering that the level of excess reserves has (naturally) been vanishingly close to zero throughout the history of banking - and maybe get someone to wonder why this has changed, and maybe even wonder what the implications of this change might be.
You really are frustrating. Every dollar in existence was LENT into existence either by the Fed expanding it's balance sheet to buy bonds or by fractional reserve lending. You know this. Of course there is more debt than money, because ALL that money has to be paid back at interest.
M2 is almost all liabilities of the bank, just as M1 is. I can't even think of an exception to this except M0
which as you know is a tiny fraction of M1. And who gives a rip what your intentions were? You were responding to MY post and after arguing against a point I never made, you want to change the subject.
ALL banks have more liabilities than they can meet if they all come due at the same time. That's been known for ages, since I was a kid watching It's a Wonderful Life. What is new is that the loans are massively undercollateralized by markets being propped up artificially. This ranges from mortgages being propped up by the FED buying MBSs to government bonds bought by the Fed from primary dealers days after auction.
Now you could say "who cares if the loans are undercollaterized as long as the payments are being made?" but that's what I'm getting at. The loans AREN'T being repaid in a growing number of cases ranging from sovereigns (Greece, PR) to payday loans. You can't see this immediately because of the churn. It's perfectly normal and healthy to refinance at a lower rate, but some are borrowing at HIGHER rates just to make payments on earlier loans at LOWER rates. This is clearly unsustainable. Honest accounting would show all of those loans as worthless. The PRIMARY reason for ZIRP is to hide this state of affairs and it's why it can't ever end.