Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 28886. (Read 26609878 times)
March 12, 2014, 11:44:03 AM
March 12, 2014, 11:43:14 AM
Quote
400 toll-free numbers with prefix "4001" are international toll-free numbers which can be routed to destination numbers inside or outside of China. 400 toll-free numbers with prefix "4000", "4006", "4007" or "4008" are national toll-free numbers which can be routed to China destination numbers only.
Thanks. Then the mystery, in the manner of soup to which cornstarch is added, thickens...
I think the margin trading on huobi is not free
March 12, 2014, 11:30:53 AM
Quote
400 toll-free numbers with prefix "4001" are international toll-free numbers which can be routed to destination numbers inside or outside of China. 400 toll-free numbers with prefix "4000", "4006", "4007" or "4008" are national toll-free numbers which can be routed to China destination numbers only.
Thanks. Then the mystery, in the manner of soup to which cornstarch is added, thickens...
March 12, 2014, 11:08:03 AM
In that recent interview, Huobi's CEO said that they have 20 people on customer assistance.
I see that their phone numbers have a '4000' prefix. Could that be paid service in China? Could that be how they make money?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toll-free_telephone_number#ChinaI see that their phone numbers have a '4000' prefix. Could that be paid service in China? Could that be how they make money?
Quote
400 toll-free numbers with prefix "4001" are international toll-free numbers which can be routed to destination numbers inside or outside of China. 400 toll-free numbers with prefix "4000", "4006", "4007" or "4008" are national toll-free numbers which can be routed to China destination numbers only.
trolling? March 12, 2014, 10:53:35 AM
In that recent interview, Huobi's CEO said that they have 20 people on customer assistance.
I see that their phone numbers have a '4000' prefix. Could that be paid service in China? Could that be how they make money?
I see that their phone numbers have a '4000' prefix. Could that be paid service in China? Could that be how they make money?
March 12, 2014, 10:41:02 AM
Richy_T had some good ideas about balancing the budget, cancelling central banks and cutting down on government spending. These are nice, but I'm not sure they're doable. The very structure of the government as an institution prohibits them. Which is why I feel the need for non-governmental alternatives.
To be clear, I agree with you. When you look at the job that lays ahead and the history of the situation, it's a path that inevitably will not be taken. Unfortunately, the alternative is pretty catastrophic collapse with some very nasty consequences.
Unless, perhaps, another way presents itself. A way to detach from the sinking ship. I think that's what you're suggesting.
This is pretty much how I see it. Being an incorrigible optimist, I keep advocating for the peaceful, bottom-up, growing of alternatives. Even though I don't think there is a high probability we will see this. Lacking this path, there seems to be only the inevitable collapse which looms pretty scary.
Just noticed the new volume option on bitcoinwisdom. 
May I suggest heading over to user/bitcoinwisdom's profile or the official btcwisdom thread and leave a donation. The guy and his website are awesome, imo: he's quick to react to (reasonable) suggestions (the volume(quote) was suggested by me some days ago, he implemented it in *no* time), his website is up and running with high reliability, and it's a breeze to use (like the very intuitive line tool). well worth a small donation /shameless plug
Great suggestion! Considering how often I stare at this chart it's downright criminal I haven't donated until now
March 12, 2014, 10:38:08 AM
LTC to tha moon, why? Any reason for this?
Supposedly being added to Huobi.
Wasn't it added last week and everybody was saying chinese market is death because nobody even buys ltc?
This is starting to sound like when mtgox was "soon to add LTC"
ltc pumpers need some get some new material
March 12, 2014, 10:37:15 AM
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/a-turnaround-for-bitcoin-at-sxsw/
Quote
The rapper Nas brought it up during a panel discussion that featured the venture capitalist Ben Horowitz, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, a firm that has invested about $50 million in Bitcoin-related start-ups. Mr. Horowitz said he believed Bitcoin was like “the Internet of money.”
In an article not long ago, Marc Andreessen declared that he himself owned no bitcoins. Smart guy?
Edit: markup
March 12, 2014, 10:33:16 AM
LTC to tha moon, why? Any reason for this?
Supposedly being added to Huobi.
Wasn't it added last week and everybody was saying chinese market is death because nobody even buys ltc?
March 12, 2014, 10:32:22 AM
LTC to tha moon, why? Any reason for this?
It's on the front page of Huobi's website, they are going to be adding it soon (likely next week).
March 12, 2014, 10:31:11 AM
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/a-turnaround-for-bitcoin-at-sxsw/
i wouldn't be surprised if i see bitcoin in rap videos soon
Quote
The rapper Nas brought it up during a panel discussion that featured the venture capitalist Ben Horowitz, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, a firm that has invested about $50 million in Bitcoin-related start-ups. Mr. Horowitz said he believed Bitcoin was like “the Internet of money.”
