A well written article, if it were written about something else. Global warming comes to mind.
That's an interesting article: there are no doubts there's gong to be a major financial storm pretty soon as the sins of the recent past catch up with the global market, however whether BT will 'save' us is pretty dubious.
However, parallels with global warming are not accurate, it's a pity so many sceptics and deniers inhabit this forum but I imagine the US media has a lot to do with this (as well as your education system).
I'm on a ferry on the Tasman strait and can't be bothered producing all the academic references. But even the 'skeptic' scientists who were employed by the corporate PR companies have jumped ship -- the evidence is now overwhelming. Hopefully, a few more super-storms will hit the east coast, wake you from your insular torpor.
But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.
As for the market....well, I can see some choppy water ahead: volume seems low, the bid order sum is reducing and I have no idea how we managed to breach 700 but I can't see that happening again until the constant flow of negative sentiment recedes.
No. There have been now two separate events where climate scientists have been busted doctoring data. Their warming models have failed repeatedly. You have no way to prove that current storms have anything to do with any sort of warming event. We just had one of the coldest summers and winters on record. The recent expedition by the global warmers were stuck in record ice caps as they attempted to document the shrinking ice caps.
NO!
There have been a number of times when the private emails of climate scientists have been intercepted (by whom I wonder), then leaked and the wording interpreted as 'doctoring' ... you should research both sides of that 'story'.
Since the first ICCP Report severe weather events have become more frequent and more severe...perhaps you should talk to the President of the Phillipines (or see his recent talk to the UN) and ask him about correlation.
Yep, you've just had a cold winters...in Australia we've just had one of the hottest summers. But you are willing to dismiss science now backed by >95% of the scientific community because you had a mild summer?
Perhaps read this rather than stuff in the media:
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n3/full/nclimate2106.html@bb113
There are some pretty fundamental differences between Earth and Venus....like an oxygen rich atmosphere to start with. A functioning biosphere...life?
@aminorex
Well, when I was a journalist I covered the first ICCP report back in 1995 and I've been following it ever since. All I can say is the science has progressed so perhaps you should do some looking rather than bashing away with your impressive lexis.
I find it ironic that you claim a political agenda to subjugate the developing world when much of the problem lies with the life style of the developed world which is promoted to the developing world as 'ideal'. I imagine the majority of climate scientists would prefer YOU changed your behaviour rather than the poorest peoples, who face displacement, famine and poverty due to climate related changes and events.
@whoever...the Aussie
er...our PM is the biggest sceptic there is and has just appointed a sceptic as head of the climate change dept, reporting directly to him. So, i'd say the sceptics have a very loud voice.
But then, what does the entire scientific community know as opposed to a few faceless folk who trade Bitcoins; obviously you are all far better qualified and experienced -- you are all such experts in pretty much everything I wonder why you need to spend so much time trading BTC, shitz and gigglz I guess, you must all be ahead in your field and rich beyond imagination.
EDIT: whay hay page 5400 and as OT as ever
