the amount of infrastructure, adoption and business being built
Right, it must be all that infrastructure and adoption that has caused the price to drop from 800$ to 450$ over the last 3 months.
Let's see what effect that will have on price when (if?) China drops out of the picture. At present I cannot see any, there is that elephant blocking the view.
There were also many negative developments in the West since November, to counter those positive ones. Such as the IRS interpretation, the continuing arrests from the SilkRoad case, the MtGOX heist and the dozens of other similar "accidents", the Neo&Bee fiasco, the Fortress embarassment, the bank account closures in Australia and the US, ...
You answered your own first point with your last. Those few businesses do not take away from the countless others in regard to is infrastructure being built.
the Chinese doesn't or didn't own 90%
I never
claimed that. Surely the price went up in Oct-Nov because the Chinese traders bought a lot of the coins that were in the Western market. How many, I have no idea; but it must have been a large fraction, in order to lift the price from ~120$ to ~1200$. It
could have been 90% of the coins, why not? In any case, if price went up from 120$ when they came buying into the market, we can expect it to go down to 120$ if (when?) they cash out and leave the market.
Also Leon Li claimed to have 10'000 active clients; discounting the hype factor, it seems reasonable to guess 10'000 active traders for all the Chinese exchanges combined. How many coins does the average trader own? How many traders are active in the Western exchanges, and how many coins do they own?
Do
you have any estimate of those numbers?
keep dreaming of $120 but absent am actual flaw with the protocol just not gonna happen. Why do you ignore all the non-chinese who are in btc since when you believe China entered the market in these assumptions? You are assuming that if the whole Chinese market leaves (which it won't) we will be back to the same number of people holding the same number of coins.
Add into that the traders who happily trade on both exchanges and your 10,000 figure for just Chinese shrinks somewhat.
A guesstimate at best obviously but more than 10,000 traders for sure. Gox had a million accounts, can't you glean something from that!
[ Not true ] that we need to keep getting bigger and bigger markets. [...] the whole worlds the market and it just so happened that a small section of that market tried to put the brakes on.
If you prefer to put it that way: Bitcoin was confined to a tiny section of the market; with China it got another small section, now it may lose that and go back to the tiny section it had before. To get a new and 10x bigger rally it needs to find another small section, that is 10 times less small than the Chinese one was.
It is bizarre to see those "experienced bitcoin traders" scoffing at me when they cannot even tell whether the current buying sprees are coming from China or from the West.
Um, no what happens if that section invests more fiat? It may be the same size but guess which way the price goes.
Nobody can tell for sure where the buying sprees are coming from that's why, you'd be a fool to suggest you could for sure for a start. Also unless coins are transferred from the west to China or vice versa the buying sprees in % holdings per markets doesn't change regardless of price.
Edited for formatting.