At one of the most exclusive parties at the conference, hosted by Nas and Mr. Horowitz, the two kibitzed with Fred Ehrsam, the chief executive of Coinbase, a Bitcoin company they have both recently invested in.
At one of the most exclusive parties at the conference, hosted by Nas and Mr. Horowitz, the two kibitzed with Fred Ehrsam, the chief executive of Coinbase, a Bitcoin company they have both recently invested in.
i wouldn't be surprised if i see bitcoin in rap videos soon
I think it may be time to write an app that display fake bitcoin balances.
March 12, 2014, 10:30:43 AM
LTC to tha moon, why? Any reason for this?
Supposedly being added to Huobi.
March 12, 2014, 10:28:47 AM
LTC to tha moon, why? Any reason for this?
March 12, 2014, 10:28:30 AM
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/a-turnaround-for-bitcoin-at-sxsw/
i wouldn't be surprised if i see bitcoin in rap videos soon
Quote
The rapper Nas brought it up during a panel discussion that featured the venture capitalist Ben Horowitz, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, a firm that has invested about $50 million in Bitcoin-related start-ups. Mr. Horowitz said he believed Bitcoin was like “the Internet of money.”
At one of the most exclusive parties at the conference, hosted by Nas and Mr. Horowitz, the two kibitzed with Fred Ehrsam, the chief executive of Coinbase, a Bitcoin company they have both recently invested in.
At one of the most exclusive parties at the conference, hosted by Nas and Mr. Horowitz, the two kibitzed with Fred Ehrsam, the chief executive of Coinbase, a Bitcoin company they have both recently invested in.
i wouldn't be surprised if i see bitcoin in rap videos soon
March 12, 2014, 10:23:48 AM
I'm liking the way the trend baseline is not much steeper than the long-term log trend baseline.
This is the way it should be when the market is driven by fundamentals.
Relatively low vol, steady trending.
Sadly it never lasts for long.
Happily the deviations are exploitable.
This is the way it should be when the market is driven by fundamentals.
Relatively low vol, steady trending.
Sadly it never lasts for long.
Happily the deviations are exploitable.
March 12, 2014, 10:17:58 AM
I'll say it again, and probably every day until Adam agrees, we will remain in hibernation until total bid sum begins to steadily increase.
depth is meaningless it's just a tool used to manipulate. when the cheap coin accumulation is done, price is 1000 and bid sum is increasing rapidly, then its a good time to buy?
....it probably will be safer to buy at that point, you'll be buying into the 10K/BTC pump
but i like to think i can spot a good entry point b4 it becomes obvious
March 12, 2014, 10:01:27 AM
The current power structures hinder us from moving to the next level, globally. Releasing ourselves from them, quickly solves many of the problems, and also the amount of human labor globally would be reduced by 75-90% and replaced by living.
This is a good point. Human productivity has increased by something like a factor of 20 over the last few hundred years. The average working slob should be able to work 1-2 days a week to easily support himself and his family by this metric and yet that productivity has been siphoned off by those who control the finances. Think of that on your commute home.
March 12, 2014, 09:54:45 AM
Just noticed the new volume option on bitcoinwisdom.
May I suggest heading over to user/bitcoinwisdom's profile or the official btcwisdom thread and leave a donation. The guy and his website are awesome, imo: he's quick to react to (reasonable) suggestions (the volume(quote) was suggested by me some days ago, he implemented it in *no* time), his website is up and running with high reliability, and it's a breeze to use (like the very intuitive line tool). well worth a small donation /shameless plug
I agree completely. I have been using tradingview and was blown away after i found bitcoinwisdom.
I use both, tradingview for the long term view and analysis, but I go to btcwisdom daily. Also: trading calculator is fantastic.
March 12, 2014, 09:52:37 AM
There are two basic ways to influence behavior; you can use/threaten force or you can persuade.
The problem with people who believe that coercion brings solutions is that when it doesn't the clear implication is that there has not been enough coercion. The endgame for this is unfortunate.
There is no reason to assume that a completely voluntary society would have any less competition for social status than our present society. By imposing status costs on free riders and rewarding status to contributors, there is every reason to expect that the net level of public goods would be just as high if not higher without a monopoly government. The difference would be in how those goods were administered and their composition. Contributors would have much more control over how their contributions were distributed with a result of more efficient administration.
http://www.samizdata.net/2013/07/how-charities-used-to-raise-money/
March 12, 2014, 09:44:37 AM
Richy_T had some good ideas about balancing the budget, cancelling central banks and cutting down on government spending. These are nice, but I'm not sure they're doable. The very structure of the government as an institution prohibits them. Which is why I feel the need for non-governmental alternatives.
To be clear, I agree with you. When you look at the job that lays ahead and the history of the situation, it's a path that inevitably will not be taken. Unfortunately, the alternative is pretty catastrophic collapse with some very nasty consequences.
Unless, perhaps, another way presents itself. A way to detach from the sinking ship. I think that's what you're suggesting.
Jump to: