This sums up rather nicely the reason why I often post the phrase "as low as possible for as long as possible"
I wish that life were fair. I wish that everyone could be rich. I would like the price to go back to 2 dollars or 2 cents so that everyone could get their "fair share".
Unfortunately, life doesn't work that way. We are all responsible for our own decisions. (And, apparently, the decisions of the politicians we elect)
Life ain't fair. If you don't like it, tough shit.
Are you really trying to say that buying at <$2 -- and getting insanely, incredibly lucky to make a fortune off this massive bubble -- makes anybody a financial genius? It turned out to be a good decision, but best believe it was mostly lucky.
I'd say the biggest geniuses were the whales who made the "decision" to get the fuck out at the top while the suckers were still willing to buy.
No.
There is nothing "insane" or "incredibly lucky" about realizing the potential of a new technology and its inevitable impacts on a globally corrupt and immoral financial system.
What I'm
trying to say is that if someone is paying attention and putting forth the effort to educate themselves about the way the current financial system works, (newsflash, they don't teach that shit in schools) and then they learn about a new technological breakthrough that has the potential to make a substantial change that would allow everyone the freedom to bypass the leeches and parasites that prey on the productive to enrich only themselves, they should not be demonized for their initiative, rather, they should be rewarded, and deservedly so.
Err, rambling, sorry.
It's not about of "getting revenge". It is about taking responsibility, and not requiring the productive to subsidize the rest.
Why do I feel like Hank Rearden in the courtroom right now, trying to explain things that should be obvious?
